Term Paper on "Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility"

Term Paper 4 pages (1169 words) Sources: 2 Style: MLA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility

Merck's decision to proceed with the development of Mectizan violated its fiduciary duty to its shareholders, but did not violate its overall corporate responsibility. Merck has stakeholders other than its shareholders who benefited from this decision. Moreover, Merck's decision fell within the normal course of business for the industry, so it did not set an unusual nor dangerous precedent for a free market society.

Milton Friedman argues that the sole responsibility of business is to increase profits. The theory is that the profits are then distributed to shareholders, who in turn can do whatever they please with these distributions. Charity is an act that should be undertaken by the shareholders and may be encouraged by the government through its taxation and legal structure.

All investment decisions are made on the basis of return on investment. ROI is a key component of any corporation's fiduciary duty to its shareholders. The shareholders invest in companies specifically to gain a return. They have a dizzying array investment options and build their portfolios to maximize their risk-weighed returns. This is why Friedman states that profit is the sole responsibility of the corporation.

Merck would have done an analysis of the product's potential, including revenue projections weighed against their traditional hurdle rate. Merck knew from the outset that this drug was going to generate sufficient returns to justify the investment. The shareholders invest in Merck with the expectation that this due diligence will not only be conducted but the results abided by. In this instance, Merck di
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
d not abide by the results, as they proceeded with the investment in Mectizan despite it's poor prospects for profit. So in the Friedman sense, Merck did not fulfill its fiduciary duty to its shareholders.

Merck could have pursued other, less costly options. Knowing that they were unlikely to secure the funding from government they wanted post-development, they could have sought a partnership with a government-funded research facility during the development process in order to defray the cost of development. Another option would have been to lend the talents of Dr. Campbell to a government or university-sponsored research facility to take on the development of Mectizan, possibly in exchange for an equally talented researcher at a non-profit lab that possibly had a marketable product in development.

However, there are limitations to Friedman's theory. First, it assumes that profit is the only consideration of shareholders. The second assumption is that the shareholders are the only stakeholders.

Shareholders do value profit, but they often have other objectives. Some investors may prefer to offload the role of social responsibility onto the companies they invest in, rather than undertaking it themselves. It is often more efficient for corporations to engage in charitable acts, than to have individuals do so. Therefore it is reasonable for an investor to invest in companies that will perform this role. There may be fiscal considerations as well. Every investor has a unique financial situation. There may be cases where an investor gains more financially from investing in a company that extends some charity to the world. In recent years, the rise of so-called "ethical" mutual funds shows that many investors prefer to extend social responsibility to all facets of their lives, including their investments. They may feel that socially responsible firms deliver superior fiscal performance in the long run, or they may be willing to sacrifice performance in return for the non-fiscal gain that comes from feeling good about their investments. Friedman ignores the possibility of altruism… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility" Assignment:

Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility

In 1978, a Merck scientist, Dr. William Campbell, discovered an anti-parasitic compound that could potentially be developed into a new drug to treat river blindness, a disease caused by larvae that leads to intense itching, blindness, and even death in some cases. At the time, over 15 million people were afflicted with river blindness, mostly in third world countries. Previous drugs that treated river blindness proved to be unsafe, leading to serious side effects.

At the time, director of Merck*****s research laboratories (and future CEO) Roy Vagelos knew that research and development for the drug, Mectizan, would cost the company tens of millions of dollars and perhaps up to a decade to complete. Moreover, once the drug was produced, there was little chance that the drug would make a profit, since there was no guarantee that international funding could be procured.

In 1987, the drug Mectizen was approved, but Merck was unable to raise money from the international community to deliver it to those who needed it most. Shortly after its release, Vagelos and Merck decided to give away the drug for free forever. (In 1987, Merck company was worth about $5.1 billion in assets.) After ten years, the decision cost Merck over $200 million but saved millions of people from the disease.

Today, Merck remains a flourishing pharmaceutical company. Merck*****s financial statements for 2003-2007 can be found at http://www.merck.com/finance/reportsannual.html.

Further information about this case study can be found in this book:

"Honest Work: A Business Ethics Reader. Joanne Ciulla, Clancy *****, Robert Solomon eds., (Oxford University Press, 2007)"

Your task:

Imagine that you are on a committee in which you are asked to give a 4-5 page (double spaced) opinion on Merck*****s decisions to research and give Mectizan away for free forever. Did Merck make the right decisions?

It is important that you frame your opinion within the context of corporate social responsibility. Some questions that might guide your opinion:

*****¢ What responsibilities does a corporation have to society?

*****¢ Did Merck violate its fiduciary duty to its shareholders?

*****¢ Do *****socially responsible***** actions such as Merck*****s set a dangerous precedent for a free market society?

*****¢ Were there other options that Merck could have exercised that would have been less costly?

The essay will need to include the following:

1. A thesis (stated in the beginning paragraph) that is argued for throughout the paper

2. A clearly articulated and well-defended position on CSR using:

A)Milton Friedman's theory: "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits"

B)Utilitarianism

4. Possible objections to your view and a response to these objections, such as:

A)R. Edward Freeman's theory: *****A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation*****

The following are also required the essay:

*****¢ Footnotes where you quote or use an idea from an outside source

*****¢ A bibliography at the end *****“ MLA format preferred.

For the bibliography, you can use the book or other sources.

How to Reference "Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2008, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/merck-corporate-social-responsibility/6735. Accessed 29 Sep 2024.

Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility (2008). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/merck-corporate-social-responsibility/6735
A1-TermPaper.com. (2008). Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/merck-corporate-social-responsibility/6735 [Accessed 29 Sep, 2024].
”Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility” 2008. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/merck-corporate-social-responsibility/6735.
”Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/merck-corporate-social-responsibility/6735.
[1] ”Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/merck-corporate-social-responsibility/6735. [Accessed: 29-Sep-2024].
1. Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2008 [cited 29 September 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/merck-corporate-social-responsibility/6735
1. Merck and Corporate Social Responsibility. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/merck-corporate-social-responsibility/6735. Published 2008. Accessed September 29, 2024.

Related Term Papers:

Corporate Universities Investigation of Their Development Internationally in the Field Sector of Tourism Term Paper

Paper Icon

Corporate universities"-investigation of their development internationally in the field/sector of tourism.

In this paper, it will be discussed how corporate universities function internationally and otherwise. From there, their development process… read more

Term Paper 60 pages (16387 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Recreation / Leisure / Tourism


Apple Stakeholder Performance Analysis Apple Inc. (AAPL) SWOT

Paper Icon

Apple Stakeholder Performance Analysis

Apple Inc. (AAPL) is one of the most profitable and continually innovative manufacturers of MP3 players, cell phones, laptop computers and handheld tablets. At the close… read more

SWOT 6 pages (2227 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Against Corporate Executive Pay Reaction Paper

Paper Icon

Executive Pay

The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO 2011) states, "U.S. corporations held a record $1.93 trillion in cash on their balance sheets in 2010.… read more

Reaction Paper 5 pages (1604 words) Sources: 3 Style: APA Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Strategic Audit of a Corporation Research Proposal

Paper Icon

Strategic Audit

Current Situation. A. Current Performance

FedEx Corporation (NYSE: FDX) has struggled in the past couple of years as a result of the global economic downturn. For the 2009… read more

Research Proposal 5 pages (1384 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Enron's Misleading Accounting & Fraud Tactics Thesis

Paper Icon

Enron was the seventh-largest corporation in the world. Enron Company was divided into five distinct parts including; Wholesale Services, Transportation and Distribution, Broadband Services, Retail Energy Services, and Corporate and… read more

Thesis 98 pages (27112 words) Sources: 20 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Sun, Sep 29, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!