Article Critique on "Legislative Critique of the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002"

Article Critique 11 pages (3515 words) Sources: 7

[EXCERPT] . . . .

MTSA Legislative Critique

Maritime Transportation Security Act (2002) Legislative Critique

In 2002, President Bush signed into Law the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA). This federal legislation was passed in direct response to the terrorist acts of 9/11 and represented a milestone in maritime regulation in the United States. While Congress had previously passed legislation regulating the merchant marine industry, American shipping had historically been spared the stringent regulatory administration that had at one time or another impacted the railroad, airline and trucking industries. However, as a result of the World Trade Center attacks, the Government, and the nation, felt the need to overhaul the security system in place for the country's maritime shipping industry. The net result was a litany of new regulations and requirements placed on those who operate vessels, ports and facilities.

Legislative History

S.B. 1214 and H.B. 3983

In 2000 and again in July of 2001, the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation introduced a Bill (S.B. 2965 (2000) and S.B. 1214 (2001)) which would require the Secretary of Transportation to design a system to assess the threat risk to U.S. ports and another system which would require the U.S. Coast Guard to design a security program in which each port would have to submit a security plan for approval (United States Senate, 2001). Ultimately S.B. 1214 cleared committee on August 2, 2001, without amendment and which called for the Coast Guard to "establish a process for conducting port vulnerability assessments…One year after the completion of an assessment, [each] seaport would be required to submit a security program for approval to the Coast Guard Captain of the Port (United States Senate, 2001).

The Bill as presently drafted passed the senate on December 20, 2001 and by the House of Representatives on June 4, 2002. The House had proposed a similar Bill (H.B. 3983), however, the House tabled their Bill in favor of the Senate's. A proposed House amendment was rejected by the Senate and the Bill was signed by President Bush and became law #107-295 on November 25, 2002 (United States Senate, 2001).

Previous Legislation

In a sense the MTSA was a direct product of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. It is clear from the Report to Congress by the U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration that the attacks of 9/11 have made the standards and curriculum of the MTSA of critical importance (USDOT). It is equally clear from the Report that the prevention of further terrorist activity is the singular top priority behind the legislation. However, the Report also addresses the need to curtail crime, theft, human trafficking, smuggling etc.… through the sea ports (USDOT). These goals are the remnants of the legislation that was soon to become federal law but for the 9/11 attacks.

The MTSA was originally introduced as the Port and Maritime Security Act in 2001 and was unanimously approved by the Senate Commerce Committee on August 2, 2001. While this draft legislation focused on eradicating theft, smuggling and graft, it did not address the issue of domestic or international terrorism. After the attacks of September 11, 2001, the bill was re-written and expanded significantly to address the threat of terrorism at domestic seaports.

Legislative Summary

Provisions of the MTSA

The Act provides for the first over-arching security regulation of the marine transportation system in our nation's history. The duties are divided between the Secretary of Transportation, the Department of Transportation, the United States Coast Guard, the port administrators and the vessel operators. The overall purpose of the Act is to eliminate all "transportation security incidents" in the nation's ports and aboard its vessels which might result in significant loss of life, environmental damage and/or transportation system or economic disruption.

The Act requires that foreign port risk assessments be conducted but the Secretary of Transportation for all ports which serve U.S. bound vessels. The Secretary can deny entry to ships leaving those ports that fail to maintain proper anti-terrorist measures. The Secretary of Transportation shall also conduct a risk assessment of all vessels and facilities involved in maritime operations in U.S. waters. All high risk vessels and facilities must be identified by the Secretary and interim security measures put in place adopted. The Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with law enforcement and private agencies and individuals with maritime security expertise, will oversee the development of security training and education and certification of security personnel working at ports and facilities. The Act has authorized a $33 million expenditure earmarked for developing the standards for this education and training.

Once the Secretary has identified potential risks to maritime security, the Coast Guard must more fully ascertain the threat levels for any vessels of facilities identified. The Coast Guard, which has greatly expanded responsibilities under the Act, is responsible for developing a National Maritime Transportation Security Plan and regional Area Maritime Transportation Security Plans to deter incidents. The Coast Guard then must develop Area response plans for dealing with terrorist attacks.

Each and every vessel, port and waterfront facility is required to submit security plans and incident response plans to the Coast Guard. These plans must reflect the Coast Guard's threat assessments and security recommendations and the plans must be approved by the Coast Guard. Facilities are very broadly defined to include any "structure of any kind located in, on, under, or adjacent to any waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" (MTSA 2002). The 2002 MTSA authorizes the Sea Marshal program to secure the harbors, ports, vessels and waterfront facilities. This portion of the law greatly expands the authority for the Coast Guard to board vessels entering U.S. waters.

The law also incorporated a Coast Guard authorization bill, which reflects the provisions of S.B. 951 and H.B. 3983, the House maritime security bill. The authorization bill provides for $6 billion budgeted to the Coast Guard in 2003 to implement many of the Coast Guard obligations under the Act, as well as increasing the maximum number of active duty guardsmen by 10,000 to 45,500 for 2003. The Coast Guard is also required to report to Congress detailed findings of its National Distress and Response System regarding gaps in the system's coverage, potential targets and strategic plans for addressing the gaps and for achieving its overall goals a protected maritime system.

The Department of Transportation is responsible for designating a portion of every port as a limited-access, high security zone. Facilities and ports are also eligible for a grant program under the Act in order to upgrade their security in order to comply with the Act's requirements.

The Act establishes a system of intelligence for collecting and analyzing information pertaining to all vessels and seamen operating in U.S. waters. The reporting and information regarding all crewmembers, passengers and cargo must be improved in order to better anticipate and deter security incidents. Part of the means to accomplish this will come from more efficient screening and inspection of vessels, crewmembers and cargo (Hollings 2002). Finally, the Act further authorizes $90 million in Research and Development grants to help the U.S. Customs Service inspect all goods and merchandise carried by vessels into Unites States ports.

Regulations and Implementation of the Act

The mandate of the MTSA was implemented through various executive and legislative agencies. Many federal regulations were established to set forth a uniform system of criteria which all vessels, ports and facilities must comply. An explanation of the Act that does not address the various regulations is incomplete because it does not set forth what is required in order to be compliant with the Act.

For example, Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations delineates the Coast Guards requirements for vessels, ports and facilities. As of July 1, 2004, mandatory compliance was required for all of the provisions of the Act and its associated regulations. As a result, over 10,000 U.S. flag ships were required to register their anti-terrorist security plans with the United States Coast Guard (Drakos 2004). Each subject vessel required to register must have on board an approved security plan and a letter of approval from the Coast Guard. AU.S. ship not carrying the proper documentation is subject to "inspection of the vessel, delaying of the vessel, detention of the vessel, restriction of operations, including movement within the port, or expulsion of the vessel from port, including denial of entry" (Drakos 2004).

The Coast Guard primary method of compliance screening is by way of boarding a ship. A "point" system is used to determine the priority of boarding a ship. The Coast Guard is required to board in a priority I situation and is not required to board in a priority III situation (Drakos 2004). The regulations do allow for an appeal process for any operator of a vessel that has been subjected to the above enforcement or control measures.

Evaluation of Legislation

The MTSA had a significant impact on the shipping industry from the time it was first instituted. This is because nearly 10,000 American vessels and 300… READ MORE

How to Reference "Legislative Critique of the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002" Article Critique in a Bibliography

Related Article Critiques:

Transportation Strategic Intermodal Essay

Transportation (general)

Strategic Intermodal Transportation

The Last Mile

Port and Terminal Operations

How has the railroad industry changed from its monopoly position in the 19th century due to the Staggers… read more

Essay 7 pages (1890 words) Sources: 8 Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

Transportation Security in the United States Research Proposal

Transportation - Security

CONTEMPORARY TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ISSUES in the U.S.

The Historical Evolution of Contemporary Transportation Security Issues

Airline Hijacking and Attacks on Transportation as Political Terrorism:

The first hijacking… read more

Research Proposal 25 pages (6826 words) Sources: 10 Style: APA Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

Transportation Security: Transportation Activities Account Research Paper

Transportation Security:

Transportation activities account for a significant portion of the country's gross domestic product and more than 10 million jobs. Despite of the critical importance of this trade activity,… read more

Research Paper 2 pages (595 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

Legislative Critique of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 Article Critique

Boat

Legislative Critique of the Homeland Security Act of 2002

The Homeland Security Act (HSA) of 2002 was passed in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United… read more

Article Critique 10 pages (2865 words) Sources: 8 Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization

---

Transportation Security Administration Research Paper

Transportation Security Administration

Airport Security (A Sweeping Change)

Whole Body Scanning

Innovative Technologies

Sterile Area Access (Employee Screening)

Higher Standards For Hiring

Transport Security Administration

Security concerns are adding to… read more

Research Paper 7 pages (2347 words) Sources: 6 Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>