Assessment on "Rorschach Inkblot Test the Rorschach"
Assessment 5 pages (1481 words) Sources: 5
[EXCERPT] . . . .
Rorschach Inkblot TestThe Rorschach test was developed by Swiss psychologist Hermann Rorschach. It was originally published in 1942 under the name "form interpretation test" in his book Psychodiagnostics. Rorschach passed away shortly after this publication and his colleagues renamed the test in his honor. The test is still used today all over the world, however there have been numerous criticisms launched against its reliability and validity. Regardless, the Rorschach test continues to be an international staple of psychological evaluation.
Content, Purpose and Structure
The Rorschach Method, of which the primary instrument is the Rorschach Inkblot test, is based on the theory of projection. This theory essentially posits that individuals react to experimental stimuli (such as the inkblots) in a way that reveals their inner selves and projects their authentic personalities. The instrument consists of ten standardized inkblots, five of which are in black and white, and five of which are in color. The clinician presents these images, one by one, to the patient, and asks him what he sees. The patient then describes whatever object or image that the inkblot brings to mind, and this is supposed to reveal personal details about his psyche.
According to Harriman (1946) there are four inquiries the clinician is to ask in association with the patient's responses to the inkblots: "First, were they in response to the whole blot or to its details? Second, what elements in the blot determined the response, those related to form, movement, color or shading? Third, what associations were inspired? Fourth, were the responses common or unusual?"
download full paper ⤓
Based upon the responses to these inquiries, the clinician's job is to equate them with psychological meaning, in the form of a "psychogram." A psychogram, according to Shakow (2006) is derived from the total scores of the four inquiries described above, "which takes the interrelationship of these various kinds of responses into account, that is the individual record is considered as a whole, not as a set of isolated scores. On the bases if this psychogram, considerable information about fundamental personality characteristics is made available" (p. 27). Although the responses are analyzed based on separate factors focusing on frequency, sequence and reciprocity, they are interpreted as an interactive whole.
Administration and Scoring Guidelines
Despite widespread controversy regarding the usefulness of the Rorschach test, Bornstein (2005) has identified seven validated systems for scoring it. These are: The Rorschach Prognostic Rating Scale (RPRS); The Rorschach Technique for Assessing Formal Thought Disorder; Concept of the Object; The Rorschach Oral Dependency Scale; the Barrier and Penetration Rorschach Scoring System; The Pripro Scoring System and the Lerner Defense Scale. Bornstein claims that each of these scoring system supports the validity of the Rorschach test in different ways, and disparages researchers such as Lovitt (2004), who have mistakenly tried to apply Exner's Comprehensive System (CS) as a method of validation.
Evaluation of Reliability and Validity
The reliability and validity of the Rorschach test have been questioned at length. Some scholars complete disparage the entire concept, while others base their assessment of the instrument on how certain variables are inserted into the equation. For example, according to Daly (2005) psychologist Sigmunt A. Piotrowski devised a list of ten variables that can either strengthen or weaken the validity of the Rorschach test. One of these variables is related to how much the patient knows about what certain responses are likely to mean. For example, if the patient is aware that if he equates every inkblot with a theme of violence or sexuality that he is going to appear mentally unstable, he will likely censor or alter his responses. As Daly (2005) explains, "The more the subject cannot differentiate between the desirable or undesirable answers the greater the validity. This is found to be essentially true on the Rorschach Test" (p. 670).
Another variable that affects validity is the amount of spontaneity involved in the administration of the test. According to Daly (2005), "Freedom of association is necessary and should be full. Those who cannot interpret the blots are very inhibited and this can be considered a part of personality, inhibition in social situations. Such behavior tells us something about the person and his inability to think and act in a free fashion. The purpose of the test then can cause the subject to withhold information or unfettered thought" (670).
Other researchers, such as Juni (1993) believe that instead of a focus on free association, the validity and… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Rorschach Inkblot Test the Rorschach" Assignment:
Using empirical references as the basis of your review, research either a standardized personality, intelligence or educational test and complete a summary critique/report. The review should include: general information about the test including title, author and publisher; a description of the test content, purpose, structure, administration and scoring guidelines; an evaluation of the reliability and validity of the test; a critique of the strengths and weaknesses of using the test in an applied setting; and an analysis of the multicultural application of the test. Your paper must utilize a minimum of 8 references; 5 of these references must be empirical, peer-reviewed, research articles (empirical references). As such, it is NOT appropriate to select an online test; you must select a published test in which there is information available on the reliability and validity.
*****
How to Reference "Rorschach Inkblot Test the Rorschach" Assessment in a Bibliography
“Rorschach Inkblot Test the Rorschach.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2010, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/rorschach-inkblot-test/2818. Accessed 5 Oct 2024.
Related Assessments:
Exner System: Rorschach Inkblot Controversies Thesis
Exner System: Rorschach Inkblot Controversies
Discuss why was the Exner system so revolutionary in the use of the Rorschach? Under what conditions might a Rorschach be preferred as a personality… read more
Thesis 2 pages (795 words) Sources: 2 Style: APA Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry
Personality Assessment Instruments Thesis
Personality Assessment Instruments
Millon, Rorschach and other methods of evaluation
This paper will attempt to give an overview of two relatively common and recently derived questionnaire-type personality assessments used by… read more
Thesis 7 pages (2270 words) Sources: 4 Style: APA Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry
Using Varied Tests in Psychology Term Paper
The administering of the MMPI-2 test is such that the patient is given forms that have 567 true/false questions that the patient is expected to handle in about an hour… read more
Term Paper 2 pages (604 words) Sources: 2 Topic:
Are Projective Tests a Valid Measure of Personality? Term Paper
Projective Tests
In contrast to objective tests, projective tests are unstructured and rely on highly ambiguous stimuli such as inkblots or pictures that are, therefore, open to different interpretations that… read more
Term Paper 1 pages (310 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry
Personality Tests Can Pose Problematic Legal Research Proposal
Personality tests can pose problematic legal and ethical challenges, when used to vet prospective employees or when imposed upon students or other individuals who have little ability to resist taking… read more
Research Proposal 1 pages (349 words) Sources: 3 Style: APA Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry
Sat, Oct 5, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!