Thesis on "International Business: Airbus vs. Boeing Competing"

Thesis 4 pages (1478 words) Sources: 5

[EXCERPT] . . . .

International Business: Airbus vs. Boeing

Competing in commercial and military aviation, space and communications systems industries, Airbus and Boeing are two of the largest and most technologically advanced companies competing in these markets. At the center of Airbus' business model is a reliance on operations across 160 international locations including Research & Development (R&D) and manufacturing centers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Spain. In addition, Airbus operates subsidiaries in North American, China and Japan. Airbus heavily relies on an engineer-to-order strategy for synchronizing its supply chain and demand management systems (Irwin, Pavcnik, 2004). Relying on a high degree of process integration in its single-aisle (A318, A319, A320, and A321) and wide-body (A300, A310, A330, A340) commercial jets, Airbus takes a more consortium-oriented approach to product development. While this can significantly reduce the subassemblies to produce a new jet, it requires an inordinately higher level of synchronization across suppliers and partners. With 80% of Airbus owned by the European Aeronautic Defense & Space Company (EADS) and BAE Systems owns the other 20% there is also the challenge of pleasing multiple consistencies in the same organization. According to research estimates Airbus leads the world in market share for commercial jets with 29.6% of the total market (Holmes (a), 2007).

Contrasting the highly collaborative approach Airbus takes in the development, manufacturing, selling and services of commercial and military aircraft, Boeing has more of a concentration on decentralized and highly autonomous teams (Holmes, 2007). There is a high level of accountability and use of process and system integration to ensure that development cycles cane be managed to project plans and meet time-to-market goals. Boeing trails Airbus with a 25.3% market share (Holmes, 2007) yet is the world's largest aerospace company. Comprised of commercial airplane, military aircraft and missile, and space and communications system divisions, Boeing has consistently relied on internal process and systems integration including the continual adoption of Computer-Aided Drawing (CAD) systems to automate their new product development process (Olienyk, Carbaugh, 1999). This commitment is seen as critical to their development of the Model 777 (Sharma, Bowonder, 2004) which was designed and manufactured purely through the use of CAD-based design and drawing applications integrated across the many functional teams building the aircraft. Boeing also has operations throughout the Pacific Rim with development centers in Australia, Japan, Korea, in addition to locations in Russia, the Middle East and Spain. Development and engineering centers are also located in China, Germany, India, and Italy. From these fundamental philosophical differences between each company, there are significantly different approaches to their product development strategies. These differences also directly impact their approach to designing next-generation products as well, which will be shown in this paper.

Airbus: Provide a summary of its product development strategy

Given its structure as a consortium of companies, Airbus relies heavily on the engineer-to-order and mass customization concepts their initial commercial aircraft were designed using. Airbus further creates a series of parallel processes that allow for their multiple divisions to interlock on a common design series of objectives. This concentration on using engineer-to-order forces a very high level of system, process and engineering specification knowledge throughout the entire Airbus consortium. The downside of this is that development cycles can often be impacted by the lack of coordination and synchronization of complex systems and jets (Kingsley-Jones, Norris, 2005). This was certainly the case with the A380, which is now over two years overdue and also lagging in key integration steps especially in firmware and systems development (Holmes (a), 2007). The advantages of having an engineer-to-order strategy is the minimization of sourcing complexity and the number of suppliers, greater levels of supplier coordination between themselves, and a continual effort to trim subassembly costs. As a result, the typical Airbus commercial jet requires only seventy-seven different subassemblies or components to create an entire jet (Economist, 2005) specifically designed to give Airbus the opportunity to create the A340 more efficiently (Kingsley-Jones, Norris, 2005). What is evident from this strategy of concentrating on the engineer-to-order process is that the discipline it places on Airbus makes them very efficient in their lower-end and mid-range commercial jets, yet does not scale well into larger, more complex projects such as the A380.

Boeing: Provide a summary of its product development strategy

Boeing on the other hand is more concentrated on the concept of individualized product and project teams, coordinated through a centralized Project Management Office (PMO). The concept of the… READ MORE

How to Reference "International Business: Airbus vs. Boeing Competing" Thesis in a Bibliography

Related Thesis Papers:

Premium Aerotec How Can Premium Aerotec Gmbh Term Paper

Premium AEROTEC

How Can Premium AEROTEC GmbH win BOEING as a major customer?

Why Premium AEROTEC wishes to attract Boeing as a major customer

Importance of winning Boeing as a… read more

Term Paper 60 pages (19753 words) Sources: 60 Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce

---

Financial Analysis of International Airlines Group Thesis

Financial Analysis of International Airlines Group

Supervisor

Contact Details

Confidentiality Restrictions

Today, the aviation industry is faced with skyrocketing energy costs, the lingering aftereffects of the Great Recession of 2008… read more

Thesis 19 pages (5321 words) Sources: 30 Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

Competition in a Mixed Duopoly Market for Boeing and Airbus Term Paper

Competition in a Mixed Duopoly Market for Boeing vs. Airbus

The global airline manufacturing industry is one of the most capital-intensive, highly competitive there is. Compounding how competitive this industry… read more

Term Paper 9 pages (2419 words) Sources: 5 Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

Marketing Questions 1. Describe the Marketing Strategy Term Paper

Marketing Questions
1. Describe the marketing strategy currently used by this restaurant. Do
you that this approach is effective? What suggestions would you make to
improve the restaurant's marketing programme.… read more

Term Paper 8 pages (3435 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Advertising / Marketing / Sales

---

Airline Industry Flying Full Service vs. Low Fair Discount Research Paper

Airline Industry: Flying Full-Service on Continental Airlines vs. Low-Fair Discount Flying on Southwest Airlines

Today, people have a wide range of transportation alternatives available to them, including personal conveyances, buses,… read more

Research Paper 8 pages (2128 words) Sources: 6 Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>