Essay on "Constitutional Court Cases and Their Effects on Law Enforcement"
Essay 4 pages (1329 words) Sources: 4
[EXCERPT] . . . .
Landmark 4th and 5th Amendment Issues in Law EnforcementIn the United States, criminal procedure underwent a tremendous evolution during the second half of the 20th century. Prior to several important cases that led to the ultimate resolution of issues by the U.S. Supreme Court, accused persons and criminal defendants lacked any appreciable protections to guarantee their constitutional rights in any practical or meaningful sense, particularly in certain areas of the country and especially with respect to persons of the then-persecuted minority classes (Dershowitz, 2002). Among other things, persons arrested by police were routinely deprived of the most basic comforts such as food and water; they were subjected to prolonged hostile interrogation without the benefit of counsel, and they were frequently coerced and even beaten to produce signed confessions of the crimes of which they were supposed to be considered innocent pending proof to the contrary adduced at their criminal trials (Schmalleger, 2009).
Three Landmark Cases in American Law Enforcement and Criminal Procedure
While there were many criminal justice cases, social factors, and pivotal events that contributed to and shaped the evolution of the modern American criminal justice system, three Supreme Court decisions in particular were responsible for introducing specific changes to the criminal procedures of arrest and custodial interrogation. Both individually and especially in combination, the series of three cases of Spano v. New York (1959), Miranda v. Arizona (1966), and Terry v. Ohio (1968) produced radical changes that resulted in significantly greater constitutional protections for those
download full paper ⤓
In Spano, a young man was arrested for the shooting death of another man during the course of a physical alteration arising from the fact that the eventual victim had stolen money from the defendant when they were both at a bar (Zalman, 2008). Spano followed the other man out of the bar and confronted about the theft him nearby. The accused man was an accomplished boxer and during the physical altercation that ensued, he knocked Spano to the ground and beat him fairly seriously. Spano then returned home to retrieve a handgun and returned to find the boxer, whereupon he shot and killed him. Spano was convicted of murder and the New York Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. When the case reached the Supreme Court, the conviction was reversed on several grounds by virtue of constitutional violations of Spano's rights (Zalman, 2008).
During the police investigation of the matter, Spano was not permitted to consult an attorney even though he had requested to do so several times (Zalman, 2008). There was also evidence that the police attempted to use psychological ploys involving guilt over fabricated trouble Spano had caused a good friend and that friend's family. Finally, when Spano still refused to confess, he was interrogated aggressively by a group of experienced law enforcement personnel and he was taken back to the scene of the shooting and prompted to re-enact it and respond to questions about it. There was also evidence that Spano was operating at a lower-than-average level of intellectual capacity. The Supreme Court determined that Spano's confession should not have been introduced against him at trial because it was not given freely and in conjunction with the right of consultation with and representation by legal counsel (Zalman, 2008).
In Terry, a police officer on patrol noticed two men behaving suspiciously, apparently "casing out" a local store for felonious purposes (Schmalleger, 2009). The officer approached the men for questioning in the context of a constitutionally permissible investigative detention short of arrest. During the process of that exchange, the police officer conducted a search of the external clothing of Terry that revealed the presence of an illegal concealed weapon for which Terry… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Constitutional Court Cases and Their Effects on Law Enforcement" Assignment:
Question:
Address the cases of Terry v. Ohio (1968), Miranda v. Arizona (1966), and Spano v. New York (1959) and their effects on law enforcement officers. Discuss these cases from the contexts of law enforcement operations, the cultural impact of these cases, and the social implications of these cases.
Expectations:
Your answer should be well thought out, comprehensive, and include general references to books, articles, or other works that support your arguments. You need not quote source material directly as in a research paper. However, you should clearly articulate the essential points of the authors you incorporate into your answers. The average answer should be approximately 1300 words.
How to Reference "Constitutional Court Cases and Their Effects on Law Enforcement" Essay in a Bibliography
“Constitutional Court Cases and Their Effects on Law Enforcement.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2011, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/landmark-4th-5th-amendment/9971027. Accessed 28 Sep 2024.
Related Essays:
Corporate Civil Procedure and Constitutional Law Term Paper
Gilbert Law Summaries: Constitutional Law by Jesse Choper
The United States Constitution is the foremost legal authority for laws created in the United States. Though the Constitution is a federal… read more
Term Paper 32 pages (10293 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Use of Force in Law Enforcement Thesis
Force in Law Enforcement
The controversy swirling about Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr., a respected Cambridge professor who happens to be an African-American, and Sgt. James M. Crowley, a police… read more
Thesis 30 pages (9298 words) Sources: 10 Style: APA Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice
Law and Evidence Essay
Federal Rules of Evidence
The issue here is whether the suspension of the license should be overturned because the police report was inadmissible. The second issue is whether the finding… read more
Essay 8 pages (2542 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Exclusionary Rule by the Supreme Court Case Study
Exclusionary Rule by the U.S. Supreme Court
Exclusionary Rule by the Supreme Court:
As a nation governed by the law, the United States uses her constitution and its amendments as… read more
Case Study 5 pages (1735 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice
Principles Policies and Rules in Legislation and Police Power Term Paper
Law and Police Powers
Recent changes to the law in Queensland, and to the powers of police there, mean that citizens need to think twice next time they stroll home… read more
Term Paper 9 pages (3246 words) Sources: 8 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Sat, Sep 28, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!