Essay on "Kelo v. New London Judicial"
Essay 2 pages (724 words) Sources: 3
[EXCERPT] . . . .
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469, 2005). Under the proposed redevelopment plan, only a limited number of individuals would be given the opportunity to benefit from the property seizures and they would need to be employed by the company the land was seized for. In fact, the New London Development Corporation (NLDC) intended to seize lands in order to support a proposed Pfizer research facility. The NLDC claimed that the proposal aimed to "create a development that would complement the facility that Pfizer was planning to build, create jobs, increase tax and other revenues, encourage public access to and use of the city's waterfront, and eventually to build momentum for the revitalization of the rest of the city, including its downtown area" (Summary of Kelo v. New London, 2011).Ultimately, judicial activism in Kelo v. City of New London not only determined that the terms "public use" and "public purpose" were interchangeable, but also established precedent that would allow lands to be unconstitutionally seized if they met certain criteria. Furthermore, "in its 2005 decision Kelo v. City of New London, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right of government agencies to take private property and transfer it to another private owner if the public interest is involved" (Eminent Domain: Drawing the Line on Property Rights, 2009). Due to this ruling, 37 state took matters into their own hands and passed legislation to protect private land owners from being robbed of their lands under the pretext of eminent domain.
References
Eminent Domain: Drawing the Line on Property Rights. (2009, Nov 10). W.P. Carey School
of Business at Arizona State
download full paper ⤓
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) (dissenting opinion). Accessed
Kelo v. City of New London, Conn. (2013). Order in the court: rule of law initiation. The Heritage Foundation. Accessed 25 April 2013, from http://orderinthecourt.org/Cases/Kelo-v-City-of-New-London-Conn.
Lesson 5: The Supreme Court. (n.d.). American Government I. American Public University.
Summary of Kelo v. City of New London (2011). National Conference of State Legislatures.
Accessed… READ MORE
Quoted Instructions for "Kelo v. New London Judicial" Assignment:
The Supreme Court, in the case of Kelo v. The City of New London ruled in June 2005 that local governments may force property owners to sell out and make way for private economic development when officials decide it would benefit the public, even if the property is not blighted and the new project's success is not guaranteed. The 5 to 4 ruling provided the strong affirmation that state and local governments had sought for their increasing use of eminent domain for urban revitalization, especially in the Northeast, where many city centers have decayed and the suburban land supply was dwindling.
Discuss the relevancy of this case to the charge of the adverse impact caused by activist judges on the American political system. In preparing your post, you might want to read the dissent opinion by former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. As part of your response, you may address the aftermath (city council elections/Pfizer abandons site/etc...); but remember what the primary question is for this week's Forum discussion question:
"Discuss the relevancy of this case to the charge of the adverse impact caused by activist judges on the American political system."
How to Reference "Kelo v. New London Judicial" Essay in a Bibliography
“Kelo v. New London Judicial.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2013, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/kelo-new-london-judicial-activism/6148238. Accessed 6 Jul 2024.
Related Essays:
Kelo Eminent Domain: Was the Kelo Decision Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Kelo
Eminent Domain: Was the Kelo Decision Fair?
In 1954 the Supreme Court ruled in Berman v. Parker that government's power of eminent domain could be used to seize property… read more
Term Paper 10 pages (2707 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Matching Terms Writ of Mandamus K. Arbitration Term Paper
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Matching Terms
Writ of Mandamus K. Arbitration
Writ of Certiorari L.
Private Enforcement
Power of Eminent Domain
M. Due Process Clause
Compensatory Damages N. Rational basis test.
Punitive Damages O.… read more
Term Paper 5 pages (1871 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Lochner v. New York Economic Regulations on Trial Essay
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
Lochner v. New York: Economic Regulations on Trial
The 1905 Supreme Court case Lochner v. New York stands as one of the most glaring examples of judicial misuse of power.… read more
Essay 6 pages (1962 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
John Locke: Political Thought on Eminent Domain Essay
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
John Locke: Political Thought on Eminent Domain and Individual Property Rights
"Men living together according to reason, without a common superior on earth, with authority to judge between them, is… read more
Essay 15 pages (4766 words) Sources: 15 Style: MLA Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence
Literature and the City the Presentation of London in Three Novels by Charles Dickens Essay
![Paper Icon](https://www.a1-termpaper.com/images/term-paper-3.png)
London and Dickens
The City of London in Charles Dicken's Great Expectations, David Copperfield, and a Christmas Carol
The Dickensian city, while a reflection of social injustices, is not strictly… read more
Essay 7 pages (2360 words) Sources: 12 Style: APA Topic: Literature / Poetry
Sat, Jul 6, 2024
If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!
We can write a new, 100% unique paper!