Term Paper on "Causes of Juvenile Delinquency and the Best Strategies and Interventions Designed to Stop"

Term Paper 8 pages (2664 words) Sources: 6

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Juvenile delinquency is a term that has many meanings throughout time and it is one that is often misused. In its technical sense juvenile delinquency is a term utilized to describe a lawful violation by a youth (Smith, 2008). Many of these law violations only exist for youth and are considered to be status offenses such as truancy, disobedience, running away, and violating curfew. These are only violations of the law when committed by youth but would not be unlawful if committed by an adult. Yet there is also an increasing amount of serious crime committed each day by juvenile offenders, particularly those between the ages of 15 and 19. Prevention and intervention strategies have done little to curb the continued rise in crime by this population. Criminal acts by juveniles are widespread across populations, particularly in urban areas, and are most often petty crimes such as theft, vandalism, fighting, and underage drinking (Smith, 2008). There have been many different approaches to prevention and intervention strategies throughout time many of which have been politically and socially driven yet none of these approaches have adequately addressed this issue.

Juvenile crime has risen significantly in the last several decades with the rate of juvenile arrests increasing by 79% between 1978 and 1993 (Levitt, 1998). This rate is three times higher than that of their adult counterparts. This gap was more significant even in the murder rates of juveniles which increased by 177% while the murder arrest rate for adults decreased (Levitt, 1998). As the incidence of juvenile crime, particularly violent crime, rose in the 1990s, there was a movement in the juvenile justice system to enforce harsher sanctions on juveniles (Chamberlin, 2001). As youth began to be seen as executors of serious and violent crimes, principles of rehabilitation became less important than ensuring the safety of the public. There was a significant push to transfer these more severe juvenile offenders to adult court where they could be tried in the criminal system that historically has handed down harsher sentences. Juvenile judges also began to take a more severe stance on offending youth and many jurisdictions implemented minimum sentences for certain offenses (Tate, Repucci & Mulvey, 1995).

It is believed that a combination of biological and psychosocial factors play a role in the causation of dissocial and delinquent behaviors that arise in youth and childhood. Biological causes can include factors such as abnormal autonomic responses and neuroendocrine disturbances whereas psychosocial causes include family conflict, abusive or neglectful relationships in childhood, mental health issues, and exposure to violent behaviors (Remschmidt & Walter, 2010). It is believed that these causation factors are interactive with risk increasing as exposure to these factors increase. Yet some youth have protective factors that safeguard them from the development of antisocial behaviors such as strong support networks, family cohesiveness, strong educational ties, and community engagement (Remschmidt & Walter, 2010). Of equal importance is the concept of resiliency in youth which has been defined as a youth's ability to experience a stressful or traumatic event and utilize adaptive coping strategies to continue to function in day-to-day life (Remschmidt & Walter, 2010). The development of delinquency is directly related to the formation of maladaptive coping strategies as a response to stressful life situations and prevention and intervention strategies should utilize this as a starting point.

The juvenile justice system has historically differed from the criminal system in the manner in which the accused were evaluated and sentenced (Kupnick, 2003). Juvenile justice proceedings are often less formal than criminal proceedings and youth are evaluated and sentenced based on a goal of rehabilitation (Kupnick, 2003). On the other hand, criminal proceedings take an offense based approach with the goal of punitive sentencing. However, punishment and retribution has gained widespread acceptance and is increasingly practiced in the juvenile system with violent youth (Tate, Repucci & Mulvey, 1995). The juvenile justice system has not been consistent in their approach to treatment of youth which can be directly linked to the subjectivity of the system as well as the moral and ethical issues associated with punishing youth and determining the age of maturation.

There has been much controversy over whether the juvenile justice system should have maintained its rehabilitative focus or should it continue to focus on punishment and deterrence. There was significant dissatisfaction with the juvenile justice system's ability to rehabilitate offenders and as a result more and more support has emerged for an offense based approach with increased sanctions. Juvenile justice sentences were viewed as being too lenient on youth who had committed violent crimes and recidivism did not appear to be decreasing (Chamberlin, 2001). Many states listened to the argument that in order to ensure that violent crimes by juveniles continue to decrease that the juvenile justice system needs to continue to include a focus on punishment (Chamberlin, 2001). In fact, many steps were taken to treat juveniles more like adults in the criminal system where sanctions are proportionate to the crime committed and mandatory sentencing is common practice (Chamberlin, 2001). There is widespread belief that some of the ineffectiveness of the juvenile justice system came from its informal nature and that a transition to a more formal process may strengthen results (Chamberlin, 2001).

Retributive justice as it exists in the criminal justice system is based upon the notion of rewards and consequences (Fontaine, 2008). It is believed that if one works hard and follows the law then they will be rewarded with all of the freedoms that society can afford them. However, should they choose not to conduct themselves within the legal system they will become indebted to society and must pay this debt through the retribution process (Fontaine, 2008). This punishment should be in proportion to the culpability of the crime committed (Fontaine, 2008).

Juvenile Justice should adopt a similar retributive approach where the primary focus of the court is on identifying the offenses and handing down punishments as deterrence for future crimes committed (Kupchick, 2003). This approach allows the juvenile justice system to focus on the safety of society from the future threats of the youth rather than the future outcome of the youth alone (Kupchick, 2003). In this system, evaluations should be focused on the factors of the crime, such as the evidence presented, the severity of the crime, and history of offenses (Kulpchick, 2003). This differs from a rehabilitative model which focuses on the offender and as the primary factor and trying to identify what led them to the criminal behavior and how to stop this behavior from occurring again.

Under this approach, the court system will address juveniles in a formal manner through the use of due process procedures as is the case in the criminal system rather through the use of informal processes that have not been proven effective in reducing recidivism (Ash, 2006). Under an informal model, juveniles are not afforded the same protection that exists for adults in the criminal system (Kupchick, 2003). For example, the juvenile system takes liberties with the concept of due process, often allowing information about a vast array of youth's life to enter into court proceedings and sentencing even if they are irrelevant to the particular crime being tried. This occurs on the premise that the information allows courts to provide youth with the best possible rehabilitations, but it may also be the case that this information can lead to harsher sentences for youth than if it was not entered in (Kupchick, 2003).

Increasingly state laws have been revised to allow for an increase in the transfer of a juvenile from the juvenile justice system to the criminal system (Chamberlin, 2001). This has allowed for an increase in the types of sentences that can be handed down to youth who commit serious crimes, as well as a decrease in the level of confidentiality that was previously expected in the juvenile justice system where juvenile records were often sealed at the age of 18 (Chamberlin, 2001). A focus on punishment would require that the juvenile justice system establish clear cut standards under which juveniles can and will be transferred to the criminal system. Under the current model, there are specific ways that a juvenile can be transferred to the adult system including a judicial waiver of jurisdiction, a waiver at the discretion of the prosecutor, and a mandatory waiver based on legislation (Chamberlin, 2001).

Sentencing of juveniles into custody has meant a number of things over the years including youth held in detention centers, training programs, shelters, or community-based foster homes (Levitt, 1998). Levitt (1998) attests that in situations where juvenile sentencing is lenient there is a pattern or increasingly violent offenses whereas when a youth faces severe punishment this pattern decreases. The same can be observed in youth transfers to the adults system or when a youth comes to the age of maturity. If a youth ages into a system that is more lenient in their sentencing then the recidivism rate of these youth increases as compared to the decrease… READ MORE

How to Reference "Causes of Juvenile Delinquency and the Best Strategies and Interventions Designed to Stop" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Causes of Juvenile Delinquency and the Best Strategies and Interventions Designed to Stop Thesis

Juvenile Delinquency

THE SHAPE OF THE FUTURE

Juvenile Delinquency: Causes and Best Strategies, Interventions

The American Heritage Dictionary (Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006) broadly defines juvenile delinquency as antisocial or criminal… read more

Thesis 9 pages (2562 words) Sources: 4 Style: APA Topic: Child Development / Youth / Teens

---

Juvenile Justice How to Prevent Juvenile Delinquency Term Paper

Juvenile Justice

How to Prevent Juvenile Delinquency

Much has been written about juvenile delinquency in the last two decades. The problem attracts a serious interest these days because of the… read more

Term Paper 8 pages (2805 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Child Development / Youth / Teens

---

Students With Disabilities Who Did Not Complete Dissertation

Students With Disabilities Who Did Not Complete High School

Richard Wieringo

This case study explores the experiences of students with disabilities who have dropped out of high school, so as… read more

Dissertation 60 pages (17241 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

Truancy Rationale, Relevance, Significance Organization of Remainder Research Proposal

Truancy

Rationale, Relevance, Significance

Organization of Remainder of Study

Review of the Critical Literature

Historical Context

Motivational and Behavioral Research: Why Punishment Doesn't Work

Co-Morbidity with Other Problems: Identifying Stressors… read more

Research Proposal 75 pages (24169 words) Sources: 60 Topic: Education / Teaching / Learning

---

Parenting Style & Jewish Youth Alcohol Use Thesis

It is also noteworthy that these findings hold true across ethnicities and gender and higher levels of parental support and involvement are consistently associated with less alcohol use by adolescents… read more

Thesis 61 pages (17942 words) Sources: 117 Topic:

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>