Research Proposal on "Use of Real Options Theory in Financial Management Modeling"

Research Proposal 8 pages (2677 words) Sources: 10 Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Real Options Theory in Financial Management and Modeling

Real options theory uses traditional financial options theory and applies to them to real investments. This combination adds flexibility to management decisions, allowing management to capitalize on future uncertainties. Theoretically, real options theory can bring the traditional discipline of the financial markets to company opportunities. This is important, because financial markets have traditionally had an advantage over real investments, in that they provide greater opportunities to exit financial strategies that are not working. Though it has been in use for approximately a decade, the real-options approach is considered state-of-the-art because it "allows management to characterize and communicate the strategic value of an investment project" (Real options in theory and practice, 2008). It also improves upon traditional methods, such as net present value, which "fail to accurately capture the economic value of investments in an environment of widespread uncertainty and rapid change" (Real options in theory and practice, 2008). If any economic time in recent history could be described as rapidly changing or uncertain, the present economic climate certainly qualifies, which means that if real options theory can live up to its hype, it may be the best approach for managers to take to weather the current economic crises.

Definition

Because real options analysis extends financial option theory to the financial consideration of real assets, one must understand financial option theory in order to understand how it could be applied to real assets. "A financial option gives its owner the right- but not the obligation- to purchase or sell a security at a given price. Analogously, a company that has a real option has the right- but not the obligation- to make a potentially value-accretive investment. Investment examples include new plants, line extensions, joint ventures, and licensing agreements" (Mauboussin, 1999). Real option analysis does not replace more traditional methods of investment opportunity valuation, like discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, but, instead, compliments them.

Discounted cash flow analysis

Traditional DCF "analysis uses future free cash flow projections and discounts them (most often using the weighted average cost of capital) to arrive at a present value, which is used to evaluate the potential for investment. If the value arrived at through DCF analysis is higher than the current cost of the investment, the opportunity may be a good one" (Discounted cash flow- DCF, 2009). While DCF can be a very helpful tool, it has a rigidity that hampers its utility in a changing and uncertain business market. Therefore, DCF is inferior to real options analysis in at least three ways. First, DCF lacks the flexibility that real options analysis has. This is because the net present value (NPV) rule fails to "factor in the value of uncertainty." (Mauboussin, 1999). DCF also lacks the ability to look at future investments on a contingent basis, which can cause them to make financial decisions that seem irresponsible from a present-day perspective, when they may actually be financially sound decisions, designed to open up access to future investment opportunities. Under the NPV rule, these investments would be deemed to have negative value, making it clear that traditional DCF analysis does not adequately consider the value of future economic opportunities. Finally, traditional DCF analysis does not adequately reflect the economic opportunities present in volatile markets. "In standard finance, higher volatility means higher discount rates and lower net present values. In options theory, higher volatility- because of asymmetric payoff schemes- leads to higher option value" (Mauboussin, 1999).

Real option valuation

Although real options can be valued in different ways, the binomial option-pricing method is one of the most widely used of those methods. In traditional options analysis, the "binomial model breaks down the time to expiration into potentially a very large number of time intervals, or steps" (Hoadley, 2009). While there is no set date of expiration for most real assets, using the binomial model approach in real option analysis one uses the same type of decision tree to determine all of the possible paths that the real asset could take and determine the terminal value of the asset depending on the path. One then works backwards to determine the value of the asset at each different step of the process. In order to understand the binomial option-pricing approach, it is critical to remember that each point on the tree only represents the option of making an investment. The options will not be exercised unless they have a positive value.

One widely-used version of the binomial model is the Black and Scholes approach, which has traditionally been used to value stock options. This approach has also been successfully applied in valuing real options in long-term projects characterized by technical uncertainty. Consideration of these projects usually requires "the consideration of technical and financial risks to quantify the true economic cost associated with the project" (Espinoza & Luccioni, 2007). In fact:

Because projects take time to complete, the cost to complete the project usually includes two different kinds of uncertainties: technical and market uncertainty. For instance, in the case of a contaminated site, technical uncertainty would be: How much contamination is present and, therefore, how much it is going to cost to remediate the site? Technical uncertainty can only be resolved by undertaking the remediation project; actual cost unfolds as the project proceeds. The second kind of uncertainty, referred to as input cost uncertainty, is external to the project. It arises because input prices for labor and materials fluctuate over time (Espinoza & Luccioni, 2007).

To determine the costs of options at different points in time, one can resort to complicated partial differential equations, or simply resort to a modified binomial model, which can approximate the same results as more complex models (Espinoza & Luccioni, 2007).

One can take a linear or a non-linear approach to real-options valuation. One such model is the threshold model. Threshold models have the ability to investigate pricing relationships in different areas. "The law of one price commands equal prices across spatial markets, but transaction costs and other market frictions allow for temporary departure from equilibrium" (Koekebakker, & Sodal, 2007). This is especially relevant in an American market, where transaction costs can be expected to be at least twice as high as transaction costs in other areas of the world. Moreover, threshold models "suggest much faster adjustments in response to deviation to equilibrium than in is the case when thresholds are ignored" (Koekebakker, & Sodal, 2007). Threshold models are useful in more complex situations, where modified binomial models may be too simplistic to accurately predict performance.

Financial Planning

Real options analysis involves a different approach to financial modeling than traditional business analysis. Real option analysis presents three types of option categories. These categories include: invest/grow, defer/learn, and divest/shrink (Mauboussin, 1999). The invest/grow category represents the optimistic point-of-view and presents three options for a business: scale up, switch up, and scope up (Mauboussin, 1999). The scale-up option means that "well positioned businesses can scale up later through cost-effective sequential investments as market grows" and would be most useful in high technology, multinational, strategic acquisition and R&D intensive businesses (Mauboussin, 1999). The switch-up option is "a flexibility option to switch products, process on plants given a shift in underlying price or demand of inputs or outputs" and is best utilized when the company deals with small-batch goods production, utilities, or farming (Mauboussin, 1999). The scope-up option applies when a business is ready to extend its traditional scope of business and implies that "investments in proprietary assets in one industry enables company to enter another industry cost effectively," and is used with companies that are the de-facto standard bearers in an industry or companies with a lock-in (Mauboussin, 1999).

The neutral approach is represented by the defer/learn category. The study/start option is best used with companies that deal in natural resources or real estate development and is characterized by delaying "investment until more information or skill is acquired" (Mauboussin, 1999). While this approach may be most applicable to a business dealing with natural resources, where more study may be necessary, the study/start approach can be applied successfully in any industry. Basically, the study/start approach is applicable any time that a company wishes to do more research in an area before committing to a financial plan. This is an area of corporate valuation that can be very tricky, because it deals with previously unchartered financial waters:

Corporate valuation is certainly a challenging subject. The challenge is greater when the firm subject to valuation is a start-up since the task must be accomplished without any information about its past performance supporting the necessary forecasts. The difficulties practically pile up when the industry is new as well. That is not all, the subject can get more complicated when the start-up is one of those firms for which innovation is the main driver of value because there is much uncertainty surrounding the success - and survival - of these firms (Maya, 2004).

In order to perform these necessary financial forecasts, regardless of the… READ MORE

How to Reference "Use of Real Options Theory in Financial Management Modeling" Research Proposal in a Bibliography

Related Research Proposals:

Use of Real Options Theory in Financial Management Modeling Term Paper

Real Options Theory in the Real World

It has been more than three quarters of a century since economic times were uncertain as they have been over the past several… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1336 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Economics / Finance / Banking

---

Applied Management and Decision Sciences Thesis

management and decision sciences from various theorists; and, analyzes the evolution of managerial decision making from scientific management to the complicated forecasting models used today. The objectives of the Breadth… read more

Thesis 90 pages (25680 words) Sources: 40 Topic: Management / Organizations

---

Real Estate in Greece Research Proposal

Real Estate in Greece

The work of Costa Siomopoulos entitled: "Fast Growth for Greek Real Estate" state that over the past few years that there has been integration of real… read more

Research Proposal 20 pages (6076 words) Sources: 150 Style: Harvard Topic: Urban Studies / City Planning / Housing

---

Personal Financial Management Term Paper

Financial Planning

Charting the Course: Planning for Life after College

It has frequently been said that the end of college is not an end at all, but is rather the… read more

Term Paper 56 pages (15430 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Career / Labor / Human Resources

---

Financial Analysis of International Airlines Group Thesis

Financial Analysis of International Airlines Group

Supervisor

Contact Details

Confidentiality Restrictions

Today, the aviation industry is faced with skyrocketing energy costs, the lingering aftereffects of the Great Recession of 2008… read more

Thesis 19 pages (5321 words) Sources: 30 Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>