Grant Proposal on "Grant Proposal for it Veteran Students"

Grant Proposal 15 pages (4584 words) Sources: 15

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Nonetheless, the funding period might be prolonged to three years for these doctoral students.

In order to be eligible for consideration for a scholarship for service (SFS) scholarship, a student first of all, has to be a United States citizen. Since the program provides funding for graduate students, a student must be one of the following:

i. A full-time student within two years of graduation with a master's degree in a comprehensible official program that is dedicated to cyber-security at an awardee institution, or ii. A full-time student within three years of graduation with both the bachelor's and the master's degree, or a student taking part in a joint bachelor's and master's degree program, for five years or iii. A research-based doctoral student within three years of graduation.

The recipients and beneficiaries of the scholarships also have to meet the criteria for selection for Federal employment. Assignments for internship and allocations for the final jobs in government organizations usually necessitate security clearances of high-level. Therefore, the recipients and beneficiaries of the scholarships are necessitated to go through the circumstantial investigation required to get hold of these sorts of clearances as part of the job as well as internship application procedure. For each proposing institution, they have to make available an explanation of its selection criteria and procedure, and have to provide and hand in their lists of applicants for SFS scholarships to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) for concluding admissibility verification.

Solicitations from institutions that have not taken part in the past in the SFS program will be taken into consideration, independently from proposals from reintroducing institutions. Institutions with prevailing SFS scholarship programs ought to clearly point out that they are making application for a renewal in the summary or title of the project and are expected to provide:

i. Particular confirmation of their contemporary SFS program accomplishments. Pointers of program achievement, taking account of, but are not restricted to, appointment statistics, faculty improvement activities, incorporation of research and education, advising and counseling of non-SFS institutions, working together of government and pertinent employment sectors, and curricular modernizations.

ii. Specific strategies as well as indication of program sustainability and/or institutionalization determinations together with information on students, devoid of SFS scholarships, who were positioned in government jobs and the preservation of SFS scholarship beneficiaries in the national labor force further than their original responsibility.

The institutions handing out proposals, irrespective of whether they are giving submissions for new proposals or renewing proposals are also anticipated to have management and administrative plans that are clearly articulated for the following program components:

i. Substantiation of scholarship candidates' entitlement, together with the recipients' educational excellence, suitable professional abilities, and admission into a cyber-security program.

ii. Accounting for scholarships, which are made up of remunerations, tuition, education-related payments, as well as other allowances pronounced below. It is imperative to point out that the scholarships granted are not centered on the financial needs of the student.

iii. Endowment of academic-year remunerations of $32,000 per year for graduate students. These amounts will be contained within the budget under Participant Support expenses.

iv. Provision of scholarship amounts to be employed for costs normally borne by full-time students at the institution. This takes into account tuition and education associated fees. However, these fees do not include payments or expenses such as meal plans, accommodation, or parking. However, it does also include a health insurance compensation allowance up to $2,000 per year, a professional development stipend of $3,000 for SFS Job Fair and other travel, professional official recognition and a book allowance of $1,000 per academic year. These will be contained within the budget under Participant Support expenses.

v. Provision for harmonization with OPM for summer internship placements and permanent job assignments for every student. Students are anticipated to undertake government internship placements in the summer between their first and second year of scholarship study. Summer training periods are characteristically remunerated by the employing agency. Money for summer internships ought not to be contained within the recommended SFS budget. Doctoral students may be permitted to swap research activity for their summer internship, subsequent to obtaining commendation from their academic advisor as well as consent from the NSF program office.

vi. Provisions for following the educational advancement of students to ascertain their sustained entitlement all the way through the academic portion of the program. Post-graduation following of students to authenticate that they meet the service requirement is an activity that will be undertaken by OPM. This is to avoid any conflict of interest.

vii. Objectives that are clearly stated and an assessment plan elucidating how such objectives will be measured. Assessment plans ought to take into account both a stratagem and approach for monitoring the project as it advances to offer feedback to give guidance to these determinations. It also encompasses an approach for assessing the efficacy of the project in realizing its objectives and for ascertaining constructive and positive results when the project is completely finished. This will be referred to as summative assessment. The beneficiaries are expected to be in cooperation with the monitoring and evaluation system done at the SFS program level.

These items mentioned above have to be clearly indicated in detail and other suitable sections of the proposal.

Institutional Accountabilities for Scholarship Projects

The institution attaining and being bestowed upon the award shall call for every recipient of a scholarship to accept the terms being set for the scholarship and consents to provide the institution as well as the OPM with yearly certification of employment and current contact information. The beneficiaries must also consent to take part in surveys piloted by the project and program assessors as part of project-level and program assessment determinations. Monitoring the amenableness of grant beneficiaries with regard to finishing their service requirements will be the combined accountability of OPM and the institution. The lack of satisfying the educational demands of the program or to finish the service obligation will give rise to loss of the scholarship award, which will degenerate to a student loan with payments pro-rated properly to mirror fractional service completed.

The institution is accountable for collecting the reimbursement amounts, comprising interest accrued. All stripped of scholarship moneys, less sensible, allocable, and admissible institutional expenses linked with gathering of the reimbursement not to surpass 5% of the surrendered amount, will be given back to the United States Treasury and might not be used again by the institution. Scholarship beneficiaries in dexterity with the institution and the Principal Investigator (PI) may entreaty the NSF Program Office to relinquish or append reimbursement of scholarships in instances of extreme adversity or other conditions that would impede the contentment of the service requirement.

The Principal Investigator will have general accountability for the management of the institution's grant, the supervision of the project, and communications with NSF and OPM. The Principal Investigator together with the institution being bestowed are anticipated to have or to cultivate a managerial structure that empowers faculty, academic supervisors, scholarship beneficiaries, and others included in the project to interrelate effectively for the duration of the grant period. The PI is anticipated to be an essential contributor in the educational undertakings of the SFS project and is necessitated to take part in boot camps, job fairs, conferences and other SFS-funded events.

A proposing institution has to provide properly acknowledged indication of a strong prevailing academic program in cyber-security. This sort of proof can take into account the Center of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education designation by the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security. It can also encompass a specific description by a nationwide acknowledged organization, for instance, in forensics or cyber operations or correspondent indication detailing a strong program in cyber-security. An emphasis on recruiting and retaining made light of minorities, women, first-generation or low-income students, individuals with disabilities and veterans is intensely heartened. Lastly, proposals have to give a clear indication and explanation as to how their projects will take into consideration the formerly specified goals of the program. Project objectives have to be transformed into a set of anticipated measurable results that can be supervised using quantitative or qualitative approaches or a combination of the two. These results ought to be utilized to track advancement, guide the project, and assess its influence.

Capacity Track

The Scholarship for Service (SFS) Capacity Track looks for proposals resulting in an increase in the capacity and competence of the United States higher education initiative to generate cyber-security professionals. Proposals placing emphasis on capacity building ought to add on to the development of prevailing educational prospects and resources in cyber-security. Thus may encompass, but is not restricted to the following endeavors and determinations:

i. Piloting research on the training and learning of cyber security, which consists of research on materials, techniques and small-scale interventions.

ii. Instituting curricula recommendations for new courses, degree curriculums, and educational paths with strategies for wide implementation all over the country.

iii. Assess teaching and learning efficiency of cyber-security curricular programs and… READ MORE

How to Reference "Grant Proposal for it Veteran Students" Grant Proposal in a Bibliography

Related Grant Proposals:

Disabled Veteran Outreach Program Research Proposal

Disabled Veteran Outreach Program

Wars have always had an immediate effect upon the forces that take part in them. In particular the ones that are directly affected are the ones… read more

Research Proposal 10 pages (3189 words) Sources: 15 Style: APA Topic: Career / Labor / Human Resources

---

Coping Mediates the Relationship Between Personality Traits and PTSD in Combat Veterans Research Proposal

Coping Mediates the Relationship Between Personality Traits and PTSD in Combat Veterans

The work of Solomon, Mikulincer and Avitzur (1988) entitled: "Coping, Locus of Control, Social Support and Combat-Related Posttraumatic… read more

Research Proposal 18 pages (4919 words) Sources: 35 Style: APA Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry

---

Illegal Immigration it Has Been Pointed Out Term Paper

Illegal Immigration

It has been pointed out many times that the United States is a nation of immigrations, with only the Native American population having been here long enough to… read more

Term Paper 36 pages (9456 words) Sources: 30 Style: APA Topic: American History / United States

---

Importance of Standard Phraseology in Aviation Research Proposal

Phraseology is Vital for Aviation Pilots & Controllers

Proper pilot/controller phraseology proves to be a vital aspect in the aviation community.

Proper Phraseology (~4 pages)

Basic Concept of Pilot/Controller Phraseology… read more

Research Proposal 20 pages (9175 words) Sources: 3 Style: APA Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

Education Budget Cuts Term Paper

Education Budget Cuts

Education is one of the most important issues in the Western world today. It dictates the future of millions of young people per year, and by association… read more

Term Paper 8 pages (2674 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>