Term Paper on "Torts Fred and Anna Ivan and Rosina"
Term Paper 4 pages (1273 words) Sources: 1+
[EXCERPT] . . . .
TortsFred and Anna
Ivan and Rosina went out with friends to celebrate their engagement at Bar Roma. Trespass to the person in Australia is dependent on the directness of the act that has interfered with the plaintiff's right of autonomy. Australian law does not require the perpetrator to have intent to trespass (Williams v Milotin).1 Therefore, though Fred was intoxicated and may not have had conscious intent to violate Rosina's right of autonomy, he is still liable to suit in court. Fred's act was direct but unintentional. Fred's act of leering at Rosina and taking her picture without her consent caused her to be uncomfortable and to not to able to enjoy the ambience of the restaurant. This gives Rosina as a plaintiff in Australia the option to pursue a tort action based upon either negligent trespass or negligence. Rosina as the plaintiff has the onus of proof, for trespass 'on the highway' is always on the plaintiff at all times to prove (see Venning v Chin).2
In Brisbane Authority v Taylor, Judge Michael McHugh elucidated the rationale of limitation periods.3 The Limitation of Actions Acts prescribe time limits within in which litigation must be commenced and the extinguishing of the cause of action (the legal basis for the claim) happens after the period lapses. This is because as time goes by, relevant evidence may be lost. Additionally, it is oppressive to a defendant to allow an action to be brought long after the act has passed. Such limitation periods give certainty to people (especially businesses and insurers) in arranging their affairs and provisioning for their liabilities within a definite period. Also, public interest requires that disp
download full paper ⤓
Ivan and Fred
Fred would likely have a claim against Ivan for threats and assault. Since Iran directly threatened him with physical harm. Such torts usually depend on the directness of trespass, which in this case would have been direct as Ivan stuck his hand in Fred's pockets. Australian tort law regarding nuisance is based upon the Scottish case of Rylands v Fletcher. Both Ivan and Fred could be considered to have violated "quiet enjoyment" of the premises that night. Fred would have violated Anna's quiet enjoyment of the evening, while Ivan would have done the same by assaulting Fred and deleting the pictures and threatening him, even though he was drunk and may not have had intent. This also opens the issue of the right of privacy.6 While Australian law has been slow to recognize this, the British House of Lords and the New Zealand Court of Appeal have recognised forms of personal privacy. However, this tort has been in development and is not fully formed.
State Immigration and Claudio and Ricardo and the other Restaurant Patrons
There would be a possible tort by either or both Claudio and Ricardo against the State Immigration Department for illegal… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Torts Fred and Anna Ivan and Rosina" Assignment:
Assignment Task:
Ivan and Rosina went out with friends to celebrate their engagement at Bar Roma, a popular Italian restaurant in East Sydney, which was always busy with customers. Bar Roma is owned and run by Claudio who often employs students and backpackers from overseas as waiters.
Seated at the table next to Ivan and Rosina*****s group was a large group of young men who were celebrating their grand final win in a touch football competition.
The men*****s table became noisier and noisier as the evening progressed, fuelled by drinking games and toasts. One of the young men, Fred, kept leering at Rosina. When she tried to go past to the ladies***** room, he first blocked her way with his arm, and then made suggestive comments as she went past. Then he took out his mobile phone and took a picture of her at close range. Ivan was furious, stormed over to the table and thrust his hands into Fred*****s pocket to take out the phone. He deleted the picture and put the phone back on the table. Fred stood up, with hands clenched into fists towards Ivan*****s face and said *****You wait till you*****re outside tonight, you d*head- you*****ll regret this***** but then slumped back into his seat and went to sleep.
Towards closing time and unknown to both tables, Claudio was dealing with a group of officials from the State Immigration Department, who had been given a tip-off that one of the waiters, Ricardo, was a backpacker who had overstayed his visa. Without obtaining the requisite warrants, they had come into the restaurant, stationed an official at each door, barring exit, and begun questioning Ricardo in the kitchen. In fact, Ricardo was on a valid working holiday visa. Ricardo was mortified.
Most of the patrons were too busy enjoying themselves and were unaware of what was happening. However, some were furious, and one of these, Tony, who wanted to leave, threatened an official that he would knock him over if the official did not get out of the way. The official did not budge. Tony was persuaded by his wife Carmela to sit down.
In one corner was a group of locals who knew that there was a side door to a lane through the kitchen (which was entered through a door with a *****staff only***** sign), but they stayed on to watch the incident.
After 20 minutes, the officials realized that their information was wrong and allowed the doors to be opened.
To cap the evening off, as Ivan and Rosina stopped to embrace passionately just as they were entering the nearby car park to collect their car, the parking attendant rammed down the shutter door without realizing they were standing under it. Ivan suffers serious head injuries. Rosina suffers post-traumatic stress disorder after this incident.
What causes of action arise on these facts? Do not consider defamation, negligence or trespass to goods. In your answer, consider defences and issues that might arise and the types of damages that may be appropriate.
Assignment Instructions:
The answer to the assignment must not exceed 4 pages, including footnotes. You must use 1.5 spacing and at least 11 point font and leave 2 cm margins on both sides, the top and foot of the page. Footnotes should contain only citations and references. Any pages in excess of 4 pages will not be read.
The assignment deals only with issues covered in topics of the course so far.
1. Historical background: the development of trespass and the action on the case
2. Trespass to the person; battery, assault and false imprisonment. Action on the case for wilful injury.
3. Trespass to land and airspace
4. Nuisance. The development of *****tort of privacy*****?
5. Defences to intentional torts.
All sources must be properly referenced in footnotes using the Australian
Guide to Legal Citation. See http://mulr.law.unimelb.edu.au/go/aglc
A bibliography is required of all sources used, other than cases which will be fully referenced in the footnotes. The bibliography is additional to the 4 pages of the assignment.
The educational objective of the assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to develop, in a problem-solving context, your understanding of particular issues, and to allow us to assess your ability to identify legal issues in hypothetical facts, carry out legal research, explain and an***** the relevant legal principles, use and apply primary and secondary authorities, write concisely and clearly, and structure your answer well.
How to Reference "Torts Fred and Anna Ivan and Rosina" Term Paper in a Bibliography
“Torts Fred and Anna Ivan and Rosina.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2011, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/torts-fred-anna-ivan/7778538. Accessed 29 Jun 2024.
Related Term Papers:
Ivan the Terrible Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Ivan IV or Ivan the Terrible deserves the moniker attached to his
name. However, he does not necessarily deserve the modern interpretation
of the word "terrible". Certainly, Ivan did terrible… read more
Term Paper 20 pages (5817 words) Sources: 5 Style: MLA Topic: Family / Dating / Marriage
Tort Case Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Tort Case
"A tort is an act that injures someone in some way, and for which the injured person may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Legally, torts are called civil… read more
Term Paper 2 pages (571 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Ivan the Terrible Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Ivan the Terrible
Ivan IV, remembered for his cruelty and the excessive punishments, is awarded the epithet, "Groznyi," meaning "Terrible," and according to popular legend, he was born during a… read more
Term Paper 14 pages (4848 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Religion / God / Theology
Torts Before Entering the Matter Proper Essay
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Torts
Before entering the matter proper of torts, the book presents a very brief overlook and introduction to the notion of torts. This is quite useful, because it placed the… read more
Essay 10 pages (2680 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Tort Law Vicarious Liability Essay
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Tort Law -- Vicarious Liability
The legal concept of tort -- the basic bottom line idea -- is a wrongful act, an illegal act, according to FindLaw.com. It is a… read more
Essay 3 pages (1002 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Sat, Jun 29, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!