Term Paper on "Philosophy Challenging Naturalist Critiques of Free Will"

Term Paper 4 pages (1231 words) Sources: 5 Style: MLA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Philosophy

Challenging Naturalist Critiques of Free Will

Naturalists have long held that we cannot demonstrate the existence of free will.

They suggest, in the spirit of the Enlightenment philosopher Baron D'Holbach, that the "will [...] is a modification of the brain" (D'Holbach 333). In other words, free will is at best simply a manifestation of natural mechanisms and, at worst, a complete illusion in a deterministic world. This is how the naturalists conceive of free will. But the opposing position would have that free will does exist independent of a priori causes and is additionally a unique feature of the human condition.

A careful, if brief, analysis of the available information reveals that free will does exist, though it would be erroneous to suggest that it somehow exists outside of the normal chain of causation. Human beings have the ability to choose, but those choices are influenced and affected, and do not exist in a moral vacuum. From an ethics standpoint, this is an important point to assert because it means that individual human beings have a moral responsibility to make ethical choices, and that their actions are not fatalistically predetermined.

Traditionally, at the opposite end of the philosophical spectrum from free will is fatalism, or sometimes determinism. Generally championed by naturalists, who can find no mechanism for free will, fatalism argues, "man is a marionette whose every action is controlled and determined" (Frost 128). Though the world often seems as if it is completely outside the control of individuals, fatalism runs contrary to the everyday, lived experiences of most people. Most people do make choices on a regular basis, and these choices determine the course of one's day and one's life. The fatalists would have us believe that such actions are pre-determined or, at least, removed from the realm of free choice and influenced by forces outside the control of the individual. But this assertion doesn't leave much room for free will, reason, or even individual thought. Reason and thinking is, after all, a chosen act by which individuals consider and respond to the world (Rand 22). But if there is no free will, if the traditional naturalist claims are correct, then it would be impossible for an individual to make such a choice. Behaviors and thoughts would simply be a process of natural mechanisms and designs outside the control of the individual. Free will would be moot.

One distinct problem that emerges from this naturalist assertion is how to deal with moral responsibility. How can we hold anyone accountable for his or her actions if said individual doesn't really have any control over his thoughts and behaviors? Some naturalists have gone so far as to argue that while free will doesn't exist in any physical, meaningful way, it plays an important role in social interaction and should be preserved as an abstract concept (Clark par. 3). In other words, even the naturalists recognize the dilemma of assigning moral responsibility in a world without free will. Without the concept of free will, no one person could ever be really responsible for his or her actions, because the choice to behave in one way or another would simply be the effect of other causes outside of the individual's control. As Rand characterizes the matter:

Ethics is an objective, metaphysical necessity of man's survival -- not by the grace of the supernatural nor of your neighbors nor of your whims, but by the grace of reality and the nature of life. (Rand 24).

If this were not the case, hen one's behavior would be nothing more than a deterministic response to external stimuli. In this situation, it would be hypocritical at best to assign moral responsibility… READ MORE

How to Reference "Philosophy Challenging Naturalist Critiques of Free Will" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Free Will Nietzsche Could Believe Term Paper

Free Will Nietzsche Could Believe In

Are we free to do what we want with our lives? There are a number of ways in which we are clearly not. I… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1865 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

Free Will and Determinism Term Paper

Free Will & Determinism

Ever since the period of ancient Greece, ideas about freedom and determinism have occupied philosophers. On the one side, we usually consider ourselves as free and… read more

Term Paper 7 pages (2605 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

Psychology Fate vs. Free Will: An Argument Thesis

Psychology

Fate vs. Free Will: An Argument in Defense of Free Will

For centuries, science, religion, and philosophy have debated whether or not free will exists. If it does, it… read more

Thesis 2 pages (675 words) Sources: 2 Style: APA Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

Free Will Term Paper

Free Will

The issue of free will and divine foreknowledge creates a somewhat problematic paradox for Christians. At the basis of the dilemma is the question that, if God knows… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1769 words) Sources: 3 Style: MLA Topic: Religion / God / Theology

---

Naturalist Claims About the Universe Term Paper

Philosophy

Traditional Naturalist Claims: The Problems Therein

Naturalism is the philosophical position most often advocated by humanists, scientists, and -- obviously -- naturalists. They would have us believe, in the… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1140 words) Sources: 5 Style: MLA Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>