Essay on "Mooting Assessment Problem Solving"
Essay 4 pages (1469 words) Sources: 1+
[EXCERPT] . . . .
Ms Edwards is a student at the University of the East of England. She lives in halls of residence, and pays £140 per week for her accommodation, £20 a week less than she would pay for the equivalent private rental property in her area. Her tenancy agreement includes the following terms:(a) Students are prohibited from holding parties in the accommodation without the prior permission of the University;
(b) Collective liability will be imposed upon students for damage when the individual(s) responsible cannot be identified; each student will pay an equal proportion in respect of any such damage;
(c) the University accepts no liability in negligence for property damage suffered by students on University premises.
In order to raise money to pay for a holiday, Ms Edwards wants to hold a themed party in her university accommodation, and to charge each guest a £10 admission fee. She does not want to seek the permission of the University for this party, since she believes that her plan to charge an entrance fee, and the theme, 'music inspired by LSD', would be unacceptable to it and she thinks that term (a) is 'unfair' and therefore contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Ms Edwards also thinks that term (c) unfair because it is 'unreasonable' and therefore contrary to s.2(2) of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977. This term concerns her because her MP3 player has been broken in her halls of residence by the University's negligence.
The trial judge accepts Ms Edwards' argument, holding:
SENIOR
(1) That term (a), consi
download full paper ⤓
JUNIOR
And
(2) That term (c) is unreasonable under UCTA. The University is appealing against both findings.
This is a case given for a mooting assessment (UK). My position in the mooting assessment is JUNIOR APPELLANT.
Junior Apellant appeals against the decision(s) of the lower court and argues that the appeal should be allowed. According to the given case, you should argue AGAINST the statement that the term (c ) is unreasonable under UCTA. You are only concerned with the second argument. Please read the full statute (the unfair contract terms act (UCTA) 1977 ) before putting your arguments. Please try to rebut the possible counter arguments and be persuasive.
In its contract the University of the East of England stipulated a term © which states that the University accepts no liability in negligence for property damage suffered by students on University premises. Ms. Edwards has argued that this term is unfair because it is 'unreasonable€ ™ and therefore contrary to s.2(2) of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977. The term further concerns her because her MP3 player has been broken in her halls of residence by the University's negligence.
As junior appellant, I argue for the university showing that the term © is reasonable under UCTA.
The guidelines in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, Schedule 2 require that fairness and reasonableness should be judged according to the following criteria:
1) the strength of the bargaining positions of the parties relative to each other
(2) Whether the customer had received an inducement for entering into the terms or whether the customer was offered an opportunity to enter into the terms with alternate parties (and that she or he therefore had other options)
(3) Whether the customer was aware of all the conditions involved in the terms (and had previous trade or dealing with the party).
(4) Whether the term also excludes any other liability if the condition is not kept; whether the contract delineates and describes all possible conditions, so that the contract is reasonable and so that compliance with the contract can be expected to be maintained.
As regards Ms. Edwards, we can show how the reasonableness exists in all these propositions:
1) Ms. Edwards was previously aware of the contract and could have questioned the university before signing
(2) Ms. Edwards had opportunity to contrast that contract with the contract of other institutions. After all, she presumably looked into other institutions before selecting ours
(3) Ms. Edwards may have not aware of all the conditions involved in the terms (nor had she had previous trade or dealing with the University). Nonetheless, the university delineated the key conditions, and she could have asked the university.
(4)… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Mooting Assessment Problem Solving" Assignment:
University of the East of England v Edwards
In the Court of Appeal
Ms Edwards is a student at the University of the East of England. She lives in halls of residence, and pays £140 per week for her accommodation, £20 a week less than she would pay for the equivalent private rental property in her area. Her tenancy agreement includes the following terms:
(a) Students are prohibited from holding parties in the accommodation without the prior permission of the University;
(b) Collective liability will be imposed upon students for damage when the individual(s) responsible cannot be identified; each student will pay an equal proportion in respect of any such damage;
(c) The University accepts no liability in negligence for property damage suffered by students on University premises.
In order to raise money to pay for a holiday, Ms Edwards wants to hold a themed party in her university accommodation, and to charge each guest a £10 admission fee. She does not want to seek the permission of the University for this party, since she believes that her plan to charge an entrance fee, and the theme, *****˜music inspired by LSD*****, would be unacceptable to it and she thinks that term (a) is *****˜unfair***** and therefore contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Ms Edwards also thinks that term (c) unfair because it is *****˜unreasonable***** and therefore contrary to s.2(2) of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977. This term concerns her because her MP3 player has been broken in her halls of residence by the University*****s negligence.
The trial judge accepts Ms Edwards***** argument, holding:
SENIOR
(1) That term (a), considered in the light of term (b), is unfair under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, and therefore not binding on her;
JUNIOR
And
(2) That term (c) is unreasonable under UCTA. The University is appealing against both findings.
The University is appealing against both findings.
Bibliography format / citation style: Footnote
This is a case given for a mooting assessment (UK). My position in the mooting assessment is JUNIOR APPELLANT.
Junior Apellant appeals against the decision(s) of the lower court and argues that the appeal should be allowed. According to the given case, you should argue AGAINST the statement that the term (c ) is unreasonable under UCTA. You are only concerned with the second argument. Please read the full statute (the unfair contract terms act(UCTA) 1977 ) before putting your arguments. Please try to rebut the possible counter arguments and be persuasive.
You can refer to a total of 3 authorities (cases, statutes, secondary sources).Can you please support the arguments with relevant cases and scholar opinions. Thanks in advance.
How to Reference "Mooting Assessment Problem Solving" Essay in a Bibliography
“Mooting Assessment Problem Solving.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2013, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/ms-edwards-student/8058194. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.
Related Essays:
Mooting Assessment Problem Solving Essay
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Mooting Assessment Problem Solving
The opening point of the case rests in the safety that a contract got signed between Ms. Edwards and the University of the East of England.… read more
Essay 4 pages (1449 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Urban Studies / City Planning / Housing
Mooting Assessment Problem Solving Essay
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Mooting Assessment
A contract can be defined as a legal agreement between two or more parties, where the law binds both parties to adhere to the terms of the contract… read more
Essay 4 pages (1440 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning
Market Entry Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Market Entry
The introduction of computer-based networks in the course of implementation of the business strategies is known as Electronic business or e-business. This involves marketing along with the extensive… read more
Term Paper 27 pages (9989 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce
Aeronautics Degree Program as Enrolled Thesis
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Aeronautics degree program as enrolled in by the student who wrote this report. There were several topics looked at for this project including increased visual intraocular pressure and other impairments… read more
Thesis 25 pages (8672 words) Sources: 25 Style: APA Topic: Astronomy / Planets / Solar System
Conflict Resolution Analysis Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Sociology - Conflict Resolution
CASE ANALYSIS and CONFLICT RESOLUTION
As parent of two growing boys, my partner and I have certainly experienced our share of conflicts that required resolutions over… read more
Term Paper 10 pages (2903 words) Sources: 1+ Style: APA Topic: Child Development / Youth / Teens
Wed, Jul 3, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!