Essay on "Water and Sustainability"

Essay 8 pages (2519 words) Sources: 6 Style: MLA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Water Sustainability

What is your conclusion about the merits of water markets and private property rights for improving water sustainability?

The Debate over Water Rights

What is a market-based approach to water

The Value of a Market-based approach

examples from Chile

The Dangers of a Market-based approach

failings in the U.S. West

What it means when water becomes a commodity

F. Conclusion: The Appeal and Inherent Dangers in the Commodification of Water

The Appeal and Dangers in the Commodification of Water

The world is in a water crisis. Even in those place of the world not facing problems with access to clean water, facing persistent drought, or any other problems that reduce the availability of water, climate change looms on the horizon to threaten future water shortages that will plague all societies. Facing this challenge head-on has been a major focus for many nations, international groups such as the World Bank, and many private organizations. One stratagem that is not without passionate supporters and detractors is the commodification of water resources or, put another way, the opening up of water to the same market forces that dictate the price of any other consumer good whose scarcity necessarily fluctuates (Postel and Richter 112). But as we shall see from examples of the commodification of water, not to mention a discussion of exactly what that would mean, the long-term dangers of such an economic approach far outweigh any short-term pricing benefits that can
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
be mustered.

By any definition of the situation, water has always been an economic resource for human societies. Some critics treat the idea that water usage can be regulated through the market as utter anathema, but the reality is that it has been this way throughout the length of human civilization. As Brown explains, "By very definition, for something to be 'economic' means that it is scarce relative to the uses to which it can be put [...] water has been recognized and treated as an economic good by every civilization that encountered a scarcity of it" (3). In other words, because water has always been a limited resource and, therefore, not infinitely available for all uses simultaneously, its use by human societies has invariably treated it as a scarce resource that might be more valuable during different periods of time (e.g., the value of water, monetary or not, would be higher during a drought).

As such, proponents of water markets argue that it is only natural, then, to extend our free market system to the valuation of water in society. Such a turn should improve the management of a scarce resource by applying an efficient and universal value to different water-related activities such as personal use, agriculture, or hydropower. Proponents of this system, such as was implemented in 1981 in Chile, argue that the "existence of a water market means [...] that behavior is not driven by the financial cost of the water but rather by the opportunity cost -- if the user values the water less than it is valued by the market, then user will be induced to sell the water" (Briscoe, Salas, and Pena 3). In Chile, in some situations, this has been perceived to be a positive thing because it allows individuals who own surface or subsurface water rights to sell, lease, or barter through a marketplace with individuals who do not possess the same water resources. The purpose, and it works well in some situations in Chile, is to allow individuals in the nation to value the water-related activities that are most important to them and then trade or sell water resources accordingly (Postel and Richter 113). This has allowed relatively water-rich areas to profit by selling their excess or unneeded water to relatively water-poor areas of the country or to individuals, companies, or groups that value the water for sale higher than the owner of the resources does. As Postel and Richter point out, "Water markets also provide opportunities for conservation groups, government agencies, or others to purchase water or water rights specifically to enhance river flows" (Postel and Richter 112).

But, of course, simply because Chile's water trading system has not utterly collapsed in failure in the last thirty years does not mean that the commodification is necessarily always, or even ever, a positive thing. There have been persistent problems, including "a range of critical water management issues, such as social equity, environmental protection, river basin management, coordination of multiple water uses, and resolution of water conflicts" (Bauer, Siren Song 2). Similarly, the concept of the privatization of water resources in the American West has been fraught with challenges as the short-term goals of 19th century laws has crafted water as a legal commodity whose only value is in the furtherance of human industry and economy. Water policy and the laws that developed around it in the 19th century United States West emphasized economic growth ahead of all other values in an effort to populate and capitalize on the resources (not water) of the West. Weighted heavily with the notion of private property, water rights in the U.S. West has inevitably favored short-term returns even at the expense of long-term consequences and collective concerns (Bates et al., 130, 144). The inevitably effect in the U.S. West, as demand for fresh water has increased dramatically throughout the 20th century has been embattled conflict over limited water resources. States, individuals, and corporations with access to greater water resources are able to utilize, and even waste, them however they see fit under the law with little regard for the collective damage their actions may cause.

Despite this obvious failing, some still argue that in order to manage water resources more efficiently, it is the best course of action to commodify all water resources the world over. Chile is often cited as an example of the positive power of the free market to manage its limited water resources, despite only limited success and many associated failings. From this point-of-view, "the economic value of water is the same as its market price," a point-of-view that critics argue is unacceptable because it does not acknowledge the basic necessity of fresh water not only to human life but to all life (Bauer, Siren Song 10). What is dangerous and new about the commodification of water in the modern world is not that it values water, but that it divorces water from its essential uses within not only human communities but also within the larger community of life (Brown 4).

The reality that the world faces it not simply that water is a limited resource, but that it is an essential limited resource without which life of any kind cannot continue. To treat it as a commodity that has no value outside of its monetary market worth is not just unacceptable, it is potentially catastrophic. The success of Chile's law to siphon water towards more socially desirable uses is not relevant in a potential future situation in which there is literally no more fresh water to be had. The application of an economic veneer to water scarcity is built on the false economic notion that, like any other commodity, if more is needed then more can be produced. But because that will never be the case with worldwide water resources, turning to water markets and trading schemes as a means to manage limited resources will never be an effective long-term strategy. More likely, the markets will continue to function right up until that last moment when there is just no more fresh water to be had.

Question #2: Does the experience of the World Commission on Dams support Postel & Richter's comments on persistent conflict over water allocation or use?

Outline

A. Introduction: The Issue of Involvement in Water Management

B. Left Out of the Discussion

a. traditional models of debate and discussion

b. The consequences for stakeholders without a voice

C. The WCD experience

a. organization of the WCD stakeholders

b. usefulness to soliciting a wider view of impacts

D. Applying the WCD approach on more water management issues

a. reasons why: enhancing our understanding of the impact

b. conclusions: decentralizing the debate

Decentralizing Water Resource Management

Postel and Richter have rightly pointed out that the "examination of any persistent conflict over water allocation or use almost always turns up two common ingredients: first, not everyone affected by the decision has had a say in making it; and second, the decision reflects the politics of power and influence rather than the broader public good" (Postel and Richter 167). In other words, the people who are making decisions about water resource management aren't necessarily the people who have to deal with the consequences or live with any mistakes that are made. Further, because those making the decisions about water management tend to be in positions of political power, the inevitable infusion of politics into water resource management suggests that the decisions made won't even necessarily be judicious ones, but instead expedient ones. For the vast majority of the world's… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Water and Sustainability" Assignment:

We will pay $112.00 for this order..

Format: Take-home exam, two out of three essay questions, open book. Due by 5:00 pm on Wed./9

Dec. 2009. Please bring a printed copy to Harvill 442 (my office), or to my mailbox in Harvill 409 (the

Geog Dept office), and also submit it electronically to turnitin.com by midnight that night. (Re:

turnitin.com: Our class ID# is 2914712 and the class enrollment password is *****wtrsust*****. Remember to

save both of your answers in a single document before submitting to turnitin.com, since the site will

not accept two separate submissions. For help: (http://www.turnitin.com/static/pdf/tii_student_qs.pdf)

Instructions: Please read the instructions and questions carefully, and contact me if you have any questions or comments. Answer any two of the following three questions. Each answer should be an essay of 4-5 pages, typed, double-spaced. Begin each essay with a brief outline of no more than half a

page (included in your page limit). These are not trick questions. You will be graded on how well you understand the material (required readings and lectures) and on how clearly you write, organize, and support your answers. Try to write carefully with your reader in mind, so that I can follow your argument without wondering what you are talking about. Sloppy grammar or typos will lose you points. In your answers you must give examples and cite your sources, from both readings and lectures, to support and illustrate what you say. Be sure to use quotation marks if you quote specific

language. Please use the following simple format for citing your sources. For readings, put the author*****s last name in parentheses in your text: e.g. *****blah blah blah. (Smith)***** Include specific page numbers if you

are citing something specific. For lectures, give the date(s) in parentheses: e.g. *****blah blah blah (lecture, 30 Sept 08).***** Be sure to discuss the readings named in a particular question (at least briefly), but feel free to also discuss other readings if they are relevant, including recommended (optional) readings.

Also note: You can get extra credit for any question by writing an additional paragraph about how political economy and historical materialism (from Weeks 3 and 4) affect your answer.

1. Many water experts in the U.S. and other countries have argued that water markets, tradable water rights, and related economic approaches are important policy tools for improving the long-term sustainability of water uses and ecosystems. Discuss some of the pros and cons of this argument, and

whether it has been important in practice, as illustrated by examples from the U.S., Australia, and Chile. Compare and contrast readings by Postel & Richter; Bates et al; Bauer; Brown; and Peña et al (and feel free to refer to any other readings if you wish). What is your conclusion about the merits of water markets and private property rights for improving water sustainability?

2. According to Postel & Richter, at the beginning of their chapter on river governance (p.167), *****An examination of any persistent conflict over water allocation or use almost always turns up two common

ingredients: first, not everyone affected by the decision in question has had a say in making it; and second, the decision reflects the politics of power and influence rather than the broader public good.***** Does the experience of the World Commission on Dams support this statement? How does the WCD fit

into the broader international debate about water management and governance? Discuss readings by World Commission on Dams; Postel & Richter; and at least three other readings of your choice from the course*****s final five weeks about international water issues (i.e. Weeks 10-15 on the syllabus).

*****

Please reference the book Sirens Song, by carl J bauer in the responses also.

How to Reference "Water and Sustainability" Essay in a Bibliography

Water and Sustainability.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2009, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/water-sustainability/32901. Accessed 5 Oct 2024.

Water and Sustainability (2009). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/water-sustainability/32901
A1-TermPaper.com. (2009). Water and Sustainability. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/water-sustainability/32901 [Accessed 5 Oct, 2024].
”Water and Sustainability” 2009. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/water-sustainability/32901.
”Water and Sustainability” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/water-sustainability/32901.
[1] ”Water and Sustainability”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/water-sustainability/32901. [Accessed: 5-Oct-2024].
1. Water and Sustainability [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2009 [cited 5 October 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/water-sustainability/32901
1. Water and Sustainability. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/water-sustainability/32901. Published 2009. Accessed October 5, 2024.

Related Essays:

Water and Sustainability Essay

Paper Icon

Water and Sustainability

Economic Approaches

Introduction / Generalizations: The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of the Global Water Partnership has issued an urgent yet coherent series of proposals. For starters, the… read more

Essay 8 pages (3130 words) Sources: 6 Style: MLA Topic: Geography / Geology


Water and Plastic Bottle Burden Research Paper

Paper Icon

Water and Plastic Bottle Burden

Where to Turn for Safe Water

The first time sustainability was defined by a global institution was in 1987, when the Brundtland Commission, with a… read more

Research Paper 5 pages (1800 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Environment / Conservation / Ecology


Sustainability Issues Essay

Paper Icon

Woolworths Sustainability

Sustainability Issues

Sustainable development seeks to balance social, economic and environmental objectives in order to secure the well-being of present and future generations. These objectives are interdependent and… read more

Essay 5 pages (1869 words) Sources: 6 Style: Harvard Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Sustainability Skills Term Paper

Paper Icon

Sustainability in the UK Construction industry

Can the UK Construction Industry Meet the Challenges of Sustainable Development?

Issues such as climate change, a rapidly growing global population, pollution, and other… read more

Term Paper 38 pages (10576 words) Sources: 30 Style: Harvard Topic: Architecture / Construction


Sustainability Movement Term Paper

Paper Icon

Sustainability

For the planet and her people to survive, the world's people must embrace the sustainability movement, for modern man is using up the Earth's resources at an alarming, and… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (4827 words) Sources: 12 Style: MLA Topic: Environment / Conservation / Ecology


Sat, Oct 5, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!