Research Paper on "U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution"

Research Paper 12 pages (3532 words) Sources: 20

[EXCERPT] . . . .

U.S. Iran Diplomatic

Pre- and Post-1979 Revolution in Iran: Comparative Study of the U.S. Diplomatic Relations and military cooperation with Iran in the 1919-79 and 1979-2011 periods.

In this assignment we are seeking to understand the changing relationship between Iran and the U.S. This is accomplished through looking at the events from: 1919 to 1979 and 1979 to 2011. Once this occurs, is when we can offer specific insights that will highlight the future of the current issues facing both nations.

Over the last 90 years, the relationship between Iran and the United States has been one that is based on tremendous amounts of ups and downs. As the country, would go from being a brutal dictatorship that was backed by the Shah to becoming an Islamic republic in 1979. This is significant, because it is showing how this is affecting their relationship with the United States. As the U.S., was once considered to be a staunch ally of the Shah and the policies that were implemented. At which point, a transformation occurred with a backlash (leading to a revolution) that affected Iranian society. This is when a fundamentalist government would emerge in the aftermath of the coup. Once this happened, it meant that the relationship between the two countries had become strained. This is significant, because it is illustrating how this would lead to increased amounts of tensions in the Middle East.

To fully understand what was taking place requires comparing diplomatic and military cooperation from 1919 to 1979. We will then focus on how this has been continually changing from 1979 to 2011. The way that this will be accomplished is through examini
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
ng a number of different factors to include: providing a basic definition of diplomatic relations, examining major events that were considered to be turning points in the relationship, understanding how U.S. foreign policy has changed, concentrating on time periods before / after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, comparing military cooperation, looking at the complexity of this relationship, analyzing the current foreign policy strategy and studying the comparative foreign policy network. These different elements are important, because they are showing how this relationship has been continually changing over the years.

The definition of foreign policy- "Diplomatic relations" will be clarified. Be sure to include the scholarly literature on comparative foreign policy

To determine the definition of foreign policy we will look at four different scholarly sources and their views about its underlying meanings. According to Herman (1991), foreign policy is those actions that nations will engage in to achieve objectives that are geared towards their own self-interest.

However, Segal (1994) believes that foreign policy involves an intermingling of international and regional objectives of a particular nation.

While Levy (1994), believes that foreign policy is when leaders are learning from historical and real world experiences to create strategy that will deal with issues affecting a county's interests in the region.

Moreover, Rose (1988) found that foreign policy is the combining of different objectives into one single strategy.

Yet, when you look further beneath the surface, Waltz (1979) thinks that foreign policy is a series of: parts, principals and ideas that are structured to support the overall strategy of a particular nation state.

While Ray (2001) believes, that the actions of different actors on the international stage are divided into levels. Under this basic approach, each nation will utilize their foreign policy to achieve different goals. During this process, is when each state will utilize a particular level of influence to affect outcome of a situation. In some cases, these actions could be based on diplomacy. While at other times, some countries are choosing to use more aggressive tactics in an effort to affect the end results. The interaction of the various nations on the world stage is what creates comparative foreign policy by looking at select strategies.

Furthermore, Hogan (2001) found that foreign policy is based upon the decisions that are being made and the strategies that are being utilized. This can have an effect on the outcome of a situation by deciding how aggressive everyone is in dealing with these issues. These different elements are important, because they are showing how the definition of foreign policy is continually changing based on shifting objectives. Over the course of time, this means that the strategy, tools and tactics will be consistently evolving to keep up with these transformations.

Major events that caused a turn point in the U.S. diplomatic relations toward Iran will be considered.

In 1925, the Reza Khan (the Shah) overthrew the traditional monarchy in Iran. Once in power, he began a massive program of building / updating the roads, railroads, electric grid and he introduced a national education system. However, the close ties that the Shah had with Nazi Germany made the allies nervous. Once World War II began, is when the Soviet Union and the Great Britain would invade the country. This was a part of an effort to prevent the Nazi's from having access to the Iran's oil reserves. When this occurred, the Shah was forced to advocate power in favor of his son.

Then, in 1951 there were democratically held elections that took place. What happened was the heavy presence of British troops meant that the nation began to embrace the Westminster Parliamentary system. This led to election of Dr. Mohammed Mosodallagh as the Prime Minister. He engaged in a number of actives that were considered to be popular with the public such as the nationalization of all Iranian oil fields. However, these actions angered many British politicians, who worked out an arrangement with the United States to overthrow the current government using the Shah.

On August 19, 1953; the U.S. And Great Britain conducted Operation Ajax. This was coup that was orchestrated by the CIA to openly overthrow the democratically elected government of Iran. Once this occurred, the West was able to have access to the various oil fields throughout the region. These different elements are important, because the open support for the Shah is causing the U.S. To look like it is endorsing his policies. Once he returned to power, is when the Shah would use brutality to control the activities of the general public. This created a sense of anger inside Iran, as they believed that the U.S. is supporting his activities.

Over the course of time, this allowed a situation where the Shah would use his secret police to be able to effectively control the population. Evidence of this can be seen by looking no further than the SAVAK. This was a special arm of the Shah's intelligence service that was known for their brutality. As, they had three major objectives to include:

The suppression of the press, books and film.

The wide spread use of torture during interrogations.

The monitoring of political opponents.

These different elements are important, because they are showing how this allowed the Shah to effectively control the population. As a result, many of the different techniques on torture were taught to SAVAK officers by CIA officials. Over the course of time, this helped them to increase the overall scope of their brutality by murdering and brutalizing hundreds of thousands of political opponents. Once this occurred, many Iranians became angry with the West. As they felt, that they were using the Shah and his institutions to control Iranian oil. Anyone who was standing in their way was considered to be an enemy (which increased the total amounts of fear and resentment).

As a result, these events are a turning point that led to tremendous amounts of anger and animosity that were imposed on the Iranian people by the Shah.

The research will explore how the rationale behind the U.S. foreign policy has changed.

The rationale behind foreign policy has been continually shifting. The way that this is taking place, is with the changing events that have caused these transformations. This designed to address the short-term issues facing the country. In these kinds of situations there are some short-term military objectives that were achieved, which resulted in many government officials looking the other way when it came to human rights abuses. Over the course of time, this kind of approach allowed the Shah to be able to engage in actions that are direct contradictions against the basic philosophy of the United States. This is troubling, because when these tactics are used, the U.S. is considered to be a bully. Once this occurred, is the point that the Iranian people became upset about what was happening.

This is problematic, because this approach makes the U.S. appear to be hypocritical. Where, government officials are helping to orchestrate the use of torture through the SAVAK. Once this takes place, it means that most people believe that Iran is under the direct control of the United States. This is when they will begin to resent the different activities that they are involved in.

At the same time, the election of Jimmy Carter to the White House meant that there was a… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution" Assignment:

Research Question: How did the United States diplomatic relations and military cooperation toward/with Iran changed after the Iranian revolution in 1979?

Title: Pre- and Post-1979 Revolution in Iran: Comparative Study of the U.S. Diplomatic Relations and military cooperation with Iran in the 1919-79 and 1979-2011 periods.

Description:

The purpose of this research paper is to compare the U.S. diplomatic relations with Iran in the 1919-79 period to the post-Iranian revolution relations. Also the military cooperation between the United States and Iran before and after the revolution will be discussed. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the major differences, and to screen for any commonalities in the two foreign policies and the military cooperation. Based on examining the pre- Iranian revolution U.S. foreign policy, major flaws in the current U.S. foreign policy toward Iran will be identified and discussed.

Area of scholarly literature: Comparative foreign policy

Objectives:

1- The definition of foreign policy- *****"Diplomatic relations*****" will be clarified. Be sure to include the scholarly literature on comparative foreign policy. please include the 4 articles cited below.

2- Major events that caused a turn point in the U.S. diplomatic relations toward Iran will be considered.

3- The research will explore how the rationale behind the U.S. foreign policy has changed.

4- The research paper should include a thorough comparison of the U.S. foreign policy toward Iran in the 1919-79 period and the 1979-present period. What are the main characteristics of each period? What made the U.S take such foreign policy? motives? reason? public opinion?

5- the research paper should include a thorough comparison of the military cooperation between the U.S. and Iran in the 1919-79 period and the 1979-present. What are the main characteristics of each period?

6- Upon the completion of this research, it is hoped to understand the complexity of the US- Iran relations. What went wrong? any recommendations? What do you think?

7- Based on the research findings, what do you think of the current U.S foreign policy toward Iran?

8- The research should be conducted within the comparative foreign policy framework.

9- The research paper should have a high conceptual clarity, and integrate the research data with the comparative theory very well.

10- Feel free to email me for any further questions.

Some of the Articles and chapters to cite from:

1- Hans Morganthau *****"Part one: theory and practice of international politics*****" in Politics Among nations (pages 3-25)

2- Kenneth Waltz *****"Political structures*****" and *****"Anarchic Orders and Balances of Power*****" in Theory of International Politics (pages 79-116)

3- James Lee Ray, *****"Integrating level of analysis in world politics*****" journal of theoritical politics: (Pages 355-88)

4- Joe Hagan, *****"Does Decision Making matter? Systemic assumptions Vs. Historical reality in International relations (Pages 5-46)

NOTE:

- ALL Citations and Bibliographic entries must be in the format described by ***** Turabian in a Manual for *****s of research papers, theses, and dissertations.

- Please include footnotes.

- ALL quotations must be in YOUR OWN words.

- In addition to the 4 articles provided above, please add a combination of another 16 primary and secondary sources. *****

How to Reference "U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution" Research Paper in a Bibliography

U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2011, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/us-iran-diplomatic-pre/97469. Accessed 4 Jul 2024.

U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution (2011). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/us-iran-diplomatic-pre/97469
A1-TermPaper.com. (2011). U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/us-iran-diplomatic-pre/97469 [Accessed 4 Jul, 2024].
”U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution” 2011. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/us-iran-diplomatic-pre/97469.
”U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/us-iran-diplomatic-pre/97469.
[1] ”U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/us-iran-diplomatic-pre/97469. [Accessed: 4-Jul-2024].
1. U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2011 [cited 4 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/us-iran-diplomatic-pre/97469
1. U.S. Iran Diplomatic Relations and Military Cooperation Before and After the Revolution. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/us-iran-diplomatic-pre/97469. Published 2011. Accessed July 4, 2024.

Related Research Papers:

Military Development of Hezbollah Dissertation

Paper Icon

Terrorists, politicians, social reformers, paramilitary, liberators; Hezbollah has worn many hats. The most striking feature of this organization though is the incredible evolution the world has witnessed since its inception… read more

Dissertation 33 pages (9563 words) Sources: 40 Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization


Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan Term Paper

Paper Icon

Post-Conflict, Peace/Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan

Somehow, within a forty year span of time, the United States has found itself ensnared in multiple wars in Asia at the same… read more

Term Paper 20 pages (7605 words) Sources: 20 Topic: Government / Politics


Assassination of the Former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri Term Paper

Paper Icon

Assination of Rafik Hariri: Extinguishing a Light in the Middle East

Lebanon is an oddity in the Middle East; a diverse cultural mixture that were it not for outside influences… read more

Term Paper 16 pages (4528 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Israel / Palestine / Arab World


Demise of the Soviet Union Resulted Term Paper

Paper Icon

demise of the Soviet Union resulted in the emergence of 15 independent republics that, in turn, entered a soul-searching period to survive and prosper. At stake were the identities of… read more

Term Paper 8 pages (2619 words) Sources: 9 Style: MLA Topic: Israel / Palestine / Arab World


Inter-Parliamentary Union and Its Role in Enhancing International Law Term Paper

Paper Icon

Inter-Parliamentary Union and Its Role in Enhancing International Law

Legal Status of the Inter-Parliamentary Union

The Development of the International Institutions

The Public International Unions

The Private International Unions

Historical… read more

Term Paper 59 pages (16130 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Government / Politics


Thu, Jul 4, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!