Term Paper on "Hobbes vs. Locke"

Term Paper 9 pages (2796 words) Sources: 1+

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Locke and Hume

The Enlightenment was a time when man, stepping out of his shackles, began to use his rational facilities and pulled himself out of the medieval pits of mysticism and in the process shoved aside the state and church authorities of the day. It was a spontaneous and defused movement which fed upon itself and led to the great scientific discoveries from which we all benefit today. Beliefs in natural law and universal order sprung up, which not only promoted scientific findings and advancements of a material nature, but which also gave a scientific approach to political and social issues. One, foremost among their ranks, was John Locke (1632-1704) and David Hume (1711-76). In this paper, we will examine their view on ethics and morality, focusing on their treatments of the following concepts: state of nature, social compact, and role of the government

Moral philosophy

The moral dimension of our everyday experience is a pervasive fact. Moral philosopy seeks to make sense of this moral dimension in our lives. Moral philosophy seeks to make sense of this dimension in our lives, the philosophical study of morality, by its reasoned approach to the concepts that figure centrally in our moral judgments, can help us be more objective. In particular, it can help us by alerting us to some of the characteristic deceptions that prevent us from seeing our own moral virtues and defects.

The philosopher's approach to such topics as good and evil or vice or virtue differs in important ways from that of the social scientist or theologian. A sociologist or an anthropologist, for example, describes and interprets a society's mores and is careful to keep the account morally neutral. A theologi an will call on us to act in a particular way and to avoid certain sinful practices. The moral philosopher instead will explain what makes an act right or a person virtuous. In discussing criteria of right action and virtuous character, the philosopher will try to show certain traits, such as honesty, generosity, and courage are worthy, and others, such as hypocrispy, selfishness, and cowardices are not. More generally, the moral philosopher seeks a clear and well-reasoned answer to the question: "What does it mean to be moral?"

Both Locke and Hume attempt to answer this question in terms of what we, as responsible agents confronting wrong and right, ought to do. The emphasis is not becoming a virtuous individual, but, rather, on how people should act in relation to society and government. Both Locke and Hume's philosophy on morality in the public sphere are critiques of Thomas Hobbes' justification of the absolutist monarch in Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan. Hobbes held that all humans are basically selfish. Without society, they would dwell in a "state of nature" living in fear and engaged in a war of all against all. This was a time of continual strife and ignorance. Hobbes characterized the life in the State of Natura as " solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Persons in the state of nature would have had the right of nature to perserve themselves by whatever means necessary. But no individual in this natural state would be strong enough to feel secure, so it was to everybody's benefit to obtain a measure of security by forming a society in which one gives up one's freedom to do as one wishes. In society one places oneself under a sovreign. In return for this, one receives the security afforded by sovreign protection.

The compact that a people makes with its sovreign is known as the social contract. The beginnings of the social contract idea was first expounded by Plato in the Republic. In Book II of the Republic, Glaucon offers a candidate for an answer to the question "what is justice?" By discussing the myth of Gyges, a shepherd who possessed a magical ring that rendered him invisible, enabling him to do as he pleased without fear of reprisal. In the myth, he used it to murder the King of Lydia. What men would most want is to be able to commit injustices against others without the fear of reprisal, and what they most want to avoid is being treated unjustly by others without being able to do injustice in return. Justice then, he says, is the conventional result of the laws and covenants that men make in order to avoid these extremes. Being unable to commit injustice with impunity (as those who wear the ring of Gyges would), and fearing becoming victims themselves, men decide that it is in their interests to submit themselves to the convention of justice.

For Hobbes, the social contract is constituted by two distinguishable contracts. First, they must agree to establish society by collectively and reciprocally renouncing the rights they had against one another in the State of Nature. Second, they must imbue some one person or assembly of persons with the authority and power to enforce the initial contract. In other words, to ensure their escape from the State of Nature, they must both agree to live together under common laws, and create an enforcement mechanism for the social contract and the laws that constitute it. Since the sovereign is invested with the authority and power to mete out punishments for breaches of the contract which are worse than not being able to act as one pleases, men have good, albeit self-interested, reason to adjust themselves to the artifice of morality in general, and justice in particular. Society becomes possible because, whereas in the State of Nature there was no power able to "overawe them all," now there is an artificially and conventionally superior and more powerful person who can force men to cooperate

State of Nature

Locke's most important and influential political writings are contained in his Two Treatises on Government. The first treatise is concerned almost exclusively with refuting the argument of Robert Filmer's Patriarcha, that political authority was derived from religious authority, also known by the description of the Divine Right of Kings, which was a very dominant theory in seventeenth-century England. The second treatise contains Locke's own constructive view of the aims and justification for civil government, and is titled "An Essay Concerning the True Original Extent and End of Civil Government. Unlike Hobbes, Locke, viewed man as naturally moral; however, he did not consider man to be a divine creature fixed with ideas on coming into this world. Locke was an empiricist, that is, all knowledge comes to us through experience. As he explained in the Essay on Human Understanding, there is no such thing as innate ideas; there is no such thing as moral precepts; we are born with an empty mind, with a soft tablet (tabula rasa) ready to be written upon by the pen of experience According to Locke, the State of Nature, the natural condition of mankind, is a state of perfect and complete liberty to conduct one's life as one best sees fit, free from the interference of others. This does not mean, however, that it is a state of license: one is not free to do anything at all one pleases, or even anything that one judges to be in one's interest. The State of Nature, although a state wherein there is no civil authority or government to punish people for transgressions against laws, is not a state without morality. The State of Nature is pre-political, but it is not pre-moral. Persons are assumed to be equal to one another in such a state, and therefore equally capable of discovering and being bound by the Law of Nature. The Law of Nature, which is on Locke's view the basis of all morality, and given to us by God, commands that we not harm others with regards to their "life, health, liberty, or possessions" (par. 6). Because we all belong equally to God, and because we cannot take away that which is rightfully His, we are prohibited from harming one another. So, the State of Nature is a state of liberty where persons are free to pursue their own interests and plans, free from interference, and, because of the Law of Nature and the restrictions that it imposes upon persons, it is relatively peaceful.

On the other hand, David Hume did not believe that man had an innate nature. Hence, for Hume, that the state of nature is mythical and thought there is little practical point speculating about the forgotten past of the human race,

Instead he turned his attention to creating a psychological theory that explained why people obey authority. For Hume, man was basically an animal, an animal which must make up for its lack of claws, fur, an agility, and prowess by developing intelligence and coopertaion with other. It is by cooperation that man is able to supply his defects, and raise himself up to an equality with his fellow-creatures, and even acquire a superiority above them. (Hume, 1985)

Social Contract

For Locke, the reason man would willingly contract into civil society… READ MORE

How to Reference "Hobbes vs. Locke" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Hobbes Locke Federalist vs. Anti Essay

Hobbes/Locke & Federalism

One of the main things that Thomas Hobbes and John Locke seemed to agree upon was the notion that all men are created equal. However, Hobbes sees… read more

Essay 2 pages (861 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

Hobbes and the Intercession of Justice, Law Essay

Hobbes and the Intercession of Justice, Law, And State

A cursory definition of power might quickly pose the argument that such is founded upon the strength of leadership. To view… read more

Essay 12 pages (3820 words) Sources: 8 Style: Harvard Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke Term Paper

Locke Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke offer two views of the human condition. What political systems emerge from a Lockian point-of-view? Which would be a good fit for Hobbes'… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (879 words) Sources: 2 Style: MLA Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

Kant Hobbes Rousseau Essay

Kant, Hobbes, Rousseau

One of the philosophical theories which has attracted the attention of numerous writers is represented by the theory of the social contract. The main philosophers who have… read more

Essay 8 pages (2433 words) Sources: 4 Style: MLA Topic: Sociology / Society

---

Synthesis Argument Leviathan and What Is a Just War Essay

Leviathan

Thomas Hobbes and Mo Tzu

Political philosophy drastically changed with the coming of the enlightenment in the 17th century, and the ideas of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and the… read more

Essay 6 pages (1764 words) Sources: 2 Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>