Term Paper on "Kashmir Dispute"

Term Paper 8 pages (2450 words) Sources: 1+

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Realism: Kashmira

L. Jones

The Kashmir Issue:

realist perspective

Whenever one tries to understand a controversial issue of any kind, it is important to consider the core issues at hand. After all, by definition any controversial issue is made up of at least two opposing sides, each with some pretty convincing arguments. If this were not the case, the issue certainly would not fit into the controversial category. However, it is a grave mistake to imagine that one's examination and interpretation of the issue, even if one is solidly outside of the fray and supposedly unbiased on the matter, is free from the possible taint of errors of reasoning or perspective. This is because matters of fact, truth, and right are hardly as simple as many suppose. One excellent example of this truth is represented by the debate over the conflict in Kashmir.

From the dawn of philosophy, many have argued about the precise nature of reality, of right and wrong and propensity of humanity to fall prey to a shadowy and false illusion of real understanding. Perhaps in response to this, the modern thinker and author, Roy Bhaskar came up with a model of examining the truth, especially as it relates to social events called by some "Critical Realism." In simple terms, this method "...came as a critique of Positivism and Hermeneutics, as well as a new philosophical approach to scientific thinking (Kaboub, 2000)," and it entails accepting the belief that a thing is real if it can result in or cause visible and material consequences (Kaboub). Thus, examples of reality may include such things as poverty, an illness, fire, unemployment, warfare, a physical confrontation, etc. Further, and perhaps even more important in the context of the Kashmir conflict, is the notion that not only is reality a "thing" indicated by its ability to cause some effect, but that the individual's understanding or acknowledgement of reality is "...subject to all kinds of historical and other influences. It draws a clear distinction between reality and our knowledge of reality (Basden, 2004)."

In order to explore this, let us consider the "bones" of the conflict in Kashmir.

The Kashmir Dispute:

Background

Perhaps one of the oldest causes of conflict and war is the struggle over land territory. In the case of the region of Kashmir, its "ownership" has been contested even before today's struggle between India and Pakistan. In fact, the issue was such a difficult one that the British (seemingly fond of occupying nations, and then "fixing" them upon departure -- see "Palestine"), left the issue to Kashmir itself, allowing the Kashmiris the "freedom" to attach itself to either India or Pakistan as they saw fit. However, unable, or unwilling to push for a full independent state, the then Maharaja, Hari Singh, decided to "...accede to India, signing over key powers to the Indian Government - in return for military aid and a promised referendum (BBC, 2002)."

Of course, as is often the case, the result of Kashmir's alliance with India was neither clear or simple -- with Pakistan claiming rights to the region, serving as a catalyst for two of the three wars between India and Pakistan. Additionally, within Kashmir itself, many dispute India's claims on the region -- desiring either an alliance with Pakistan, or complete independence from both nations. In simple terms, the key issues are:

Islamabad says Kashmir should have become part of Pakistan in 1947, because Muslims are in the majority in the region.

Pakistan also argues that Kashmiris should be allowed to vote in a referendum on their future, following numerous UN resolutions on the issue.

Delhi, however, does not want international debate on the issue, arguing that the Simla Agreement of 1972 provided for a resolution through bilateral talks.

India points to the Instrument of Accession signed in October 1947 by the Maharaja, Hari Singh.

Both India and Pakistan reject the so-called "third option" of Kashmiri independence. (BBC).

Certainly, on the surface, it seems that the conflict over Kashmir is a simple one -- based on issues of ownership and land. That said, it is easy to imagine that India "owns" Kashmir fair and square. After all, the then ruler, Maharaja Singh "signed it over" back in the 1940's. However, much as in any conflict that boils down to war, the issues that prompt the actual driving controversy -- or the impetus for the resolution of the problem based on "truth" is the human effects of the problem. Indeed, it is this "reality" that prompts the seeking of the facts upon which Bhaskar's theories on critical realism may shed some light.

The Human Toll

Any war causes immense human suffering. From poverty, destruction of property, war crimes, blight and death -- Kashmir has seen its fill of all. According to the article written by Christine Walsh for the online publication India New England, many people accuse India of committing atrocious human rights violations against the people of Kashmir. However, many on the "Indian side" respond that the real issue is not the suffering of the people, but instead "who started it." For example, Walsh quotes one Mohanram Ramalinkgam, president of an American-Indian anti-defamation association, as saying, "People who know what the Kashmir issue is know who started the war,' he said. 'There were three wars over Kashmir and, all three times, everyone knows Pakistan was the aggressor and started the war (Walsh, 2003)."

However, according to some outside witnesses visiting the territory, the human toll is quite horrific. Again, according to Walsh, Republican state Rep. Robert Giuda said he witnessed evidence of state-sponsored terrorism by the Indian government -- including "...young children missing limbs, adults missing limbs, men whose daughters and wives were gang-raped and shot in front of them, purportedly at the hand of the Indian Army...(Walsh)." He also noted, that although he initially intended to visit Kashmir "as a vacation," he eventually found himself "getting involved in trying to find out what the hell was going on in Kashmir..."

Thus, armed by what he "discovered" to be the truth in Kashmir -- that India should immediately stop its activities there, he returned to the United States to "facilitate a just, peaceful and rapid resolution to the Kashmiri conflict between India and Pakistan."

However, many Indians (some say personifications of their government's position), take offence to his (and many other's) position, that Kashmiri's are suffering under Indian control and must be emancipated (into Pakistani control). In specific, they assert that there are "two sides to the story," citing "cross-boarder terrorism," an inflation of the level of atrocities committed by the Indian army, and that it is ultimately "nobody's business" except the governments of India and Pakistan. Further, some, like the office of the Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, assert (much like Israel), that they will "...talk to Pakistan as soon as they stop sponsoring cross-border terrorism," that, "...The Indian Army is one of the finest professional armies in the world...Any kind of charges are investigated promptly (Walsh)."

Additionally, India and her representatives (unlike Pakistan, and again, much like Israel), seem to be strongly opposed to the presence of outside "eyes" on the situation and their activities, stating in response to a call for United Nations human-rights monitors, "We have our own human-rights commissions...This is a national, democratic society. We don't need outside human rights watchers to come (Walsh)." Of course, this kind of calm reasoning seems to give one pause -- especially given the fact that since 1989 somewhere between 33,000 to 80,000 (BBC, 2002) people have been killed, with countless others suffering injury, poverty, and misery as a direct result of the dispute between the two nations.

What Is the Truth?

Given all of the controversy over the Kashmir problem, how can one arrive at any truth? After all, both sides believe that they are in the right, that the suffering is caused by the actions of the other side, and that the solution to the problem lies in the eventual triumph of their respective government over the territory. Does this mean that it is all "relative" and that there is no reality or ultimate right answer?

Perhaps one of the most important contributions of critical realism is its ability to shed light on the possibility of a "truth" or the "truths" of any given situation, including this one. However, first it is important to understand the concept of "reality" as defined in critical. Again, according to Fadhel Kaboub in his 2000 work, "Roy Bhaskar's Critical Realism: A Brief Overview and a Critical Evaluation," "It is important to define reality in the critical realist paradigm. Reality exists independently of us and of our knowledge and/or perception of it. Failure to distinguish between reality and our conception of it is referred to as the epistemic fallacy." This means that we must not only take into account our unique perspective based on our personal circumstances and the effect that may have on our grasp of the reality of any situation, but… READ MORE

How to Reference "Kashmir Dispute" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Kashmir Is a Territory Located Research Paper

Kashmir is a territory located in the upper northwestern section of Southern Asia. As a country, Kashmir has a long and bitter history as several countries continue to assert their… read more

Research Paper 2 pages (604 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Asian History / Asia

---

First Kashmir War 1947-1948 Background Information Research Paper

Kashmir War 1947-1948

India and Pakistan have always been bitter historical rivals and conflicts have risen not only because of territorial disputes but religious / ideological differences as well. During… read more

Research Paper 2 pages (638 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Asian History / Asia

---

India Relationship With the United States Term Paper

India-U.S. Relations: A Look back and forward

With a booming capitalist society, a large population, a strategic location and an established democracy, India would be a natural ally in a… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (3329 words) Sources: 5 Style: APA Topic: Asian History / Asia

---

India Pakistan Conflicts Thesis

India-Pakistan Conflict

A GLOBALLY CATASTROPHIC COMMUNICATION GAP

India

The Republic of India measures 3.1 million square kilometers and is located on the Indian Plate in South Asia (BBC, 2009). It… read more

Thesis 8 pages (2332 words) Sources: 6 Style: APA Topic: Asian History / Asia

---

Bush Doctrine Term Paper

Bush doctrine

From the early years of the Cold War in the post World War II period until recently, the United States had followed a foreign policy of 'containment.' The… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (3461 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Military / Army / Navy / Marines

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>