Thesis on "Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured"

Thesis 6 pages (1570 words) Sources: 5 Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Psychology - Human Observation

HUMAN OBSERVATION

Gathering Baseline Information

Attractiveness plays a fundamental role in the way that humans respond to one another and can even compromise security functions in law enforcement and private- sector physical security maintenance. Numerous previous studies have documented the influence of relative attractiveness on the friendliness of strangers, vocational interview assessment (Macionis, 2003), and on the generosity and helpfulness of passersby in situations where there assistance would obviously have been appreciated but were not necessitated by emergency, such as the dropping of paperwork by a cohort in an elevator next to research subjects (Gerrig & Zimbardo, 2007).

In the physical security industry, if officers and agents are susceptible to this natural dynamics of gender relations, awareness training should address that potential security lapse and the specific situations in which it may arise. Generally, this issue tends to arise more in connection with the influence of female attractiveness on male behavior than the reverse, as well as more than same-sex encounters (Hockenbury & Hockenbury, 2007; LeVay, 1994; Zuk, 2002). Theory:

In long-term physical security checkpoints such as limited public access facilities or private property, checkpoint staff are responsible for adhering strictly to procedures and protocols. In some security situations involving manned checkpoints, male security staff are susceptible to the influence of female attractiveness in altering their adherence to protocol, particularly in low-level-of-risk situations where officer
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
and agents are, by order, prohibited from exercising discretion, such as permitting access based on personal familiarity where an I.D. card is absolutely required.

It is anticipated that female attractiveness can influence the judgment of male perimeter security agents in certain circumstances. It is not anticipated that male subjects will suspend the rules to permit unauthorized access to attractive female strangers.

Rather, it is anticipated that in situations that pose only an issue of technical rule compliance on the part of the agent (but no perceived security risk), female attractiveness can influence the degree to which male security agents adhere to technical rules. It is also expected that physical appearance is much less likely to influence behavior in all other situations (i.e. male agent/male cohort, and female agent/highly attractive male cohort). Hypothesis: The experimental hypothesis is that where physical security agents are responsible for adhering to technical rules without exception, they are more likely to suspend those rules in innocuous security situations (such as involving individuals they recognize first- hand) when the cohort is an attractive female than for both unattractive females and males. For the purpose of this experiment, "attractiveness" was determined by (1) objective measurement of facial symmetry known to be a strong determinant of physical attractiveness in humans and myriad other animal species (LeVay, 1994; Zuk, 2002) and (2) subjective responses of independent test subjects rating the physical attractiveness of still photographs of the cohorts. It is hypothesized that male checkpoint personnel compliance with technical protocols will be compromised by the influence of female attractiveness in low security risk situations.

Experimental Design and Procedure: The experiment was conducted on a large government building unscreened access to which is restricted to individuals (mostly federal employees) bearing official government-issued ID cards in which silicon circuitry triggers automatic doors to open, admitting one individual at a time. Individuals without ID cards (such as visitors and citizens representing themselves or conducting other official business in government agency) offices must pass through an X-ray and metal detection screening station.

Existing protocol for checkpoint personnel specifically prohibit security agents from admitting individuals failing to present a building ID card, without regard for whether or not they recognize the individual. At various checkpoints throughout several nonconsecutive days, checkpoint personnel were confronted with situations where they were specifically required to deny access and redirect a person they recognize as working in the building but without an I.D. card. Because components of the experiment required comparing the responses of checkpoint personnel to strangers and visual acquaintances, the experimenters first conducted a conditioning period that lasted two months in which cohorts were issued official building I.D. cards and used them to enter the building just as ordinary federal employees do for two months before the actual experimental trials. All of the cohorts purposely greeted the checkpoint agents on several different occasions to ensure that the agents recognized them once the experimental trials began. The experimental trials were recorded via security camera as checkpoint personnel were confronted with the following scenarios involving females of average attractiveness, females rated highly attractive, and males of various levels of attractiveness.

The male cohorts were included to control for the possibility that human attractiveness in general influences the types of interactions being studied. Likewise, highly attractive strangers were also used to test whether or not the anticipated results extend beyond formal adherence to mandatory protocol without any perceived potential security risk (i.e. involving attractive acquaintances) to include situations with perceived genuine potential security risks (i.e. involving attractive strangers). Finally, female checkpoint personnel were presented with the same situations to control for the possibility that attractiveness in general influences the measured behavior. II. Behavior Differences

Results: Ten male security checkpoint personnel and ten female security checkpoint personnel were confronted with similar situations. The researchers recorded the responses of security checkpoint subjects when confronted by average looking males, average looking females, highly attractive males, and highly attractive females in the following circumstances: (1) the individual seeking access is a stranger to the officer; (2) the individual seeking access is someone the officer recognizes. In half the trials, the individual either approached the officer requesting assistance or proceeded to the automatic door but were unable to trigger the mechanism and the officer overseeing that physical barrier or entrance lane responded. Sometimes, the cohorts pretended to have forgotten their I.D. cards at home; alternatively, others possessed their cards but apparently forgot their turnstile access codes.

Specific protocol provisions require the checkpoint agent to deny to any individual seeking access to the "Federal Employee Only" lane except to federal law enforcement personnel bearing agency credentials. In that situation, the checkpoint officer is permitted to override the door mechanism by an emergency control key in his possession. In all other cases, checkpoint officers are required to redirect any individual without a building I.D. card or whose I.D. card fails to work in conjunction with the turnstile access code entered by the individual swiping a building I.D. card. Checkpoint personnel are strictly prohibited from using their emergency access control override keys in any other non-emergency situation.

Data analysis confirmed the experimental hypotheses. Specifically, male cohorts were appropriately denied access by all checkpoint personnel in every instance, regardless of the gender of the checkpoint agent, or the relative attractiveness of the male cohort. Likewise, average looking female cohorts were appropriately denied access in every instance, irrespective of the gender of the checkpoint agent. Strangers not recognized by the agents were appropriately denied access in every situation, irrespective of the gender or relative attractiveness of the cohort or the gender of the checkpoint agent.

However, in thirty-nine percent of encounters between a highly attractive female cohort and a male checkpoint agent, the agent either used his emergency override key to provide the cohort inappropriate access or violated some other element of standard protocol in connection with rendering assistance instead of redirecting the individual to the screened lane marked "All Visitors." In several instances, male checkpoint personnel did not grant immediate physical access but violated other protocol, such as by temporarily abandoning a post to direct the cohort to the security office to verify identity instead of directing the individual to the screening building entrance lane as required. In another instances, a male agent allowed the cohort to enter his secure area and wait there while she telephoned personnel from her office to come to the lobby and sign her in under the… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured" Assignment:

We will pay $120.00 for the completion of this order!!

Human Observation Project

Objectives:

a. To provide students opportunity to apply scientific method to a study of human behavior.

b. To provide working models for key terms.

c. To provide experience in application of behavior change theories.

The Observation Project should consist of a minimum of five typed pages. Information should be provided for each section of the following outline. Write in complete sentences, use good English grammar, and correct spelling. The project is divided into two sections: gathering of baseline information and behavior change. APA documentation style must be used when citing references in context and bibliography. Google "citation.com" for help. Charts and graphs are part of an "A" paper, but are not part of the basic page count of the project.

Baseline Information

I. State the Problem Include description of any research which is related to the subject selected. (For example: Dr. Robert XYZ of Harvard University found that students; failure to maintain eye contact was strongly correlated with increased freshman depression.) Select a behavior that can be easily observed and counted. The selection process is the most difficult part of the observation project.

II. Theory Statement of relationship or cause and effect. (Example: Adults tend to avert their gaze when meeting another adult while walking in a public place. More males will pick up money from the ground than females.)

III. Hypothesis (Example: Adults walking from building 104 to the library on the CTC campus will fail to make eye contact with on-coming adults.) Include operational definitions. (Example: Eye contact is defined as 5 seconds of sustained gaze. Subjects are classified as adults if they are 17 years of age or older.) Operationalize the hypothesis. (On Saturday afternoons between the hours of 1:00 and 3:00 more adult males than females over the age of twenty will pick up a quarter on the floor in front of the main entrance of Sears.)

IV. Procedure or Methodology Describe the steps taken to sample behavior. (Example: The investigator disguised himself as a bush between building 104 and the library in order to complete a naturalistic observation. An assistant was trained to observe traffic in the opposite direction. Stop watches were used to time the length of each gaze. Only subjects without glasses were selected for the study. The behavior samples were taken between 1:00 and 2:00 on Monday and Wednesday afternoon. A tally sheet was used to record behavior.)

V. Results How many samples were gathered? (Example: Fifty qualified subjects, having no glasses and being 17 years of age or older, walked between building 104 and the library between the hours of 1:00 and 2:00 on Monday afternoon. Five of the subjects maintained gaze with on-coming subjects for 5 seconds or more. It was observed that only 10% of the qualified subjects maintained eye contact while others were observed to look away, read while walking, or appeared to be day dreaming....) Charts may be added to the discussion and will count toward the quality of the paper, but not as one of the six minimum requirement pages. Include appropriate age and gender comparisons.

VI. Discussion In paragraph form describe the results and discuss the what the finding indicate about human behavior. (The results indicate that adults walking across the CTC campus to not maintain eye contact with an oncoming adult. Aversion of gaze breaks relationship and isolates one person from another....)

Behavior Change

VII. State the Problem. (Example: Observation results support the theory that students at CTC are not as friendly as they should be. According to the previously cited study by Dr. XYZ this could increase depression on campus, especially among freshmen.) Be specific. What needs to be changed?

VIII. Theory Statement of relationship or cause and effect. (Example: Adults tend to maintain their gaze when meeting another adult who smiles and speaks while walking in a public place.)

IX. Hypothesis Include operational definitions. (Example: Adults walking from building 104 to the library on the CTC campus will maintain eye contact with on-coming adult if the on-coming adult smiles directly at the subject and presents a verbal greeting. Once again define eye contact and adult. Include definitions related to the behavior change.)

X. Procedure or Methodology Include a step by step description of the procedure. Volunteers from psychology 2301 were trained by the investigator to maintain eye contact of 5 seconds or more and provide verbal greeting. Greetings included "Hi, how are you?..." Include the time, day of the week, and the manner in which the count was made as described under IV.)

XI. Results How many samples were gathered? What was the count? Was there a gender or age comparison. Carts may be included. See V.

XII. Discussion Explain what the results indicated about behavior and the relationship to other human behaviors. What should the next step be in researching the problem?

How to Reference "Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured" Thesis in a Bibliography

Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2009, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/psychology-human-observation/2161857. Accessed 5 Jul 2024.

Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured (2009). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/psychology-human-observation/2161857
A1-TermPaper.com. (2009). Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/psychology-human-observation/2161857 [Accessed 5 Jul, 2024].
”Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured” 2009. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/psychology-human-observation/2161857.
”Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/psychology-human-observation/2161857.
[1] ”Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/psychology-human-observation/2161857. [Accessed: 5-Jul-2024].
1. Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2009 [cited 5 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/psychology-human-observation/2161857
1. Opening the Door for Visibly Injured Person vs. Visibly Uninjured. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/psychology-human-observation/2161857. Published 2009. Accessed July 5, 2024.

Related Thesis Papers:

Person Whom I Spoke to Is Approximately Essay

Paper Icon

person whom I spoke to is approximately 30 years older than I. She was describing her childhood experiences when her parents were divorced and the fact that she had to… read more

Essay 4 pages (1583 words) Sources: 6 Topic: Family / Dating / Marriage


Doors by Carl Sandburg Essay

Paper Icon

Doors by Carl Sandburg

The title of the poem Doors immediately conjures what a door is -- a pathway by which you move from one thing to another. From indoors… read more

Essay 2 pages (764 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Literature / Poetry


Person and Work of the Holy Spirit in John Term Paper

Paper Icon

Person and the Work of the Holy Spirit in John

The objective of this work is to read the Gospel of John and to relate in writing what John states… read more

Term Paper 12 pages (3588 words) Sources: 9 Topic: Religion / God / Theology


Opening Statement Term Paper

Paper Icon

Opening Court Statement for Defendants

"Does it explode?" To the infamous question "What happens to a dream deferred," the African-American poet Paul Dunbar suggests that a dream thwarted becomes anger,… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (979 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Family / Dating / Marriage


Person Centered Theory Cognitive Behavioral Term Paper

Paper Icon

PERSON-CENTERED THEORY & COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THEORY

The objective of this work is to discuss the person-centered theory and to discuss the cognitive-behavioral theory. This work will examine in detail the concepts… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1357 words) Sources: 2 Style: APA Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry


Fri, Jul 5, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!