Term Paper on "US Policy Concerning Iraq War"

Term Paper 10 pages (3455 words) Sources: 6 Style: MLA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

U.S. policy concerning Iraq war

The war in Iraq is one of the most debated subjects on the international scene for more than four years now. It represents one of the most challenging affairs of the international community due to the fact that controversy has been widely spread concerning the conditions in which this was conducted, the level of trust of the American forces, the degree in which the justifications of the foreign intervention in Iraq was legitimate, as well as issues related to elements of international law that are to a certain extent considered to be inconsistent with the rule of law practiced at the UN.

There are several aspects that must be taken into account in order to have a better image of the war in Iraq and the current situation on the ground. In this sense, it is important to consider the policy of the main actor involved, the United States; also, its place insider the wider framework of the policy towards the Middle East; in addition to these general aspects, an important issue is the precise reasons for the American presence on the ground, to the extent in which these reasons are made available to the public; the status of the objectives stated in the beginning of the operations must also be assessed, as well as the degree in which the direction of the policies is adequate for achieving these goals. Finally, an important segment for describing the wider situation of the war in Iraq and the U.S.'s attitude towards it is the assessment of the costs and benefits of the operations.

Stated Policy of the U.S. In Iraq

There have been serious concerns regarding the policy that the U.S. would engage in following the 9/11 attacks on the American soil. In this sense, there were opinions that argued for a diplomatic response to the events and limit the intervention possibilities in the Middle East to only the ones that were actually agreed upon by the international community (Nye, 2005). On the other hand, there was a majority of opinions that argued for the engagement in a war against terrorism and authoritarian rule around the world in order to put an end to what precisely is the global terrorist threat. In any circumstances, the general idea about the stated policy concerning Iraq was that "Current U.S.-UN policy regarding Iraq has failed and has largely lost credibility. It is widely viewed internationally as reflecting U.S. (and, to a lesser degree, British) insistence on maintaining a punitive sanctions based approach regardless of the humanitarian impact and it is increasingly regarded as having failed to bring about either democratic changes in Iraq or security for the Persian Gulf region" (Bennis et al., n.d.). Therefore, it can be said that the policy of the U.S. concerning the intervention in Iraq was more a unilateral choice rather than a consensual one.

The issue of unilateralism or consensus is yet another interesting issue that could shed light on the precise instruments the United States used to justify the war in Iraq. Firstly, it must be taken into account the fact that the intervention was not the result of the Security Council decision. Even more, the Iraqi file was not even subject to the vote in the Security Council because the U.S. administration was aware of the feeling of opposition of the P5 club regarding this matter, more precisely the reluctance of France, Russia, or China to authorize the armed intervention in Iraq. In this sense, it is considered that the war waged in Iraq by the Coalition of the willing was not in fact officially approved by the UN. However, the fact that the United Nations did not intervene in terms of diplomatic pressures can be viewed as a tacit agreement of the solution, yet without actually submitting the UN to unnecessary critique from the international scene.

The policy followed by the U.S. was largely influenced by the 9/11 events and by the desire of the U.S. administration to eventually force the regime of Saddam Hussein away from power in Bagdad. He was considered one of the few dictators left and the Middle East was largely influenced by his presence. The American administration suggested that his regime in fact encouraged terrorism and totalitarian rule which is a hurdle in the road to democracy.

Another part of the explanation provided by the U.S. Administration in the months preceding the 2003 war in Iraq there were additional reasons which subscribe to the policy towards Iraq. In this sense, "The United States, the United Kingdom, and other nations claim that Iraq poses an imminent threat to international security because it has weapons of mass destruction and operational connections to the Al Qaeda terrorist network. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell asserted in his presentation to the Security Council on 5 February that Iraq has made no effort to disarm and is concealing efforts to redevelop weapons of mass destruction" (Cortright et al., 2003). Therefore, the need for security in the region as well as in the world was invoked in relation to the justification for the policy conducted towards Iraq. However, as later research would eventually conclude, there was little if any evidence found concerning the existence of weapons of mass destruction.

Another element that was widely considered to be part of the U.S. policy towards Iraq was the mentioning of the humanitarian aspect as part of the reasons for which the U.S. went to war in Iraq. However, this was not seen as a major element in the war. Thus, "if you believed the Bush administration, the war was about Saddam's supposed weapons of mass destruction, about Saddam's alleged links with international terrorism, or perhaps about creating a model for democracy in the Middle East. Human rights were occasionally mentioned only as an after-thought, part of an effort to tar the enemy, to show that Saddam was the worst of the worst" (Roth, 2004). However, this inclusion of the idea of the protection of human rights in Iraq can be seen, from the perspective of the arguments involved, as being part of the policy towards Iraq. In this sense, the word "genocide" was often used to justify the U.S. policy towards Saddam in particular. The dictator was accused, without a proper proof framework of being responsible for genocide. However, there was little evidence to suggest that at that particular time he was conducting genocide related activities (Roth, 2004). Nonetheless the accusation of genocide was considered to be a viable aspect of the policy towards Iraq.

Objectives in Iraq and the Middle East

The war in Iraq pointed out several issues that must be taken into account in order to have a clear view on the situation. First and foremost, it included a series of actions aimed at the environment taken as a whole and not particularly one country. In this sense, the stated policy towards the Middle East in general is the promotion of democracy as a new environment for peace and cooperation. More precisely, this is seen as an important and appropriate approach of the situation and "part of the changed U.S. geostrategic outlook arising from the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks against the United States" (Carothers, 2003). The rise of democracy in a Muslim country is rather hard to attain because it implies addressing certain values which are not compatible with the Western view. One such issue is the human rights aspect on which the two sides do not share a common stand. Aware of this difference of perception, the strategy of the West includes a gradual approach in terms of economic and political connections. In this sense, the activities in the Middle East area start from economic cooperation and incentives towards eventual political changes.

Promoting democracy in the Middle East is a rather difficult endeavor taking into account the violent means used by the United States to oust the Hussein regime. In this sense, it can be said that the main reason for the presence of western powers in the area is to try to seek a possible solution for the improvement of the political, economic, but most importantly, social aspects of life. However, this has not been an easy task due to the reluctance of countries such as Iran or Saudi Arabia in embracing the democratic rule. At one extreme, the Iranian rule is considered to be one of the least if not the least democratic state in the region and of the world. This is due to the authoritarian rule of its president as well as the precarious situation of its political system. Moreover, the constant discussions about the Iranian nuclear program are relevant to point out the volatility of the area and the difficulty to achieve any type of compromise or middle ground. At the other end however, the issue of Saudi Arabia represents a clear example that modernization is indeed possible. The change that the Royal House is determined to promote especially in the Saudi society is… READ MORE

How to Reference "US Policy Concerning Iraq War" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Foreign Policy of the United States Term Paper

United States

Digressions with Current American Foreign Policy

Our Nation's cause has always been larger than our Nation's defense. We fight, as we always fight, for a just peace --… read more

Term Paper 11 pages (3373 words) Sources: 5 Style: APA Topic: American History / United States

---

What Factors Affects the US President Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process About Iran Research Paper

U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process About Iran?

President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process is a lucrative feature that ensures maintenance of security and stability of many organs of… read more

Research Paper 25 pages (8528 words) Sources: 35 Topic: Government / Politics

---

US Security the Evolving U.S. Security Theory Essay

US Security

The Evolving U.S. Security Theory: Cold War, War on Terror and Beyond

For the larger part of the 20th century following World War II, United States security policy… read more

Essay 10 pages (3069 words) Sources: 6 Style: MLA Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization

---

US Decline Term Paper

US Decline

The decline of the United States

The Romans.

On them I impose no limits of time or place.

I have given them an empire that will know no… read more

Term Paper 8 pages (2692 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: World History

---

How Has September 11 (9-11) Changed the Nature of US Interventions? Term Paper

U.S. Foreign Policy: Pre and Post 911 term that appears repeatedly in discussions of American foreign is hegemony. Uncertainty regarding the meaning of this term led to the dictionary. The… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (4171 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: American History / United States

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>