Thesis on "Organizational Design Change Is an Important"

Thesis 10 pages (2685 words) Sources: 6 Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Organizational Design change is an important aspect of any organization. All organizations undergo time of change. Having the ability to manage and organize such changes is vitally important. Managers must be proactive as it pertains to the manner in which they pursue design change. The purpose of this discussion is to define the process to produce organizational design change. Research will be conducted on the topic and a critical analysis will be made. In addition a conclusion and recommendations on the research completed will be provided.

Organizational design

The concept of organizational development first came about in the 1960s. According to Aken (2007) organizational development has been popular for many years amongst organizations in a broad range of industries. However, in recent years, there has been concern that the theories and concepts associated with organizational development are efficient enough to assist with the "Design science can be defined as the body of knowledge of a particular discipline on designs and design methods. A design can be viewed as a representation, a model of an entity to be realized and intended as an instruction for the next step in the creation process (van Aken, 2005b). An example of a design is a set of drawings for the construction of a machine or building. A design is a solution to a problem, but it is a special kind of solution. It is not a solution to a pure knowledge problem but a solution to a field problem (see also Trullen & Bartunek, 2007 [this issue]). A knowledge problem is a problem that arises from limitations in our knowledge of present reality; a field problem is a problem regarding the realization of a "better" reality (Aken 2007, 68) . "

The author further explains that the ability to solve a problem in the field necessitates not just the design of the solution but also the understanding of the designed solution in the physical or social world. With this understood design can be defined as the boundary between the inconsequential scope of rationalizing and cooperating on one hand and the scope of the pysical and social world on the other hand.

Aken (2007) also explains that the design science factors associated with an understanding of a particular discipline demands a credible knowledge concerning various types of solutions for the design. These solutions provide answers for problems that occur in the field and procedural knowledge concerning the process by which solutions for these problems can be designed. Designs are usually associated with structures, actions, systems or processes. Additionally, design methods denotes design roles, design processes, and in addition to more specific strategies for resolving certain kinds of design issues (Aken, 2007). The author also explains that there are two decisive attributes of design science. These attributes are concern for problems in the field and focusing on interventions or strategies associated with solving problems in the field. The author also explains that design is an extremely creative process that is natural. In fact all human beings use design on a daily basis to assist them through their lives and to solve problems.

With these things understood, the need for design within the context of certain situations becomes obvious. The research thus far indicates that the science of design can assist organizations in their efforts to solve complex problems that occur in the field. The ability to solve these problems is vitally important to ensuring that the goals of the organization are met in a manner that is efficient and timely.

Indeed, design can be used across a broad range of disciplines. One of the most popular uses for design is connected to organizational change. Organizational change occurs as a natural progression in any organizational environment. More specifically organizational change is associated with leading people on a different path than what they are accustomed to. Associated with business planning. There are three main driving forces - people, technology, and information ("Organizational Change")."

Organizational change can be difficult to implement because people are naturally resistant to change. According to Stanley et al. (2005) organizational change often creates cynicism amongst employees. The article explains that many organizations are attempting to deal with many different changes related to more chaotic social, economic and technological environments. As an aspect of confronting these issues organizations tend to rely heavily on their employees to conform to such changes in the workplace environment. However many employees resist such change. The authors point out that there are many reasons for the resistance displayed by some employees. The most significant of these reasons seems to be cynicism. In general, Cynicism is characterized by despair, irritation, and discouragement. In addition those who are cynical may experience feeling of contempt and distrust toward a person, group, philosophy, social principle, or the organization itself. In addition, organizational cynicism in particular is defined as "a negative attitude toward ones employing organizationcomprising cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions. More specifically, cynicism is "a belief that the organization lacks integrity" accompanied by feelings of "distress, disgust, and even shame" and contributing to "tendencies toward negative, and often disparaging behavior (Stanley et al., 2005)"

Rollag (2005) also explains the difficulty that can occur in organizations that are undergoing change. For the purposes of assisting students in understanding the difficulty associated with change management the BikeStuff Simulation was created. This simulation allowed students to actually experience the challenges that managers face in times of organizational change.

As a result of the resistance to change and the challenges that occur as a result of organizational change, the use of design science is incorporated into change management. According to Kikulis et al. (1995) that are certain patterns or processes associated with change in organizational design. The authors explains that such an approach is characterized by several ideals including drive, merging, re-creation, progress, and reorientation. The purpose behind this approach is the consistent nature of elements associated with the structure of the organization and systems that must be taken into consideration when attempting to fully comprehend the foundation of changes that are occurring within an organization. In addition archetypal organizational designs are made coherent or fluid by principles and standards that form dominant notions of what an organization should be engaged in. Such a design also reflect how the organization should be performing and how it is evaluated. The author further explains that certain design patterns associated with change that are identified as "reorientation, re-creation and revolution" are related to are concerned with attempts to transition from one kind of design model to another design. This transition is associated with all encompassing changes in values, systems and structures.

In addition to the variations in patterns as it pertains to archetypal change, there are also theories concerning the "extent to which organizational change is likely to take place in some elements of structure and systems rather than others. In short, whether there are some aspects of organizational structure and operation that are more susceptible or resistant to change. Some organizational elements may be particularly difficult to change because they embody deeply held values, yet it may be these specifically that need changing in order to signal the purpose and seriousness of change (Kanter,

1984; Schein, 1985). This is the idea of high impact systems (Kikulis et al.

(1995) ."

In this passage the authors explain the complex issues that arise when attempts to undergo change are present. It seems that some of the deeply held values of an organization can be the greatest impediment to change. However it is also apparent that organizations must find a way to confront this impediment before they will be able to implement any type of meaningful change. The authors do not expand on why deeply held values are so important to employees. However, it could be assumed the employees become attached to the principles of the organization that they serve. As such when changes occur related to the values of an organization individuals have difficulty accepting such changes.

There are several theories associated with organizational design change. One of the most prominent of these theories is contingency theory. This theory is also called structural contingency theory. Structural contingency theory is defined as "a fit between the organization's structure, its size, its technology, and the requirements of its environment ("Organizational Theory: Determinants of Structure") ."

Although many organizations believe that this theory is a sound approach for organizational design, there are some experts that believe the contrary is true. For instance,

"A challenge is that structural contingency theory is static and fails to deal with organizational change and adaptation (Galunic and Eisenhardt, 1994). It is true to say the heart of structural contingency theory is statics, in the sense that it deals with how a static state of fit between structure and contingency causes high performance (e.g.. Woodward, 1965). However, structural contingency theory writings are within a functionalist tradition of social science (Merton, 1968) that sees organizations as adapting to their changing environments (Parsons, 1961).

Therefore, organizations change from one fit to another over… READ MORE

How to Reference "Organizational Design Change Is an Important" Thesis in a Bibliography

Related Thesis Papers:

Organizational Behavior Book Management Book Review

Organizational Behavior

Book review of a management topic of your choice

The book chosen for review in this paper is 'Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations' published in 2011 and… read more

Book Review 6 pages (1815 words) Sources: 6 Topic: Management / Organizations

---

Organizational Diagnosis Surrounding the Acquisition of Palm Capstone Project

Organizational Diagnosis

Surrounding the acquisition of Palm by HP, several issues contour to raise organizational challenges. For once, there is the actual organizational restructuring, understood in terms of the people… read more

Capstone Project 5 pages (1468 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Management / Organizations

---

Organizational Alternatives and Social Change Term Paper

Organizational Alternatives and Social Change

What is organizational behavior? It is a social science discipline much like cultural anthropology, economics, political science, psychology, and sociology. That means that it uses… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1612 words) Sources: 4 Style: APA Topic: Management / Organizations

---

Organizational Behavior the Basic Objective Research Paper

Organizational Behavior

The basic objective of this project is to describe and analyze the organizational structure of Foresight Technologies Co -- a fictional company, as well as to investigate whether… read more

Research Paper 12 pages (3685 words) Sources: 10 Topic: Management / Organizations

---

Change Management Using Various Organizational Examples (Different Essay

Change Management

Using various organizational examples (different companies), please evaluate the major concepts underlying effective major business transformation and dynamic change management which we discussed in class, including: the new… read more

Essay 13 pages (4441 words) Sources: 15 Style: Chicago Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>