Research Proposal on "Why a Legalization Program for Undocumented Workers Would Be Bad for the United States"

Research Proposal 8 pages (2693 words) Sources: 8 Style: MLA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Legalization Program for Undocumented Workers Would be Bad for the U.S.

Why a Legalization Program for Undocumented Workers Would be Bad for the United States

Benjamin Franklin, never at a loss for the pithy comment, once said, "these immigrants are the most stupid in the nation. Few of their children speak English, and through their indiscretion or ours, or both, great disorders may one day arise among us." (Masel 155)

Now, Franklin was referrings to another facet of immigration, but the last part of his statement has proven true. Today, "great disorders" have arisen among us concerning the issues of immigration, illegal immigration, undocumented workers, amnesty, "legalization," and temporary workers. Never as much as now, we are a nation divided, in particular, over the issue of amnesty or legalization for illegal and undocumented immigrants. It would seem half the nation favors some sort of amnesty for those "illegals" already residing in the U.S., now estimated at about ten to fifteen million people. And the other half of us can not swallow the idea that the ones who broke the law getting here and staying here, would be rewarded for it. It is the latter group we will discuss in this paper -- those who think that a legalization program for undocumented workers in this country is a bad idea and would be bad for the country.

It's important to delineate between amnesty and legalization, though many think they are one and the same, since both involve forgiveness of the fact that these immigrants entered the country illegally and would not be expelled under either program, but rather rewarded by a place in line to become a legal citizen.

That being said, amnesty is defined as the act of an authority (as a government) by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals. (Merriam-Webster Online) the amnesty program President Reagan offerred in 1986 was amnesty; more on that later.

Legalization is defined as giving validity or legal sanction to something. And legal means conforming to or permitted by law or established rules, according to Webster's Online Dictionary. So, in the case of a legalization program for undocumented workers, it would indicate a process by which they could be given legal validity to remain in the U.S. It is this definiton that raises the hair on the back of the necks of its opponents.

Let's keep in mind also that this anti-legalization belief that there is little or no difference between the two terms comes from the opinion that if an immigrant is in this country because he broke the law to get in, then anything short of deportation or a jail term or both is amnesty. Therefore, a legalization program equals amnesty. It is an opinion held by many.

Reward for Criminal Behavior?

Why?" ask those who oppose any program of amnesty or legalization for illegal immigrants. "When did we start rewarding people who perform illegal acts in this country?"

Whether its total amnesty with no fines, penalties, or "going to the back of the line," or some form of amnesty that includes a legalization program, much of the opposition comes from people who sincerely question whether that's the direction this country wants to go.

The argument here is not that a legalization program in itself is bad and wrong for the country. It is the offer of such a program, which serves as an open invitation to all immigrants to come to America and take advantage of this largesse of amnesty-driven legalization. The results of that massive influx of illegal aliens is an overwhelming of the legalization programs themselves and part of American culture and society in general.

After listening to the argument from those in favor of legalization or amnesty who say there are just too many illegals, and their children, in this country to even consider jailing or deporting them, opponents ask "so what?" To them, it goes beyond practicality to the bigger concept of justice for all. If we say that, because of their numbers, we'll just slap them on the hand, and forget about it, are we not condoning criminal behavior? The answer, they say, (League of United Latin American Citizens) is yes. And then where, eventually, does this "OK" for breaking the law stop? It is not good either for society because of the presence of a large population living outside the legal structures or the migrant, who is subjected to abuse, exploitation, and death in the desert.

Once breaking the law gets to be okay, it is hard to construct any program that can function. "Guest-worker" programs and legalization proposals boast many detailed new rules. But if we won't enforce existing rules, how will we enforce the new ones? The government tell us, "This time we really mean it." But until we start enforcing our laws, any new plan must remain equally meaningless. Legalization programs depend on lots of rules...rules our government will not enforce just as they do not enforce immigration laws today. (Moseley)

New Flood

Today's illegal aliens will be joined by millions more tomorrow. Usually, rewarding trespassers for climbing through our windows will invite more trespassers who want some of the action. (Moseley)

Border agents already are reporting a surge of traffic at the borders. Based on the outcome of the last amnesty, under President Reagan in 1986, the Center of Immigration Studies (CIS) predicts that with the passage of some type of amnesty/legalization/guest worker bill from Congress, they expect approximately ten million illegal aliens will receive "amnesty." (Camarota)

As in 1986, they predict that one-fourth (2.6 million) will obtain amnesty fraudulently. In addition, a bill of this sort would allow an estimated 4.5 million family members of illegal aliens to join their legalized relatives -- a total of 14.4 million beneficiaries. CIS comments that these figures do not include the increase in future legal immigration, which may double or triple to one million per year. (Camarota)

And this flood of illegals will overwhelm the system.

The Risks of Mass Immigration

There is a downside to importing workers who are mainly poorly educated with few or no skills, according to Daniel Stein, director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). Stein adds, "All we're doing is importing a huge pool of cheap labor, which helps employers but keeps wages low for Americans," he says. (Masel 158) This "importation" or rush of illegal aliens into the U.S. with the promise of citizenship through legalization will impact American workers for years. No immigration bill so far indicates an immediate "upgrade" to U.S. citizenship, so that low-paid illegal immigrant worker is going to take the job of a citizen for a period of time, because he or she is willing to accept less pay and fewer benefits.

Instead of using incoming illegals to fill vacancies, we should be focusing on training the unemployed here," says the Center for Immigration Studies' Mark Krikorian. "If we lost immigration as a source of workers, employers would seek to increase the labor pool by increasing wages," he says. "They would also look to communities with higher unemployment rates -- more marginal elements of the population -- like those on public assistance, ex-convicts or the handicapped." The point is that the work will get done. We don't need the carrot of legalization, which will attract millions more illegals to join in on the giveaway.

Immigration causes American workers to lose $133 billion in wage depression and job loss to foreign workers annually, according to Professor George Borjas of Harvard University. Legalization of illegals or a guestworker program would increase competition for American jobs and put downward pressure on wages, especially for the least skilled American workers.

League of United Latin American Citizens)

Other Considerations

Opponents of illegal immigration and of amnesty for those illegals already here, say that they are an economic drain on this country. They pay no taxes yet enjoy some of the benefits of living in the United States. They don't contribute much to the economy because they are "poorly educated people who take low-skilled jobs for little money," says Stein, who opposes high immigration levels. (Masel 155) and, says Stein, the newcomers take Americans' jobs and suppress wage levels.

Immigration opponents also reject the idea that immigrants are willing to do jobs that most Americans won't do. Not true. Krikorian says that in parts of the country with few immigrants, low-wage jobs still get done, and by native-born people.

Employers could find Americans to do these jobs if they wanted to, but they would have to provide training and raise wages to do so," says Krikorian. Immigrants are simply an easier and cheaper alternative for business, according to him. (Masel 155)

In and of itself, legalization does not represent a comprehensive solution to the many problems faced by immigrants. Ultimately, it must be coupled with economic policies that encourage and fund sustainable development and permit working people to earn a living wage in their home countries - as well as… READ MORE

How to Reference "Why a Legalization Program for Undocumented Workers Would Be Bad for the United States" Research Proposal in a Bibliography

Related Research Proposals:

United States Investing Too Much in WMD A2 Coursework

United States investing too much in WMD protection

Is the United States investing too much time and money in WMD protection?

America has made massive investments of their resources towards… read more

A2 Coursework 4 pages (1551 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Military / Army / Navy / Marines

---

USA Intervention of Central America Essay

S., the American foreign policies for many years are looking to soften the historic reputation in the region by deferring negotiations to Central American diplomats. One case which led to… read more

Essay 5 pages (1427 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Latin America / Mexico / Caribbean

---

United States Should Be Against Immigration Research Paper

Immigration: Why the United States Should Be Opposed to It

Today, the U.S. plays host to millions of both legal and illegal immigrants. Those who oppose the current levels of… read more

Research Paper 6 pages (1887 words) Sources: 15 Topic: American History / United States

---

United States Government Is a Republic Term Paper

United States Government is a Republic, formed on democratic principles. This means that the United States operates under a system of democracy that is "for the people, by the people."… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (717 words) Sources: 1 Style: APA Topic: American History / United States

---

US Patriot Act Term Paper

USA Patriot Act

The purpose of this paper is to research the "USA Patriot Act" and examine exactly what the implications are in the implementation of this act should another… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1258 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: American History / United States

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>