Term Paper on "John Stuart Mill vs. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels"

Term Paper 11 pages (3184 words) Sources: 1+ Style: MLA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Mill & Karl Marx

Comparative Analysis of the Political and Economic Theories of J.S. Mill and Karl Marx

Nineteenth century marked an unprecedented development of ideologies and schools of thought that paved the way for economic and political progress of human societies. Among the figures considered most prominent in the modern period, John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx emerged as two influential political philosophers, promoting their "brand" of economies to describe the nature of capitalism and modern society.

John Stuart Mill was known for his development of the utilitarian movement, wherein capitalism is said to be the resulting effect of this phenomenon that occurred in the modern period. Under Utilitarianism, Mill promoted the idea of assuming individualism in pursuit of happiness, resulting to the concept of rationalism that gave birth to capitalism. Karl Marx, meanwhile, was synonymously identified wit the socialist movement in the midst of a rapidly-individualizing nature of human society under the capitalist economy. Under the socialist, specifically Communist, movement, Marx promoted the idea of achieving an ideal, egalitarian society through the dominant emergence of a proletariat class, occurring after a social revolution.

These core ideas developed by Mill and Marx have created an impact on how modern society viewed and perceived capitalism. When analyzed from the capitalist context, Mill and Marx share similarities and differences in their theories and ideas. The texts that follow outline, discuss, and analyze these points of comparison and contrast in Mill's Utilitarianism and Marx's Socialism. Four (4) main themes are used for the comparative analysis, wherein the first two enumerates their points of similarity, while the other two tackles their points of difference. Points of similarity include the themes of: (a) welfare of the individual as having greater value in the modern-capitalist society, and (b) achievement of ethical freedom through Mill's and Marx's proposed political-economic movements. Points of difference include the following: - individualism vs. socialism, specifically centering on the issue of "alienation," and (d) the right to property vs. The equal distribution of property in society.

Theme 1: Welfare of the individual as having greater value in the modern-capitalist society

Although Mill and Marx were known to subsist to opposing views about the modern capitalist society, they have a point of similarity when the issue of welfare of the individual is discussed. In "On Liberty," Mill expressed the need for an individual to address his/her needs and wants in life. In fact, he focused on this particular point in analyzing modern human society: more than just development and progress, it is the needs and wants of individuals that made capitalist society assume its modern nature.

In effect, by centering on people's desires in life, Mill reflected one characteristic that modern human society is known for: addressing the individual's welfare in the society. Addressing this issue became the core argument for Mill. In the passage that follows, achievement of human desires became an important gauge through which improvement of human society was determined:

Human beings are not like sheep; and even sheep are not undistinguishably alike. A man cannot get a coat or a pair of boots to fit him, unless they are either made to his measure, or he has a whole warehouseful to choose from: and is it easier to fit him with a life than with a coat, or are human beings more like one another in their whole physical and spiritual conformation than in the shape of their feet? If it were only that people have diversities of taste that is reason enough for not attempting to shape them all after one model. But different persons also require different conditions for their spiritual development; and can no more exist healthily in the same moral... The same things which are helps to one person towards the cultivation of his higher nature, are hindrances to another...Such are the differences among human beings in their sources of pleasure, their susceptibilities of pain...that unless there is a corresponding diversity in their modes of life, they neither obtain their fair share of happiness

This passage brings into fore the natural diversity among humans, wherein their differences naturally result to different desires in life. Mill acknowledged this natural diversity as a reality that must be addressed by the new, modern society, since progress and development in the society is signified by the quality of life lived by its people -- which is ultimately determined by the degree of happiness one feels about his/her life.

More than just a fulfillment of one's desires, however, Mill's elucidation was not confined only on this aspect. Further looking into the concept of happiness and liberty in the modern society, Mill's philosophy can be best applied in ensuring the welfare of each individual in the society, that is, the collective welfare of all members of the society. Liberty is signified by the ability of individuals to recognize their capacities to participate in public activities and forums, and fulfill their duties as members of the civil society. In effect, "[t]here is equality among citizens, all of whom have the capacity to deliberate on public matters" (Urbinati, 2002:345).

Marx's conception of individual welfare is similar to Mill's in that he also took into account not only the individual as s/he relates to civil society, but also the role of the individual as a member of this civil society (i.e., the individual as the civil society). While Mill equated individual welfare with the successful pursuit of one's happiness in both the personal and public realms, Marx synonymously associated individual welfare with specific determinants, which are actually characteristics of a socialist community. Some of the most important and relevant characteristics are identified as follows: (1) abolition of property, application of land rent for public purposes; (2) centralization of authority (governed by the State); (3) "equal liability of all to labour" [sic]; (4) combination of agriculture and manufacturing industries; and (5) free, public education.

Addressing and accomplishing these characteristics of a socialist state would result to the desired social revolutionary change in the modern society. It is through these efforts that individual welfare will be rightfully addressed and achieved, ultimately helping the individual to pursue a justifiably satisfying life. It cannot be said that these characteristics lead to the individual's pursuit of happiness, since Marx, instead, assumed that an ideal society would be an egalitarian society.

What these characteristics highlight is the achievement of an "unalienated, cooperative, and creative" society in the period of modernism, a society composed of the "free human" (Lovell, 2004:638). In Marxian terms, individual welfare is the achievement of basic human needs and similarly with Mill, the realization of one's role and importance in his/her participation in the endeavors of the society (such as participation in the workforce and compliance to a centralized authority).

Theme 2: Realization and achievement of Ethical Freedom

The concept of ethical freedom is mainly characterized as the desire of the individual to be economically, politically, and spiritually independent; thus his/her actions are guided by these objectives in mind. This was the reality that both Mill and Marx believed to be driving people towards their chosen courses of action in life. For Mill, competition and rationalization of modern society was developed because there was a need for the modern individual to become independent in all aspects of his/her life, which is consistent with the individualist character of capitalism. Marx also subsisted to this belief, since it would be the individual's desire to have better living conditions -- primarily, to become economically independent -- that would also drive the proletariats to seek a social revolution to abolish the class system in the society.

Mill exemplified the modern individual's pursuit for ethical freedom through the changes occurring in different Churches during his time. In a period wherein individualism was creating a stronghold as religious belief in Western society, there had been a 'culture of tolerance,' wherein society has begun to acknowledge the existence of more than one religious philosophy. In so doing, Mill observed that "the rights of the individual against society have been asserted on broad grounds of principle...have mostly asserted freedom of conscience as an indefeasible right, and denied absolutely that a human being is accountable to others for his religious belief." In this sense, he was highlighting how the increased tolerance for different and conflicting religious beliefs can be considered an 'assertion of freedom of conscience,' an act that contributed to the general concept of ethical freedom in the context of modern society.

However, this discussion of ethical freedom is only applicable in societies wherein the level of economy and technology is considered comparable to other advanced societies. Stafford (2004) clarified that for Mill, tolerance to different and opposing ideologies in the society will only be applicable to societies which have developed "mental and moral characteristics" (171). Unless these ethical components have been changed to adapt to the new modern society, such developments in the thinking of modern individuals have yet to occur.

The socialist movement promoted by Marx centered primarily on a comparison of… READ MORE

How to Reference "John Stuart Mill vs. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism Research Proposal

John Stuart Mill's philosophy of utilitarianism were a popular moral guidepost for leadership today, it would be interesting to see how many leaders embrace the idea that actions are correct… read more

Research Proposal 5 pages (1730 words) Sources: 1 Style: MLA Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

Philosophy of Religion Karl Marx and Friedrich Term Paper

Philosophy of Religion

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels said that man makes religion, religion does not make the man (p 160). What they meant to say is that man makes… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (658 words) Sources: 6 Topic: Religion / God / Theology

---

John Stuart Mill's Utilitarian View Term Paper

Utilitarianism: John Stuart Mill's Concept Of Justice

John Stuart Mill was one of the leading liberal thinkers of the 20th century. His philosophy of utilitarianism attempted to improve upon Jeremy… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1510 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Ethics / Morality

---

John Stuart Mill and Sigmund Freud Essay

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY and the PERSPECTIVES of FREUD vs. MILL

The relationship between man and society has interested philosophers for millennia. On one hand, the structure and institutions of civil society… read more

Essay 7 pages (1940 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry

---

Ethics and John Stuart Mill Essay

This is where can be found the basic social problem not only with gay marriage, but with the gay community in general. Mill may have lived and written in Victorian… read more

Essay 3 pages (993 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>