Term Paper on "Treaty of Waitangi Social Policy and Programmes"

Term Paper 10 pages (3286 words) Sources: 8 Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Treaty of Waitangi is the founding document of New Zealand. The name "Waitangi" refers to the place where it was officially signed - on the Bay of Islands - on the 6th of February 1840. In the Web site (www.nzhistory.net.nz) thedate of the signing of the treaty is a national public holiday in New Zealand.

This document is written in English and in the Maori language, and it was an agreement between the British Crown - when New Zealand was an English colony - and about 540 "rangatira," or chiefs, from the Maori culture. It came about as a result of the influx of many British migrants into New Zealand and the www.nzhistory.net.nzsiteprovides a "Treaty Timeline" which is germane to a paper that is presenting an analysis and review of the treaty.

History of the Treaty of Waitangi: Timeline

The first British "missionaries" arrived in New Zealand in 1814 and the Rev. Samuel Marsden of the Church Missionary Society gave a sermon in English at Rangihoua on Christmas Day, 1914. There was a translation into the Maori language by chief Ruatara. Europeans began arriving in large numbers during the early 1800s and "growing lawlessness," according to the www.nzhistory.netsiteled local indigenous peoples to petition British King William IV for protection. Also, Maori people began to fear that the French would "annex" New Zealand, and those concerns were relayed to the king in a 1831 letter that Missionary William Yate helped the chiefs to draft. The King of England did acknowledge the letter and made a promise that the Crown would protect the native citizens of New Zealand.

In 1835 fifty-two Maori chiefs signed what they believed was a "Declaration of Independence"; it was written by British resident James Busby, but he had no authorization to do what he did. What the document attempted to do was to make official that "all sovereign power and authority" was in the hands of the "hereditary chiefs and tribes." And in 1837 the British Crown decided to establish a colony in New Zealand; the government believed it needed to "intervene" to "ensure that colonization was regulated and that land transactions that defrauded Maori were stopped," the www.nzhistory.netsiteexplained. This policy followed the original British strategy of hoping that English missionaries would moderate or keep peace between the British settlers and the Maori.

In 1839, meanwhile, the British decided to "annex at least part of New Zealand to New South Wales"; and the first ship full from the "New Zealand Company" set sail for New Zealand in May of 1839. It was called the "Tory" and was loaded with emigrants. Thomas Hobson was appointed consul to New Zealand in 1839, and was ordered to "obtain sovereignty over all or part of New Zealand with the consent of a sufficient number of chiefs." At that time, agents "swarmed" over New Zealand looking for land to purchase.

The Treaty of Waitangi was signed in February 1840; the first day of the signing about 40 Maori chiefs signed on, and within a few months another 500 chiefs put their names on the document. Also in 1840, William Hobson suddenly "proclaimed sovereignty over all of New Zealand" (www.nzhistory.net);hedid that on the basis that the North Island had been acquired through the Treaty of Waitangi and as for the southern islands "by right of discovery."

By 1842, the British considered New Zealand "and its inhabitants" to be under British sovereignty but there was dissention among some chiefs who did not sign the treaty. In the subsequent years there were battles between the British and the Maori and it was clear that the Treaty of Waitangi was not being honored by all parties. In 1846 the British announced that "all Maori land ownership was to be registered" and any land that was deemed to be "unused" or "surplus" was to become "Crown land."

The Meaning of the Treaty of Waitangi:

Did the Maori chiefs really know what they were signing when they agreed to the treaty? The New Zealand History site ("The Treaty in brief") suggests that the chiefs who were briefed on the substance of the Treaty were "reassured that their status and authority would be strengthened." That did not turn out the way the chiefs who signed the Treaty hoped it would. Indeed, in the Maori version of the Treaty the word "sovereignty" translated into the word "kawanatanga" which actually means "governance." Because of that translation-based confusion, many chiefs believed that they would retain the right to "manage their own affairs." They later found out this was not to be the case.

Also, the English version of the Treaty guaranteed "undisturbed possession" of all of Maori "properties"; but the Maori translation into their language suggested a guarantee of "tino rangatiratanga" ("full authority") over "Taonga" ("treasures," but not necessarily those that are tangible). So the problem of understanding what the document actually guaranteed was substantial and significant, and remains a problem today. Those varying understandings have led to protests and demands before the New Zealand government beginning in the 1970s. The New Zealand History site explains that the Treaty of Waitangi "is not considered part of New Zealand domestic law, except where its principles are referred to in several Acts of Parliament."

Some chiefs at the time of the signing were leery of the meaning of the treaty and did not sign, while still others signed but were "uncertain" of what they were really signing. Some did not have a chance to sign the treaty. But meantime, the Colonial Office in England sometime later declared that the Treaty applied to all Maori tribes whether they had signed the document or not.

The Treaty in reality did three things; one, it made England the holder of sovereign rights in New Zealand; two, the Maori handed the British Crown the "exclusive" rights to buy land that the Maori wished to sell (in other words, France could not come in and buy lands from the Maori), but in return the Maori were "guaranteed full rights of ownership of their lands, forests, fisheries and other possessions"; and three, the Treaty guaranteed the Maori all the rights and privileges of British subjects."

Controversy Over Social Policy:

Mark Barrett and Kim Connolly-Stone, writing in the Social Policy Journal of New Zealand (Barrett, et al., 1998), explain that while much has been said and debated about Article 1 and Article 2 in the Treaty "...comparatively little debate" has been heard regarding Article 3. Barrett asserts that in most cases, when an individual in a sovereign nation is granted full citizenship rights, along with those rights comes "social rights." But the reality of the matter is that social rights were not specifically expressed in New Zealand (for anyone) until the late 1880s and early 1900s.

However, even though there are assured social rights now in New Zealand, there are those who argue that the "rights and privileges of citizenship" that the Treaty guaranteed to Maori "are limited to the civil and political rights" (Barrett, p. 140) that were in place in 1840, when the Treaty was originally signed. The doubters as to that approach contend that the Treaty is "a living document" and hence, the guarantees should not be restricted to the precise circumstances that existed" in 1840. The truth of the matter, Barrett continues, is that in 1840 when the Treaty was agreed upon, "neither signatory" believed that in the future the Maori would become "an underclass in their own lands." With that in mind, and fairness a necessity, Barrett suggest that in order to "close the gap," new policies favorable to the social welfare of the Maori people "should be developed with target assistance to Maori" (Barrett, 140). As of the writing of this article, ten years ago (1998), the New Zealand courts had not examined closely the language of the Treaty with reference to the Crown's responsibility to provide social services to the Maori.

Indeed, as of the publishing of this article, the Treaty had not been "formally" incorporated into New Zealand's Constitution, making its status "ambiguous," in Barrett's words. But if the Treaty is indeed New Zealand's founding document, then there should be means within it's guidelines and principles for the Maori to redress grievances in terms of the lack of social justice they clearly seem to be experiencing.

The New Zealand government did pass the Education Act (1989), which requires school boards to "take all reasonable steps...to discover and consider the views and concerns of Maori communities"; also the Act requires schools to provide education with respect to observing cultural practices of Maori and to incorporate the Maori language into the curriculum. But if school boards do not live up to the letter of this law, Bennett goes on, there is no legal way for Maori to sue because the Treaty is not mentioned in the legislation. Another piece of legislation ("The Children, Young Persons and their Families Act of 1989") seems to be aimed at helping the Maori out of their second-class citizenship situation;… READ MORE

How to Reference "Treaty of Waitangi Social Policy and Programmes" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Social Policy Term Paper

Social Policy

Relationship Between Society, Business, and Government

Society, business, and government, are three dynamic forces that if viewed deeply can present relationship between each other. This is because all… read more

Term Paper 1 pages (336 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Government / Politics

---

Social Policy Term Paper

Social Policy focuses on the well-being of society as a whole. In my future position as a human services worker, I will primarily concern myself with education. A strong educational… read more

Term Paper 1 pages (369 words) Sources: 2 Style: APA Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

Social Change Plan Program Research Paper

PSC will promote extended families and neighborhood networks. Family members will be taught to respect each other and have mutual respect. Adults, children and youth will be taught to appreciate… read more

Research Paper 7 pages (1826 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

Social Policy -- Affirmative Action Essay

Social Policy -- Affirmative Action

Background and History of Affirmative Action

The concept of affirmative action evolved in the aftermath of the Civil Rights era, primarily as one way of… read more

Essay 4 pages (1162 words) Sources: 4 Style: APA Topic: Race / Ethnic Studies / Racism

---

Canadian Social Policy Essay

Canadian Social Policy

The title of the article by Gerard Boismenu and Peter Graefe provides a strong hint as to the intended message and impact of this piece. "Tool Belt"… read more

Essay 3 pages (1064 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Government / Politics

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>