Research Paper on "Intelligence the First Step in Identifying"

Research Paper 9 pages (2776 words) Sources: 9

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Intelligence

The first step in identifying and updating the intelligence requirements that must be answered in order for operational personnel to refine a Noncombat Evacuation Plan (NEO) for a future contingency in the Democratic Republic of Congo is contextualizing this plan according to the desired objectives, the means to achieve these objectives, and the hierarchical structure of both ends and means that will characterize the actual planning and execution of any possible noncombat evacuation operation. While every evaluation of a preexisting noncombatant evacuation plan using the Strategies-to-Task (STT) paradigm likely need not consider the entire chain of command when addressing the need for updated intelligence, for the purposes of this exercise, it is useful to start at the top, if only to highlight the top-down nature of the STT approach, the complexities involved in a plan such as this, and why "a strategies-to-task framework is ideal for identifying the complete range" of necessary information contained within a noncombatant evacuation plan (Rhodes, Hagen, & Westergren, 2007, p. 9). In the case of noncombat personnel in the Democratic Republic of Congo, this means determining where their safety and well-being falls on the hierarchy of objectives and strategies for achieving those objectives.

Firstly, it is worth pointing out that placing the safety of noncombat personnel in the DRC in a hierarchy of objectives should not be taken as the relativization of human life or safety, but rather part of a process of identifying the most suitable means for achieving the given objective. In order to do this, one must identify where that objective falls within the hierarchy of objectives and the strategies that link them, because the goal of the Strategies-to-Task paradigm is:

To provide an audit trail from the broadest national objectives down to operational activities at the tactical engagement level. It explicitly disaggregates these activities into key functional elements encompassing the tactics, organizations, and systems that enable the successful execution of missions; it also gives high visibility to the interrelationships among these elements. […] it can help expose systems and functions necessary for executing missions, and it links them hierarchically to national objectives. (Thaler, 1993, p. 1)

In the general hierarchy of objectives outlined by the RAND Corporation when it first developed the Strategies-to-Task concept, the evacuation of noncombatants would fall under the category of operational objectives, or those subordinate objectives which directly support the overall campaign objective, itself a subset of the national military objective (Thaler, 1993, p. 42). In 2011, the United States Africa Command outlined its primary national military objectives for the region, highlighting the need to cooperate with its African partners in order to disrupt the various transnational terrorist and criminal groups working in the region (Ham, 2011, p. 10). This need for cooperation at the level of national military objectives is reflected at the level of operational objectives as well, and this may be seen when considering the role of the State Department in the planning of noncombatant evacuation operations.

Locating the evacuation of noncombatants at the level of operational objective presupposes a number of things, including the presence of a well-defined set of campaign objectives concerning whatever events or developments that precipitated the need to evacuate personnel from the DRC in the first place. Furthermore, while the evacuation of noncombatants will be carried out by the Department of Defense, the steps leading up to an evacuation require the intervention of the State Department, and as such any evaluation of an evacuation plan must take into consideration the upper levels of the hierarchy of objectives aside from just national military objectives, and in particular any relevant national political objectives that might influence the particular tactics used (DOD, "Noncombat Evacuation Operations," 1990). As discussed above, recognizing the interconnected nature of objectives and the means for achieving them is a key component of the Strategies-to-Task paradigm, and this is nowhere more true than in situations like the one discussed here, where sometimes ostensibly mutually exclusive military, diplomatic, and political objectives meet and must be integrated in order to achieve the task at hand.

As noted in the 2007 update to the joint publication covering noncombatant evacuation operations, "while the protection of U.S. citizens being evacuated remains paramount, NEOs will probably be conducted in an environment where political concerns and constraints are key considerations" (DOD, 2007, p. II-1). This is especially true in a country like the DRC, because various border disputes and human rights issues require any actions taken within the DRC be measured against the potential political and diplomatic ramifications (CIA, "Republic of Congo," 2012). Thus, while the actual evacuation is located at the level of operational objectives, approaching the issue within the Strategies-to-Task framework reveals that the basis of the evacuation plan may actually be traced all the way to the level of the President, who ultimately decides the country's national security objectives, which includes economic, military, and political objectives. Recognizing this fact will be important for appreciating the various topics that must be covered in a noncombatant evacuation plan, because the interconnected nature of these objectives means that success depends not on one strategy or operation, but rather on the smooth and seamless cooperation between a number of disparate organizations, individuals, and goals. As will be seen later, a failure at one level can cascade throughout the hierarchy, ultimately undermining national security as a whole.

Locating the evacuation plan in the hierarchy of objectives and strategies allows one begin determining what topics would likely be covered in a noncombatant evacuation plan and thus what intelligence needs updating in light of a future contingency. Firstly, the plan would likely include information regarding the State Department's presence in-country, because "U.S. Embassies and consulates are required to have emergency action plans for the area under their cognizance," and these emergency action plans must be integrated into the overall noncombatant evacuation operation in order to ensure that the operation proceeds as smoothly as possible, and that all necessary personnel are accounted for (DOD, 1997, p. ix). While anyone responsible for participating in a noncombatant evacuation should already know the regulations governing who may be evacuated (especially in regards to non-U.S. citizens), this information would likely be included as a part of the evacuation plan dealing with coordination between the State Department and the DOD, especially because the local embassy ultimately designates "those authorized evacuation assistance," and is responsible for making these designations clear to the DOD representatives engaged in the operation (DOD, 2009, p. 4)

The integration of emergency action plans into larger plans for noncombatant evacuations would be conducted by the Regional Liaison Group for the area, which is "collocated with combatant commands" in order to "ensure coordination of emergency and evacuation planning," and as such, the NEO-would have to include information regarding the particular regional liaison group. Due to the unique requirements of noncombatant evacuation procedures, any plan would likely include information regarding the chain of command and a clear-cut delineation regarding which individuals are responsible for what elements of the plan, especially because any NEO-includes various emergency action plans. While the chain of command for NEOs is standardized according to Department of Defense guidelines, the specific plan for any given country or contingency would have to include the specific information regarding the State Department presence and duties as well as the relevant regional liaison group. This last detail highlights the importance of approaching the issue from the Strategies-to-Task perspective, because only by viewing the issue in the context of a larger hierarchy of objectives and means can one appreciate the various elements which go into the successfully planning of any effective evacuation operation, let alone one in a country as fraught with diplomatic, political, and military dangers and variables as the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Close coordination between the State Department and the Department of Defense is especially important somewhere like the Democratic Republic of Congo, because according to the CIA, the "primary [telephone] network consists of microwave radio relay and coaxial cable with services barely adequate for government use" and "intercity lines [are] frequently out of order" (CIA, 2012). While ideally both State and Defense department personnel would not be communicating via local phone lines, the lack of a substantial communications infrastructure in the country makes careful coordination and cooperation all the more important. Furthermore, while the actual operation will be carried out by the Department of Defense, the State Department is ultimately responsible for determining if "political or military actions within a country [have created] a potentially dangerous situation," and as such any noncombatant evacuation plan begins with coordination between the State Department and the DOD (DOD, "Noncombatant Evacuation Operations," 1990).

Depending on the specificity of the contingency the noncombatant evacuation plan is being prepared for, it may contain a variety of evacuation options depending on the particular threat. However, in addition to the aforementioned information regarding coordination with the State Department, all noncombatant evacuation plans must include certain important information that will likely already be part of the embassy's emergency action plan. This… READ MORE

How to Reference "Intelligence the First Step in Identifying" Research Paper in a Bibliography

Related Research Papers:

Intelligence Agencies Term Paper

Intelligence Agencies

What exactly is an Intelligence Agency? It is an agency that is responsible for gathering information about an enemy of any kind, and assimilating this information in such… read more

Term Paper 28 pages (11218 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Military / Army / Navy / Marines

---

Effects of Emotional Intelligence in Adolescents and Smoking Cessation Programs Term Paper

Emotional Intelligence and Adolescent Smoking

The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of emotional intelligence on the success of various strategies to prevent smoking in adolescents. A… read more

Term Paper 20 pages (6326 words) Sources: 15 Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry

---

Intelligence Surveillance Policies and Procedures Thesis

Intelligence/Surveillance Policies & Procedures

After the tragedy of September 11 attacks on Pentagon and World Trade Center, the National Security Agency (NSA) was given authority to listen to all kinds… read more

Thesis 8 pages (2139 words) Sources: 4 Style: APA Topic: Terrorism / Extremism / Radicalization

---

Intelligence Test Assessment and Critique Term Paper

Intelligence Test Assessment & Critique

The title of the test is the KAIT: Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test authored Alan S. Kaufman & Nadeen L. Kaufman. Although it is… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (1050 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Psychology / Behavior / Psychiatry

---

Nine Step Stakeholder Analysis Essay

Stakeholder Map and Stakeholder Analysis

My organization

I am the commander of the Criminal Intelligence Bureau and it comprises of six distinct units. They include the Intelligence Analysis Unit, the… read more

Essay 4 pages (1312 words) Sources: 4 Topic: Crime / Police / Criminal Justice

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>