Term Paper on "Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan"

Term Paper 20 pages (7605 words) Sources: 20

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Post-Conflict, Peace/Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan

Somehow, within a forty year span of time, the United States has found itself ensnared in multiple wars in Asia at the same time. Again, unless we can influence the postwar nation building process, powers that are inimical to United States interests (in the present Iran) will fill the vacuum upon the American withdrawal. In this short essay, this author will list two lessons learned from our wars apply it to the defacto American raj in Afghanistan and Iraq. First is not to become too closely associated with present unpopular regimes as it is doing with the present administrations in the countries in which we are "nation-building." Also, staying engaged in a never ending guerrilla war that has no foreseeable end is an obvious lesson, something we have had the odious distinction of doing in both cases. Unfortunately, for all involved, the deed has been done. In the case of Afghanistan, the deed has been done twice (if one counts the CIA effort against the Soviets). In that case, it is a question of whether or not round two will also comprise a failure in nation-building.

What is disturbing about the war in Afghanistan and Iraq as is that the comparisons to Vietnam end at the energy question. For all of its problems that conflagration did not include oil and natural gas. Obviously, energy is at the heart of these wars, if not in their origin, then in their duration. After all, nation states (especially hegemonic unipolar super powers like America) do not spend trillions of dollars defending nonessentials. Americans have died for many years at the hands of terrorists, yet we had no widespread war against it before 2001.
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
By plumbing the depths of what is different between the present conflicts about why the present is different and why our Afghan and Iraqi efforts have failed can find out how not to repeat such mistakes in places such as Libya. By examining the depleted state of the United States economy, we certainly know that the present course is definitely not the way to go. Unless we engage the people of all these countries on all levels on a civil affairs basis, including culturally, economically and democratically, we will lose the wars of hearts of minds to the Iranians.

For the above reasons, this author proposes an out of the "out of the box" solution that can be added onto U.N. conventions that have been part and partial of international law since the early 1990's in the wake of the first Gulf War and the humanitarian intervention in Somalia. This is an old solution with a number of notable, yet little know successes and it has complemented U.N. Efforts admirably in the difficult cause of peacekeeping: international arbitration under the auspices of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague. The efforts of the Hague conventions of 1899 and 1907 have given us long-lasting international institutions that promote peace and understanding among nations. These conventions, were among the first formal international statements concerning the laws of war and war crimes in international law.1 In order to defeat the psychological assaults of radicals in the Taliban and Al-Qaeda and to counter Iranian propaganda, we will need to examine this option as a way of engaging the people of these countries to get their acquiescence in the nation building efforts.

2-Post Conflict and Peace-building -- the Took Kit

In this section of the essay, we will define what post conflict strategies and peace building operations entail and why this all is important in the rebuilding of nations that have been destroyed by War. Before we even speak about peacekeeping or nation building, we need to define the state a country is in. In a 2002 Foreign Affairs article, Robert Rotberg defines rogue states and failed states and explains that sometimes these are, but are not always the same thing. In such an estimation, a failed state is one where the central government has completely collapsed. These can include countries such as Afghanistan where the government was not fully in control or Somalia where there was no central government. Certainly, Afghanistan could have been considered a rogue state due to its sponsorship of Osama bin Laden. While Iraq had a working central government, it would be considered a rogue state.2

Certainly, the original organization that comes to mind when post conflict and peace-building are mentioned is the United Nations. After the first Iraq War and the U.N. sanctioned intervention, specific U.N. policy guidelines were promulgated in order to make sure that their member states got it right on peacekeeping missions. As then U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Ghali defined it:

Post-conflict peace-building seeks to prevent the resurgence of conflict and to create the conditions necessary for a sustainable peace in war-torn societies. It is a holistic process involving broad-based inter-agency cooperation across a wide range of issues. It encompasses activities as diverse as traditional peacekeeping and electoral assistance.3

As will be examined in this section of the essay, the then Secretary General laid out structural prevention/strategies to address the root causes of deadly conflict so that wars do not happen in a region again. This includes meeting peoples' basic economic, social, cultural and humanitarian needs by rebuilding societies that have been shattered by war or major crises. He emphasized that this new peacekeeping will be based upon information and fact-finding.4 For this, there would need to be an unprecedented sharing of information among U.N. departments to inform the Secretary General and the Security Council as to options. He points to Articles 36 and 37 of the Charter that give the Secretary-General "to recommend to the U.N. Member States the submission of a dispute to the International Court of Justice, arbitration or other dispute-settlement mechanisms."5 This would then determine the type of peacekeeping mission that the U.N. Or its constituent states would be involved in. Peace-building and options short of war need to be considered first. Peace-building strategies are of two broad types: 1)The development by governments acting cooperatively, or alternately by international regimes in order to manage the interactions of states (this idea will be developed further in the case of international arbitration). 2) the development by individual states (with the help of outsiders if necessary) of political mechanisms to ensure bedrock security, well-being and justice for their citizens) 6 Basically, the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) of the U.N. does this.7 The PBC is an intergovernmental advisory body of the U.N. that supports peace efforts in countries that are emerging from conflict. It is a key addition to coordinating the capacities of the International Community to promote the broad peace agenda (coordination of troops, finances, governments, etc.)8

Robert C. Orr reflects upon the effectiveness of the U.N. As an instrument for peacekeeping by looking at the effectiveness of its chief provider of forces for peacekeeping missions, the United States.

For Orr, there is not question bu that the United States is a force in the world for stability. It is simply a question of how that stability is to be best achieved. For Orr, there are three fundamental questions to answer with regard to this issue. These questions can be listed as follows: 1) What is needed to rebuild countries after war? 2) How can the United States improve its capacity to succeed at post-conflict reconstruction? 3) When and how should the United States use this capacity?9 Orr posits further that weak or failed states engaged in war and revolution are a threat to the United States and the entire world because of the threat that they present to the world in general and the United States in particular due to destabilization of world order. This is due to the operation of criminal and terrorist networks from such countries.10

In James Dobbins book regarding America's nation-building efforts since World War 2.

While there have been armed United States interventions, the focus is upon political peacebuilding. These include structural peace-building, such as activities that create middle-level peace structures such as in Haiti, Bosnia and Kosovo11 The United States addresses all aspects of public safety, especially with regard to the establishment of a safe and secure environment and development of legitimate and stable security institutions. This includes the provision of individual and collective security.12 However, the United States is not doing this on its own, but is turning to multilateral partners as well.

James Notter and Louise Diamond call for a different strategy that they label structural prevention or peace building. According to Notter and Diamond, peace-building comprises strategies that address the root causes of wars. They call it conflict transformation to imply the deep, foundational types of changes that need to be made in order to prevent war.13 Notter and Diamond however differ considerably Ghali's approach. They feel his emphasis is based upon his concentration upon the violence and military conflict. They further feel that prevention is also the key here so as that crises do not happen in the… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan" Assignment:

About the *****

I understand that the US military intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan is a controversial matter. Thus, there are different perspectives on the issue. However, I need a ***** that believes or can argue that such military interventions where a disaster not only for the countries that were occupied but also for the U.S economy, its Foreign Policy and the US image throughout the world. I need a ***** who could argue that post conflict and nation-building operations in both countries were a disaster and have resulted in a decade on military occupation and the lost of human lives and billions and billions of dollars.

Paper

This final paper is about post conflict and Nation Building operations within Afghanistan and Iraq. This paper should not be based on personal opinions it NEEDS to be supported by peer reviewed articles or books. You can use some newspaper articles but no more than a few. Additionally, proper citation (footnotes) is REQUIRED at least 5 footnotes per page that show where the information comes.

The paper should be structures this way:

1-Introduction

2-POST CONFLICT and PEACE BUILDING

Here you must define what defines post conflict strategies and peace building operations. And its importance in the rebuilding of NAtions that have been destroyed by War.

Structural prevention/strategies to address the root causes of deadly conflict: Structural prevention ***** or peace building ***** comprises strategies to address the root causes of deadly conflict, so as to ensure that crises do not arise in the first place, or, if they do, they do not recur. (Including putting in place international legal systems, dispute resolution mechanisms, and cooperative arrangements; meeting people***** s basic economic, social, cultural, and humanitarian needs; and rebuilding societies that have been shattered by war or other major crises.

Peace-building strategies are of two broad types: 1. the development by governments acting cooperatively, or international regimes to manage the interactions of states; 2. the development by individual states (with the help of outsiders if necessary) of mechanisms to ensure bedrock security, well-being and justice for their citizens).

Measures can also support preventive diplomacy; Demilitarization, the control of small arms, institutional reform, improved police and judicial systems, the monitoring of human rights, electoral reform and social and economic development can be valuable in preventing conflict, as in healing wounds after conflict has occurred.

While *****˜conflict transformation***** describes the outcome, peacebuilding describes the actions;

PEACEBUILDING EFFORTS MUST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: YOU MUST USE THIS INFORMATION IN THIS SECTION . JUST USE OTHER WORDS OR PROPERLY CITE IT.

Political peacebuilding: outermost superstructure. It is about agreements. Establishes political arrangements providing the overall context for understanding the relationships of the various parties and their resources. Building a legal infrastructure addressing the political needs and managing the boundaries of the peace system (negotiation, fact-finding missions, technical working groups etc.). Governments focus their attention on political peacebuilding;

Structural peacebuilding: Activities creating middle-level structures. Creating structures ***** systems of behavior, institutions, concerted actions ***** supporting the embodiment or implementation of a peace culture. It is about building an economic, military and community infrastructure, providing concrete and realistic avenues through which a new peace system might express itself. Structures are necessary because political peacebuilding cannot accomplish conflict transformation itself (a signed treaty does not create peace. It only creates a basis for peace, or a legal infrastructure to support peace). Activities include economic development programs, strengthening democracy and governance, and supporting the creation of indigenous NGOs that support peace;

Social peacebuilding: The missing link, seeking to build the human infrastructure that can support the political agreements and societal institutions. Trying to prepare the system to be able to implement political agreements without the further loss of life (Activities: e. g. conflict resolution workshops; reconciliation activities; mediation efforts between different societal/ethnic groups etc.)

Security pillar: addresses all aspects of public safety, in particular the establishment of a safe and secure environment and development of legitimate and stable security institutions. Provision of individual and collective security;

Governance and participation pillar: addresses the need for legitimate, effective political and administrative institutions and participatory processes. Most often guaranteed through a representative constitutional structure;

Social and economic well-being pillar: addresses fundamental social and economic needs of the population, in particular the provision of emergency relief, restoration of essential services, laying the foundation for a viable economy, and initiation of an inclusive, sustainable development program;

Justice and reconciliation pillar: addresses the need for an impartial and accountable legal system and for ways to deal with past abuses: in particular, creation of effective law enforcement, an open judicial system, fair laws, humane corrections systems, and formal and informal mechanism for resolving grievances arising from conflict

I GOT THIS INFORMATION FROM THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES which must be consulted (This section MUST MUST use information from the Carnegie Commission website)

Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict, 1997)

Post-conflict peace-building (Agenda for Peace, B. B. Ghali, 1995)

Peace-building definitions: IMTD, the Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy (in Notter & Diamond, Building Peace and Transforming Conlflict, Occ. Paper 7, Oct. 1996)

Robert C. Orr: *****˜Winning the Peace***** & *****˜Reconstruction*****

James Dobbins et al.: America***** s Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq

3-IRAQ

Here you should give an introduction as why the US intervened in Iraq ( again I know this is a controversial matter but I need you to argue that there WERE NOT any Nuclear weapons found in Iraq , so the main justification for the War was a manipulation in order to control oil resources in Iraq).

Then you should go into what happened in Iraq after the U.S occupation in 2003. I need you to argue that peace and nation building efforts were directed by people who had no idea what they were doing and not only failed to achieve sustainable peace but actually made the situation worse. Some issues that MUST be mentioned are: looting, lawlessness and caos, no martial law, the role of ORHA and its replacement by CPA, disbanding of the Iraqi military ( where thousands of armed people where left without a job), they did not secure guns, they fired anyone employed by the former government which created unemployment. All of this, among other things, resulted in many people joining religious organizations that promoted anti-American sentiments.

4-Afghanistan

You should follow the same structured that Iraq. An introduction as to why the U.S invaded the country in 2001 ( looking for Al-qaeda and to dismantle the Taliban regime)

And then go into what has happened since the occupation. Some issues are, displaced people, anti-American sentiment, bombing, deaths of American soldiers and locals. mainly the destruction of the country. and the failure the re-build the country.

5- Conclusion

At the end you should asses if the U.S has achieved peace in the region and if the U.S has helped rebuild this 2 countries. . What have this 2 wars achieved? What are the lessons learned? Then you can argue that maybe we can learn from thus mistakes and do the opposite in Libya.

YOU MUST USE SOME ARTICLES FROM THE magazine FOREIGN POLICY

How to Reference "Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2011, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/post-conflict-peace-nation-building/8943344. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.

Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan (2011). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/post-conflict-peace-nation-building/8943344
A1-TermPaper.com. (2011). Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/post-conflict-peace-nation-building/8943344 [Accessed 3 Jul, 2024].
”Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan” 2011. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/post-conflict-peace-nation-building/8943344.
”Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/post-conflict-peace-nation-building/8943344.
[1] ”Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/post-conflict-peace-nation-building/8943344. [Accessed: 3-Jul-2024].
1. Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2011 [cited 3 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/post-conflict-peace-nation-building/8943344
1. Post-Conflict, Peace / Nation Building in Iraq and Afghanistan. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/post-conflict-peace-nation-building/8943344. Published 2011. Accessed July 3, 2024.

Related Term Papers:

Nation Building Term Paper

Paper Icon

Nation Building as such refers to the process by which a nation is structured or constructed by utilizing the power of the state. It is an important process that involves… read more

Term Paper 12 pages (4801 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Government / Politics


Conflict Resolution and Post Conflict Reconstruction in the International System Thesis

Paper Icon

International Relations

Conflict Resolution and Post-Conflict Resolution in the International System

Conflict is a fact of international relations. States make war on each other and, factions within states disturb internal… read more

Thesis 6 pages (1956 words) Sources: 3 Style: MLA Topic: Israel / Palestine / Arab World


International Conflict Resolution Term Paper

Paper Icon

International Conflict Resolution

For policymakers who wish to resolve conflicts - through political, economic, and military tools - there are several proven ways and means of arriving at closure. This… read more

Term Paper 8 pages (2740 words) Sources: 1+ Style: MLA Topic: Israel / Palestine / Arab World


Conflict and Security Case Study

Paper Icon

Conflict and Security

Current situation in Afghanistan from political, military, social and economic points-of-view

Afghanistan is a country of many facets, of outmost importance for the Middle east and the… read more

Case Study 10 pages (3159 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Government / Politics


International Political Economics the Impact of UN Peacekeeper Corruption Term Paper

Paper Icon

International Political Economics: The Impacts of UN Peacekeeper Corruption

International political economy tries to understand global and international problems through a diverse interdisciplinary arrangement of theoretical perspectives and analytical tools.… read more

Term Paper 15 pages (4412 words) Sources: 15 Topic: Government / Politics


Wed, Jul 3, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!