Term Paper on "Was Saddam Hussein's Execution an Essential Point in Establishing Democracy in Iraq?"

Term Paper 7 pages (2462 words) Sources: 7 Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Saddam Hussein

The execution of Saddam Hussein has been widely heralded as a turning point in the war in Iraq, if not the central point at which democracy might be established. Gruesome images and videos of the public hanging stirred the Iraqi public and shocked viewers and readers around the world. Most of the mainstream media from Great Britain and the United States, the two nations most heavily vested in establishing pro-Western democratic governments in Iraq, presented the event as a major victory. Like killing the bad guy in an action flick, executing Saddam Hussein was depicted as the fulfillment of a central goal of the war. Therefore, the execution served a central purpose in promoting propaganda: in generating and maintaining support for the war. On a propaganda level alone the execution marked a turning point. Images of joyful Iraqis celebrating in the streets enhanced the notion that the death of Saddam meant the birth of freedom in Iraq. Moreover, Saddam Hussein's execution served a solid symbolic function. It was as if the Wicked Witch of the East was melting and Dorothy could finally return home. One of the most potent symbols of tyranny in the modern world, Saddam Hussein, was no more. The execution, which was decried by many nations that do not support capital punishment, meant that the primary emblem of the Iraqi dictatorship was destroyed. Even if the execution did not extricate the root causes for tyranny in Iraq or instability in the Middle East, the execution of Saddam Hussein was in fact a major turning point in the war and paved the way for democracy.

Even before the public hanging of Saddam Hussein, his capture was "presented by the coalition as a turning point for Iraq leading to reconciliation and political stability," (Reynolds 2003). Thus, the symbolic function of the Iraqi dictator had been firmly established well before the execution in 2006. In fact, during the first Gulf War Saddam's image in the public eye was solidified as an evil tyrant who single-handedly prevented the Iraqi people from living in a democratic state. Saddam Hussein had cultivated a cult of personality, too (Reynolds 2003). After twenty-five years in a position of incredible power, Saddam Hussein was larger-than-life: he became a demon. His capture was, as Reynolds (2003) notes, the first step on the road toward freedom, even if that road would be riddled with bumps, forks, and potholes. Never mind that the capture did not immediately precede the establishment of democracy in Iraq. With Saddam symbolically out of power, the whisper of democracy in Iraq was heard worldwide. President Bush beamed in press conferences, making statements like "All Iraqis can now come together and reject violence and build a new Iraq." Footage of Iraqis rejoicing were plastered on television sets and in newspapers. The capture of Saddam Hussein also uplifted the spirits of Americans who may have wondered how successful the war effort might be in the long run, especially since support for the war was far from universal.

That the execution of Saddam Hussein might have been a turning point for establishing democracy in Iraq is poignantly ironic. For one, most democratic nations decry the death penalty. The execution of the dictator's henchmen had also led to "a chorus of international criticism," ("Saddam aides 'to die this week'" 2007). The United States is one of the only remaining developed countries to continue support for capital punishment on its own shores, and thus many Americans salivated at the idea that the demonized dictator might meet a gruesome end. Opponents of capital punishment around the world criticized the method by which Saddam Hussein was tried and hung in public not because they supported the dictator or his methods but because they rooted for and integrity at all costs. Publicly hanging any human being seemed antithetical to establishing democracy, opposed to the very message the United States wanted to send to the Iraqi people and the world about its lofty intentions of liberating the Iraqi people.

Second, the execution was carried out in public. It was an old-fashioned hanging, noose and all. Any person, even Saddam Hussein, strangling in the hangman's noose is far from being a symbol of democracy. If anything the public execution represents backwardness and barbarism: the opposite of democracy. Without a stint in the Hague, Saddam Hussein's trial progressed like any other in Iraq. Democracy was being established on flimsy foundations in the former Mesopotamia.

Third, the trial of Saddam Hussein in Iraq instead of on international soil such as in the Hague seemed an affront to the democratic principles the United States espoused. In an interview with Democracy Now! correspondent Amy Goodman, Scott Horton speaks of "the brazen political manipulation of this trial by the Bush administration," (2006). Many Iraqis shared the belief that the Bush administration and its lackeys in Iraq did not try Saddam fairly, in keeping with international law and rules of justice. The trial was viewed as a farce, as a puppet show in Iraq (Sabbah 2006). At the same time, the Bush administration and Iraqi officials supporting it asserted that the trial proceeded with "strict adherence to legal procedures" (Palmer 2006).

Media coverage of the execution varied but in the West mainly focused on the "fear" in Saddam's eyes and the "celebrations" in the streets that included dancing around the dead body of the former dictator (Raman, Chilcote, Dagher, Karadsheh, & Henry 2006). Therefore, the imagery of both the capture and the execution served propaganda needs well. After his capture, the viewing public watched the dictator grow more haggard by the day. Rumors abounded as to whether the real Saddam had been captured, given his use of body doubles. The slow rotting away of Saddam Hussein's will, the decreasing sense of determination and the increasing sense of resignation on the dictator's face sent powerful messages to the world about the triumph of the mighty United States over the demons of the world. During the trial, American newspapers and television news shows depicted the proceedings as being emblematic of the democratic process. As fair and legal as it might have been, the trial was more for show than anything else; it seemed that the writing on the wall already spelled out the demise of the Iraqi dictator. The more haggard he looked, the more it seemed that democracy was possible in the country he held sway over for so long. His capture, trial, and execution was central in creating at least the belief that Iraq was on its way toward freedom.

The belief that democracy was possible proved more important than reality. With so few democratic states in the Middle East, Iraq was highly unlikely to suddenly sprout freedom and liberty. Core values of the country continued to irk feminists and human rights activists worldwide, and the tolerance of public hanging underscored the types of traditions Iraqi people favored. The United States was triumphant not just in helping capture, trying in court, and hanging Saddam Hussain under the watchful eye of the world. More importantly, the Bush administration and its allies enabled continued support of the war. The imagery of Saddam's death was so powerful, so potent, so compelling that even anti-war activists were proud in spite of themselves.

As a turning point, the execution of Saddam Hussein changed public opinion of how the Untied States was doing in the war effort. The American public had long forgotten about Osama Bin Laden by the time Saddam was executed; Saddam conveniently took bin Laden's place as the demon of the day. One of the central purposes of the execution was to create propaganda that would prevent anti-war sentiment from fomenting, and it worked to an extent.

In Iraq, reaction to the execution was mixed. Some did indeed dance around the body "with jubilation," (Karadsheh & Raman 2006). Others hesitated to praise the event as a turning point in the political evolution of the Iraqi people. Quoted in the U.S.A. Today, an Iraqi school teacher stated, "If it was another government who executed Saddam you would find me celebrating by dancing in the middle of the street, but unfortunately I feel so disappointed today, because this government have done every ugly thing against Iraqis in the last couple years," (cited by Palmer 2006). Some Iraqis protested the capture and the execution, as many Iraqis continued to support Saddam Hussein and vehemently opposed the American occupation of the country. The execution left not just a leadership vacuum in Iraq but also the rift between Sunni and Shiite Muslims deepened so severely that civil war seemed inevitable. Granted, civil war does not preclude the establishment of democracy but the execution did not seem to have an immediately peaceful effect on the ravaged country.

The execution seemed to have served as a turning point more for media and propaganda purposes than for practical ones. However, any government and any society depends on propaganda to promote its core values and ideals even when those values… READ MORE

How to Reference "Was Saddam Hussein's Execution an Essential Point in Establishing Democracy in Iraq?" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Gay and Lesbian Torture in Iraq and the International Human Rights Violations Term Paper

Torture and Abuse of Gays and Lesbians in U.S. Occupied Iraq

The United States has always presented itself as a model of fairness and equality. A champion of human rights… read more

Term Paper 25 pages (9056 words) Sources: 30 Topic: Sexuality / Gender

---

Phoenix Program Term Paper

Phoenix Program Lessons to Iraq

Scope and Significance

Summation

The Phoenix Program in Vietnam

Lessons Learned from Phoenix

Applications for Iraq

Selected Bibliography

APPLICATION of PHOENIX PROGRAM LESSONS to IRAQ… read more

Term Paper 75 pages (19225 words) Sources: 50 Topic: Military / Army / Navy / Marines

---

Moral Legal Political and Practical Dimensions of Assassination Term Paper

Moral, Legal, Political, And Practical Dimensions of Assassination

Political assassination is a very old and hard to tackle problem, which caused innumerable victims throughout history. Due to the many forms… read more

Term Paper 22 pages (9721 words) Sources: 5 Style: Turabian Topic: Government / Politics

---

UN Peacekeeping Limitations After Five Decades Thesis

UN Peacekeeping Limitations

After five decades of international conflict, waged between the imperial champion of the communist ideology and the frontrunner for western democracy, the latter prevailed in the peaceful… read more

Thesis 20 pages (6252 words) Sources: 15 Style: MLA Topic: World History

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>