Term Paper on "Robert Reich and Ayn Rand Liberalism"
Term Paper 6 pages (2017 words) Sources: 4 Style: MLA
[EXCERPT] . . . .
Robert Reich and Ayn Rand= LiberalismAs the world is in a continuous change in the last decades, scholars and analysts are constantly trying to define the current trends in politics, economics, social, and cultural affairs. There are permanent discussions especially in the academic world over the actual role the individual, the state, the national values and the universal values have in this global world.
Liberalism in this sense has tried to offer a proper solution by molding its centuries old conceptions to the evolving reality of the current times. In this sense, John Hallowell makes a synthesis of the core precepts of liberalism applicable to the world we live in. On the other had however, there are other numerous discussions and theories that go even further in assessing the role of the state, of the individual and of the connections established between them. In this sense, the concept promoted by George Soros in his open society philosophy is relevant for drawing the attention on other views as well.
Despite this array of theoretical approaches, in order to have a clearer image on the actual possibilities of applicability of one theory or another, it is important to take into consideration other points-of-view, and underline their common and divisive elements in comparison to the liberal values pointed out by Hallowell and the aspects presented by Soros in his open society theory. In this way, a wider variety of opinions emerging from such a comparison can prove useful for shedding light on possible future evolutions.
John Hallowell synthesizes the major ideas on the liberal doctrine by touching on the most important of its
download full paper ⤓
George Soros is considered one of the most influential voices in contemporary economic debates. This major theory revolves around the idea of open societies and the existence of a global government that would eventually take the place of the national state and all the values it entrenches. (Walsh, 2006) His argument is based on the assessment that in the current globalised world, the national identity and the entire set of elements that hold a nation together are no longer available. He promotes the idea of a limited influence of boundaries throughout the world. Therefore, he emphasizes the need for the development of broader values that would encompass the fallibility of our individual perceptions. In making reference to the rights enshrined in the U.S. Declaration of Independence, he states that "The Declaration of Independence may be taken as a pretty good approximation of the principles of an open society, but instead of claiming those principles are self-evident, we ought to say that they are consistent with our fallibility," thus pointing out that man must, more or less, promote not necessarily his individual values, but rather contribute to the development of new, broader and universal ones. In this framework, the role of the state is minimized. He tried to support such convictions throughout his activities, by financing various international organizations that promote the sense of connection at a global level.
These two rather differing concepts of the notion of liberalism create a framework which may constitute a point of reference for the comparative analysis of the ideas of Robert Reich and Ayn Rand. While the former places a wider accent on the collective action needed to increase the quality of human life, the latter considers capitalism as a viable and moral answer to achieving happiness of the individual.
Both Reich and Rand share some of the core values expressed in Hallowell's presentation of liberalism. Reich is indeed a proponent of the social contract existing between the individual and the state as a safety measure for ensuring their rights. (Reich, 2002) However, in his equation, he also adds the need for an increased role of the companies who are actually the main providers for the income of the individual. In this sense, free enterprise is seen as prerequisite for the development of the society and for the ultimate improvement of the condition of the individual. Therefore, one can see the influence of the liberal perception of the economy.
Rand is even more attached to the liberal conception of the economic environment. Thus, she considers capitalism as the only solution which caters for the respect of the individual rights. It is based on the will of the individual, just as Hallowell described the theory. Moreover, her main point is related to the individual's constant quest for happiness as the supreme goal of life. In this sense, the accent is on the value of human personality above the idea of society as a whole and as a collectivity. From this perspective, the inalienable rights of the individual, life, liberty, and property are essential for the behavior of man in society. She considers that capitalism has been treated as an ill famed concept due to the fact that it was being defined in parallel to the notion of moral values which are, in her view, automatically entrenched in the definition.(Rand, 1967) Another common element with the traditional line of liberalism is the accent she puts on the rationality of the individual and the morality it develops.
In comparison to Soros's point-of-view, Rand does not see altruism as being effective in the individual quest for happiness; still, they both may be seen as having similar views on the role of the state. (1967) Soros proposes a close to dissolution role of the state, denying any viability of boundaries, while Rand, although not so drastic in opinions, does consider the state should be limited in its intervention and should rely on the ability of the individual to strive.
Both Reich and Rand stress their position on the place of the individual in comparison to the community they live in and to the individual as a single entity. However, their opinions differ to a certain extent.
Reich considers the individual must be fully aware of his dual capacity, as an individual and as a member of the collectivity. Taking into account the recent evolutions of the international scene and the economic environment in which Reich wrote his book, it is explainable the concern for the well-being of the community rather than that of the individual. The 9/11 attacks and the subsequent Enron scandals which affected the moral basis in the first case, and the economic one in the second case, put in balance the actual protection the individual can benefit from, from the state and the private sector alike. In this sense, he considers that the needs of the individual must be served in the society by helping the respective society. Moreover, man as an individual should care for the well-being of his fellows because "our common wealth lies not in the fatness of our individual wallets but in the productivity of every one of us." (Reich, 2002) Therefore, the individual has a moral duty to care, in the same way as the state has the social duty to ensure the prosperity of the population in the light of the liberal social contract.
On the other hand, Rand's perspective on the relation between the individual and the community is oriented towards a more pragmatic approach. She considers that altruism is not an effective means to achieve happiness and that it is the ability of each individual to succeed. Indeed, taking into account the fact that she sees the individual as the main responsible for the course of his existence, rational choices as seen as the most important tools for deciding on the individual destiny. This idea is identifiable in her rejection of accepting before established traditions "merely because it is a 'tradition' means that we must accept the values other men have chosen, merely because other men have chosen them -- with the necessary implication of: who are we to change them? The… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Robert Reich and Ayn Rand Liberalism" Assignment:
The Topic:
Robert B. Reich and Ayn Rand differ substantively as to what obligations a citizen has to the community and to the various individual members of that that community. Nevertheless, both RAND AND REICH belong to the LIBERAL tradition.
Adress the assertion with following questions
1. To what extent do both Rand and Reich relfect the core values of Liberalism as spelled out in "Liberalism" by John Hollowell (the reading is provided at the end of these specification). and to what extent do both embrace what Soros calls "THe Open Society"?
2. What are their views as to the obligation one has to the community and to the individual members of the community?
3. What assumptions about human nature and the role of the state are found in Reich and Rand?
**The thesis paragraph should paraphrase the arguement developed in the essay and should be a response to the topic.
**Imagination and going beyond what is told is needed. THe material must be synethesized into a coherent arguement that supports the thesis handle contrary arguements.
The readings:
I'LL BE SHORT by Robert B. Reich
CAPITALISM:THE UNKNOWN IDEAL by Ayn Rand
Liberalism by John Hallowell provided Now
LIBERALISM
The word Liberal did not come into use until early in the nineteenth century and it was not until around 1839 that the Whig Party in Great Britain came to be referred to as *****the Liberal Party.***** But liberalism as a political philosophy finds classic expression in the writings of Hugo Grotius and John Locke and it was a modified version of this philosophy which was adopted as the program of the English Liberal Party. Liberalism defies succinct definition and rather than attempting to express its tenets within the framework of a brief formula we shall rather seek to identify it by enumerating the attributes which distinguish it*****¦Liberalism is characterized by the following beliefs:
1)A belief in the absolute value of human personality and the spiritual equality of all individuals.
2)A belief in the autonomy of individual will.
3)A belief in the essential rationality and goodness of man.
4)A belief in the existence of certain inalienable rights peculiar to individuals by virtue of their humanity. They are commonly spoken of as the natural rights to *****life, liberty, and property.*****
5)A belief that the state comes into existence by mutual consent for the sole purpose of preserving and protecting these rights.
6)A belief that the relationship between the state and individuals is a contractual one and that when the terms of the contract are violated individuals have not only the right but the responsibility to revolt and establish a new government.
7)A belief that social control is best secured by law rather than command. The law is conceived as being at once the product of individual will and the embodiment of reason. The law alone can command and restrain the individual and *****government under the law***** is the liberal ideal.
8)A belief that *****the government that governs least governs best.***** The government is conceived as having primarily negative functions, the protection of the individual in his rights and freedom in order that he may be free to follow *****dictates of conscience,***** and the laws of nature.
9)A belief in individual freedom in all spheres of life (political, economic, social, intellectual and religious). Freedom is conceived as freedom from all authority that is capable of acting capriciously or arbitrarily, freedom to act in accordance with the dictates of *****right reason.*****i.e., with the dictates of natural law as it is revealed to men through natural reason.
10)A belief in the existence of a transcendental order of truth which is accessible to man*****s natural reason and capable of evoking a moral response. It is an order requiring both individual thought and will for its realization, i.e., it is a potential ordre requiring individual thought and will for its translation into actuality. Through his autonomous reason and in the light of his conscience the individual avoids anarchy by translating the principles of this natural order into practice. The choice between order and anarchy revolves upon the individual and more partciularly, upon individual conscience. Thus conscience is the keystone of the liberal doctrine.
Not all of these beliefs are peculiar to liberalism and many of them have a long heritage in the history of Western civilization. The beliefs, for example, in the absolute moral worth of the individual, in the spiritual equality of individuals, and in the essential rationality of a man are a hertitage from the Middle Ages and have their roots deep in Christian and Greek thought. The ideal of individual freedom under the impersonal rule of law is not a peculiarly modern or liberal ideal. It has a long heritage in Western political thought extending at least as far back as the Stoics in ancient Greece if not even further into the past
by Hallowell
How to Reference "Robert Reich and Ayn Rand Liberalism" Term Paper in a Bibliography
“Robert Reich and Ayn Rand Liberalism.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2007, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/robert-reich-ayn-rand/14669. Accessed 27 Sep 2024.
Related Term Papers:
Ayn Rand: A Woman Objectified Early Life Research Proposal
Ayn Rand: A Woman Objectified
Early Life and Experiences Under Oppressive Regimes:
Ayn Rand was born Alisa Rosenbaum in St. Petersburg, Russia in 1905. A self-taught reader, she aspired to… read more
Research Proposal 4 pages (1157 words) Sources: 7 Topic: Literature / Poetry
Ayn Rand's Life and Work Contains Three Research Paper
Ayn Rand's life and work contains three main sections. First, it describes her life from a biographical viewpoint. Second, it discusses key features of her works. Third, it critiques Rand's… read more
Research Paper 5 pages (1851 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Literature / Poetry
Robert Reich Formal U.S Secretary of Labor Term Paper
Robert Reich formal u.s secretary of labor during the clinton's administratation. conduct some reserch on the current administration's labor policies.Has anything been done to pursue the goals Reich articulated in… read more
Term Paper 5 pages (1517 words) Sources: 3 Style: MLA Topic: Economics / Finance / Banking
Objectivism Ayn Rand, Philosopher Thesis
Objectivism
Ayn Rand, philosopher during the beginning of the 20th century, can be said to have pioneered the concept of objectivism. She explicates this ideal in many of her works,… read more
Thesis 2 pages (697 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Literature / Poetry
Ayn Rand's Objectivist Philosophy Guilt and Original Essay
AYN RAND'S OBJECTIVIST PHILOSOPHY
Guilt and Original Sin:
I completely agree with Rand's position on the futility and destructiveness of the entire concept of Original Sin in human life and… read more
Essay 2 pages (590 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry
Fri, Sep 27, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!