Essay on "Shackford & Gooch, Inc"

Home  >  Topics  >  Law My Account

Essay 4 pages (1282 words) Sources: 3

[EXCERPT] . . . .

And as the text by Hinkel (2011) demonstrates, permits serve a critical purpose in providing for oversight and enforcement by any Zoning Board. According to Hinkel's text, which also provides a look into the present case, identified "building permits [as] another way to enforce zoning ordinance. A building permit will be refused unless the proposed improved and its intended use comply with zoning." (p. 66)

The actions of the Superior Court of York County, by contrast, constitutes a judgment made on "factual findings independent of those of the board" and may also be interpreted as "substituting" court "judgment for that of the board."

Also important to maintaining the board's original findings, beyond the rule of law relating to Dockside's lack of permit, is the original case of Shackford & Gooch. According to established rule on the subject, the appellants were in full right to be protected by the Zoning Board's original decision. In events where some harm might result for the appellant, it is incumbent upon the Zoning Board to intervene. According to Glassman, "the opponents appeared before the Board and as abutting landowners demonstrated they would suffer particularized injury as a result of the Board's action. See Harrington v. Town of Kennebunk, 459 A.2d 557, 559 (Me. 1983); Pride's Corner Concerned Citizens Association v. Westbrook Board of Zoning Appeals, 398 A.2d 415, 417-18 (Me. 1979)."

This denotes existing precedent justifying the Zoning Board's decision to halt construction on the Dockside roof deck. This is critical in establishing the entitlement of the Board to act in the manner that it did. The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine could
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
determine on this basis that the Zoning Board of Kennebunk acted appropriately and should therefore have been spared the intervention and determination of the Superior Court of York County.

Conclusion

There is a level of significance implicated by Shackford & Gooch's successful appeal in protection of its business and its retail property. This denotes a degree of entitlement against the encroachment of other commercial interests that should be especially valuable to small business owners. The evidence of the decision's significance is found in a 2002 case, Salisbury v. Town of Bar Harbor which went before the Main Supreme Judicial Court as well. According to the opinion by Justice Saufley (2002), "the facts asserted by Salisbury, even if presented appropriately to the court, would have been insufficient to support a claim of estoppel against the municipality. As a matter of law, Salisbury's alleged reliance on oral statements made by the CEO was not reasonable. We addressed this issue in Shackford & Gooch, Inc. v. Town of Kennebunk, 486 A.2d 102, 103 (Me. 1984), where the building inspector granted a permit to build stairs and, at the same time, provided verbal authorization to build a deck on the roof of Bartley's Dockside Restaurant." (Saufley, II) This denotes the precedent affirmed by Shackford & Gooch v. Kennebunk.

To this point, the greater significance in this case is the reiteration at a State Supreme Court level, of the entitlement of municipally empowered bodies and agencies to enforce existing law without undue intervention by judicial decision-making. In other words, the case re-affirms the precedent that local government bodies such as the Zoning Board of Kennebunk are vested with broad authority to ensure a sound legal and regulatory environment. Improper influence by a judicial body, the decision implies, may compromise the ability of a Zoning Board to perform its duties with order, fairness and consistency.

Works Cited:

Glassman, J. (1984). Shackford & Gooch, Inc. et al. v. The Town of Kennebunk et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Hinkel, D.F. (2011). Essentials… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Shackford and Gooch, Inc" Assignment:

This is the case to write about: Shackford & Gooch, Inc. et al. v. The Town of Kennebunk et al.

Write a case brief on it using the IRAC method of briefing a case:

Use sentences and paragraphs not bullet points.

In your brief, answer the following questions using the IRAC method(please go to the following web site for help with IRAC Format http://www.lawnerds.com/guide/irac.html):

a. Describe the facts of the case.

b. Describe the issues or questions before the Court

c. Describe the court's decision and rationale

d. Identify and explain the standard relied on or established

e. Discuss the case significance.

Please post the Case name and page number your case in the discussion boards.

If there is anyway you can put this in Bluebook citation that would be awesome

How to Reference "Shackford and Gooch, Inc" Essay in a Bibliography

Shackford and Gooch, Inc.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2013, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/shackford-gooch-inc-et-al/9501260. Accessed 5 Oct 2024.

Shackford and Gooch, Inc (2013). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/shackford-gooch-inc-et-al/9501260
A1-TermPaper.com. (2013). Shackford and Gooch, Inc. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/shackford-gooch-inc-et-al/9501260 [Accessed 5 Oct, 2024].
”Shackford and Gooch, Inc” 2013. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/shackford-gooch-inc-et-al/9501260.
”Shackford and Gooch, Inc” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/shackford-gooch-inc-et-al/9501260.
[1] ”Shackford and Gooch, Inc”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/shackford-gooch-inc-et-al/9501260. [Accessed: 5-Oct-2024].
1. Shackford and Gooch, Inc [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2013 [cited 5 October 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/shackford-gooch-inc-et-al/9501260
1. Shackford and Gooch, Inc. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/shackford-gooch-inc-et-al/9501260. Published 2013. Accessed October 5, 2024.

Related Essays:

Tyson Foods, Inc Case Study

Paper Icon

Tyson Foods Inc.

Tyson food inc

The first and most significant reason why people work is to sustain their lives. It is for this very reason that several investors have… read more

Case Study 9 pages (2766 words) Sources: 9 Topic: Agriculture / Food / Culinary


Food Inc. Robert Kenner's Film Film Review

Paper Icon

Second, the filmmaker shows the toll of mass food production in America. At first, the food production model being used by agribusiness was viewed as a boon. In the blissfully… read more

Film Review 3 pages (951 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Agriculture / Food / Culinary


Food Inc. Film Film Review

Paper Icon

Animals at factory farms face horrible conditions, but the results of these on humans is also bad. Our food is simply not that healthy when it comes from these factory… read more

Film Review 3 pages (947 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Agriculture / Food / Culinary


About Food, Inc. Documentary Film Film Review

Paper Icon

Food, Inc.

As its title suggests, the film Food, Inc. is an expose of American, commercialized agriculture. Instead of a family farm producing and raising meat, milk, vegetables, and grains,… read more

Film Review 3 pages (941 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Agriculture / Food / Culinary


Immelt Et Al. (2009). Becht (2010) Term Paper

Paper Icon

Immelt et al. (2009). Becht (2010) discusses how RB (Reckitt Benckiser) has developed the global entrepreneurship skills of its top managers using global mobility strategy. The global mobility strategy is… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1206 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Sat, Oct 5, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!