Term Paper on "Tobacco Deal of 1997"

Term Paper 4 pages (1270 words) Sources: 3

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Social Ethics -- Tobacco Regulation

TOBACCO DEAL of 1997: SOCIAL and ETHICAL ISSUES

Who were the key stakeholders involved, or affected by the negotiations for a tobacco deal and what were their interests. To what degree were the interests of the various stakeholders met by 1997 settlement? By the 1998 settlement?

The actual parties to the lawsuits that eventually resulted in the deal accepted in 1997 and ultimately settled in 1998 were the major American tobacco manufacturers, such as the American Tobacco Company, Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, Liggett & Meyers, the Tobacco Institute, among others, and the states attorneys general of several states, including Arkansas, Maryland, and Virginia.

Since the individual state law suits were settled at the federal level, it now applies to the interests of all 50 states and to all their citizens. The settlement called for initial payments totaling $200 billion to the states with subsequent payments totaling another

168 billion paid out more gradually over 25 years. Critics point out that the settlement fell short of what is necessary to address the magnitude of harm caused by tobacco smoking in society. According to them, its provisions are still too permissive with respect to its limits on the authority of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate nicotine as a drug and also with respect to allowing certain advertising mechanisms for the tobacco industry that would have been prohibited under earlier versions of an agreement that was not passed by Congress earlier (NYT 1997).

2. Should the FDA regulate tobacco? What are the key arguments for and against involvement of the FDA in restricting or banning the sale or promotion of tobacco products?

Testimony and other evidence discovered in connection with the tobacco suits that precipitated the 1997 settlement established that nicotine content of cigarettes is precisely controlled and adjusted for the purpose of inducing addiction rather than for taste" as previously maintained by tobacco industry executives in congressional hearings (Lehrer 1998). Tobacco companies regulate nicotine by growing specific strains of high- nicotine tobacco in foreign countries secured by patents granted in those countries, for large-scale importation for sale in the United States; they also artificially manipulate nicotine content in other ways, such as by reintroducing nicotine into tobacco plant by- products processed into cheaper tobacco (FPO 2007). They also secured patents for the process of combining ammonia and tobacco, because ammonia alters the chemical composition of tobacco smoke to make it more addictive in a manner similar to the role of ammonia in producing freebase cocaine smoke (STIC 1998).

The only argument against FDA regulation is that nicotine is not intended to treat health condition or disease, but by virtue of the way nicotine is used to alter human behavior with respect to nicotine consumption, tobacco products should be regulated by the FDA. This is especially true in light of the massive and uncontroverted evidence of the magnitude of medical harm and financial cost to society of treating the known health consequences of tobacco use in the manner that the products are intended to be used.

3. What mechanisms of political influence had the tobacco industry historically used? Did the tobacco industry influence the public policy process legitimately, or did it have too much influence?

Historically, the tobacco industry is probably the single most notorious example of the ability of large and well-funded business concerns to influence government policy and industry regulation. Through political contributions, tobacco industry lobbyists managed to undermine regulation that threatened their profits, measured in billions of dollars for decades. As late as 1994, representatives from the biggest tobacco companies still argued before Congress that no evidence established a link between tobacco use and human illness. At least part of the motivation for settling the lawsuits that initiated the 1997 arrangement was the disclosure… READ MORE

How to Reference "Tobacco Deal of 1997" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Teens and Tobacco Term Paper

Teens and Tobacco

The Journal of Family Practice article "Current trends in tobacco prevention and cessation in Nebraska physicians' office" (Backer et al. 1997) explores many aspects of the problems… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (941 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

Letter Addressing Modifiable Risk Factors Dear First Research Paper

Letter Addressing Modifiable Risk Factors

Dear

First of all, I just wanted to say that I love you. It is out of this love I have for you that I… read more

Research Paper 3 pages (1036 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

Medical Marijuana Is Something to Consider Bill Term Paper

Medical Marijuana Is Something to Consider

Bill Number CA 345657686

This bill will legalize the use of marijuana in its natural form for those that meet the criteria set forth.… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (2854 words) Sources: 8 Style: MLA Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

Inmates Relationships With There Family Compared and Contrast of Drug Use Term Paper

family and community support and the outcomes of drug abuse treatment programs in female prisoners prior to family and community reintegration

Various research study designs have been utilized in understanding… read more

Term Paper 11 pages (2900 words) Sources: 13 Style: APA Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

Privatization of the Prison System Term Paper

PRIVATIZATION of the PRISON SYSTEM and the IMPACT of the DIFFERENTIATION of SENTENCING in POWDER vs. CRACK COCAINE OFFENSE and the IMPACT on African-American OFFENDERS

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND of the POLICY… read more

Term Paper 18 pages (5077 words) Sources: 32 Style: APA Topic: Drugs / Alcohol / Tobacco

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>