Term Paper on "Liberalism and Realism"

Term Paper 4 pages (1269 words) Sources: 6

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Realism and Liberalism in Foreign Relations

As the civil war in Syria careens into its second year of savage sectarian violence, forcing the American government once again to consider the possibility of military intervention in the name of humanitarian aid, the philosophical approach to foreign policy favored by the ostensibly liberal President Obama has been shown to be based on a stark sense of realism. Rather than succumb to the understandable urge to apply democratic ideals to his decision making process during this time of heightened international concern, especially after reports of chemical weapons attacks have emerged from Syria's battlegrounds, President Obama has carefully engaged in a process of political calculus, weighing the potential impact of intervention against the consequences of inaction. As the New York Times observed of the Obama Administration's handling of the similarly volatile transfer of power in Egypt in 2011, "from the war on terror to the current unrest in Egypt, his foreign policy has owed far more to conservative realpolitik than to any left-wing vision of international affairs"1 (Douthat, 2011, pg. 1). Considering the vital role that the realist theory of international relations is likely to play in America's future foreign policy decisions, it is important to understand the foundational precepts on which this school of thought was founded, and how realism has been adapted to the constructs of the modern geopolitical map. The realist approach to foreign policy has been the dominant ideology of international relations since Thucydides penned his History of the Peloponnesian War, exposing the

1 Douthat, Ross. "Obama the Realist." The New York Times, February 07, 2011.

mythology of war to be merely myth, while revealing the truth that the greatest of conflicts are typically rooted in the pragmatic pursuit of political power.

Since the introduction of realist thought thousands of years ago, the evolution in terms has led to the introduction of neorealism, and scholars who are proponents of this progressive worldview "have generated two theories of foreign policy, offensive and defensive realism, which both start from the assumption that the international system is comprised of unitary, rational states motivated by a desire for security"2 (Rose, 1998, pg. 149). The overriding tendency of states to act in accordance with their own self-interest forms the basis of realist theories of foreign policy, because as history has routinely demonstrated, instances in which an ideal becomes worthy of self-sacrifice are a rare confluence of cultural circumstances, rather than the normative method of governance. From this perspective of neoclassical realism, the framework of international relations represents nothing more than "the record of rational states reacting properly to clear systemic incentives, coming into conflict only in those circumstances when the security dilemma is heightened to fever pitch"3 (Rose, 1998, pg. 150). The escalating conflict in Syria has borne this theory out once again, proving that, despite the idealistic calls for aid voiced by liberals, unless the situation presents a clear security risk to the United States and its interests abroad, the foreign policy realism of President Obama will preclude the use of direct military intervention.

2 Rose, Gideon. "Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy." World politics 51 (1998): 144-172

3 Ibid.

Standing as an alternative to the rigidity of realism-based foreign policy, the progressive model of international relations known as liberalism is predicated on the notion that domestic political philosophies should provide the guiding principles for geopolitical conduct. Rather than attribute the distribution of power among states to their relative capability to exploit resources, as realism proposes, a liberalist foreign policy holds that each state's distinct internal attributes, including cultural composition, religious affiliation, economic system, and governance structure, are the determining factors in its overall approach to international relations. One of the central aspects of the liberal worldview of foreign policy has emerged to reflect the increasing economic… READ MORE

How to Reference "Liberalism and Realism" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Realism and the End of the Cold War Seminar Paper

Realism and the End of the Cold War

The field of international relations has always been dominated by one theory or another that tried to explain, through different mechanisms and… read more

Seminar Paper 3 pages (1070 words) Sources: 0 Topic: World History

---

Neo-Realism vs. Liberalism Essay

Neo Realism vs. Liberalism

Compare and contrast Neo-Realism vs. Liberalism. Pick a historical event and discuss how each theory would explain it. Which one do you think is more accurate… read more

Essay 3 pages (1073 words) Sources: 3 Topic: World History

---

Theory and Grand Strategy Essay

Grand Strategy

Liberalism and how it sheds light on the American grand strategy as applied to the world war

The theoretical aspects of realism, liberalism and constructivism exemplify a political… read more

Essay 4 pages (1893 words) Sources: 4 Style: Chicago Topic: Government / Politics

---

Neo Liberalism Explain How Neo-Liberalism Agrees Journal

Neo Liberalism

Explain how Neo-Liberalism agrees with Neo-Realism

Neo-liberalism is focusing on different nations states and private entities working together to improve trade among the various actors. This is designed… read more

Journal 3 pages (855 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Government / Politics

---

American Public Opinion Toward Iran Literature Review

Realism and Liberalism in U.S. Foreign Policy Towards Iran

One of the longer international conflicts in recent history is the perpetual state of conflict which has existed between the United… read more

Literature Review 4 pages (1425 words) Sources: 7 Topic: Israel / Palestine / Arab World

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>