Research Paper on "Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa"

Research Paper 5 pages (1467 words) Sources: 5

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Politics and Program Evaluation

Getting from Good to Best:

The Role of the Politics in the Evaluation of Public Programs

Any program designed for the public good is by its nature inextricably linked to politics, not only through motive but in many instances through more practical elements as well. The political system provides the directives and often the financial support for these programs, and thus the programs themselves are prone to many of the same strengths and weaknesses as the political system. Program evaluation is also part of this link. Eleanor Chelimsky (1987) points out that "evaluation, with its purpose of providing high-quality information to decision makers, automatically claims a role for itself in the political process" (p. 24). What this role should be, and what it ultimately is in reality, are questions of fundamental importance to those involved in public policy administration and in the political world at large.

No one doubts the overall usefulness of program evaluation. Evaluation, according to Berk and Rossi (1999), is rooted in "the commonsense idea that social programs should have demonstrable benefits" (p. 1). As "commonsense" as this may seem, what qualifies as "demonstrable" and what qualifies as a "benefit" are not always simple matters. Even when the evidence is clear and the benefits are undisputed, how this information should be used in the political sphere is often a matter of contention.

There has been a long-standing concern in the evaluation research community that program evaluations are not used enough or in the proper manner by political decision makers. Carol Weiss e
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
lucidated this concern in her 1973 landmark paper "Where Politics and Evaluation Research Meet." In this paper, Weiss states that "relatively few evaluation studies have had a noticeable effect on the making and remaking of public policy" (qtd. In Cheminsky 1987, p. 24). This situation can be frustrating to the sociologist and especially disheartening to the program evaluator, since "being taken seriously in policy matters would appear to be part of [the evaluator's] professional identity" (Rothbart 1975, p.23).

A salient example of this dismissal of evaluation results by policy makers can be seen in the case of the Head Start evaluation performed by the Westinghouse Corporation in 1969. Despite the fact that this evaluation showed the benefits of Head Start to be short-lived if present at all, federal policy makers decided to fund the program at an even higher rate. The methodology of the Westinghouse Study was found to be questionable, but subsequent studies have confirmed the disappointing results. However, these results seem to have no effect on the public perception of the Head Start program, or on its political viability. Labeled "a program that works" by Jimmy Carter and expanded significantly under Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, Head Start has at times commanded an annual budget of more than $1 billion (Besharov and Hartle 1985, para.1).

This case points to a fundamental difference between the priorities of program evaluators and those of policy makers. Referring to the Head Start case study, George Rothbart (1975) noted that, while Head Start fails as a program if approached in a methodological sense, "political elites may view Head Start, not in terms of its capacity to maximize educational change, but in terms of the alternatives that might be necessary to satisfy community demands" (p. 25). While the aim of the evaluator is to reach a fair and data-driven conclusion about the effectiveness and focus of the program, the goal of the policy maker in interpreting and using the evaluation is determined in no small way by the public popularity of the program and the political price to be paid by changing or terminating it.

However, there need not always be a disjunction between the aim of the evaluator and the ultimate priorities of political decision makers. According to Huey-tsyh Chen (2005), "evaluation is most useful when it contributes [my italics] to the political process" (p. 269). This is most likely to happen when policy makers and evaluators "have a mutual understanding on the evaluation needs and the evaluation approaches to be used" (Ibid). How this mutual understanding comes to be is not always clear, and often depends on the philosophical assumptions of the program administrators, the program evaluators, and the politicians creating the program policy.

Eleanor Chelimsky broke down the philosophical differences between these parties in her 1987 paper "The Politics of Program Evaluation." The program evaluators… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa" Assignment:

The impact of Politics and Program Evaluation ( and vice versa)

The activity of evaluation is usually a final phase in the policy cycle; it involves determining if a program met goals, sometimes if it was implemented consistently with legislation, and generally if it made a difference. Programs are inherently political in origin. Furthermore, their impact is interpreted in a political arena. You may look at this issue broadly as evolution*****s role in policy cycle, detailing the impacts of politics. Or you may look more narrowly at specific political issues associated with evaluating programs in general (or programs in some particular substantive area). Or you may do a little of both. This area has drawn much attention over the years and there is a very large literature to draw on.

An early treatment of many different aspects of politics and evaluation can be found in Dennis Palumno, 1987, The Politics of Program Evaluation (*****). Two recent books that deal with politics and evaluation are Micheal Patton*****s 1997 Utilization-Focused Evaluation (*****) and Olaf Rieper and Jacques Toulemonde, 1996, Politics and Practices of Intergovernmental Evaluation (Transaction Books). The Classic is still the 1993 Carol Weiss paper *****Where politics and evaluation research meet***** in Evaluation Practice.

How to Reference "Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa" Research Paper in a Bibliography

Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2010, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/politics-program-evaluation-getting/9662. Accessed 5 Oct 2024.

Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa (2010). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/politics-program-evaluation-getting/9662
A1-TermPaper.com. (2010). Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/politics-program-evaluation-getting/9662 [Accessed 5 Oct, 2024].
”Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa” 2010. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/politics-program-evaluation-getting/9662.
”Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/politics-program-evaluation-getting/9662.
[1] ”Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/politics-program-evaluation-getting/9662. [Accessed: 5-Oct-2024].
1. Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2010 [cited 5 October 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/politics-program-evaluation-getting/9662
1. Impact of Politics on Program Evaluation and Vice Versa. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/politics-program-evaluation-getting/9662. Published 2010. Accessed October 5, 2024.

Related Research Papers:

Belonging International Students and Web Research Proposal

Paper Icon

BELONGING, WEB 2.0 AND INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS

This work reports a study in which 24 international students were interviewed in a research initiative that seeks to understand how international students adjust… read more

Research Proposal 70 pages (20197 words) Sources: 80 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning


Teacher Motivation Research Proposal

Paper Icon

Teaching is one of the professions that many and indeed probably even most people enter with a large measure of idealism. They seek out education as a profession not for… read more

Research Proposal 64 pages (17626 words) Sources: 32 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning


Mara Salvatrucha and 18th Street Gangs: Threat to National Security? Thesis

Paper Icon

predominantly Latino Gangs, Mara Salvatrucha (aka MS-13), and the 18th Street Gang operating on the streets of communities across America. This study is significant because it will provide a snapshot… read more

Thesis 40 pages (17380 words) Sources: 40 Style: APA Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice


Scott 2001 Thesis

Paper Icon

Institutional Property and Process
The concept of the institution may on the surface seem very simple
and concrete. Particularly, we recognize that this term refers to some
established organizational or… read more

Thesis 2 pages (616 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Sociology / Society


Learning Styles and Student Achievement Term Paper

Paper Icon

Learning Styles and Student Achievement

According to William Watson Purkey and John M. Novak, in order to teach a student, you have to be able to reach the student. They… read more

Term Paper 35 pages (9900 words) Sources: 15 Style: APA Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning


Sat, Oct 5, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!