Term Paper on "John Mill and De Behavior"

Term Paper 6 pages (2292 words) Sources: 2

[EXCERPT] . . . .

John Mill and De Beaviour

John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) and Simone De Beauvoir (1908-1986) both write meaningful treatise regarding the position of women in society. Both contend that women are subjected to men in legal and political functions, but the depart on several key points, perhaps in part due to De Beauvoir's unique perspective as a women in a society far progressed in egalitarianism. Taken out of the context of their lifetimes, the conversation they might have had regarding the sweeping changes that made De Beauvoir's society more progressive toward women and Mill's, society nearly completely oppressive toward women, would still garner interest. This work will attempt to do just that, create a conversation between these two very like minded individuals, utilizing a comparison and contrast between the two works the Subjection of Women by Mill and the Second Sex by De Beauvoir. This work will argue that Mill, though progressive in thought never intended to take women out of the position of economic dependence on a husband, while De Beauvoir, having seen the "progress" made was largely only on paper and not in reality, would have women become wholly independent of men economically and maybe even physically.

According to Mill, gender equality is a state where women have an equal voice in the political and the right to pursue her own "suitabilities" as long as such pursuit did not interfere with her ability to manage a household and raise a family. While De Beauvoir stresses that the encumbrances of this sort of equality make women totally dependent on men, and for real gender equality to ensue, the pursuit by women of economic independence must be ingrained in the social
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
order. Gender inequality to Mill is women lacking political voice and the right to pursue outside interests while to De Beauvoir anything short of total female economic and physical independence is clearly proof of inequality. It would then be fair to say that Mill was progressive indeed, and that his and the works of many others aided in female suffrage as well as a limited political and social voice for women but De Beauvoir, living in a time after some such changes had taken place, stressed that this de jure "equality" was by de facto simply not true equality as in practice women are still fully dependant on men, for both opinion and action as without economic independence women, are beholden to men.

Mill begins in a promising fashion, expressing that his belief in the need for equality between the sexes has not weakened with age and experience but has in fact endured and become even stronger. He articulates the thesis of his lengthy work as the following:

…the principle which regulates the existing social relations between the two sexes -- the legal subordination of one sex to the other -- is wrong itself, and now one of the chief hindrances to human improvement; and that it ought to be replaced by a principle of perfect equality, admitting no power or privilege on the one side, nor disability on the other. (Mill 1)

Mill then goes on to do several things, first he defends his position, adamantly as he states that an individual with an opinion that goes against common belief and practice requires the individual with that opinion prove that the opinion is valid with a mighty force, including but not limited to substantial evidence. The individual who seeks to question a "truth" that is accepted in popular opinion requires more diligence in that quest than anyone seeking any other redress. Mill then goes on to compare the subjection of women to an overt abuse of power by men, using slavery and military despotism as correlations to the subjugation of women. When he does this he counters contradiction by stating that many would argue against this analogy because women are the weaker sex and therefore must be protected and subjugated. To this he answers that this assertion is based on a history of might over right, which no longer exists in this culture and should therefore not be used as a "modern" ideation of reason to support continuing to subjugate women. He contends that there is no possible way in which this assertion can be made, because it is being made within a society that is wholly voiced by men. Women have no voice, excluding writing and these writings are the exception rather than the rule, and are often dismissed and ignored because they have no place in the patriarchal rule of politics. "But was there ever any domination which did not appear natural to those who possessed it?" (Mill 20-21)

For women to truly be equal, according to Mill, must have a political voice, and according to Mill this should include not only the right to suffrage but the right to hold political office and have their voice be heard as lawmakers rather than simply as citizens with a vote. Mill speaks frankly of the fact that many dismiss such thinking, and such comparisons of women to slaves, because women do not complain, and therefore they are not truly ruled by force.

…it will be said, the rule of men over women differs from all these others in not being a rule of force: it is accepted voluntarily; women make no complaint, and are consenting parties to it. In the first place, a great number of women do not accept it. Ever since there have been women able to make their sentiments known by their writings (the only mode of publicity which society permits to them), an increasing number of them have recorded protests against their present social condition: and recently many thousands of them, headed by the most eminent women known to the public, have petitioned Parliament for their admission to the Parliamentary Suffrage. (Mill 24-25)

Mill goes on to say that not only are these respected and well thought women seeking the right to vote, but they are also seeking other rights which would equate them greater ability to be free and productive members of society; "The claim of women to be educated as solidly, and in the same branches of knowledge, as men, is urged with growing intensity, and with a great prospect of success; while the demand for their admission into professions and occupations hitherto closed against them, becomes every year more urgent." (Mill 24-25)

De Beauvoir on the other hand begins her treatise on the subjugation of women with a strong argument in favor of women's economic emancipation. Within her work is the sentiment that women have won all these "rights" and yet none has been fully realized as she is for the most part still subject to men based on economics.

According to French law, obedience is no longer included among the duties of a wife, and each woman citizen has the right to vote; but these civil liberties remain theoretical as long as they are unaccompanied by economic freedom. A woman supported by a man -- wife or courtesan -- is not emancipated from the male because she has a ballot in her hand; if custom imposes less constraint upon her than formerly, the negative freedom implied has not profoundly modified her situation; she remains bound in her condition of vassalage. It is through gainful employment that woman has traversed most of the distance that separated her from the male nothing else can guarantee her liberty in practice. Once she ceases to be a parasite, the system based on her dependence crumbles; between her and the universe there is no longer need for a masculine mediator." (De Beauvoir 679)

De Beauvoir uses incredibly unkind language, claiming that women are parasites and that until this is no longer the case society will continue without question to be one of inequality. When De Beauvoir speaks of this subjugation she gives examples of the minimal way in which women have been afforded to seek their independence, economically from men;

It is quite understandable, also, that the milliner's apprentice, the shopgirl, the secretary, will not care to renounce the advantages of masculine support. I have already pointed out that the existence of a privileged caste, which she can join by merely surrendering her body, is an almost irresistible temptation to the young woman; she is fated or gallantry by the fact that her wages are minimal while the standard of living expected of her by society is very high. If she is content to get along on her wages, she is only a pariah: ill lodged, ill dressed, she will be denied all amusement and even love. (681)

The opportunities open to women for economic equality are according to De Beauvoir, so paltry that women have no real choice in the matter. If she wants to have love, children and a better standard of living she must submit to a man. If she chooses not to she will be seen as in a perpetual state of pity, with no real prospects for her future happiness… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "John Mill and De Behavior" Assignment:

PERSUASIVE ESSAY

QUESTION: To what extent does John Stuart Mill*****s analysis in The Subjection of Women provide an adequate understanding of persistent forms of gender inequality and offer helpful proposals to achieve gender equality?

GUIDELINES

* Since gender equality is a contentious topic that most of us have very strong ideas about, there is the danger of answering this question on the basis of subjective opinions. The question is not about your own opinions regarding what is adequate, helpful, or persistent; it expects you to make these assessments on the basis of the assigned texts by John Stuart Mill and Simone de Beauvoir. You are expected to draw on the readings by Simone de Beauvoir to be able to assess the merits and limits of Mill*****s analysis. Similar to the previous assignment, you need to put at least two texts in a conversation with each other without losing your focus on Mill.

* A persuasive essay should convey the reader a focused argument that is supported by textual evidence. The introduction of your essay should have a clearly articulated, concise thesis statement formulating your argument. Clarity and conciseness can be achieved without sacrificing complexity. As you reread the texts and write your essay, please check whether your argument needs to be modified and qualified in the light of textual evidence. Your purpose is to grapple with complexities, not to obscure them by ignoring textual evidence that does not neatly fit your position. This process of revision and qualification is essential for articulating an argument that is sound, plausible, and persuasive.

* You should also have a specific focus clearly identified in your introduction, indicating how you are going to approach the assignment question. There are several different dimensions of Mill*****s analysis. The first challenging task in this essay is precisely to identify what you will focus on given the wide-ranging set of issues and questions. Once you identify how you will approach the assignment question, you should keep your focus throughout your essay as you are developing your supporting points.

* To support your position, you need to make frequent use of the texts. Your writing should demonstrate your grasp of authors***** arguments as developed in different sections of their texts. Your persuasive essay should not be a summary; instead, it should offer an analytical engagement with these authors, identifying, interpreting, and assessing specific themes and positions in their texts that are particularly relevant for the purposes of your argument.

* To support your argument with textual evidence, provide citations (even if you are not directly quoting from the text):

e.g. The subjection of women is *****certain to outlast all other forms of unjust authority***** (Mill, 12).

* Since you will be using more than one text, you should provide a bibliography at the end of your essay.

* You should avoid long quotations. In a short essay, it is important to use your limited space effectively. One of the purposes of the assignment is to develop your skills of interpreting complex arguments and articulating them in your own words. Make sure that your quotations are brief; given the purposes of this assignment, they should not exceed three lines. And do not just list quotes one after another, assuming that the meaning or relevance of these quotes is obvious to your reader; when you use a quote, make sure that you are demonstrating its relevance to your argument.

* Please title your essay. For the purposes of this assignment, please also include a statement of your thesis/argument after your title. You should write a brief introduction where you articulate your thesis statement, specify your focus, and state how you will approach the question. You should also have a brief conclusion to give the reader a sense of finality.

* This is an analytical essay that requires formulating, demonstrating, and defending an argument; your language should reflect that goal. Since this is not a personal essay, avoid sentences beginning with, among other things, *****I feel***** and go for a more analytical language (e.g. argue/propose/contend/suggest).

* Since the essay is not a mere recollection of your reading and thinking experience, your ideas should probably not appear in the order that you happen to think them, especially if that is not the most logical way of organizing them into a coherent whole. Think carefully about how to organize your supporting points and structure your paper; outlines can be helpful. You will be dealing with different authors in this assignment; dividing the paper into two or three sections*****one for each author*****might not be the ideal structure. Think about your argument and supporting points, and take them as your starting point in structuring your paper.

* Proofread for spelling errors, incomplete sentences, mistaken quotes, etc.

* Number the pages of your assignment; do not forget to write your name and staple your paper.

GRADING CRITERIA

This assignment is graded over 250 points. The following criteria will be taken into consideration in the grading of the assignment:

* Focus and Clarity: Is there a specific focus and clearly articulated position in the introduction and the rest of the essay? Do you make your supporting points clear?

* Textual Evidence: Are you drawing on the relevant sections of the text to support your argument or position? Do you make defensible assertions about the text? Are you citing page numbers correctly?

* Argumentation: Is there a clearly articulated, logical relationship between the thesis stated in the introduction and the supporting points elaborated in the rest of the essay? Do you provide persuasive and plausible arguments about the concepts and positions in the texts as you are making the case for your thesis? Does your interpretation anticipate, and respond to, counter-arguments that can challenge your position or reading?

* Organization: Do you present your arguments in a coherent order, assigning one supporting point per paragraph and making smooth transitions? Is your paper organized carefully to abide by the page limit?

* Language and Style: Does your essay avoid slang or colloquial language? Has it been proofread for spelling and grammar? Does it deploy words and phrases carefully for a clear and effective mode of presentation? Do you have title and page numbers?

GRADING SCALE

Remember all your assignments, attendance, and participation add up to 1000 points.

Below is the grading scale that will be used in determining your final grade:

945-1000 A

895-944 A-

845-894 B+

795-844 B

745-794 B-

695-744 C+

645-694 C

595-644 C-

495-594 D

494 and below F *****

How to Reference "John Mill and De Behavior" Term Paper in a Bibliography

John Mill and De Behavior.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2010, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/john-mill-de-beaviour/3222. Accessed 5 Jul 2024.

John Mill and De Behavior (2010). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/john-mill-de-beaviour/3222
A1-TermPaper.com. (2010). John Mill and De Behavior. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/john-mill-de-beaviour/3222 [Accessed 5 Jul, 2024].
”John Mill and De Behavior” 2010. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/john-mill-de-beaviour/3222.
”John Mill and De Behavior” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/john-mill-de-beaviour/3222.
[1] ”John Mill and De Behavior”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/john-mill-de-beaviour/3222. [Accessed: 5-Jul-2024].
1. John Mill and De Behavior [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2010 [cited 5 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/john-mill-de-beaviour/3222
1. John Mill and De Behavior. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/john-mill-de-beaviour/3222. Published 2010. Accessed July 5, 2024.

Related Term Papers:

John Grierson the Documentary Film Developed Term Paper

Paper Icon

John Grierson

The documentary film developed alongside the narrative film, though largely during the sound era. It was shaped most profoundly during the 1930s as filmmakers began to record sociological… read more

Term Paper 75 pages (22277 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Film / Movies / Television


Applied Management and Decision Sciences Thesis

Paper Icon

management and decision sciences from various theorists; and, analyzes the evolution of managerial decision making from scientific management to the complicated forecasting models used today. The objectives of the Breadth… read more

Thesis 90 pages (25680 words) Sources: 40 Topic: Management / Organizations


Group Protocol for Adolescents Term Paper

Paper Icon

Group Protocol for adolescents - addressing the occupational needs of the adolescent population

Occupational needs assessment

During the occupational assessment, a group of 12 adolescents are observed attempting to solve… read more

Term Paper 5 pages (1719 words) Sources: 2 Style: APA Topic: Leadership / Mentoring


Country of Origin Effect on the Brand Loyalty of Moller's Cod Liver Oil Literature Review

Paper Icon

Country of Origin Effect on the Brand Loyalty of Moller's Cod Liver Oil

An understanding of the contextual elements that impact upon individual purchase decision making and the overall process… read more

Literature Review 20 pages (6167 words) Sources: 20 Topic: Advertising / Marketing / Sales


Sales Promotion Techniques Used in the Clothing Retail Industry in India and Challenges Ahead Term Paper

Paper Icon

Sales Promotion Techniques Used in the Clothing Retail Industry in India and Challenges Ahead

The Nature of Competition

Buyer-Seller Relationships for Promotional Support in the Clothing Sector

Long-Term Impact of… read more

Term Paper 44 pages (12044 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Fashion / Designers / Beauty


Fri, Jul 5, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!