Book Review on "Stephen Decatur: American Naval Hero"
Book Review 5 pages (1771 words) Sources: 1 Style: Chicago
[EXCERPT] . . . .
Stephen Decatur: American Naval HeroThere have been a lot of biographies written on Stephen Decatur and all he did during his lifetime, and most of them have been written within the last few years. However, this particular volume does stand out among them due to several reasons. One of them is the 'swashbuckling' nature of the story. There are many facts about Decatur that can be verified and that make for an exciting read, and Allison (2005) brings them all to light in a way that is difficult to ignore. The story is compelling even if one only looks at it from that angle. There are subtleties as well in this book, and many of them are vital to not only the understanding of the book but also to the interesting nature of the story. Intricately woven into what the book has to say is the story of the way America began its move from the midst of revolution into a budding empire. It was the underdog at one point, and barely hanging onto survival in a world that it saw as dangerous but also strived to conquer. It was a nation that was originally obsessed with the ideas of violence and honor but moved more toward the concepts of enterprise and commerce. This was not easy, but Decatur played a role in ensuring that the America of yesterday became the strong nation that it is today.
In writing about Stephen Decatur, Allison (2005) shows his continued interest in history. As the Assistant Professor of History, Director of American Studies, and University Archivist at Boston's Suffolk University, he is clearly interested in how this country came about and who worked to bring it to this point. He is also the author of the Crescent Obscured: The United States and the Muslim World 1776-18
download full paper ⤓
Of a particular interest in the discussion in the book is the way that Decatur lost his life. He was killed by the hand of a fellow officer. There were a lot of intricacies of politics - both country and personal - during that time period. These worked to create the myth that there were individual heroes, and this is much of what Decatur's reputation actually rests on. They ascendancy of and within the organization, though, is also very important. In Decatur's case it was the United States Navy, and it was believed to have both life and supremacy that superseded only the individual. Allison (2005) is very serious about showing how much importance the Navy had to Decatur and how much importance Decatur had to the Navy, as well. Overall, this book is designed to tell the life of Decatur and everything that he went through. How he changed history is also important. Underlying this is how history has changed and the differences that Decatur caused in the making of America.
The idea that the Navy was life and supremacy and much more important than the individual there are many contributions that Decatur made. Allison (2005) points out that Decatur's contributions mostly went toward ensuring that the Navy was more professionalized and assuring that it was subservient to the control of civilians. This came at a time when the rumors of military coups were flying all over the place. There was also a great fear that there would be a standing Navy and that it would have a potential role in the toppling of the Republic. Decatur helped to guide the administration of the services that were presented by the Navy and show how they could be changed to work more efficiently and better serve the country that it was designed to protect.
Particularly interesting in the book is the way that Allison (2005) addresses the treatment of the way that Decatur was involved with the Tripolitan states. There were wars between America and the Islamic states even a long time ago, between 1803 and 1815. Decatur played a strong role in the expeditions that the Navy had against areas that are now Libya, Tunisia, and Algeria. These wars and Decatur's role in the expeditions are essential if a person is to understand the historical context of America in that region and time period and the way that the country used force in that area. There were also economic and political currents that produced many reasons for America to become involved in those areas. Not everyone realizes how much was going on in the world during that period in history. Instead, they only seem to be interested in what is happening right now, thinking that it is all new. The tensions that go along with this current time in history, though, often stem from the time period that Decatur came from and will not be leaving in the future.
Decatur is only dimly remembered by most people. When they do remember him, however, they cannot always say what they remember him for or exactly what he did. They sometimes believe that he was quoted as lauding his country whether it was right or whether it was wrong. He did in fact make a similar statement, but it was more detailed and addressed the hope that the country would always be right in the dealings that it had with foreign nations, but also that the country would be successful all the time, even if it was wrong (Allison, 2005). This is not the same thing and has a different meaning, but that does not stop a lot of people from misquoting Decatur in the misguided impression that they understand what he was trying to say and that they know exactly what he meant. Either way, Decatur knew what he was saying at the time, as well as the importance of it for the country and for the Navy at that particular time in history.
When Decatur made his comments it was in the context of the War of 1812, which was nearly disastrous in the first place. The country was very nearly divided over the declaration, then it was invaded, and that it struggled based on a lot of political decisions that were made concerning the war's conduct. At that point it was nearly divided again by a secessionist movement that got a late start but would have looked for a separate peace. Decatur was definitely not a professional orator, with all the polish that an individual like that has, but he was interested in making a case for what he believed in. The case that he made was basically that it would be easier to deal with the rest of the world from a position of superiority and victory and that there would not be any substitution for planning and preparedness.
These were what were important, and the leaders of the country needed to see that before it became too late and American fell into a position where it was not powerful and could do little to change the course of events that would keep it in a submissive position well into the future. Planning now for what was taking place and what would and needed to take place was the only way to ensure that the country continued to grow stronger. Allison (2005) addresses this issue from the point-of-view of what Decatur had to say and why, but he also frames this information and makes it stand out by discussing the opposing and contemporary viewpoint of that time. He uses as his example Mr. John Quincy Adams, who was then an experienced diplomat but who was still some years away from being President, and shows how the man wrote to his father and stated that he could not ask for America to succeed in areas where the country was clearly in the wrong.
What he actually stated was "I cannot ask of Heaven success, even for my country, in a cause where she should be in the wrong. I disclaim as unsound all patriotism incompatible with the principles of eternal justice. But the truth is that the American union, while united, may be certain of success in every rightful cause, and may if it pleases never have any but a rightful cause to maintain" (Allison, 2005). There was a strong debate over that viewpoint and Decatur's viewpoint during that time period, but it did not end there. It is easy for anyone who follows politics to any reasonable degree to see that a debate along those lines… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Stephen Decatur: American Naval Hero" Assignment:
The Book is- Stephen Decatur: American Naval Hero, 1719-1820 by Robert J. Allison
I. You should begin with a brief summary of the book that also relates the author's main point or thesis. This is a one-paragraph introduction to your review.
II. You should then provide one or two paragraphs of information about the author. What is the author's viewpoint? What can you discover about the author's background that might shed light on the author's thesis or upon the author's bias and point of view? What is the author's purpose in writing the book? If you don't understand the author's purpose in writing the book, you surely will have trouble understanding the book itself.
III. You may now provide a brief (one to two paragraph) abstract of the book's content. This is NOT the heart of your review. Rather, it is background material for the next section, your analysis of the book's thesis.
IV. The heart of your review is a three to four paragraph analysis of the book's thesis or argument. What evidence does the author present to support his thesis? Is the evidence presented clearly and logically? Do the author's main points follow in a logical sequence, and does the author provide adequate evidence to support the points? Is the author convincing and persuasive in presenting and arguing for thes thesis? You might want to compare the content and arguments of this book with other materials you have read.
V. Finally, in one to two paragraphs of conclusions and recommendations, provide a summary evaluation of the book. Was the thesis clear? Was the evidence strong? Were the conclusions drawn from that evidence sound and persuasive? Do you agree or disagree with the author's assumptions and conclusions?
How to Reference "Stephen Decatur: American Naval Hero" Book Review in a Bibliography
“Stephen Decatur: American Naval Hero.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2008, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/stephen-decatur-american-naval-hero/7315. Accessed 5 Oct 2024.
Related Book Reviews:
War of Tripoli Thesis
war of Tripoli
As a young republic, America fought a war with the Barbary pirates who plied the waters of the Mediterranean in early nineteenth century. The Tripolitan war which… read more
Thesis 10 pages (3129 words) Sources: 6 Style: Chicago Topic: American History / United States
American Foreign Policy Since Its Inception Term Paper
American Foreign Policy
In his farewell address, given to Congress on September 17, 1796, the father of the country, George Washington warned his fellow Americans against "the insidious wiles of… read more
Term Paper 5 pages (1508 words) Sources: 3 Topic: American History / United States
American Art John Gadsby Chapman Research Paper
John Vanderlyn, "The Landing of Columbus"
1. John Vanderlyn depicts Christopher Columbus's crew from the Santa Maria finally reaching land in the West Indies. The men are weary from their… read more
Research Paper 5 pages (1398 words) Sources: 5 Topic: American History / United States
American Revolution Many People Understand Research Paper
American Revolution
Many people understand the American Revolution from a "tip of the iceberg" perspective.
They feel this war was perpetuated by a struggle between colonists and the ruthless British… read more
Research Paper 7 pages (2024 words) Sources: 12 Topic: American History / United States
American Exceptionalism Is a Concept Thesis
American exceptionalism is a concept that has been shrouded in controversy since the arrival of the first British pioneers and settlers. The ideal of exceptionalism was born as a result… read more
Thesis 6 pages (1870 words) Sources: 6 Style: MLA Topic: American History / United States
Sat, Oct 5, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!