Research Paper on "Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients"

Research Paper 5 pages (1727 words) Sources: 6

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients

The use of mittens or sleeve restraints as effective as the use of wrist restraints in the prevention of unplanned extubation

Endotracheal tubes are an uncomfortable reality for patients in intensive care units. Often, patients will remove their tubes by themselves, placing them at risk of harm from the inability to breath through mechanical means. The issue of various types of restraints is a topic that has received recent attention from the medical community. The problem unplanned extubation is a serious risk for patients and increases the difficulty of caring for intensive care patients. The problem is important for the medical community and for the patients. The following will explore representative articles regarding the use of various restraints on patients to restrict them from removing their tubes before it is deemed medically appropriate.

Literature Review

Mon, Minnick, & Leipzig et al. (2007) explored the prevalence of the extubation problem in intensive care units. The research objectives of the study were to assist in the development of guidelines to help prevent patient-initiated extubation. The study addressed the prevalence of the issue in order to ascertain the significance of the problem. This study used a large, geographically diverse sample population of 49 adult intensive care units spread across five states. This sample population increased the external validity of the study in such a manner that it could be applied to a wide sample population. This study assessed the total patient days and the number of episodes, expressed in terms of patient days. The study found high ex
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
tubation rates in ICUs that had fewer resources and lower staffing rates. It also found that patient harm occurred in 23% of the extubation episodes. However, only a small percentage experienced major harm from the episode. Of the patients examined, nearly 44% were restrained in some manner at the time of extubation This study highlighted the significance of the problem and also indicated a need to study the problem further, as restraints did not appear to significantly reduce the incidence of extubation in the sample population.

Chang, LY., Wang, KW., & Chao, YF et al. (2008) explored various forms of physical restraint that have been used to prevent patients from prematurely removing their endotracheal tube in intensive care units. The study surmised that physical restraints represented a physical risk and additional safety hazard to patients. Therefore, their benefits and risks must be weighed. The study involved 300 patients that were divided into a control group and a test group. The test group consisted of 100 patients with unplanned extubation and a demographically matched group of 200 who had no record of unplanned extubation. The study was conducted on a group of Taiwanese patient who had experienced a stay during a selected 21-month period.

The data was collected using medical records and incident reports of unplanned extubation. Several factors were found in this study that may lead to a risk of unplanned extubation. This study found that the use of physical restraints actually increased unplanned extubation by almost three times. An infection, longer stays in the unit and higher scores on the Glasgow coma scale also increased the risk of extubation. This study contributed to a general understanding of the risk factors involved in an increased risk of unplanned extubation. One of the key weaknesses of the study is that it used retrospective data. In this type of study, a chance of research bias in the data collection is increased using this type of study method.

Bryan (2009) conducted a study based on the study by Chang, Wang, & Chao et al. (2008). This study also explored risk factors associated with extubation. When a patient extubates, they must often be reintubated quickly, within the first hour to 48 hours. The risk of harm to the larynx, anoxia or death is increased with unplanned extubation. This has led nurses to resort to increased use of restraints or various levels of sedation to decrease the chances of extubation. The study examined the use of untied mitten restraints vs. sedation to decrease the risk of extubation. The study found that the use of sedation increases the risk of extubation, as it often extends the time needed on a ventilator. However, use of mittens also increased the chances of extubation due to increased risk of nosocomial infection. This study concluded that other methods, such as using family members as sitters was as more effective way to prevent extubation. This study used actual patient data and patient observation to draw its conclusion. However, not enough details about the data collection and interpretation criteria were provided to make an accurate assessment of the reliability of the data used in the study. It is not known how the biases of the rules of the institution affected the data collection and interpretation of the data.

Dunn (2009) also explored the topic of unplanned extubation. The article was also a response to the article by Chang, Wang, & Chao et al. (2008). This author felt that the former article was premature in its conclusions that physical restraint presented its own risk factor for extubation. One of the key flaws found with the original study is that the authors provided little information on the criteria that was used to determine which patients would receive the restraints. This lack of information introduced a potential confounding variable that was not addressed by the original authors. Differences in the two groups could have been due to differences in risk factor among the patient groups. Dunn brings up a valid point about the study by Chang and colleagues. Another factor that Dunn examined in a critique of the study is that the original authors did not indicate the type of restraint used. Dunn found that the most typical type of restraint is a wrist belt tied to the bedside railing, but it is not known if this was the type of restraint used in the original study. Dunn's analysis of the study conducted by Chang and colleagues brings up many valid points that were not addressed in the original study.

Silva, Sergio, & de Carvalho (2010) explored the use of restraints of intubated pediatric patients. This study explored the topic of unplanned extubation in pediatric patients. Its purpose was to develop best practices for this special group of patients. It also focused on strategies to prevent extubation in this special population. This study used metaanalysis of studies obtained through a data base search to derive the results. This study found that unplanned extubations in the pediatric population were closely associated with age, placing younger patients at greater risk. They were also associated with inadequate tube fixation, agitation, copious secretions, the performance of patient procedures and nursing workload. In this metaanalysis, the use of physical restraints produced conflicting results across studies. The study found that there are few studies regarding extubations in pediatric populations. As with any metaanalysis, it is difficult to find perfectly matched studies, which can impact the results of the study.

Krayem, Butler, & Martin (2006) explored the incidence and factors associated with unplanned extubation with the intention of determining its impact on nursing workload. This study assessed five risk factors and nine factors of nursing manpower to determine the connection between nursing staffing factors and the risk of unplanned extubation. Data was collected 24 hours before and 24 hours after an extubation event. The results of the study revealed that factors such as agitation rate of the patients, the amount of benzodiazeprines represented more significant factors than nursing staff factors. This study found not significant impact on extubation associated with nurse workload. One of the key strengths of this study is that it carefully attempted to eliminate many as many confounding variables as possible. There still might have been issues that were not addressed, but that could have affected the outcome of the study. However, because the study found no significant connection between staff workload and unplanned extubation incidents, it is unlikely that these factors would have influenced the results of the study significantly.

Conclusions

Unplanned extubation in critical care units place the patient at risk for self-injury or even death in some cases. This topic has received considerable attention from the academic community in recent years. Literature regarding the significance and prevalence of the problem revealed that this issue had a major impact on the ability to provide safe and effective care in the critical care unit. The impact of staff workload was not found to be a factor in extubation incidents. However, several important factors were found to be predictors of risk in these patients. For instance, the length of stay, severity of coma, proper tube placement and the presence of infection were found to increase the likelihood of unplanned extubation.

In terms of studies that focused on the effectiveness of restraints, study results were mixed. One of the most important studies on the subject, conducted by Chang, Wang, & Chao et al. (2008) suggested that the restraints themselves increased the… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients" Assignment:

Find at least six references related to your topic--scholarly/peer reviewed research articles. One or two theoretical articles may be included. Keep in mind that there may not be direct evidence available for your question(s) in the exact format you envision. If no one has studied or published research results on your topic, you may need to infer from research on similar or related topics. Carefully read each of the articles (minimum six references) you*****'ve identified as related to your topic and then summarize each of the articles for yourself on a worksheet similar to what you used in Lesson 5, using figure 4.2 on page 150 of the Fundamentals of Nursing Research textbook, as a guide. This exercise will help you identify similarities and differences among articles and help you to evaluate the strength of those articles. Complete this portion by the end of the two weeks allotted for this project (see the Course Schedule on the Syllabus for the specific due date). You do not need to submit this portion of Project 2 to your instructor.

The following information may help you as you appraise your articles.

The type of Research Question or Type of Study:

*****¢Therapy--how to select treatments for patients that do more good than harm and that are worth the efforts and costs of using them. (My focus is Therapy)

*****¢Diagnosis--how to select and interpret diagnostic tests, in order to confirm or exclude a diagnosis, based on considering their precision, accuracy, acceptability, expense, safety, etc.

*****¢Prognosis--how to estimate our patient*****'s likely clinical course over time and anticipate likely complications of the disorder.

*****¢Etiology--how to identify causes for disease.

* Adapted from Sackett et al. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2000: 19.

Type of Study/Study Design:

*****¢Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

A true experiment (one that delivers an intervention or treatment), the strongest design to support cause and effect relationship, in which subjects are randomly assigned to control and experimental groups.

*****¢Cohort Study

A prospective longitudinal study that begins with the gathering of two groups of patients (the cohorts), on that received the exposure (e.g., to a disease) and one that does not, and then following these groups over time to measure the development of different outcomes (diseases).

*****¢Case Study

An intensive investigation of a case involving a person or small group of persons, an issue, or an event.

*****¢Case-Control Study

A type of research that retrospectively compares characteristics of an individual who has a certain condition with one who does not; often conducted for the purpose of identifying variables that might predict the condition.

* Adapted from Sackett et al. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2000: 19.

Rating System for the Hierarchy of Evidence/Levels of Evidence

Level I Evidence for a systematic review or meta-analysis of all relevant RCTs or evidence-based clinical practice guidelines based on systematic reviews of RCTs.

Level II Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed RCT.

Level III Evidence obtained from one well-designed controlled trials without Randomization.

Level IV Evidence from well-designed case-control and cohort studies.

Level V Evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive or qualitative study.

Level VI Evidence from single descriptive or qualities study.

Level VII Evidence from the opinion of authorities and/or reports of expert committees.

* Table from Melnyk, Bernadette Mazurek and Ellen Fineout-Overholt. Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare. Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005:10.

Begin by drafting a topical outline that will help you organize your work more effectively. This portion of the paper is expected to be about 5 pages in length and will be a literature review of the EBP topic.

1.Be sure to write clear topic sentences for each paragraph, and be sure that the information contained in that paragraph relates to the topic sentence.

2.Write an introduction describing the organization and purpose of the review of the literature.

3.Include content from relevant literature and relevant research studies.

4.Studies with similar methodology and/or findings should be discussed in relation to each other to show similarities and differences and to prevent repetition.

5.The findings from the studies should logically build on each other so that the reader can see how the body of knowledge in a particular research area is developed.

6.Write a summary. The summary should include discussion of the quality of the literature reviewed, identification of knowledge gaps, and should indicate directions for further research.

7.The review of the literature should include a minimum of six references. Submit a citations page in APA format at the end of the review. All in text references must use APA style format.

The instructor will evaluate the literature review and supply written comments/feedback within the paper you submit. Your paper, along with the instructor*****'s feedback, will be sent to you as an attachment within your course mail system. Students will be expected to revise the draft and present it as part of the final EBP paper.

How to Reference "Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients" Research Paper in a Bibliography

Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2010, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/mitten-restraints-icu-patients/3907. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.

Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients (2010). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/mitten-restraints-icu-patients/3907
A1-TermPaper.com. (2010). Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/mitten-restraints-icu-patients/3907 [Accessed 3 Jul, 2024].
”Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients” 2010. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/mitten-restraints-icu-patients/3907.
”Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/mitten-restraints-icu-patients/3907.
[1] ”Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/mitten-restraints-icu-patients/3907. [Accessed: 3-Jul-2024].
1. Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2010 [cited 3 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/mitten-restraints-icu-patients/3907
1. Mitten Restraints in ICU Patients. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/mitten-restraints-icu-patients/3907. Published 2010. Accessed July 3, 2024.

Related Research Papers:

Open Visitation in the ICU Is it Harmful or Helpful to the Patient Research Proposal

Paper Icon

Open Visitation in the ICU

Privileges to visit the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) have been a controversial topic since a long time. It is a simple issue between rules and… read more

Research Proposal 14 pages (4237 words) Sources: 10 Topic: Family / Dating / Marriage


Proper Physical Restraint Use in Nursing Facilities Term Paper

Paper Icon

Restraints

As the mean age of the general population becomes older, and as we stand on the threshold of the senility of the baby boomers, geriatric health care is becoming… read more

Term Paper 8 pages (2585 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Healthcare / Health / Obamacare


Non-Compliance in Patients Research Paper

Paper Icon

Patient Noncompliance

Noncompliance in Patients

Advanced Practice Nursing represents a partnership between the patient and service provider. Many times the success of the treatment plan depends on the patient taking… read more

Research Paper 15 pages (4937 words) Sources: 10 Style: APA Topic: Healthcare / Health / Obamacare


Trends Affecting the Nurse as a Patient Educator Research Paper

Paper Icon

Nurse as a Patient Educator:

In the modern healthcare system, nursing student or staff education and patient education is an issue of significant interest to nurses in all their settings… read more

Research Paper 4 pages (1266 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Healthcare / Health / Obamacare


Patient Guide to the Internet Essay

Paper Icon

Patient's Guide To The Internet

Evaluation Criteria for Healthcare Websites

The Internet has become the catalyst for a multitude of information and knowledge sharing websites, portals and vast databases and… read more

Essay 2 pages (642 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Healthcare / Health / Obamacare


Wed, Jul 3, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!