Term Paper on "Patriot Act"

Term Paper 10 pages (3426 words) Sources: 10 Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Patriot Act is probably one of the most controversial pieces of legislation in American history. Many see it as a somewhat hysterical reaction to the 9/11 attacks. They see it as a response to a terrorist threat of which the phantoms haunt minds rather than actual American safety and security. Indeed, some citizens have accused the government of particularly seeking out a specific sector of society for their discriminatory detention and surveillance practices. As emotions and shock began to settle down and diminish after 9/11/2001, both national and international outcry against the Patriot Act and its concomitant lack of Constitutional liberties have been increasingly intense. It is however interesting that George Bush, the instigator and President residing over all these practices, remains to be removed from power. It is equally interesting that, despite all the outcries, the Patriot Act II, guaranteeing an even greater infringement upon the Constitution, has been approved. Specifically, many criticisms are based upon the fact that the Patriot Act is against the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the American Constitution and the Bill of Rights. As such, a large amount has been written on exactly what these pieces of legislation mean to the American people today, after the devastating attacks of 9/11.

The Government and the Public after 9/11

In response to what was seen as the atrocities relating to the legal aftermath of 9/11, civil libertarian organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) were formed to advocate the rights of the people against a government that was seen as abusing its power. These organizations have created both online and offline reading material advocating the rights of the people. According to this, not only the United States, but other Western nations were also sacrificing their freedom in favor of the illusion of safety (Etzioni, 2004).

Another group of citizens, and apparently the majority in the United States, feel that some freedoms are not too excessive a sacrifice for the feeling of safety. This group places its trust completely in the United States government, believing that it is acting in the best interest of the country and its citizens.

Nonetheless, according Etzioni, the dissenters focus on the government's focus on safety in favor of basic rights such as equality and the removal of checks and balances on government-approved actions such as surveillance and detention. Among these dissenters is the press, whose freedoms have been included in the government's new law-making paradigm. Indeed, according to articles such as one by Wendy Kaminer in the American Prospect, providing the Government with unchecked power removes the focus from terrorism.

According to this article, cited by Etzioni, the focus is now on domestic dissenters and immigrants, rather than on safeguarding the country's borders against further attacks of the kind perpetrated on 9/11. Indeed, under the guise of protecting the public, the government is instead focusing its efforts on monitoring and harassing immigrants and legal citizens that have now ill will towards the country that houses them. And indeed, so much manpower and funding is invested on these issues that little remains to focus on the actual problem of terrorism from outside the country.

Another tender issue is the war in Iraq. Here also thousands of innocent people have died for what many regard as the hidden agenda of the government - not to fight terrorism per se, but rather to seize the oil resources of the country. In the name of this agenda, or indeed in the name of terrorism, thousands of American lives, as well as innocent foreign lives, were lost.

Because of this, many Americans and international critics have begun to feel that the United States no longer adheres to its fundamental principle of not only freedom, but the also the very core of democracy upon which the country has been built.

The Effect of 9/11 on Constitutional Rights

The question of democracy is also addressed by Etzioni (2004). In considering issue of democracy in terms of historic events such as the fall of the Weimar Republic and the concomitant rise of Nazism, the author asserts that the focus in the Germany and many other similar cases is the development of non-existent democracy, while in the United States the issue focuses on the loss of existing democracy.

Etzioni takes a rather optimistic view of the issue, mentioning that an established democracy is almost never lost by means of internal developments, even such as the ones now faced by the United States. Etzioni then goes on to address possible definitions of democracy. It has to be noted that the term democracy might answer to a very wide variety of definitions. In many cases, it depends upon the particular paradigm under which the society in question operates. For some countries, for example, democracy may mean no more than regular elections. In terms of the United States, then, democracy needs to be defined according to the standards of the existing democracy that has been experienced to date.

In the United States, democracy refers to changes in power, two or more political parties at any time in governance, checks and balances in government branches, and courts that protect the rights of individuals. In addition, there are provision such as the freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and the freedom to peacefully and undisturbed exercise one's religion or culture without government interference. In short, democracy means that the constitutionally guaranteed rights of all Americans, regardless of ethnic or religious heritage. This has not been the case after the 9/11 attacks.

In the same spirit, the exact meaning of the constitution and the Declaration of Independence is addressed by Robert Hole (2001). According to this author, Thomas Jefferson created the Declaration in terms of the time and specific concerns in the world where he operated. Hole for example mentions the case of slavery, which was still rampant during Jefferson's day. Indeed, the President himself was dependent upon the slavery paradigm for his way of life, his own prosperity, and even his progeny. Yet he created a document that stated that all persons are equal under the constitution. The provisions were however that all equal persons should be white and be able to maintain a certain standard of living.

It is interesting to note that Hole's book was published during 2001. This is the year of the 9/11 attacks, in itself was a time of particular political upheaval, where the paradigms relating to rights and equality were in a state of flux, as they are now. Instead of negroes, women and other minority groups, rights and liberties are now sacrificed across the board for the sake of "protecting the American way of life" by eradicating terrorism before it even has a chance to occur. According to the author, the reader has to consider the time and the context during which the laws were created. The paradigm of slavery can for example hardly be applied to the Constitution now, anymore than Jefferson could have been blamed for slavery in the face of the ideologies in his Constitution. Should one therefore revise one's criticism against the Patriot Act today?

When seen in this light, one might argue that the current threat of terrorism should be kept in mind when defining democracy and equal rights. Indeed, if Hole's premise were to be followed, one might argue with the government, that certain rights need to be placed on hold to guarantee the safety of the country and its citizens.

The difference between the situations is however the same as cited by Etzioni (2004). The democracy and its definitions, as evolved to the present cannot be declared null even in the face of the terrorist crisis. In Jefferson's time, democracy was defined in a certain way. The same is true of the budding democracy of all citizens during the 1950's. Democracy as it is understood today is the product of the evolution from Jefferson's times. It is a process that cannot be reversed. Democracy today means the same thing as it did seven, eight, and even ten years ago. It means what it guarantees: no person should be discriminated against on the grounds of his or her religion, gender, ethnic heritage, or any other distinguishing paradigm. This is not the case under the Patriot Act.

The Patriot Act provides the government with the right to implement surveillance and detention against any person it regards as dangerous or oriented towards terrorism. This is where citizens' guaranteed rights become problematic. Because the terrorist attacks were perpetrated by Arabs and Muslims, the federal government now presumes that people with the same profile, regardless of number of year in the United States or demonstrated loyalty to the country, are more likely to perpetrate terrorist acts. The government is using this as an excuse to disregard any legal or civil rights that such citizens might previously have had.

Under the Patriot Act, the government is now creating profiles of people it regards as high risk in terms of terrorism. These people are also… READ MORE

How to Reference "Patriot Act" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

US Patriot Act Term Paper

U.S. Patriot Act

How the U.S. Patriot Act facilitates foreign intelligence operations

Patriot Act has been helping the FBI with efforts of sharing information. The Act has made significant contributions… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (3180 words) Sources: 9 Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization

---

Patriot Act vs. Constitutionally Guaranteed Rights Term Paper

Patriot Act vs. Constitutionally Guaranteed Rights

Patriot Act was passed in haste following the terrorist attacks on the U.S. In 2001. It was reauthorized and amended in 2006. But in… read more

Term Paper 20 pages (6439 words) Sources: 6 Style: Harvard Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

Civil Rights Does the Patriot Research Paper

In the course of research, several sources claim that The Patriot Act merely nationalizes most measures that were already being taken by the government. First, even if that assertion was… read more

Research Paper 6 pages (2276 words) Sources: 5 Style: APA Topic: American History / United States

---

Bush Administration Patriot Act and Legal Constitutional Dilemmas Term Paper

Bush Administration can be fully encompassed as belonging to the conservative ideology, we need to refer to some of the basic characteristics of conservatism, as it appears according to theoreticians.… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (913 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Government / Politics

---

Telecommunications Law Thesis

Telecommunications Law

The USA Patriot Act was passed by Congress in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The Act allows federal officials to have greater authority in… read more

Thesis 25 pages (7930 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>