Research Paper on "Societal Changes in Work Structure Affected"

Research Paper 12 pages (3198 words) Sources: 12

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Societal Changes in Work Structure Affected the Family Structure in the Last 20 Years?

Twenty years ago, the first effects of innovations in telecommunications began to be felt in the workplace, with a few Fortune 500 companies experimenting with telework and telecommuting alternatives for their employees. In the intervening years, more and more companies of all types and sizes have implemented these and other types of initiatives in an effort to improve employee performance and efficiency while reducing costs. During this same time period, the structure of the American family continued to undergo significant changes as more and more people divorced and remarried, creating so-called "blended families" or, in many other cases, opting for single-parent family structures. A concomitant of these two trends was a fundamental change in the social contract that existing around the mid-20th century wherein employees were guaranteed lifelong employment in return for hard work and loyalty to a social contract characterized by employment at will. To gain additional insights with respect to these issues, this paper investigates these trends to identify how societal changes have affected the family structure during this time period.

How Have Societal Changes in Work Structure Affected the Family Structure in the Last 20 Years?

Introduction Thesis Questions/Statement

The stigma that has formerly been attached to divorce has largely evaporated and there are a growing number of so-called "blended families" or single-parent families that have increasingly replaced what the U.S. Census Bureau terms "traditional nuclear families" in which children are raised in a home with both biological parents (Ginther & Pollak, 2004). Indeed, there are now more non-traditional families in the United States than there are traditional families. In this regard, Magnuson and Berger (2009) report that, "Most children no longer spend their entire childhood in a family that includes both of their biological parents. More than half of children under 18 will spend some time in a single-parent family and about a third will spend some time living with a social parent (a stepparent or unrelated cohabiting partner of their resident biological parent), most frequently, a social father" (p. 575).

These significant changes in the American family structure have taken place during a period of enormous innovations in technology and telecommunications. Or instance, the past 2 decades have been characterized by fundamental changes in work structure in many industries, with practices such as so-called telecommuting becoming more commonplace every day. To determine whether these innovations have had a significant effect on the changes that have taken place in family structure in recent years, this paper provides a review of the relevant peer-reviewed and scholarly literature to develop an analytical framework using appropriate concepts and theories, followed by an application of the research to these issues. Finally, a summary of the research and important findings are presented in the conclusion.

Analysis Using Concepts/Theories

Following the end of World War II, the prevailing social contract in the United States was widely recognized and acknowledged by employers and employees alike, even if it was not reduced to a codified form. This social contract provided that people (mostly men) could join an organization in an entry-level position, work hard and enjoy periodic promotions and wage increases with virtual assurance of employment through retirement (Weidenbaum, 1999). By and large, this social contract held that:

1. Employees understood that they would have to provide satisfactory attendance on the job. They also would have to demonstrate an acceptable level of effort as well as loyalty to the organization.

2. Employers, in turn, were expected to provide "fair" pay and fringe benefits, and advancement based on seniority and merit. And, to a greater or lesser degree, they were expected to provide job security (Weidenbaum, 1999, p. 51).

Beginning in the late 1970s and early 1980s, that social contract was increasingly replaced by a social contract that no longer guarantees employment for life, and it is no longer uncommon for people to have a dozen or more jobs during their professional careers (Davey, 1999). According to Weidenbaum, the social contract that characterizes the modern American workplace involves general expectations on the part of both employers and employees, but these expectations are markedly different in many ways from the social contract that was in place during the mid-20th century. In this regard, Weidenbaum provides an outline of the revised social contract which is set forth in Table 1 below.

Table 1

The 21st Century Social Contract

Actor(s)

Expectations

Employer Expectations of Employees

* Performance to the best of one's ability

* Commitment to the objectives of the firm

* Participation (and making suggestions)

* Willingness to take training to improve productivity

* Ethical and honest behavior

Employee Expectations of Employers

* "Fair" pay and benefits proportionate to contribution to company success

* Security tied to fortunes of the company and ability to perform

* Respect, recognition and participation

* Opportunities for growth

* Safe and healthy workplace

* Access to timely information and openness by candid leaders

Joint expectations

* Partnering replaces paternalism.

* Employees are value-adding resources, not mere costs to be cut.

* Employees and employers must focus on customer needs and desires.

Source: Weidenbaum, p. 52

While there are some commonalities between the former social contact and the emerging social contract, there are also some significant differences that clearly point to a new type of social contract that will likely affect work structure well into the 21st century. For instance, according to Weidenbaum, "Whether employees and managers realize it or not, they are forming new social contracts to govern their places of work. The new relationships between management and labor that are evolving will hold sway at least through the early part of the 21st century" (p. 53). These changes in the social contract and their impact on workplace and family structures are examined further below.

Application of Research

During the 1990s, Vega (2003) reports that there was growing interest in academia and professional circles alike concerning the changing America workplace. According to Vega, "Articles began appearing on a regular basis in the popular press about the benefits and drawbacks of telecommuting, and, in the academic press, concerns about this emergent work structure began to surface, ever so gently" (p. xv). This "gentle" interest quickly assumed torrential levels as more and more companies adopted alternative work arrangements and structural changes in their workplace. Many organizations in fact jumped on the telecommuting bandwagon in order to improve employee productivity while reducing the costs of maintaining a formal workplace environment for them and it became increasingly apparent that the traditional workplace was undergoing significant changes. In this regard, Vega also notes that, "Technological advances leapt from the drawing board to the marketplace. Stock markets were booming worldwide, and business was becoming more and more global each day. The air crackled with excitement, Web-citement, and investment in this new and glorious age of electronic information sharing. Work and workplaces were changing quickly" (2003, p. xv).

As noted above, one of the first structural workplace changes to be experienced during the last 20 years involved telecommuting and telework arrangements and by the early 1990s, "Telecommuting, and later teleworking, became the unpublicized competitive advantage for a group of Fortune 100 companies willing to try something new" (2003, p. 6). The term "workplace structure" is defined by Tien (2007) as "the individual's relationship with the workplace was subdivided into internal structure (i.e., how an individual maintains personal boundaries in the workplace) and external structure (i.e., the organizational structure of the workplace and how the individual related to this structure)" (p. 99). Although both telecommuting and teleworking involve employees performing conventional tasks at some location apart from their brick-and-mortar workplace, there are some fine distinctions between the two that are important to note. According to Vega, telework is "any form of substitution of information technologies [such as telecommunications and computers] for work-related travel; moving the work to the workers instead of moving the workers to work"; by contrast, telecommuting involves "periodic work out of the principal office, one or more days per week either at home, a client's site, or in a telework center . . . [via] the partial or total substitution of telecommunications technologies…for the commute to work" (Vega, 2003, p. 6). Therefore, telecommuting is a type of telework, with the latter representing an umbrella term for all such working arrangements (Vega, 2003).

Despite these structural changes, in some ways, the workplace of the 21st century still resembles that of the mid-20th century with respect to the so-called "glass ceiling" that prevents females and minorities from gaining access to the upper echelons of organizations. For instance, Arnow-Richman (2003) reports that, "Existing work structures that require full time hours plus overtime are designed based on a prototypical male employee with no family responsibilities and in this way discriminate against women who diverge from the 'ideal worker' norm" (p. 345). Even here, though, significant changes have taken place, particularly in recent years, with an African-American sitting in the Oval Office and the country's… READ MORE

How to Reference "Societal Changes in Work Structure Affected" Research Paper in a Bibliography

Related Research Papers:

Work Values and Generational Differences Research Proposal

Work Values and Generational Differences

A generation is defined as a body of individuals who were born and alive at approximately the same time. These individuals share similar life experiences,… read more

Research Proposal 10 pages (2949 words) Sources: 7 Style: Harvard Topic: Leadership / Mentoring

---

Social Science Social Change Situations Keep Discussion Chapter

Social Science

Social Change

Situations keep on evolving, making different aspects of culture to change as well. The human social life has been faced with immense development, and still on… read more

Discussion Chapter 4 pages (1086 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Anthropology / Culture

---

Grandparent Caregivers Societal Antecedents as Predictors Dissertation

Grandparent Caregivers

Societal Antecedents as Predictors of Resilience, Caregiving/Parenting Stress and Coping Strategies in Custodial and Non-Custodial Grandmothers of African-American or African Decent

The past three decades have seen a… read more

Dissertation 100 pages (26485 words) Sources: 30 Topic: Child Development / Youth / Teens

---

General Systems Theory and Modern Research Paper

System Theory

The origin and foundation of system theory

System theory as a general frame of inquiry

System and environment

Living System Theory

Boundaries of Living System theory

General system… read more

Research Paper 17 pages (4711 words) Sources: 25 Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

Dealing Effectively With Organizational Change Research Proposal

Dealing Effectively With Organizational Change

This study seeks to investigate how effectively individuals deal with organizational change. This literature will show how changes within organizations can be a stressful event… read more

Research Proposal 20 pages (8797 words) Sources: 30 Style: APA Topic: Management / Organizations

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>