Term Paper on "Privatization of the Prison System"

Term Paper 18 pages (5077 words) Sources: 32 Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

PRIVATIZATION of the PRISON SYSTEM and the IMPACT of the DIFFERENTIATION of SENTENCING in POWDER vs. CRACK COCAINE OFFENSE and the IMPACT on African-American OFFENDERS

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND of the POLICY

In 1986 and 1988, the U.S. Congress passed federal sentencing laws related to crack cocaine that differentiated the sentences imposed upon defendants in powder and crack cocaine related offenses in what is known as the 'Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986'. These stricter sentencing guidelines were passed to address the emerging issue of crack cocaine which was perceived to be."..a social menace that was categorically different from powder cocaine in its physiological and psychotropic effects." Crack cocaine is powder cocaine mixed with banking soda and then cooked into hard rocks, which are then broken up into smaller pieces and sold to those who use the drug by smoking it. Crack cocaine is cheaper than powder cocaine and aroused great public concern when it first hit the streets in the United States. According to Alfred Blumstein of Carnegie Mellon University, as reported by Coyle (2002) in the work entitled: "Race and Class Penalties in Crack Cocaine Sentencing" crack cocaine began as an innovation in the drug market "crack distribution rights and boundaries were apportioned amongst competitors with the use of violence." (Coyle, 2002) the following table relates the median street-level dealer drug quantities and mandatory minimum imposed by the Anti-Drug Act of 1986.

Median Street-Level Drug Quantities and Mandatory Minimums

Drug

Median Drug Weight

Mandatory Minimum

Crack Cocaine

52 grams

10 years

Powder Cocaine

340 grams

Source: Coyle (2002

Congress created the United States Sentencing Commission in 1984 for the purpose of developing federal sentencing guidelines for the purpose of bringing about a reduction of sentencing disparity. By 1994 in alliance with provisions set out in the Omnibus Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, the Commission was instructed to conduct a study relating to different penalties in powder- and crack-cocaine sentencing. The study lasted the duration of one year with recommendations by the Commission to the U.S. Congress to revise the crack/powder 100:1 sentencing disparity due to findings that due to the small differences in the two forms of cocaine that such sentencing disparities were not justifiable. Commission advised an equalization (1:1) of the quantity ratio that would require mandatory sentencing relating to the two forms of cocaine. Commission recommendations included advisement that guidelines in federal sentencing should be based upon criteria other than the type of drug for determination of the lengths of sentences. These recommendations were rejected by the U.S. Congress along with refusal to make changes to the law and was in fact the first such move in the history of the United States Sentencing Commission since its' formation. Once again, recommendations were made in April 1997 regarding the disparity in sentencing between crack- and powder-cocaine that the differential sentencing should be balanced through provision of a range of 2:1 to 15:1 for Congress to choose from among. This new recommendation "was based on both raising the quantity of crack and lowering the quantity of powder required to trigger mandatory minimum sentences." (Coyle, 2002) Once again, Congress failed to act on the Commission's recommendation. The political climate provided support for the rejections of the Commission's recommendations by Congress and it was not until: "...the last year of his second term" that President Clinton endorsed a "10:1 ration to be arrived at by raising crack weight minimums and lowering powder ones. Congress however made no revisions." (Coyle, 2002) Originally, both the public and congress held a view of crack cocaine as being the instigator of violent offenses due to the chemical makeup of the drug and its reaction on the human system. It was widely believed that crack users were violently enraged due to the effects of the drug on the individual. This did appear to be the case in the advent of crack cocaine on the streets because violence and gang-related crimes were occurring simultaneously to the emergence of crack cocaine. The view held included perceptions such as those stated as follows: "Crack is a more dangerous and harmful substance than cocaine powder for a number of reasons. The most common routes of administration of the two drugs cause crack to be the more psychologically addictive of the substances, particularly because smoking crack produces quicker, more intense, and shorter-lasting effects than snorting cocaine powder. Identifiable social and behavioral changes occur much more quickly with the use of crack than with the use of cocaine powder. Crack can also be broken down and packaged into very small and inexpensive quantities for distribution and is thereby marketed to the most vulnerable members of society, including those of lower socioeconomic status and youth. Additionally, the open-air street markets and crack houses used for the distribution of crack contribute heavily to the deterioration of neighborhoods and communities. Finally, the present crack market is associated with violent crime to a greater extent than that of cocaine powder." (House of Representatives Report 104-272, Sept. 29, 1995) Changes have occurred in the perspectives held toward crack-cocaine since the 'Anti-Drug Act of 1996', which imposes harsher sentencing on crack-cocaine offenders than on powder-cocaine offenders. In a October 2, 2007 report entitled: "Supreme Court Examines Disparity in Crack and Powder Cocaine Sentences" it is related that "A federal judge's decision to slice a few years off a lengthy prison terms has brought to the Supreme Court the radically tinged issue of harsh sentences for dealing crack cocaine. Derrick Kimbrough, a black veteran of the 1991 Gulf War, received a 15-year prison term for selling both crack and powder cocaine, as well as possessing a firearm in Norfolk Virginia." (PR-Inside World News, 2007) the mandatory minimum sentencing laws relating to crack cocaine were called 'ridiculous' by U.S. District Judge Raymond a. Jackson whose decision is now going before the U.S. Supreme Court of Appeals. The primary result of the 100:1 sentencing guidelines is the disparity in the incarcerations between white and black defendants. Black Americans are much more likely to be sentenced for offenses of dealing crack cocaine than are white individuals because the more affluent white individuals prefer powder cocaine and because powder cocaine is the 'trendy' and 'in' form of the drug to do. The work of Levenson (2006) entitled: "The Cocaine Sentencing Disparity" relates that: "Crack is often portrayed as a violence inducing substance. The stereotypical crack user is a poor black urbanite who will use any means necessary to get his next fix. Powder cocaine, on the other hand, is seen as an upper-class white drug used by businessmen and clubbers. This distinction has led policy-makers to justify their sentencing recommendations by labeling crack traffickers and users as volatile and violent, more so than powder cocaine dealers." (Levenson, 2006) So prevalent is this disparity that a poor black women, with children who has purchased 5 grams of crack to feed her addiction "would be sent to jail much longer...than for buying 5 grams of powder cocaine which she could not afford." (Levenson, 2006) Levenson further relates that the racial disparity that exists "among person convicted of possession or trafficking of crack cocaine is obscene and is only aided by the 100:1 ratio. According to a report published by 'The Sentencing Project' about 2/3 of crack cocaine users are white or Hispanic. However, crack cocaine convictions for possession in 1994 were handed primarily to blacks. The defendants in 1994 were 84.5% black, 10.3% white and 5.2% Hispanic. For the offense of trafficking, the defendants were 88.3% black, 10.3% white and 5.2% Hispanic. For powder cocaine, in 1994, the defendants of possession were 26.7% black, 58% white and 15% Hispanic, and for trafficking, the defendants were 27.4% black, 32% white, and 39.3% Hispanic." (Levenson, 2006) White this trend has been noticed by the courts in the United States, and challenges to the sentencing policy have been posited on constitutional grounds, and even though "arguments have been set forth that the 100:1 quantity ration denies equal protection and due process, constitutes cruel and unusual punishments, and that the policy is vague under the terms of the constitution...these arguments have failed in federal appellate court." (Levenson, 2006) Levenson states that it is unfortunate that in the United States inner-city blacks have been stereotypes as: "...poor, violent, drug users who are a threat to society. The same stereotypes peg poor blacks as prime candidates for crack cocaine use as it is cheaper than the powdered version. Thus, to keep the violent addicts of the street the government struck using the very crack that kept the users poor." (Levenson, 2006) Finally, it is related by Levenson that: "The presence of racism is especially striking when we take note of the fact that 2.3 of crack cocaine users are white or Hispanic." (Levenson, 2006)the work entitled: "Cracks in the System: Twenty Years of the Unjust Federal Crack Cocaine Law" (2006) relates the fact that: "In 1986, before the enactment of federal mandatory minimum sentencing for crack cocaine offense, the average federal… READ MORE

How to Reference "Privatization of the Prison System" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Privatization of American Prisons Thesis

Privatization of American Prisons

The history of Prison privatization as well as its merits and demerits

Cost

The Policy Recommendations and ability to adapt to Changes

The origin of Private… read more

Thesis 17 pages (4789 words) Sources: 30 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Prison Overcrowding Term Paper

Prison Overcrowding

Prisoners' rights

Allegations of abuse

Prison overcrowding

Exploding jail populations

Soaring costs

Pressure on correctional facilities

Effects of overcrowding

Competition for limited resources

Aggression

Higher rates of illness… read more

Term Paper 12 pages (3768 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Privatization of Prisons and Jails Term Paper

Privatization of Jails & Prisons

Privatization of Jails and Prisons: Its Advantages and Disadvantages

The issue of privatizing a social service such as the establishment and development of jails and… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (592 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Prison Crowding and Violence on Staff Term Paper

Prison Overcrowding and Its Relationship to Violence on Prison Staff Members

The debate on whether prison works or not is futile. What matters is that prison is allowed to take… read more

Term Paper 11 pages (3015 words) Sources: 30 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Private Run Prisons vs. Government Run Prisons Who Does a Better Job Research Paper

Privately Operated Prisons vs. Government-Operated Prisons: Who Does a Better Job?

Private prisons are becoming an increasingly popular alternative to government-operated prisons, but the question remains, "Are these private corporations… read more

Research Paper 9 pages (2638 words) Sources: 9 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>