Term Paper on "Nursing Study. Ozkan and Gokdogan (2003) Examined"

Quoted Instructions for "Nursing Study. Ozkan and Gokdogan (2003) Examined" Assignment:

Research Article Critiques

A research critique is a critical estimate, value, or judgment regarding general or key features of a research report. A research critique involves careful, systematic, and critical analysis of the research report according to specified criteria. Consequently a research critique "encompasses a descriptive account of what has been studied..." and focuses upon "making...judgments]" [or, evaluations] about the [research] proposal's [or research report's] scientific merits and ultimate worth" (Wilson, 1993, p. 269). Therefore a research critique is a judicious appraisal of a research study's strengths, weaknesses, and limitations and, hence, serves two (2) purposes: 1.) to assist the researcher to refine and to improve the process of inquiry, and 2.) to assist the research consumer in deciding how to utilize research findings. To this end, evaluation of assigned research articles critiques is based upon scientific criteria. These criteria must be attached to each completed critique when presented to the instructor for grading. Failure to do so will result in five (5) -point deductions from the numerical grade.

Critique of the Quantitative Research Report

Purpose: The purpose of a research critique is to provide the student with the opportunity to acquire expertise as a consumer of nursing research while refining critical thinking skills through the process of analysis of research articles. This activity is designed to assist the student to objectivity and critically evaluate a research report*****s content for scientific merit and application to nursing.

Guidelines: The following is a listing of key elements/components that the researcher should consider in the process of critique of quantitative research. In the process of critique, the reader should consider each element/component since each specific element/component could affect the written report and subsequently affect the reader*****s process of analysis. As the analysis is completed, the reader should consider each element/component critically; one should analyze each in the following ways:

* Is the element weak or absent?

* Is the element appropriate?

* Is the element strong?

* What are the suggested improvements for the elements?

* What are the potential impacts on the findings of the particular element?

1. This section addresses areas in the problem statement, identification of need for the study and purpose for the research. The critique should consider the following elements/components* of the research article selected for review:

A. Title

B. Abstract

C. Problem statement

D. Purpose of the study

E. Literature Review

F. Theoretical Framework/Conceptual Framework

G. Hypotheses/Research Questions

H. Research Design/Methods

I. Sample

J. Instrumentation

K. Validity and reliability

L. Data collection procedures

M. Data Analysis

N. Results

O. Discussion of findings

P. Implication, limitations and recommendation

* It is not necessary to address each item in a separate paragraph. It is acceptable to combine several elements into paragraphs when it seems logical to do so.

2. The critique should be concluded with a summative evaluation. The reader should comment on the article*****s strength and weaknesses. The critique should conclude with overall comments about the article. This constitutes the readers personal reaction to the article.

Format: This critique should be presented as a scholarly paper. It should be type written and should follow the guidelines specified by American Psychological Association (APA) in the Publication Manual (5th edition) for the presentation of a paper of this nature. It is expected that this paper will follow conventional guidelines related to English usage (i.e., spelling, grammar, sentence structure) and other stylistic considerations. The mechanics involved in presenting this paper are part of the evaluation process. Additionally. the article that has been critiqued should be attached.

Evaluation: This assignment will be evaluated in the following manner.

1. Elements of the Article (60%)

a. Title, Abstract, Problem Statement (10 pts): 1 2 3 4 5 X 2 =

b. Literature Review, Theoretical Framework (10 pts):

1 2 3 4 5 X 2 =

c. Hypotheses/Research Questions, Research Design, Sample (10 pts)

1 2 3 4 5 X 2 =

d. Instrumentation, Validity and reliability, Data collection procedures, and data analysis. (10 pts) 1 2 3 4 5 X 2 =

e. Results, Discussion of findings. (10 pts) 1 2 3 4 5 X 2 =

f. Implications, limitations, and recommendations (10 pts)

1 2 3 4 5 X 2 =

2. Personal Reaction (10 pts):

Summative evaluation, strengths and weaknesses, overall comments. Clearly stated as to what is the needed next step. Implications for nursing practice and nursing knowledge development identified.

1 2 3 4 5 X 2 =

3. Mechanics (30%)

a. English usage (25 pts): written in past tense and 3rd person, preferably gender neutral. Correct spelling, grammar, capitalization, punctuation, sentence structure, and paragraph construction; absence of run-on sentences, compounded ideas.

1 2 3 4 5 X 5 =

b. Appearance (5 pts): neatly typed; errors corrected neatly; 1 inch margins; APA format for references, documentation, and style.

1 2 3 4 5 X 1 =

Critique of the Qualitative Research Report

Purpose: The purpose of a research critique is to provide the student with the opportunity to acquire expertise as a consumer of nursing research while refining critical thinking skills through the process of analysis of research articles. This activity is designed to assist the student to objectivity and critically evaluate a research report*****s content for scientific merit and application to nursing.

Guidelines: The following is a listing of key elements/components that the researcher should consider in the process of critique of qualitative research. In the process of critique, the reader should consider each element/component since each specific element/component could affect the written report and subsequently affect the reader*****s process of analysis. As the analysis is completed, the reader should consider each element/component critically; one should analyze each in the following ways:

* Is the element weak or absent?

* Is the element appropriate?

* Is the element strong?

* What are the suggested improvements for the elements?

* What are the potential impacts on the findings of the particular element?

1. This section addresses areas in the problem statement, identification of need for the study and purpose for the research. The critique should consider the following elements/components* of the research article selected for review:

A. Title

B. Abstract

C. Problem for study/Problem statement

D. Purpose of the study

E. Sample

F. Measures to capture data

G. Procedures for data collection:

1. method (e.g. ethnography)

2. time/length of study

3. subject involvement

J. Procedures for data gathering:

1. researcher*****s feelings

2. researcher-subject relationship

3. checking for bias

4. organizing/categorizing/summarizing

N. Results of data gathered

O. Discussion for the use of findings/Conclusions

P. Suggestions for use of findings

Q. Style/organization

* It is not necessary to address each item in a separate paragraph. It is acceptable to combine several elements into paragraphs when it seems logical to do so.

2. The critique should be concluded with a summative evaluation. The reader should comment on the article*****s strength and weaknesses. The critique should conclude with overall comments about the article. This constitutes the readers personal reaction to the article.

Format: This critique should be presented as a scholarly paper. It should be type written and should follow the guidelines specified by American Psychological Association (APA) in the Publication Manual (5th edition) for the presentation of a paper of this nature. It is expected that this paper will follow conventional guidelines related to English usage (i.e., spelling, grammar, sentence structure) and other stylistic considerations. The mechanics involved in presenting this paper are part of the evaluation process. Additionally, the article that has been critiqued should be attached.

Evaluation: This assignment will be evaluated in the following manner.

1. Elements of the Article (60%)

a. Title, Abstract, Problem for study/Problem Statement (15 pts):

1 2 3 4 5 X 3 =

b. Purpose, Sample, Measures to capture data (15 pts):

1 2 3 4 5 X 3 =

c. Procedures for data collection/Method, Procedures for data gathering (15 pts)

1 2 3 4 5 X 3 =

d. Results of data gathered/Findings. Discussion for use of findings/Conclusions, Suggestions for use of findings (15 pts)

1 2 3 4 5 X 3 =

2. Personal Reaction (10 pts):

Summative evaluation, strengths and weaknesses, overall comments. Clearly stated as to what is the needed next step. Implications for nursing practice and nursing knowledge development identified.

1 2 3 4 5 X 2 =

3. Mechanics (30%)

a. English usage (20 pts): written in past tense and 3rd person, preferably gender neutral. Correct spelling, grammar, capitalization, punctuation, sentence structure, and paragraph construction. Absence of run-on sentences, compounded ideas. 1 2 3 4 5 X 5 =

b. Appearance (10 pts): neatly typed; errors corrected neatly; 1 inch margins; APA format for references, documentation, and style.

1 2 3 4 5 X 2 =

Critique Guidelines

Title

1. Does the title clearly and concisely describe the study?

2. Are the variables included in the title?

3. Is the population/sample included in the title?

4. Is the length of the title appropriate?

Abstract

1. Is an abstract included in the article?

2. Does the abstract include a statement of the problem, purpose, and/or hypotheses?

3. Does the abstract briefly summarize design, methodology, results, and conclusions?

4. Is the abstract adequate - why or why not?

Confidence in the Findings of the Report

1. What are the qualifications and reputation of the investigator(s)?

2. What evidence is there in this report that they are qualified to conduct this study?

3. What other articles have the authors published in this area of research?

4. Is this article published in a refereed journal?

5. What are the dates of submission of the report and the publication of the report?

Section 1: Theoretical/Conceptual Framework:

1. Is a conceptual framework described? If not, does the absence detract from the significance of the research?

2. Are the concepts to be studied identified and defined?

3. Are measures for each of the concepts identified and described?

4. Does the research problem flow naturally from the conceptual framework?

Section 2: Protection of Human Rights:

1. Is there evidence of an independent ethics review by a board or a committee?

2. Has the study been designed to minimize risk and maximize benefits to participants?

3. Is there an indication that participants gave voluntary, informed consent?

4. Is there evidence in the study that individuals can be identified?

Section 3: The Problem:

1. Was problem statement introduced promptly?

2. Is the problem significant to nursing and is the significance described?

3. Has the purpose for conducting the research been explained?

4. What are the research variables and how are they measured/operationalized?

5. Will an answer to the problem provide insight into clinical applicability of the problem?

Section 4: Research Questions/Hypotheses:

1. Are research questions or hypotheses formally stated? If no, should they be included?

2. Do the research questions and hypotheses naturally flow from the research problem and theoretical framework?

3. Does each a research question or hypothesis contains at least two variables?

4. Are the research questions or hypotheses worded clearly and objectively? Is a prediction evident?

Section 5: Review of the Literature:

1. Is the review comprehensive, logical and relevant to the problem?

2. Is the relationship to the research purpose evident?

3. Does it include recent research and theoretical work?

4. Can a case be made for conducting this study based on the review?

Section 6: Research Design:

1. What design has been used for the study?

2. Is the design appropriate for the research question and purpose of research?

3. Has enough information been given to permit replication?

Section 7: Sampling:

1. Is the target population carefully described?

2. Are sample selection procedures clearly defined?

3. Does the sampling method fit the research design?

4. Are potential sample biases described?

5. Is the sample sufficiently large?

6. Did the authors use power analysis to document that the study size was adequate or inadequate?

7. How was sample size justified?

8. To whom can study results be generalized?

Section 8: Data Collection:

1. Describe the instruments used for data collection.

2. Has rationale been given for the selection of instruments?

3. Are instruments congruent with the research question?

4. Are instruments suitable for use with the study sample?

5. Have procedures for testing the reliability and validity of instruments been described? Are results sufficient to indicate their use?

Section 9: Quantitative Analysis:

1. Do the research design and the study question fit with the analysis methods used?

2. Does the level of measurement of the data fit with the type of statistics used?

3. Is the link between the analysis and the findings logical and clear?

4. Is the statistical result presented clearly both in the text as well as in numerical presentation?

5. Are graphic displays clear, simple, and accurate?

Section 10: Conclusions and Recommendations:

1. What are the assumptions and limitations of the study? Are they listed or do you have to infer what they are?

2. Are results of data analysis clearly explained in reference to research questions, hypotheses and theoretical framework?

3. Has there been appropriate generalization of significant findings beyond the study sample to the population?

4. What recommendations for nursing practice and future research studies have been made? Are these recommendations supported by the data?

I will email the Nursing journal article. thank you.

*****