Term Paper on "Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake"

Term Paper 6 pages (2419 words) Sources: 7

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Purges -- Stalin's Great Blunder

The ghost of Stalin will circle the earth for a long time to come… Almost everyone has renounced his legacy, but many still draw their strength from him. -- Milovan Djilas

Investigation - Decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union, sixty years after the death of Josef Stalin, and seventy-five years after the era of the Great Purges in the U.S.S.R., the question of causality and control within the Stalin regime continues to plague historians. Despite the opening of archival material and greater academic openness for Russian scholars, there is still no definitive agreement on the extent of control that Stalin had over the Communist Party and indeed, how much direct responsibility one can credit the dictator over the period known as the "Great Terror."

Part of this terroristic period was a series of political and pseudo-campaigns known as the Purges, designed ostensibly to rid the Party of any dissent when, in fact were concocted to shore up a paranoid leader and his cadre's ability to govern without dissent. Using a dogmatic legal professor named Andrei Vyshinsky, a large-scale purge of the Communist Party and various governmental officials at all levels, repression and persecution of thousands of unaffiliated citizens, widespread surveillance, suspicion, and the infamous "knock at 3am" contributed to a climate in which half the population was wary of the other half of the population. In fact, this time may be reflected by a remark by Stalin, "There is a person, there is a problem."

Evidence- One of the most recent portrayals of Josef Stalin was eerily reminiscent of gazing into the heart o
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
f a true sociopath. This Stalin calmly answered Winston Churchill's query over dinner one evening while discussing Allied responses to Hitler. Churchill remarked that he had always been interested in the rapid modernization that occurred in Russian Agriculture after the Revolution. He asked Stalin how this was accomplished in view of the rich-peasants, the Kulaks. Stalin calmly looked up and between sips of his wine said, "It was simple, we shot them all" (Armstrong, et.al. 2009; Rees, 2010).

While a number of academic subdivisions present cogent arguments, there are two major schools of thought regarding the subject: the "standard" scholarship, deeply imbedded in Cold War ideology and causality that sees Stalin as the evil mastermind and deftly orchestrated terror controlled by him and his henchmen. The revisionist and post-revisionist school, however, looks at fascist regimes and agrees that the consequences were horrific. They are in no way apologists for actions or terror. However, their argument is that Stalin was more a force for moderation -- keeping the country together while necessary modernization occurred. Then, there is the approach that Stalin was in control of setting up a vast bureaucracy, but not of individual decisions -- and as historians have seen in Nazi Germany, a number of excesses were clearly the result of power-hungry middle bureaucrats.

Sources - in order to adequately survey the rich and contentious literature surround the Stalinist debate, it is necessary to begin decades ago, during the Cold War Era, when Uncle Joe was no longer a friend and ally to the United States in the defeat of Hitler and Tojo. Surveying this vast, and continually evolving, literature on Stalin and Stalinism, one is almost immediately struck by a certain periodicity in language, assumptions, and even modality of analysis. In part this seems to reflect the ebb and flow of the Cold War, the fall of the Soviet Union, and the almost uninterrupted re-examination within Russian and Soviet scholarship of Stalin's leadership since Khrushchev's startling revelations before the XX Party Congress in 1956.

The earliest works on Stalinism, for instance, published in the 1930s and 1940s, tended to emphasize the revolutions in administration that Stalin brought to the Soviet Union. These may be categorized into emigre literature, and are critical of both Stalin the man and Stalin the leader. However, these works also have a political agenda, but do provide information to the reader about life under a totalitarian regime, but also tend to blame Stalin for betraying Lenin, which also establishing their own agenda for change. The Orlov (1953) is probably the most valuable of this set, but other examples are Trotsky (1957), Abramovitch (1962), and Amba (1952).

For most of the 1960s through the early 1990s, the focus seemed to shift toward viewing the Stalinist phenomenon as a colossal effort of modernization, driven by a peculiarly xenophobic expression of Great Russian Nationalism dating back to Ivan the Great. While the prose followed the tensions of the Cold War to some extreme, the most prevalent view was Stalin as a monster -- a tyrant totally in control of this monolithic and megalithic machine. This view was epitomized by Robert Conquest in the Great Terror, first published in 1968, and then updated as information and trends changed. The work is valuable, because it reflects the thinking of the Cold War period, and also spurred numerous revisionist approaches to the topic.

In the 1980s, however, newer scholarship tended to adopt a more balanced approach, breaking down Stalin's thirty-year rule into constituent "sub-periods," and studying each not as an unchanging system, but as a response to a specific set of political, economic, and social circumstances. The newer scholars were rethinking the entire philosophical basis of Stalinism and asking if the Robert Conquest paradigm of an all-powerful and omniscient tyrant was indeed even viable. These scholars often looked outside the Moscow-Leningrad connection to establish trend in bureaucratic behavior, the movement of goods and services, and the real substance of internal State power. J. Arch Getty, now at UCLA, epitomized this approach -- not by denying Stalinism or the tyrant Stalin, but by asking us to imagine a country in which it was even potentially possible for one person to manage that kind of terrorist system. Instead, the value of this source, and similar sources, is to realize that while the "tone" may be set from the top, the actions are carried out by tactitions (Getty, 1985).

Once new archival materials were opened, scholars had a field day. One might have thought that this would settle the argument but, in fact, it has made it far more complex in nature: interpretation, chronology, and place are even more important as are source materials and perspectives. Once the Soviet structure collapsed even the most ardent Sovietologists found that the country was in far worse shape than even the most pessimistic predicted. The economy was in total shambles, the impact of totalitarian indoctrination deep into society was, at best, superficial, the power of national sentiment among ethnic minorities and nationalism were more powerful and surprising than perceived by the West, and finally, whatever the cause, it was now possible for historians to look back at the entire era; Leninist preparation from the late 1890s, the issues with retaining power in 1917, the death of Lenin in 1924, and what it would take to move such a dinosaruic system to a never reached goal of self-sufficiency and the exporting of world revolution. This valuable and more balance approach, along with a number of more primary sources may be found in books like the Rise and Fall of the Soviet Union (McCauley, 2007).

Analysis - Much of what actually occurred during the years of Stalinism was not that difficult to understand when looking at it in retrospect. and, we find that many of the political and social policies were not even that unique: state-sponsored rapid modernization was the rule, not the exception, in the 20th century. and, one can find plenty of examples of monolithic economies that did not tolerate multi-party systems, outlawed democracy, and had dictators -- military or otherwise. One feature, though, certainly that leads us to our next section, is the level of violence that Stalinism inflicted upon the population -- especially through the secret police and GULAG system of incarceration. In fact, in the 20th century, if one counts the Purges, the GULAGs, lesser prisons, deportation, wiping out of the kulaks, forced starvation, and the toll from World War II due to government factors, one certainly can see Stalinism as one of the bloodiest regimes ever conceived (Kotkin in Hoffman, 2002).

Stalin, however, needed a legal mouthpiece to purge the best and the brightest, the intelligentsia, from the rank and file who might see through his tyranny and lack of adherence to either Leninism or true Marxism. His choice, lawyer Andrei Vyshinsky - a minor bureaucrat thrust into the limelight. Vyshinsky certainly had a great impact on the justification and legal paradigm of the terror -- so much so that the Trials themselves almost form a template of the terror. Although Vyshinsky became a "non-person" after Stalin's death, the accomplishment of a unified Soviet legal theory and procedure remained in place ( Rittersporn, 1992). This seems to have been Vyshinsky's goal from the very beginning. In his the Law of the Soviet State, Vyshinsky set down his conception of the… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake" Assignment:

-The Intelligentsia Purge was Stalin*****'s greatest mistake as opposed to his economy command system, or another great mistake.

-Able to change the specific purge if information isn*****'t sufficient, but ideally the Intelligentsia purge.

-It*****'s an argument, must be able to defend/or put down both sides

-7 sources minimum, all used equally throughout paper

-5 sources MUST be books

-Cannot use wikipedia, world book, an encyclopedia, etc.

-Will be submitted to turnitin.com

-CANNOT exceed 2000 words, minimum of 1700 words

7 lettered sections as followed

A. Plan of investigation (100-150 words)

1. state the topic of the investigation, which should be formulated as a question

2. define the scope of the investigation

3. explain the method of the investigation

- Clear statement of what*****'s being written

B. Summary of evidence (500-600 words)

should consist of factual material that is

1. drawn from sources that are appropriate for the investigation

2. correctly and consistently references

3. organized thematically or chronologically

-Historical background, all facts, no analysis

C. Evaluation of sources (300-400 words)

1. a critical evaluation of two important sources appropriate to the investigation

2. explicit reference to the origin, purpose, value and limitation of the selected sources

-2 different views for both sources

-O.P.V.L

~Origin (author, credentials), Purpose (why did they write it?), Value *why does this source have value to your

argument?), Limitations (what is the bias?)

D. Analysis (500-600 words)

1. an analysis that breaks down the complex issues in order to bring out the essential elements, any underlying

assumptions and any interrelationships involved

2. an understanding of the issue in its historical context

3. a critical examination of the factual material presented in section B

4. an awareness of the significance of the sources used, especially those evaluated in section C

5. a consideration of different interpretations of evidence, where appropriate.

-own point of view/must be backed by research/2-3 citations per paragraph

E. Conclusion (150-200 words)

-Must be clearly stated, consistent with the evidence presented and relevant to the research question. No new

evidence.

F. Same as section C

Evaluation of sources (300-400 words)

1. a critical evaluation of two important sources appropriate to the investigation

2. explicit reference to the origin, purpose, value and limitation of the selected sources

-2 different views for both sources

-O.P.V.L

~Origin (author, credentials), Purpose (why did they write it?), Value *why does this source have value to your

argument?), Limitations (what is the bias?)

How to Reference "Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2011, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/purges-stalin-great-blunder/8297396. Accessed 6 Jul 2024.

Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake (2011). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/purges-stalin-great-blunder/8297396
A1-TermPaper.com. (2011). Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/purges-stalin-great-blunder/8297396 [Accessed 6 Jul, 2024].
”Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake” 2011. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/purges-stalin-great-blunder/8297396.
”Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/purges-stalin-great-blunder/8297396.
[1] ”Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/purges-stalin-great-blunder/8297396. [Accessed: 6-Jul-2024].
1. Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2011 [cited 6 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/purges-stalin-great-blunder/8297396
1. Intelligentsia Purge Was Stalin's Greatest Mistake. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/purges-stalin-great-blunder/8297396. Published 2011. Accessed July 6, 2024.

Related Term Papers:

Stalin's Use of Charisma Term Paper

Paper Icon

Stalin's Use Of Charisma In His Taking Control Of Power In The Soviet Union

According to the historian Hiroaki Kuromiya, Joseph Stalin's tyrannical rule of the Soviet Union was not… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (667 words) Sources: 1 Style: MLA Topic: World History


US Ignorance of Stalin's Crimes for Political and Diplomatic Purposes Term Paper

Paper Icon

U.S. ignorance of Stalin's crimes for political and diplomatic purposes

The history of the Soviet Union represents one of the most controversial aspects of the history of the world. Its… read more

Term Paper 20 pages (6893 words) Sources: 22 Style: Chicago Topic: World History


East Africa's Great Rift Valley Article Review

Paper Icon

East Africa's Great Rift Valley

Overview / Main Points

Geologists know a great deal about the tectonic plates that form the Earth's crust around the world. They know in which… read more

Article Review 2 pages (781 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: African History / Africa


Great Depression Issues Essay

Paper Icon

Great Depression Issues

The Great Depression officially began in October of 1929 with the failure of the American banking system based on the Stock Market Crash and other economic abnormalities.… read more

Essay 3 pages (1097 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Race / Ethnic Studies / Racism


Charisma Leader-Joseph Stalin's Political Career Term Paper

Paper Icon

Charisma leader-Joseph Stalin

Joseph Stalin's political career grew out of two major circumstances mixed together. On one hand there was the unstable situation that the fallen monarchy had left behind,… read more

Term Paper 1 pages (387 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Government / Politics


Sat, Jul 6, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!