Term Paper on "Effects of Terrorism"

Term Paper 10 pages (2858 words) Sources: 3 Style: MLA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Terrorism

The Effects of Terrorism on the Global Economy since Sept. 11th

Without question, terrorism has dramatic and significant impacts. The human cost can be high, and the damage can be extensive depending on the target and the method. However, it is unclear to some degree whether or not terrorism has a palpable impact on the global economy. Certainly, there are immediate economic impacts at the site of the terrorist attack and these effects will be felt in that region. However, the degree to which a terrorist attack is capable of impacting the global economy is less certain. Commonsense tells us that major acts of terrorism will impact the global economy, but commonsense is not necessarily the best indicator of financial effects. Rather it is crucial to examine the state of the world economy both before and after major terrorist attacks and evaluate if there is a significant change after accounting for other, usual, economic factors.

The modern transnational economy depends on the free flow of capital -- people, goods, services, and ideas. As the national economies of the world become more interconnected and more integrated, ensuring the free flow of capital is of ever-increasing importance to ensure the health of all economies (Carafano 25). However, as national economies become more integrated, seemingly isolated events can have significant effects throughout the global economy as financial institutions, corporations, governments, and individuals change economic policy to adapt to these events. The Asian financial crisis of the late 20th century had global economic implications, even though the locus of that crisis was centered squarely on Southeast Asia. Thus, it is entirely plausible to posit that transnational terrorism, in taking advantage of the integrated global economy, can have tremendous impacts on that economy even when the acts of terrorism are highly localized.

A consideration of some significant terrorist attacks, and the state of the global economy before and after these events, should give us some indication whether or not there is any credence to this hypothesis. In particular, I will make mention of the September 11th attacks on the U.S. The discussion of these events will occur within a larger theoretical context in which I discuss that nature of the modern global economy and how that nature is conducive to feeling the effects of localized terrorism on a global scale. And though we will find that the absolute effects of terrorist events are small when contrasted with the global GDP, it is clear that there is a significant and tangible global impact on the economy. In particular, we shall find that in a relatively open and integrated global economy, terrorism induces shifts of capital away from sites of terrorism in order to minimize risk. Over time, then, the concentrated effects of localized terrorism can be significant as capital moves from sites of higher risk to those of slightly lesser risk.

Because trade and security can no longer be considered separate issues in the transnational economy, globalization provides opportunities for both economies to grow and for terrorists to mobilize their resources globally. Trade could be maximized at the expense of security, but would provide terrorists would significant opportunities to act globally. Contrariwise, efforts to control global trade strictly could theoretically limit terrorist activity, though this would come at the extreme expense of global economic health (Carafano 25). As such it is crucial that we understand the true costs imposed by terrorism on the global economy. If we have a sense of the significance of the impact, then we can begin to make judgments about how much of a burden -- through extra security measures -- that is warranted by the threat of terrorism. Much in the same way that insurance companies insure against potential damages, we must first understand the nature and extent of the threat and the maximum amount of harm that can be caused if a terrorist attack occurs. if, for example, the cost of security measures to reduce the economic impact of terrorism by $1 billion per year cost $50 billion per year, then obviously the cost of preventative measures far outweigh the benefits secured. Our first step must be to evaluate the global economic damage that can be wrought by terrorism.

Conventional analyses of the impact of terrorism tend to center on a few immediate effects. In "Terrorism and the World Economy," Abadie and Gardeazabal explain that there are four primary, conventional effects of terrorism from an economic standpoint. They are:

Reduction in capital resources, both human and physical from the attack itself.

An induced higher level of uncertainty in the market as corporations and individuals adapt to the possibility of warning-less terrorist attack.

The diversion of resources from productive economic to security-focused activities such as surveillance.

Terrorism tends to negatively affect specific industries such as tourism and travel (Abadie and Gardeazabal 1).

While these effects of terrorism are significant and real, they are nonetheless generally localized and generally short-term in duration. As soon as it is destroyed, new capital will be mustered to replace what was lost. Uncertainty fades as the time between terrorist attacks lengthens and routines re-emerge. Interest in heightened security will never be as high as immediately after the attacks, and even highly affected industries will eventually recover. These four effects cannot account for global economic effects that might occur as a result of terrorism. In fact, it is difficult to understand how a terrorist attack could have a global economic impact at all. The September 11th attacks on the U.S., one of the most significant terrorist events, only reduced the nation's productive assets by0.06% (Abadie and Gardeazabal 1). In other words, the terrorism's effects in that event on the U.S. productive resources were so low that we should barely be able to record an effect on the U.S. economy over the long-term, let alone an economic impact on the global economy.

In addition, other analysis has suggested three levels of impact of the September 11th terrorist attacks on the global economy. First, there was, naturally, the direct and primary damage that impacted the economy, much in the same way that any isolated natural disaster might impact the economy. Hurricane Katrina was devastating for the regional Gulf Coast economy; in this sense, the September 11th attacks were equally damaging to the economic health of the area directly hit by the attacks. Second, we can factor in the heightened perception socially, economically, and politically. This heightened perception will translate into higher spending on security vs. economic growth and more caution in producer and consumer behavior to account for the potential next attack. Finally, and this applies specifically to the case of the September 11th attacks, we must accept that those attacks instigated the U.S. global war on terrorism. This political and military machine has cost the U.S. economy hundreds of billions of dollars over the last six years and spawned a war in Afghanistan and one in Iraq (Nanto 2-3). All told, these economic impacts have drastically altered the U.S. economy, most notably in the case of increased spending on the war on terrorism.

The economic aftershocks of the September 11th terrorist attacks were, to some degree then, felt immediately. Foreign equity markets, tourism and travel industries, and consumers' attitudes were all affected almost immediately (Nanto 3). But these immediate effects don't necessarily speak to long-term impacts on the global economy. Yet despite these relatively conventional conclusions, there seems to be every indication that there was a tangible economic impact that stretched beyond the borders of the U.S. As an example, before the September 11th attacks, the total amount of FDI into the U.S. stood at 15.8% of the total Gross Fixed Capital Formation for the country. However, after the attacks, in 2003, the percent of FDI was a measly 1.5% (Abadie and Gardeazabal 2). True, there could have been other economic factors at work in this situation, but a reduction in FDI by a factor of 10 is a significant change in only two years. Since FDI is, by its own definition, foreign in origin, then it is reasonable to conclude that the September 11th terrorist attacks had an effect on the global economy. This dramatic change in FDI over such a short span of time indicates that the September 11th terrorist attacks were a significant contributing factor in changes in the global economy.

In fact, these findings seem to be consistent with general economic principles that we can assume operate at the level of an open, integrated global economy. Namely, capital in all its forms will naturally be shifted from high-risk areas to low risk areas of the world (Abadie and Gardeazabal 2). Consider that most economies operate on basic market principles: maximize profits while minimizing costs. The perceived threat of terrorist attacks will naturally then suggest that costs may be higher for investing capital in regions of the world that have persistent terrorism problems or that have recently been the target of terrorism. The end result would be the shifting of capital -- people, goods,… READ MORE

How to Reference "Effects of Terrorism" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Homeland Security Effects of Terrorism Term Paper

Homeland Security

Effects of Terrorism on Homeland Security and Local Law Enforcement

The Homeland Security Program is supposed to work hand-in-hand with local law enforcement officials to instill national security… read more

Term Paper 6 pages (2000 words) Sources: 5 Style: APA Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization

---

Terrorism Is a Weapon of the Weak Global Jihad a Myth or Reality Essay

Terrorism is a "Weapon of the Weak -- / Global Jihad, a Myth or Reality

Terrorism is a weapon of the weak

Terrorism has become one of the most discussed… read more

Essay 4 pages (1337 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization

---

Is Terrorism Effective? Essay

Terrorism Effective?

The term "terrorism" is basically politically and fervently charged which compounds the struggle of providing a precise description of terrorism. Some examination studies by intellectuals have shown the… read more

Essay 4 pages (1359 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization

---

Terrorism What Was Once Seen on Television Term Paper

Terrorism

What was once seen on television as part of temporary news broadcasts is now more and more present to even become a global threat. Terrorism is "the threat or… read more

Term Paper 7 pages (2297 words) Sources: 15 Style: APA Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization

---

How Is Terrorism Different From Violent Crime and Insurgency Ethno National Terrorism? Essay

terrorism different from violent crime and Insurgency / Ethno-National Terrorism

How is terrorism different from violent crime and insurgency

Terrorism has become one of the most discussed subjects in terms… read more

Essay 5 pages (1618 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>