Term Paper on "American Political Behavior"

Term Paper 9 pages (2611 words) Sources: 6

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Organization Social Capital

NGOs, the U.S. Government and Social Capital: Amnesty International

Organization:

Amnesty International describes itself as a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) dedicated to research on human rights abuses, action on humanitarian crises and the proliferation of global justice. (AI, 1) Since its founding in London in 1961, Amnesty International has been a leading voice calling for reform in every setting in the global community where there is a demonstrated need for improvements in democracy, health rights, gender equality, environmental rights, economic opportunities, freedom from violence and protection from genocide.

Policy Goal:

Originating in London but operating all over the world, its primary focus is in the developing sphere, where humanitarian crises are often symptomatic of larger economic, political and ethnic strife. However, its policy goals also call for it to interact closely with established global powers such as the United Kingdom and the United States. Its relationship to the latter is of particular interest in understanding the organization's policy goals. This is because it must both work in collaboration with the political bodies of the United States in order to advance improvements in the developing sphere but must also use its objective position to rebuke the United States for its own abuses. This denotes a challenging balance that will be of particular interest in the discussion proposed here within.

Organization's Recruitment Tactics:

As the discussion hereafter will explore, Amnesty International's recruitment tactics are of an especially important relevance in its mission to operate independently from the influence of any government group while still maintaining the resources to influence political, legislative and government policies. Amnesty International courts members throughout the global community by emphasizes that it accepts no donation, funding or moneys from government groups. This assertion of its independence from ulterior interest is effective in garnering the type of social capital necessary to bring credibility to its research and its assertions.

Organizational Outlook:

Introduction:

With its founding in 1961, Amnesty International quickly became a prominent voice in calling for change on a global scale, targeting conditions in the developing sphere with a particular focus on wrongful imprisonment and the suppression of civil liberties. Its ambition gathered a tremendous amount of support even in its first decade, with Amnesty quickly rising to a role of council for international bodies such as the United Nations and the UNESCO fund. As it relates to the United States, Amnesty International has long possessed a mixed relationship, most specifically underscored by the manner in which the organization interacts with America's political orientation. Both in terms of its recognition of the U.S. As a model for democratic and socioeconomic development and in terms of its steady line of criticism for the U.S., Amnesty International has sought not just to influence U.S. policy but to use the pressure applied by its findings to force the U.S. To be a better role model to nations in the developing sphere. The discussion hereafter will examine the unique dynamic between the political bodies of the United States and the Amnesty International organization.

Background:

Before proceeding to a more direct discussion on the relationship between the U.S. And Amnesty International, as well as consideration of the role played by social capital in this relationship, it is appropriate to offer some discussion on the most pressing issues currently facing the organization. Amnesty International faces no small number of obstacles in its ambition to help reduce human rights abuses and acts of cruelty perpetrated or enabled by organized governmental bodies in the developing world. The primary issue that is considered in this report is governmental use of the death penalty, social inequality and the general exclusions which detain the impoverished in untenable living conditions throughout the Third World. These key Amnesty International issues impact individuals in countries throughout the world and, as a NGO of note, it plays a prominent role in identifying and improving governments which lag in human rights categories. Moreover, these areas all implicate the United States and its political bodies in important ways.

According to our research, there are many developing nations in which those rights and protections which are assumed by some as inalienable are not only denied but are met by aggressive, often violent oppression. This identifies a core set of conflicts to which Amnesty International must respond directly.

The issue of the death penalty is one which is especially troubling, given the implications of its outcome. For many nations, draconian governmental control is accompanied by this permeating threat of capital punishment. In the developing sphere, where nations often lack the organizational capacity, judicial propriety or political will to ensure that legal proceedings are fair and equal, it is also the case that the death penalty will tend to be used with more rigor and frequency. As this discussion will further demonstrate, there is a clear historical connection between the application of the death penalty in dictatorial contexts and the dramatic inequality of the classes. This reflects on the relevance of poverty to world governance, which will be considered in light of recent events in the economic sector. With the crash of global markets and the use of government bailouts to protect floundering banks, there is a background to current conditions of economic inequality which points to a total lack of accountability for the poor.

Discussion:

Because Amnesty International is a global organization, its focus is not on the United States specifically. As the discussion will show hereafter, there are a number of areas in which the United States government and AI are on the same page. Still, the U.S. is identified as the single greatest offender in the area of human rights based on the number of studies reported by AI. This may not be a fully proportional representation of human rights abuses but is instead, Ron et al. (2001) report, a demonstration of the tactics employed by AI to generate political capital. Ron et al. find that by publishing a disproportionate number of reports regarding abuses committed by the United States, AI hopes to bring greater political pressure on U.S. leaders to correct said abuses. According to Ron et al., "we find that while human rights conditions are associated with the volume of their country reporting, other factors also matter, including previous reporting efforts, state power, U.S. military assistance, and a country's media profile. Drawing on interviews with Amnesty and Human Rights Watch Staff, we interpret our findings as evidence of Amnesty International's social movement-style 'information politics.' The group produces more written work on some countries than others to maximize advocacy opportunities, shape international standards, promote greater awareness, and raise its profile." (Ron et al., p. 2)

This denotes a strategic emphasis on the violations committed by the United States, as one example. The expectation is that the particular political structures in more highly developed governmental settings are likely to create pressure in response to negative reporting by Amnesty International. Moreover, the United States will tend to have the impact of making certain international transgressions appear as acceptable according to human rights standards. Creating reform would have the positive reverse effect of making the U.S. A far more credible advocate for policy change and improvements in the developing sphere. Ron et al. echo that assertion that Amnesty International is engaged in a positively intended but somewhat distorted mode of representing global human rights struggles. According to Ron et al., "scholars of transnational advocacy also claim that NGOs are savvy interest groups who maximize opportunities and scarce resources through innovative, social movement style tactics. Keck and Sikkink (1998) offer an influential and detailed analysis of NGO 'information politics,' explaining that activists 'seek our resources' and 'conduct public relations'; 'generate information quickly . . . [and] effectively'; deploy information in 'innovative ways' within 'hospitable venues'; and use 'symbolic' and 'leverage' politics. Their interpretation of this is positive, viewing information politics as a worthwhile tool in the struggle for global justice." (Ron et al., p. 3)

Of course, the United States is not just targeted by Amnesty International because of its visibility. It is truly guilty of a great many trespasses that AI has worked to alter through the above-noted approach of 'leverage' politics. As stated above, an area which is particularly troubling is that relating to the death penalty. On this point, in 2010, Amnesty International sharply rebuked the United States for its continued use of capital punishment in its punitive system. According to an AI report, "ahead of World Day against the Death Penalty on 10 October, Amnesty International has urged the U.S.A., the only country that carried out executions in the Americas in 2009, to end its use of this cruel and inhumane punishment. 'A clear majority of countries have rejected the death penalty. How can the U.S.A. claim leadership on human rights yet still commit judicial killings?' said Widney Brown, Senior Director of International Law and Policy at Amnesty International." (AI3, p. 1).

The article released by Amnesty International would go on to detail an array of dimensions of the U.S. death penalty… READ MORE

How to Reference "American Political Behavior" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

American Political Behavior Discussion Chapter

American Politcal Behavior

American Political Behavior

Different Types of Social Capital

Social capital refers to "the connections among individuals' social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness that arise… read more

Discussion Chapter 4 pages (1372 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Government / Politics

---

American Political System Term Paper

Politics

The American Political system has been an intriguing topic for many decades. In many ways the American political system is unique in its approach to governance (Rubin). The purpose… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1555 words) Sources: 1+ Style: MLA Topic: Government / Politics

---

Political Psychology Essay

American Revolution

Motivations of the American Revolution

Some may say that the American Revolution was conceived during the earliest days of British colonization. Inspired to move to the new world… read more

Essay 3 pages (717 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: American History / United States

---

American Revolution Describe the Social and Political Term Paper

American Revolution

Describe the social and political climate in England; how was it different in the colonies. Although English culture was not as admired as French culture within the European… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1703 words) Sources: 3 Style: APA Topic: American History / United States

---

Political Science - Federal Term Paper

Political Science - Federal

Political Science

In what ways did the events of 9/11 and the measures taken as a result of the tragedy affect the way in which America… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (3647 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: American History / United States

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>