Essay on "Inherently Unequal Trips"
Essay 12 pages (4082 words) Sources: 12 Style: Harvard
[EXCERPT] . . . .
An Overview of the Inherently Unequal TRIPS AgreementIn consideration of the TRIPS agreement and its implications to the
global community, it is important to evaluate the relevance of its
establishment as a function of the World Trade Organization (WTO). As this
discussion will yield, the TRIPS agreement is the product of a history of
international conventions as well as an actuality produced by the trade
liberalization sparked after the end of the Cold War. To the latter
occurrence, one may attribute the opening of countless new international
trade relationships, the deconstruction of politically motivate blockades
and the vast flooding of the international community with nations in
genuine need of development strategy. To the former, the existence of
prior international agreements such as the Paris Convention for the
Protection of Industrial Property (1883), the Berne Convention (1886), the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT, 1947) and the Patent
Cooperation Treaty (1970) would all contribute to the intent and legal
precedents of TRIPS.
Though all of these conventions would promote the idea and the
parameters of an international standard on the subjects of intellectual
property and patent-holding, it would not be until the establishment of the
WTO that any real global mandate could exist for contending with the
subject. The WTO, through its primary role as a mediator, negotiator, and
monitor of international trade policies and disputes, serves by design as a
gatekeeper o
download full paper ⤓
assembled authority to exact a legitimate level of authority over its
member nations. This accounts for the appropriation of many of the
conditions resulting from previous global conventions relating to
intellectual property for use in the TRIPS legislation, with its
reinforcement under the parameters of the new WTO denoting an intellectual
property structure with theretofore unprecedented regulatory relevance.
In considering the text of the TRIPS agreement in light of its legal
implications and some recent case history, the function of the WTO comes
into more vivid focus. Indeed, we can see through its approach to
intellectual property and patent protections, which its legislative and
philosophical thrust tends to endorse as a mode to sustainable global
development, that the WTO is designed to reduce the impact of tariffs,
diplomatic trade obstructions and basic social/legal/political differences
in the interests creating globally viable standards in all categories of
commerce. According to this exact premise, the TRIPS agreement functions
to serve this interest in the categories of intellectual property and
patenting.
The analysis of the legal implications of the conditions established
by the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
(TRIPS) contained here, with a specific focus directed toward understanding
the ways in which its policies differ both from former internationally
governing agreements or conventions on the subject of intellectual property
rights and from currently existent or currently subsiding domestic policies
on the subject of intellectual property rights. The core of the focus in
this analysis will be on the relevance of patent laws, which have vast
economic implications that can be illuminated through several different
modes.
The 1994 adoption of the TRIPS agreement would induce a collective
acceptance of a minimum of standards for the protection of intellectual
property and patent rights that, by its own declaration, would be yielded
by precedents in these categories set by the Paris Convention and the Berne
Convention. These would define all the forms of intellectual property to
ultimately be assessed and categorized in the TRIPS agreement, making due
for protection under a new and legally enforceable framework such
properties as have typically been understood as subject to patent
protection for the innovative value to societies and economies. (Gervais,
1)
This agreement requires a great deal of ongoing judicial attention,
particularly to the inherently fluctuating nature of the agreement. Such
is to say that its interest in bringing many nations gradually into the
fold through the encouragement of measured adoptions of standards that
might promote sustainable development requires constant oversight.
Interactions between developed and developing nations and their respective
corporate bodies dictate that distinctions in protections for intellectual
properties in domestic legal systems will result in global disputes.
The function of the WTO as a forum for collecting the input of the
international trade community on the actions of its member states and
aspiring member states may be noted in one such dispute. This one, between
the Novartis pharmaceutical corporate and the nation of India, is
demonstrable of the chief cause for dispute, in which a company and its
related member state will file complaint against another member state
refusing to acknowledge its right to patent protection. In the Novartis
lawsuit against India, the company has placed pressure on the developing
nation to expedite its integration into a global patenting system,
suggesting that the Doha Declaration affirmations have been met with
ongoing hostility by internationalizing corporations seeking to establish
newly protective markets for their exclusive patenting rights. (Oxfam, 2)
One of the defining characteristics of Doha would be its affirmation
of the right reserved for all cosigners of the TRIPS to distribute
compulsory licenses requiring the release of patented drugs to generic
domestic production. According to Section 5(b) of the addendum to the
original TRIPS agreement, this freedom is accompanies with right of the
member nation to grant such compulsory licenses according to their own
grounds. (WTO, 1) Naturally, the patent holding organization may appeal to
the international governing body in order to find an intervening
application of the overall intent of the TRIPS agreement. The Doha
Declaration, though it leans in the direction of diminishing the pressure
placed upon developing countries to make unnecessary or premature
restrictions upon appropriately flexible patenting practices, nonetheless
attempts to strike a balance to the end of maintaining the overall thrust
toward greater, as opposed to lesser or static, restrictions upon the
generic production of pharmaceuticals. This is asserted in Section 3 of
the Doha Declaration, which indicates that "intellectual property
protection is important for the development of new medicines." (WTO, 1)
This reaffirms a position found in much of the precedent-setting
legislation upon which the TRIPS agreement would be based.
Indeed, the TRIPS agreement devises to improve through patent
production the alignment of developing nations with developed ones, as
demonstrated by the parallel policies of the United States. Such
legislative measures as Special 301 of its Trade Act require "the US trade
representative (USTR) to identify countries it considers have inadequate
intellectual property rights, to warn them to improve, and if not, to apply
unilateral trade sanctions." (Oxfam, 1) Thus, even as India has sought to
retain some objective authority over its own national policies on the issue
of drug patenting, the United States has itself adopted a policy whereby
its own internal structures are designed to counteract such resistance.
The study here goes on to indicate that in addition to the clear economic
dangers of imposed by economic sanctions, national governments will often
bow to the pressure of more dominant trade partners in the interests of
retaining positive diplomatic and political conditions therewith. Here, it
is apparent that one of the core deficiencies in the TRIPS agreement, as
with many other aspects of the WTO's 'governance' over international trade,
is its overextension of any legitimate oversight bodies. Much evidence
suggests that the economic robustness of a trade partner is likely to play
a greater role in the shaping of this nation's susceptibility to the
overarching authority of the progressive conditions endorsed by the Doha
Declaration.
In its aftermath, the continued resistance of American drug
corporations to looser patenting rules in many developing nations suggests
a determination by the latter to establish a universal patenting standard
that conforms with inherently stricter western policies. To this end, one
of the clearest modes through which to observe the embattled nature of the
intentions to the Doha Declaration is the fully unchanged position by
western pharmaceutical companies on the subject of compulsory licenses,
which powerful lobby groups and governments have conspired to legally
obstruct. As it falls upon the member nation from which a patent seeking
or holding company derives itself to file grievance over a perceived
failure by another member nation to honor patent protections, the consent
of a member nation to entertain the complaint is required. Certainly, as
we continue to explore the legal and realistic implications of TRIPS, its
important to note that corporate policies tend to reflect the policies of
the nations from which they derive their core operations.
Now investigating the notion that the establishment of an
international standardization in the governance of patenting laws
inherently favours the development of a more protective and restrictive
policy in heretofore lax developing nations, it is understood that the
TRIPS agreement is consistent with the conventions which had established
precedent for its conditions over the course of more than a century of
international legislation. It does pave more concretely the way for
globalizing corporations to indulge the benefits afforded them in the
developed world in spheres with lesser economic, legal or infrastructural
stability.
In Article 3 of the agreement,… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for " Inherently Unequal Trips" Assignment:
I would like to request "*****" to write this essay for me.
Pls ensure the minimum word count of the contents is 3,600.
Thank you.
How to Reference "Inherently Unequal Trips" Essay in a Bibliography
“Inherently Unequal Trips.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2009, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/overview-inherently/716156. Accessed 4 Oct 2024.
Related Essays:
Unequal Childhood by Annette Lareau Term Paper
Unequal Childhoods
Lareau, Annette. (2003) Unequal Childhoods. Berkeley: University of California Press.
The theoretical under-pinning of the author's study
America may be the land of opportunity, but it is also… read more
Term Paper 5 pages (1912 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Child Development / Youth / Teens
Unequal Childhoods by Lareau Research Paper
Unequal Childhoods
The social and political structure that people live within -- both poor people and people who are affluent -- provides whatever social capital there is available. For low-income… read more
Research Paper 2 pages (824 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Child Development / Youth / Teens
Unequal Wealth This Chapter of the Book Term Paper
Unequal Wealth
This chapter of the book begins with a look at the reasons behind the quickly eroding membership of labor unions, and how that erosion is affecting the redistribution… read more
Term Paper 1 pages (339 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Government / Politics
Computer History Museum Virtual Trip Online Term Paper
Cloud Computing Virtual Trip
Cloud Computing Virtual Field Trip: Computer History Museum
Description of the Event
After having taken a virtual field trip to the Computer History Museum in Mountain… read more
Term Paper 2 pages (647 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Computers / IT / Internet
Unequal Childhoods by Annette Lareau Term Paper
Unequal Childhoods
Annette Lareau's book Unequal Childhoods (2003) is a lengthy report of her research on child raising practices in America. In the book she argues that there are two… read more
Term Paper 4 pages (1500 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Child Development / Youth / Teens
Fri, Oct 4, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!