Thesis on "Managerial Challenges"
Thesis 6 pages (1837 words) Sources: 5 Style: APA
[EXCERPT] . . . .
Managerial Oversight of the U.S. Financial CrisisExecutive Summary:
The financial crisis is a product of managerial absence in the U.S.
private sector. The U.S. government neglected these responsibilities,
particularly during the Bush administration, allowing for the corruption
and fraud that helped to bring about economic collapse. The discussion
here considers a plan for more effective government management principles
in going forward, resolving that the Obama Administration must enact strong
managerial oversight for the private sector through the government.
Introduction:
The current recession is considered among the worst in U.S. history.
As it has been characterized by policy experts, public officials and
members of private industries alike, the U.S. economy is experiencing a
financial crisis which is surpassed at present only by the Great Depression
which persisted across the 1930s. As public officials in the Obama
Administration enact dramatic and controversial legislative packages in
order to reverse an already cresting tide, it is clear that the very same
Departments of the U.S. Government which have helped to create the
disastrous conditions now afflicting the nation and global economic
community are those upon which we are now relying to alter a pointedly
problematic economic path. The discussion contained here is driven by the
severity of the current economic crisis and the range of policy debates
which surround it. Ultimately, the financial crisis is a massi
download full paper ⤓
managerial challenge characterized by a current transfer in power. After
the managerial failures of the Bush Administration, the Obama
Administration has stepped in to assume managerial control.
This research is grounded by a recognition that the financial crisis
as has been instigated by an absence of managerial oversight. All
indications are that there are observable causes in U.S. policy and in U.S.
delegation through its various federal financial departments which may have
stimulated the current recession. Accordingly, Tong (2009) would report
that "the crisis has its roots in the imbalance of the global economic
structure, years of freewheeling lending in the United States and loose
regulation on financial markets. The crisis was triggered by a subprime
mortgage meltdown that erupted in the United States in the summer of 2007,
which forced closure of many companies that largely invested in products
related to subprime mortgages and tightened credit around the world."
(Tong, 1) Here, the journalist would frame what has become a global crisis
in an assertion that most policy errors may be traced to the U.S.
orientation toward both global and domestic markets. This reference in the
Tong study to loose regulation is particularly pertinent as the discussion
here aims to introduce the failure of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, as one example, to properly function in its regulatory role as
a federal department. Such failures underscore the premise that
significant managerial negligence allowed the financial markets to behave
destructively, irrationally and without fear of reprisal.
This is to suggest that the Bush Administration generally acted
throughout its tenure on a pattern of philosophically and practically
unfounded economic presumptions. These would lead to a meltdown in the
U.S. housing market, which our research identifies as an oft-misconceived
cause for the current condition in which our economy is attempting to
recover. That is to say that where Brewer (2009) is concerned, it was not
the housing bust but the housing boom which should be seen as largely to
blame for today's recession. Brewer argues that the high price of housing
relative to that which individuals could afford would be a significant
factor, itself produced by departmental failures owing to executive policy.
Brewer queries accordingly; "How did house prices get too high? The
answer to that question (which has mostly to do with bad interest rate
decisions from the Fed interacting with bad public policy in financial
market regulation) will help us prevent the next financial crisis. But for
addressing this financial crisis, all we need to understand is that the
correction is not the root cause. The root cause is that house prices got
so high that the average household couldn't afford an average house."
(Brewer, 1) The absence of managerial control on the part of the
government reflects a free market ideology that has proven flawed. The
premise that private companies could be trusted to provide themselves with
ethical oversight and to present financial outlooks without scrutiny would
allow for massive fraud, corruption and commercial exploitation. Because
the government declined to act in the role of a conscientious manager, such
behavior ran rampant until it ultimately helped to hasten the decline of
the United States economy.
Some major concerns to be addressed through the course of this
research are those relating to the broader impact of U.S. policy decision.
This is to say that all evidence frames the economic crisis as having a
substantial radius of fallout for the global economic community. The
emphasis on globalization, trade liberalization and monetary regionalism
across the same decade leading to the financial crisis all have produced an
interdependency which makes the economic recession in the United States a
problem faced by all members of the world community. So is this reported
by Tong, who tells that "as the crisis caused downturns in European and
U.S. economies, exports to those countries tumbled and developing countries
were affected. The IMF provided at least 52 billion dollars to Hungary,
Serbia, Latvia and Ukraine, which saw severe capital flight and a sharp
drop in exports." (Tong, 1) This is to indicate that the crisis is ever-
unfolding throughout the world community and that the ability of American
federal policy to reverse the patterns which it helped to set into motion
may well be called into question altogether. New issues in the area of
policy adjustment will be those relating to the approach taken by the U.S.
in its international posture and approach.
From an operations management standpoint, these are external factors
which impose a significant effect upon the government's ability to truly
manage its private organizations. In the globalization scheme, if we are
to consider American private firms as being analogous to departments
internal to a single company which in this case is the United States, we
can see that such departments are also increasingly under the purview of
partners other than the United States. For the U.S. government, this is an
operations management challenge that is requiring a change in perspective.
Thus a management plan for coping with the financial crisis will relate to
the changes in U.S. policy which are coming into phase under the oversight
of the present administration. A core difference between the Obama
Administration and the Bush Administration is the current president's
philosophical orientation toward stricter regulatory control over private
financial activities, a distinct transition in managerial philosophy. This
comports with a plan calling for a stronger emphasis on public investment
in financial recovery coupled with far greater regulatory oversight of both
private activity and fiscal policies. To this point and with recognition
that reckless economic liberties helped to invoke a massive transfer of
wealth, "President Obama ordered the Treasury Department to prevent the 165
million dollars of executive bonuses from being paid in the insurance giant
American International Group in March, while the executives returned part
of their bonuses under the pressure of public reprimand." (Tong, 1) This
is a principle of Operations Management that correlates personnel
compensation with performance quality. In a staggered economy, the
performance of these leaders of industry has been rightfully called into
question. The project a plan designed to undermine those elements of the
private sector which have usurped the managerial authority of the U.S.
government.
The result is a managerial orientation that is now geared toward
survival. According to the text by Hacker (2006), there is an ever-
diminishing concreteness and stability underlying the American economy with
the outcome being a context of sheer risk for those without the means or
intent to undertake such. Certainly, one of the core management failures
of the previous administration was a characterization of economic
conditions that was primarily stimulated by the experiences of wealthy
business owners and other financially elite Americans. This would not only
prove fabricated by corrupt misrepresentation, but would further illustrate
a perspective on the financial crisis separate from the suffering of those
on the lower rungs of the socioeconomic ladder. The bailout packages
produced by the Obama Administration, though widely criticized by the
presidents political opponents, illustrate an understanding that it has not
been the spending liberties of the federal government but the misdirection
of resource which has allowed so drastic a collapse. Thus, Moseley (2009)
would report that the "Obama administration and Democrats in Congress are
working on a second, much larger stimulus package of about $850 billion,
which will consist of two-thirds increased spending (with emphasis on aid
to states, education, unemployment benefits, and public works
infrastructure projects and one-third tax cuts (mainly on payroll taxes).
This second stimulus package will be somewhat more effective than the
first, mainly because it is so much bigger, and also because more of the
total money is for increased spending rather… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Managerial Challenges" Assignment:
Assignment in following description:
1. Identify an important managerial challenge facing the United States Government---Managing finances during a budget crisis
2. Develop a plan that integrates project management, operations management, and information systems management to successfully meet this challenge and improve organizational performance, in a succinct report that includes an executive summary.
3. Need at least 5 scholarly references.
How to Reference "Managerial Challenges" Thesis in a Bibliography
“Managerial Challenges.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2009, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/managerial-oversight-us/877846. Accessed 4 Oct 2024.
Related Thesis Papers:
Managerial Challenge Term Paper
Business Management: Problem Solving Knowledge Sharing
More and more managers face increasingly difficult problems and challenges in organizations both large and small. One of the most serious problems facing large… read more
Term Paper 7 pages (1878 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Management / Organizations
Managerial Economics - Should I Start Thesis
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS - Should I Start a New Business?
In today's world, more and more employees become emancipated and are granted more rights and responsibilities. However, at the end of… read more
Thesis 8 pages (2353 words) Sources: 2 Style: APA Topic: Economics / Finance / Banking
Managerial Accounting Sue Davis Term Paper
Managerial Accounting
Sue Davis is faced with an ethical dilemma with regards to the allocation of $2 million in research and development funding. According to company policy, she is obligated… read more
Term Paper 2 pages (612 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Accounting / Auditing
Managerial Finance Thesis
Managerial Finance - Johnson & Johnson
Company Overview
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) is a global conglomerate of over 250 different companies. The company did $61.1 billion in business in… read more
Thesis 10 pages (3790 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce
Managerial Leadership Course Term Paper
Managerial Leadership Course
Gender Consciousness Questionnaire
Without actually considering misogynists, it is a fact that there is a general tendency to doubt a woman's capacity of being a leader, although… read more
Term Paper 6 pages (1643 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Management / Organizations
Fri, Oct 4, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!