Term Paper on "Peacemaking Criminology"

Term Paper 10 pages (3963 words) Sources: 1+

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Peacemaking Criminology

The first difficulty in assessing peacemaking criminology (PMC) begins with identifying a clear, reasonably encompassing definition, or even isolating a group of precepts that binds adherents. The PMC perspective is not a theory, because it lacks an identifiable core of readily testable postulates or claims, contains more vision than explanation, and does not seem amenable to modification when confronted with contentious factual or other challenges. In fact, many advocates of the perspective seem to avoid addressing criticisms. It is not a systematic philosophy, because it contains no well-articulated premises or rigorous method for critiquing, testing, or advancing knowledge. Although identified with the discipline of criminology, peacemaking criminology is not a discipline, because it possesses no integrating set of systematic theories or method or immediately obvious policy-oriented guidelines. Therefore, we begin our exploration of PMC by initially viewing it as a perspective, or a stance from which to view and comment upon objects within our gaze.

A peacemaking perspective in the social sciences is hardly new. Three decades ago, Curle (1971) articulated a detailed theory of strategies for replacing conflict with peace, and journals such as Humanity and Society have long nurtured a social science humanistic perspective. but, the emergence of a distinctly criminological form of "peacemaking," although it emerged over 20 years ago, has mushroomed primarily in the past decade. The growth occurred largely as a response to the perceived futility of the warmaking metaphor that dominates crime control research and scholarship, and in part as a response to the need to integrate criminal justice theory and practice within a broader framework of basic human needs. Although origins of PMC are often attributed to Richard Quinney, the seeds of a kinder, gentler mainstream criminology that responded to human needs rather than reacted to human misdeeds were sown especially by the works of Tifft (1979), Tifft and Sullivan (1980) and Pepinsky (1979). In arguing for minimalist state control structures and spiritual rejuvenation as the preconditions for a just society, Tifft offered one of the earliest systematic attempts to establish a base for a criminology of peacemaking. Tifft's responsive anarchism was a call for a society based on love, one that attends to essential human needs. Stressing empathy for the plight of others, he argued that existing social structures and forms of interaction perpetuate human misery, and that crime and misery are irrevocably intertwined. Spiritual rejuvenation requires empathy with those who, because of their social position, are more likely to be relegated to life conditions characterized by structural inequality, existential despair, and physical or mental suffering.

The articulation of an explicit peacemaking perspective in criminology arguably began with the works of Richard Quinney (1988), and further developed by others, such as Anderson (1989) and Pepinsky (1988). Pepinsky and Quinney (1991) reshaped the perspective with twenty articles by peacemaking proponents in a single collection that addressed the PMC tradition, integrated PMC with other genres such as feminism, and then connected the perspective to radical/critical criminology. Their collection not only increased the visibility of the perspective, but it also cast a wider intellectual and ideological net than had previous works by uniting scholars who had been writing on the periphery of explicit peacemaking issues.

Developing a similar theme of a humanist social science, Pepinsky observed that, "rather than trying to find out what is, the humanist uses data to calculate what can be." In doing so, he contributed to criminology a transformative set of ideals to guide the emerging perspective as a research direction. In later refinements, Pepinsky argued that there is a direct relationship between violence and social unresponsiveness that occurs through processes of depersonalization. Like Tifft, Pepinsky challenged us to rethink our conceptualization of crime and suggested that an act of crime is conventionally defined by nuances of context and motive, a distinction he rejects.

Related to PMC, restorative justice is a theory of criminal justice that focuses on crime as an act against another individual or community rather than the state. As Pepinsky writes, "more than one criminologist has told me how refreshing it was to read Criminology as Peacemaking because the book contained so many ideas of what to do. 'Now I can feel good about being a criminologist,' I hear. This is also the primary appeal of 'restorative justice,' although as I have explained in this volume, I think that 'making things right' is more than any social process can deliver." The victim plays a major role in the process and receives some type of restitution from the offender.

Restorative justice takes many different forms, but all systems have some aspects in common. Victims have an opportunity to express the full impact of the crime upon their lives, to receive answers to any lingering questions about the incident, and to participate in holding the offender accountable for his or her actions. Offenders can tell their story of why the crime occurred and how it has affected their lives. They are given an opportunity to make things right with the victim - to the degree possible - through some form of compensation.

For petty or first-time offenses, a case may be referred to restorative justice as a pretrial diversion, with charges being dismissed after fulfillment of the restitution agreement. In more serious cases, restorative justice may be part of a sentence that includes prison time or other punishments.

Victim-offender mediation, or VOM (also called victim-offender dialogue, victim-offender conferencing, victim-offender reconciliation, or restorative justice dialogue), is usually a face-to-face meeting, in the presence of a trained mediator, between the victim of a crime and the person who committed that crime. This system generally involves a small number of participants, and often is the only option available to incarcerated offenders, due to limits on visitors.

Family group conferencing (FGC) has a much wider circle of participants than VOM. In addition to the primary victim and offender, participants may include people connected to the victim, the offender's family members, and others connected to the offender. FGC is often the most appropriate system for juvenile cases, due to the important role of the family in a juvenile offender's life.

A community restorative board typically is composed of a small group of citizens, prepared for this function by intensive training, who conduct public, face-to-face meetings with offenders sentenced by the court to participate in the process. During a meeting, board members discuss with the offender the nature of the offense and its negative consequences. Then board members develop a set of proposed sanctions which they discuss with the offender, until they reach agreement on the specific actions the offender will take within a given time period to make reparation for the crime. Subsequently, the offender must document his or her progress in fulfilling the terms of the agreement. After the stipulated period of time has passed, the board submits a report to the court on the offender's compliance with the agreed upon sanctions. At this point, the board's involvement with the offender is ended.

Sentencing circles (sometimes called peacemaking circles) use traditional circle ritual and structure to involve the victim, victim supporters, the offender, offender supporters, judge and court personnel, prosecutor, defense counsel, police, and all interested community members. Within the circle, people can speak from the heart in a shared search for understanding of the event, and together identify the steps necessary to assist in healing all affected parties and prevent future crimes. Sentencing circles typically involve a multi-step procedure that includes: (1) application by the offender to participate in the circle process; (2) a healing circle for the victim; (3) a healing circle for the offender; (4) a sentencing circle to develop consensus on the elements of a sentencing plan; and (5) follow-up circles to monitor the progress of the offender.

Cases in which the offender denies responsibility for the crime or has no remorse are unsuitable for restorative justice and are usually referred back to court. If the victim is unwilling to participate, the effectiveness of restorative justice is diminished, because the process depends on holding the offender directly accountable to the victim. Offenses without a readily identifiable victim, such as truancy or marijuana possession, are less suitable for restorative justice than other crimes, according to Prince William County, Virginia juvenile probation officer Danielle McCauley.

A study of 1,298 juveniles conducted throughout the late 1980s and 1990s found a 32% reduction in recidivism relative to a comparison group, according to an article in the Summer 1999 edition of VOMA Connections. The Fiscal Year 2004 annual report of Prince William County, Virginia's Restorative Justice Program found that of the 234 offenders served in Fiscal Year 2003, 18 had re-offended through June 30, 2004, for a recidivism rate of 8%. A 2001 report by Department of Justice Canada found that "restorative justice programs, on average, yielded reductions in recidivism compared to non-restorative approaches to criminal behavior."

In 1995, Dennis Sullivan and Larry Tifft discussed the possibility of creating a new journal that would publish work on justice that had a difficult time… READ MORE

How to Reference "Peacemaking Criminology" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Peacemaking Criminology Term Paper

Peacemaking Criminology: An Overview

The idea of constructing a "peacemaking criminology," according to criminologist academic Hal Pepinsky, may at first seem oxymoronic. The pursuit of criminal justice is usually construed… read more

Term Paper 1 pages (343 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Radical and Neo-Critical Theory Term Paper

Criminology

Radical and Neo-Critical Theory

The purpose of this work is to research and then state information concerning the precise meaning as well as facts in relation to the Radical… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (498 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Sociology / Society

---

Victimology and Alternatives Term Paper

Victimology and Alternatives

The objective of this work is to examine whether the use of shaming, peacemaking and restorative justice offer useful alternatives to our traditional criminal justice system, particularly… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1487 words) Sources: 3 Style: APA Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Arise Gang Prevention Program Thesis

Gang Prevention Program

"Gangs contain bright boys who do well, bright boys who do less well, and dull boys who pass, dull boys who fail, and illiterates"

(Garabedian & .… read more

Thesis 16 pages (5590 words) Sources: 8 Style: APA Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Incorporating Restorative and Community Justice Into American Sentencing and Corrections Article Critique

Restorative Justice

Evidence

Evaluation

Bibligoraphy

In criminal justice, new interventions targeting crime control and reduction are constantly being developed and implemented. The recent intervention that is notable is Restorative Justice.… read more

Article Critique 14 pages (5088 words) Sources: 14 Style: APA Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>