Research Paper on "School Systems Use Data to Implement Strategies"

Research Paper 14 pages (3796 words) Sources: 5

[EXCERPT] . . . .

School Systems use Data to Implement Strategies and Drive Instruction for Elementary Students?

In any setting, there is a best way to do something, and elementary school systems are no exception. In the Digital Age, though, trying to make sense of the enormous amounts of information available is often like trying to take a sip from a fire hose and many educators might be at a loss concerning how to use the available data to its best effect. Therefore, identifying ways that other educational school systems have used data to help them implement strategies and drive instruction represents a timely and valuable enterprise.

In an era of dwindling state budgets for education and increasing calls for accountability on the part of teachers and principals as the result of a long string of federal mandates such as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the No Child Left Behind Act, the need for cost-effective methods of assessing the effectiveness of curricular offerings and teacher performance in achieving established goals is paramount. It is axiomatic that in order to improve something it must first be measured, so there is also an ongoing need for innovative ways to use existing secondary data in order to identify opportunities for improvement that might otherwise be overlooked. Therefore, the overarching purpose of this study was to identify current approaches to using data of different types to implement strategies and drive instruction for elementary students.

Problem question

The problem question that guided this study was, "How do school systems use data to implement strategies and drive instruction for elementary students?"

Research question

The research question used to guide this study had two parts: (a) What type of data is available for performance-related analyses as well as to identify opportunities for improvement; and (b) How can this data be used to implement strategies and drive instruction for elementary students?

Brief Review of the Literature

In the Age of Information, there is typically a wide array of data about any elementary school system available, whether in print or online, that can be used to track changes in performance indicators and identify trends, but the specific types of data needed for any particular educational initiative may not be readily available or may require fine-tuning existing computer-based applications. Therefore, it would be useful to establish some common areas in which data is widely used for these purposes from the outset. Certainly, performance-based metrics such as standardized test scores can be used to assess the effectiveness of current instruction and this data are already used for this purpose across the country and globe. Some educational analysts have taken this data and applied it across several realms of elementary school operations to determine the effectiveness of their current performance as well as what could be done to improve educational instruction. For instance, a study by Bryk (2010) (currently president of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching) examined innovative ways to use data to implement strategies and drive instruction for elementary schools in the Chicago school system. The five key data-driven realms for improving elementary school instruction developed by Bryk are set forth in Table 1 below.

Table 1

Five Key Data-Driven Areas for Improving Elementary School Instruction

Key Area

Description

Coherent instructional guidance system

This key area is characterized by schools that have demonstrated student learning improvements based on coherent instructional guidance systems that specify how instruction will be delivered and what curricular content will be offered. Some of the ways this dimension can be measured include the learning tasks required of students which are an essential analytical element, as well as the results of any standardized testing regimens that are in place that are used to provide feedback to students and inform instructional development. A part of this assessment concerns the quality of the tools, materials, and instructional routines that are shared by faculty that support instruction. While individual teachers enjoy a significant amount of discretion concerning the allocation of resources, the overall effectiveness of individual teacher will relate to the quality of the supports and the local community of practice that guide their use and refinement.

Professional capacity

Elementary school teachers and principals can work together to improve instruction, but for them to become proficient at the process, they must have access to ongoing training opportunities and collaborative exchanges to improve their delivery of educational services. Some of the ways this dimension can be measured include: 1. The professional development that supports their learning;

2. The faculty's capacity to work together to improve instruction;

3. The school's ability to recruit and retain capable staff;

4. The efficacy of performance feedback and professional development; and,

5. The social resources within a staff to work together to solve local problems.

Strong parent-community-school ties

Recruiting and sustaining the active involvement of parents is an essential ingredient in the overall mix of efforts needed to use data-driven methods to improve instruction and measuring this dimension can provide some useful insights into existing gaps in the school-parent-community continuum. In fact, this is probably the most cost-effective approach to improving academic outcomes which of course is one of the main goals of all elementary schools. More active involvement by parents with schoolwork and curricular content may also have some significant tangential benefits that transcend mere grades, though, making this an especially important realm for assessment.

Student-centered learning climate

The type of climate that is cultivated by the responsible adult educators in an elementary school will have a profound effect on the quality of instruction that is provided. This dimension an be measured by the extent to which a climate that:

1. Encourages young people to consider themselves as being learners is facilitated by educators;

2. Creates a positive learning climate conducive to learning such as a safe and orderly environment;

3. Creates a climate that celebrates ambitious academic work ethics together with the provision of support for each young learner.

Leadership drives change.

Although all of the five support indicators are essential for success, a growing body of knowledge suggests that if any one could be singled out as being "most important," it would be this dimension. According to Bryk, "Principals in improving schools engage in a dynamic interplay of instructional and inclusive-facilitative leadership. On the instructional side, school leaders influence local activity around core instructional programs, supplemental academic and social supports, and the hiring and development of staff" (2010, p. 24). Some of the ways that this dimension can be measured would include the extent to which a principal:

1. Established strategic priorities for using resources and buffer externalities that might distract from coherent reform;

2. Developed relationships across the school community because improving teaching and learning places demands on these relationships.

3. School leaders advance instrumental objectives while also trying to enlist teachers in the change effort in their daily activities.

4. Principals cultivate a growing cadre of leaders (teachers, parents, and community members) who can help expand the reach of this work and share overall responsibility for improvement.

Source: Adapted from Bryk, 2010, p. 24

Based on the results generated by extensive primary survey data collected from teachers, principals, and students in the Chicago area, Bryk and his colleagues developed secondary data indicators for each of the five foregoing essential supports, tracked changes in these indicators over time, and then associated these performance-related outcomes to changes in student attendance and learning gains in reading and mathematics. Some of the main findings that emerged from this data analysis included the following:

1. Schools with strong indicators on most supports were 10 times more likely to improve than schools with weak supports.

2. Half of the schools strong on most supports improved substantially in reading.

3. Not a single school weak on most supports improved in mathematics.

4. A material weakness in any one support, sustained over several years, undermined other change efforts, and improvement rarely resulted (Bryk, 2010, p. 25).

In fact, Bryk frequently equates these five supports with pillars, and the absence (or sustained weakness) in one pillar threatens the performance of the entire school on the others. Like an automobile that will not run properly without a carburetor or a set of tires, simply focusing on one pillar will not provide the complete well-oiled machinery of educational success that can be achieved when all five supports are in place. In this regard, based on the analysis of the secondary data indicators for the elementary schools in this study, Bryk emphasizes the need for timely and relevant data to achieve the broad-based types of support needed to help elementary schools achieve their organizational missions. According to Bryk, "This statistical evidence affords a strong warrant that how we organize schools is critical for student achievement. Improving schools entails coherent, orchestrated action across all five essential supports. Put simply, there is no one silver bullet" (2010, p. 24). Although there is no "silver bullet" available, it is clear that the secondary data-driven approach used by Bryk could be applied to elementary schools… READ MORE

How to Reference "School Systems Use Data to Implement Strategies" Research Paper in a Bibliography

Related Research Papers:

Schools Use Data for Implementing Strategies Term Paper

schools use data for implementing strategies in order to prove their accountability to the No Child Left Behind legislation. Almost 300 of the articles that I browsed through dealt with… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (962 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

Impact of Big Data on Business Strategy Term Paper

Big Data on Business Strategy

Business Strategies

The competitive nature of today's business environment is driving companies to use technology driven business strategies (Berman & Hagan, 2006, p.28). Big Data… read more

Term Paper 20 pages (5673 words) Sources: 18 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce

---

System Analysis the Company Term Paper

4.125a + 8.25b + 12.375c + 10.428d + 26.540e 100

v. 30a + 15b + 45c + 20d + 50e 150

Objective function: 200 = 1.2a + 2.0b + 2.6c… read more

Term Paper 13 pages (3770 words) Sources: 0 Style: MLA Topic: Management / Organizations

---

School Restructure Term Paper

School Restructure

The school statistics are academically unacceptable despite the presence of 40 experienced teachers. The school has 600 students with 40% being minorities. There are elements of low middle… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1465 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

School Improvement Project Proposal Term Paper

School Improvement Project Proposal

Improving Test Scores through Student Online Engagement

Description of the Community

In this particular district, the students are home schooled. These students are scattered all around… read more

Term Paper 15 pages (4564 words) Sources: 12 Style: APA Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>