Term Paper on "Marketing Challenges of Going Green in the Domestic Automobile Industry"

Term Paper 12 pages (3409 words) Sources: 6 Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Marketing Challenges of Going Green in the Domestic Automobile Industry

The domestic automobile industry

The automotive industry is one of the most competitive in the world and the U.S. automotive industry is leading the way in terms of sales. In terms of manufacturing, the production activities are shifting from high income regions to the low income ones, such as China as a response to the globalization phenomenon that continuously dragged costs and implicitly selling prices down to historical figures.

Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) also chose to relocate their production facilities to low cost regions to be able to compensate the increase of oil prices with lower prices. The AAA (formerly known as the American Automobile Association, 2007) recently announced that the average prices for gasoline is $3.07/gallon, compared to $2.32/gallon last year and is estimating this price to vary between $3.40 and $3.70 during 2008. In parallel with these changes on the crude oil market, the automotive consumption trends slightly changed from last year towards hybrid cars. Thus, Toyota, the market leader in terms of hybrid technology, reported 44% increase in hybrid car sales compared to last year (2006), reporting 227,750 units sold. Toyota also managed to outrun Ford Motor, n"2 OEM in the market and is heading straight to the leader position.

Currently, GM is the leader on the American automotive market. However, this position is difficult to maintain given both globalization and crude oil price challenges. Thus, GM has prepared an aggressive plan as a reaction to Toyota's success and this involves both plant relocation to China and a $250 million research and development center in Shanghai meant to redesign the current products to be more environment-friendly and more efficient (e.g. hybrid models, alternative fuels, etc.).

Reasons to green the marketing strategy

Firms may choose to adopt a green marketing strategy for various reasons, such as: consumer attitudes and behaviors, stakeholder and institutional pressures or collective action dilemmas.

Consumer attitudes and behaviors

Although U.S. was one of the few nations not to adhere to the Kyoto protocol, the American consumers seem to be quite concerned with environmental issues. Thus, 50% pretend to look for environmental labels when buying products and switch between products based on their environmental friendliness, 87% of the U.S. adult population claims to be concerned about natural environment condition (Phillips, 1999), 75% of the same sample considers itself to be an environmentalist (Osterhus, 1997) and 80% of them think that designing measures to protect the environment will require major changes it the current lifestyle (Ottman, 1996).

The above statistics represent consumer attitudes. However, many of them may not translate into behaviors (McGuire, 1985). Ritchie & McDougall, (1985) suggested that social pressures for a greener world could be one of the reasons to explain these behavior-attitudes differences.

Prakash (2002) used Maslow (1943) and Herzberg's (1966) work motivation and influence factors to try to explain greening consumer behaviors. The old theories explain motivators as factors that motivate employees and hygiene factors as those preventing employee dissatisfaction. Applied on the greening-related issues, the following can be translated as follows: the presence of motivating factors determines consumers to buy certain factors and purchase is an increasing function of the firm/product's green level; the absence of hygiene factors may create some discomfort to the customer, but after a small greening improvement, the preferences are no longer an increasing function of the certain firm/product.

Green products/organizational policies are motivating factors when customers favor firms with green products or policies and in this case the organizations would have a competitive advantage to adopt green strategies. The same policies act as hygiene factors when customers chose to penalize firms that violate environmental laws and in this case organizations should be compliant with these laws just maintain their current position in the consumer's preferences.

In the automobile industry, consumer attitudes and behaviors are not at all congruent. Although many consumers acknowledge that traditional automobiles are responsible for a large part of pollution, the vast majority is not willing to change their lifestyle to reduce the negative impact on the environment. This happens for reasons, such as: comfort (e.g. The hybrid's need for constant recharging and the reduced number of recharging locations vs. The traditional gas bomb high density), perceived lower performance (e.g. diesel engines are perceived as being able to deliver a better automobile performance in terms of speed) and costs (the vast majority of used cars in U.S. are based on gas, which leaves little choice for second-hand buyers in terms of hybrid products).

Stakeholder and institutional pressures

The corporate social responsibility/responsiveness theory indicates that firms have a social responsibility towards the community that shouldn't necessarily reinforce its profit objectives. Thus, firms choose to green their strategy to show an increased social responsibility as greening is the ethical thing. The stakeholder theory comes to support this former theory and the stakeholder notion refers to "any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization's objectives" (Freeman, 1984, p. 46). The latter theory suggests that firms green their products when key stakeholders demand it.

One other reason for a firm to chose a green strategy would be to later be able to influence environment-related policies that could potentially affect their profits in a negative way (Fri, 1992).

The pressures in the automobile industry are high. On one hand, the social pressure of consuming environment-friendly products is converting more and more customers to the green philosophy and on the other hand manufacturers are trying to fill in this new trend by developing greener products, putting pressure on their competitors to do the same. This is the case of Toyota that recently stepped up to being the second largest OEM in U.S. In front of Ford. As mentioned before in this paper, GM's reaction was fast and it included a large R&D investment meant to redesign some of its product to be more environment-friendly.

In terms of institutional pressure, California's Low-Emission Vehicle (LEV) regulations stand as a good example. In 1990, California Air Resources Board established that zero-emission vehicles should be 2% of all vehicles produced for sale in California. In 2003, the percentage threshold was increased to 10%.

Collective action dilemmas

Institutional environmental policies are still in their infancy and many organizational green policies are not made as a consequence of laws or regulations, but as a consequence of internal decisions. However, when facing a greening policy decision, companies have to take under consideration of such action on itself. On one hand, the organization can reap the benefits of environmental stewardship and exploit the first-mover advantage (Porter & Van der Linde, 1995). On the other hand, being among the first to adopt such a change can have a negative impact on the company, as consumers are faced with the dilemma of choosing between a clean environment, which entails premium costs and continuing with their consumption habits and contributing to the environment's worsening.

One way to deal with collective dilemmas would be for firms to help develop formal regulations that are imposed to all their competitors. That way, firms that want to adopt green policies wouldn't be penalized by charging premium prices for their products. The downside of this step would be that the measure would provide a competitive advantage to the initiators.

The automobile industry is definitely facing collective dilemmas. Firms have to decide whether they should adopt similar non-environment-friendly strategies as the vast majority of the players and try to exploit the current regulation situation or be among the first to switch to a green strategy and charge consumers with premium prices for their green products, while waiting to be rewarded by those for doing the ethical thing.

The dilemma is worsen by the fact that even when companies desire to green their strategy that are faced with the possibility of the consumer's lack of trust. "A lot of companies are afraid because they don't have a tremendous track record," says Paul West, communications director at the Rainforest Action Network. "But they know the public wants them to be [pursuing environmental programs]. it's a Catch-22: How to put out news about your environmental efforts in a way [the public] can trust." The credibility issue will be discussed more extensively in the green marketing mistakes section.

Green marketing myopia

Green marketing must satisfy two objectives: improved environmental quality and customer satisfaction" (Ottman et.al., 2006). Green marketing myopia refers to the misjudging or overemphasizing of the former at the expense of the later (Ottman et.al., 2006). The marketing myopia was initially defined by Theodore Levitt (1960), who said that corporations that are more preoccupied about products than consumer needs may fail, because customers choose only those products or innovations that satisfy their needs.

GM and Ford's electric vehicles launched in the late 1990s - early 2000s could be categorized as marketing myopia. The two vehicles were the result of California's zero emission vehicle mentioned before in this paper. Both automakers expected these products to be successful and the first one… READ MORE

How to Reference "Marketing Challenges of Going Green in the Domestic Automobile Industry" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Impact of the Higher Gas Prices in the Automobile Industry Term Paper

High Gas Prices on the Automobile Industry

The heart and soul of this study, the primary research question, purports: What impact(s) do higher gas prices exert on the automobile industry… read more

Term Paper 44 pages (12212 words) Sources: 20 Style: APA Topic: Energy / Power

---

CEO of Our Company Research Proposal

CEO of our company with an overview of one of our main competitors, Ford Motor Company, so that we can develop a more honed competitive strategy. This paper analyzes Ford's… read more

Research Proposal 2 pages (605 words) Sources: 0 Style: MLA Topic: Advertising / Marketing / Sales

---

Ford Motor Group Thesis

Ford Motor Company

Company Background and History

Environmental Analysis

Competitor Analysis

Company Performance

Strategic Issues

The Ford Motor Company was founded in 1908 and quickly became an American icon, built… read more

Thesis 21 pages (5756 words) Sources: 7 Style: APA Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce

---

Ecofeminism: Attracting the World's Attention Claims Thesis

Ecofeminism: Attracting the World's Attention

Claims by feminists of a verifiable linkage between the patriarchal plowing of Planet Earth's ecosystems asunder and those same males' history of trampling on women's… read more

Thesis 19 pages (6366 words) Sources: 18 Topic: Women / Feminism

---

Branding Brand Is a Living Entity Term Paper

Branding brand is a living entity - and it is enriched or undermined cumulatively over time, the product of a thousand small gestures. - Michael Eisner, former CEO, Disney

What… read more

Term Paper 10 pages (3339 words) Sources: 5 Style: MLA Topic: Advertising / Marketing / Sales

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>