Book Report on "Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism: A Review"

Book Report 8 pages (2932 words) Sources: 1

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism: A Review

Murphy's book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism explores the very nature of America's capitalist society and works to debunk some of the economic myths and falsehoods that many in this country and abroad hold dear. The book is written from a conservative standpoint, and pushes the idea that free-market capitalism is the best economic option for America. Some very divisive subjects are discussed and broken down, bit by bit, through the lens of a conservative free market capitalist. Some of these topics include outsourcing, central planning, minimum wage, the IMF and Welfare. All of these topics are divisive, especially in American culture, and Murphy's take on these subjects is consistently from the right side of the isle. Readers usually open a book because they expect the book to hold up a certain perspective as truth, and Murphy's book is no exception. He uses labels such as "liberal" and "conservative" to help illustrate his points and, while there was a little finger pointing here and there, and a little blame being pushed around for some of what Murphy sees as the social ills of today's American culture, the book was mostly fully of arguments that would hold up in any court of law. They are fact-based and the references and experts used in the writing of the book all check out as legitimate.

Murphy breaks his book down as a twelve step plan for understanding free market capitalism. That is to say, he makes it easy for people who are unfamiliar with the idea of true capitalism, and makes his arguments clear and concise. Throughout the book, He dispels the wrongs of communism and socialism, and tells the reader why great care needs to be taken to steer clear of these two economic structures. This is where there is a little bit of politically-charged edge to the book. Sure he is an economist, lecturer, and financial adviser, but Murphy seems to have a distinct political agenda, which is not always right out in the reader's face, but is a constant undercurrent on every page. This may or may not be a bad thing, given that many people pick up a book because they wish to have their side of the argument validated. I would say that anyone looking to learn more about free market economics from a conservative platform should read this book. But those expecting a completely fair, bi-partisan look at America's economy should steer clear of this book, unless they are using it to gain insight into the argument structures that those on the right side of the isle like to use when justifying free market capitalism.

If the reader accepts Murphy's premise that America was set up as a completely free market capitalist society, and that socialism and communism, along with government are inherently bad, then there is little to squabble over throughout the book. Murphy assumes, as his reader would have to, that labor unions, rent control, and raising taxes are all socially irresponsible, sometimes bordering on socialist things to do. If the reader accepts these basic arguments as truth, then they will benefit greatly from having some economic and intellectual ammunition with which to defend their position.

Workers and Outsourcing

The book delves into the issue of outsourcing and free market economies with great passion. I found the first couple of sections on these topics went by fairly quickly, as Murphy established that he was a knowledgeable expert right away. His argument that outsourcing is good for the U.S. economy is from a conservative perspective. He argues that outsourcing, while labeled as a major threat to the U.S. economy by most "liberals," is actually a good thing. In a free market economy, prices are set based on pure supply and demand, not based on government regulation, restrictions, and tariffs. Therefore, in a purely free market economy, prices are free to fluctuate, assuming no company or corporation would dare to try to defraud people of their hard earned cash. This is where I first began to look at Murphy's view point and understand that he is a relatively idealistic free market economist. He assumes that corporations are working in the best interest of the customers by arguing that corporations that do not, wouldn't be in existence if customers were not happy with their product. This, to me, is like living in a vacuum where all corporations exist in a benevolent bubble, unwilling to rig prices or take an "unfair" share of a customer's money. I suppose his argument holds water, theoretically, but I wonder exactly how realistic it is.

Further into his book, Murphy begins to outline why outsourcing is not as bad as people sometimes say it is. If jobs are outsourced, and move overseas, the initial argument is people are now out of work. But Murphy goers a step beyond this widely-accepted "falsehood" and illustrates that those who were working jobs that were outsourced now have better opportunities to better their education or job situation, and in this way, everyone benefits. In Murphy's world, low-skilled, low-pay jobs are outsourced and the jobs that require education, innovation, and true American grit are the ones that survive and thrive. While there are some jobs that are necessary to the country's safety and security, which will likely never be outsourced, many of the low wage jobs, according to Murphy, should be outsourced to poorer nations that possess larger, cheaper labor pools.

Another advantage to outsourcing is the fact that it helps the companies doing the outsourcing by keeping costs as low as possible. Murphy argues that by keeping costs low, products would have lower prices and not have to conform to so many government restrictions are rules. As they do now. Even the tariffs on certain products, when made in America, can cost companies more than the cost of the entire product itself. Murphy argues that this is a very bad thing, and has been hurting businesses. To Murphy, the need to outsource is clearly spelled out in a free market capitalist society. The ability for a company to seek out and find the cheapest labor in order to produce a cheaper product is required of the capitalist model.

The movement toward a free market form of labor and labor restrictions (or lack of restrictions) are another argument that Murphy feels necessary to discuss. His feelings regarding minimum wage fall on the same side as most of the rest of the book, and are articulated well, from the right side of the isle. To Murphy, raising minimum wage hurts a free market capitalist economy because it raises the cost of everything else in that society. If a worker gets paid an additional $1 for the work he does, just because the government mandates that he make a minimum wage, then a company's logical choice would be to outsource that labor to another country. If the company can't outsource due to government restrictions or regulations, then their only choice is to charge more for their product. They are not just going to absorb that extra cost as may "liberals" would expect the company to do, according to Murphy. So a chain reaction of price hikes occurs, and those people now making an extra $1 an hour have less purchasing power. The system, according to Murphy, is flawed. What good is a raise in the minimum wage if prices rise accordingly?

Murphy also argues that minimum wages hurt companies because they handicap them financially. If a company is required to pay a minimum wage, they are at a distinct disadvantage to one who does not. Whether or not the company who is not required to pay a minimum wage is overseas or not is of no consequence in Murphy's argument, but the author presents the evidence in a very clear, compelling manner. Each time minimum wage goes up, so does the price of everything else. Inflation via minimum wage increases is also a major systemic flaw according to Murphy. He believes that in a true free market, both the price of the product and the cost of the product should never be regulated by the government.

Murphy's argument against labor unions follows a similar line of thinking. If labor unions are allowed to organize, they can become the bullies of the economic landscape by demanding outrageous pay and benefits, independent of the true cost or value of their product. By their very existence, labor unions handicap corporations' ability to compete on the global market. And, since many labor unions do not allow the company to outsource their livelihood, these unions grandfather themselves into the economic fabric of the country, bleeding America corporations dry and keeping more of the company's profits for themselves. To Murphy, labor unions are only a few steps away from socialism. He argues that controlling the production, as the Soviets did in communist Russia, is a distinctly anti-capitalist model, and that by their very definition, unions therefore cannot be… READ MORE

How to Reference "Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism: A Review" Book Report in a Bibliography

Related Book Reports:

Creative Powers it Is a Fact Term Paper

Creative Powers

It is a fact that the society in which we live will never be truly free in all areas of life. Indeed, it has been suggested by some… read more

Term Paper 9 pages (2842 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Sociology / Society

---

Author Study Project Term Paper

Roald Dahl's Life & Works

Roald Dahl was born in Wales in 1916. After his father and sister died, his mother decided to move to England. There Dahl studied until… read more

Term Paper 8 pages (3007 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Literature / Poetry

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>