Term Paper on "Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth"

Term Paper 40 pages (11687 words) Sources: 1+ Style: MLA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Inconvenient Truth

Former Vice President Al Gore, who, in his documentary film on global warming, by director Davis Guggenheim, an Inconvenient Truth (2006), introduces himself, "I am Al Gore, I used to be the next president of the United States," won an Academy Award for the documentary. It is not the first time that a controversial documentary film has won an Academy Award, nor is it the first time that a politician has harnessed the Hollywood public relations mechanism as represented by the film stars like those stars backing Al Gore's documentary, to promote both their ideology and themselves as politicians. Hillary Clinton did it with her book, it Takes a Village (1996), which won a Golden Globe Award, and was the first time a book received such a Golden Globe. It was perhaps Clinton's which served as impetus for the Gore documentary, which, like Clinton's book, is replete with political and social rhetoric such that might cause some to wonder whether Gore's documentary is a political campaign, or a sincere statement of concern on global warming.

This essay attempts to examine the rhetoric of Mr. Gore's documentary, not because there is a lack of support for environmental wellness and for mankind to live in harmony with nature; but because there is an emerging trend seen here of politicians moving self-interest and special interest out of the confines of the Senate, and into the private sector in a very public way. Harnessing the momentum that can be gained from the fast pace of the Hollywood public relations machine when a well-known star or matinee idol endorses a candidate or cause draws huge support to the cause or candidate's ideological position. Many people believ
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
e that wealthy people such as Leonardo DiCaprio, who endorsed Al Gore in his documentary and message on global warming, and who was seen vigorously applauding his support at the Academy Awards; actually have done research on the subject or have a knowledge on the subject that many ordinary people do not have. For that reason, because their favorite "star" has endorsed the product or candidate or idea, these people will go along and incorporate those individuals or ideologies into their own ideas and support them with votes or with charitable donations, or renting or purchasing a DVD.

This essay will explore the rhetoric and the facts on global warming not in order to sway a mind in one direction or another, but to understand and the shed light on the ways in which political candidates and others target human emotions in order to take aim with arrows of rhetoric in order to reel in that support for a political cause. An attempt will be made to reveal the self-interest, if any, that might be associated with the global warming issue, and who might stand to benefit from efforts to "combat" global warming.

There are some real concerns that people should have about politicians and corporate magnates who attempt to harness the public passion in support of an ideological cause. This essay hopes to turn the spotlight away from the celebrities, towards the facts, dismantling the rhetoric so that people can gain an informed understanding of how that language is used to manipulate their ideas and support for ideas.

To do this, the documentary, an Inconvenient Truth, will be examined in as much detail as possible, breaking down the language and the images through analysis to reveal what might actually be seen beyond the rhetoric. Comparisons will be made between the data provided in the documentary with that of other documentaries, such as the counter position on Al Gore's version of global warming as seen in the documentary film the Great Global Warming Swindle (2007), by director Martin Durkin; and Doomsday Called Off (2004), by director Lars Mortensen.

Again, it has to be stated that there is no attempt being made here to thwart environmentalists in their efforts to bring about a balance between human nature and Mother Nature. In fact, the opposing views to Al Gore's science are very much supportive of balancing mankind's place in the world with nature, and supporting a clean environment, a conscientious approach to environmental efforts.

The Planet Earth

The documentary film, an Inconvenient Truth, the film opens with aesthetic images of nature: flowing stream (not blue though), trees, and the quiet voice of former Vice President Al Gore narrating, introducing the viewer to nature. Not that the viewer needs to be introduced to nature, because most viewers, urban and rural have an understanding of nature, but, as Al Gore goes on to say, following the aesthetic scenery, "I'd forgotten about this." That sentence, "I'd forgotten about this," not only re-introduces the viewer to nature again, and in a really aesthetically visual way on film, but also suggests to the viewer, wow, we have been so busy with our lives that we forgot about this. From the perspective of rhetoric, this statement goes even further, because it is Mr. Gore's gentle way of putting us in the frame of mind to accept our responsibility for having forgotten about nature; because in having done so, we have put nature, and ourselves, in fact, our planet, at risk. That we are responsible is something that is rhetorically important to establish early on in the film and the reason why will be explored as it is revealed towards the end of the film. However, it is, at this early start in the film, essential to the ideology being introduced in the film to invest the viewer by causing the viewer to accept that responsibility for, wow, I had forgotten about this. You can almost hear Al Gore's gentle, even fatherly voice softly chastising, shame on you; and, yes, we will feel shame before it is over. The rhetoric, as we note along the way, is supported, emphasized by the tone and infliction of Mr. Gore's voice.

The scene then jumps to Mr. Gore standing before an American audience with a tall screen next to him. On the screen is an image of earth, the blue planet, in a half shot, its white clouds swirling in the atmosphere above blue oceans and seas. The photograph, titled Earthrise, was taken by astronaut William a. Anders, during the 1968 Apollo 8 mission, seven months before the first moon landing. It is one of the most important photographs of earth taken from space.

As that image of earth is shown to a large auditorium that is filled to capacity with young Americans, all of whom are shown as listening intently to Mr. Gore's remarks because he is sharing with them information that, more than anyone else right now, impacts their lives as they will be the gatekeepers to successful environmental change in the world. The earth problems created by the generations before them are now theirs to deal with. It is, therefore, important invest them in the not just the concept of history, but in the notion of their inherited historical legacy. Americans were, after all, first to land on the moon. This is an important historical event, it is a legacy that belongs to them, and out this important historical event was this ever important photograph of the blue planet, their planet, Earth. The combination of rhetoric and imagery is magnetic up to this point in the documentary, and it remains either as magnetic, or increases in its magnetic hold on the viewer. "Within 18 months of this picture, the modern environmental movement had begun," Mr. Gore advises the audience. Thus, the reason Mr. Gore is showing this audience the picture; to invest them in the modern environmental movement.

Next, Mr. Gore shows the audience a photograph of the full picture of the blue planet, Earth, taken from the moon. December 11, 1972, the most commonly published photograph of the earth in all of history. Then, Mr. Gore shows the audience a time lapsed photograph taken from the American exploration satellite Galileo and it shows a 24-hour period of the earth's rotation. It is indeed an amazing image to see. Iconic images which are used in combination with rhetoric are a powerful tool. As the camera scans the faces in the audience, we see that Mr. Gore is enjoying success so far.

The use of the image of planet Earth serves another purpose here. It serves to emphasize that all mankind shares the same planet. This is a valid, and irrefutable point, and a necessary point to make from the perspective of not just the environment, but the global community and the global initiative that it will require to bring about change to protect the environment. Hopefully, as Mr. Gore suggests in the film, through the Kyoto initiative which he sponsored, and which the United States has not yet signed itself in commitment of supporting. The reasons for that will be explored here too.

Examining what has been accomplished up to this point in the film, it is seen that Mr. Gore has invested the older… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth" Assignment:

Technical specifications:

*****¢ Use at least 5 of the sources provided, including the two that have been included in the short paper; however, at this level of college the student should be able to use the appropriate number of sources to support his or her argument.

*****¢ In-text citations should be in standard MLA form. Both the secondary material and the film should be reasonably quoted from to support and highlight the argument.

*****¢ The paper must be 40 complete pages, not 39 and a half.

*****¢ A Works Cited must be included in proper MLA format.

*****¢ Preferred outline:

o Introduction

o Description of the artifact, *****An Inconvenient Truth*****, and it*****s context

o Description of the Unit of Analysis

o Report of the Findings of the Analysis

o Contribution to Answering the Research Question

o Conclusion

*****¢ Absolutely no vague assertions*****”specifically show how the film does what is claimed*****”make as strong as argument as possible.

*****¢ Provide support, support, support

*****¢ Avoid generalizations and cliché*****s

Research question:

*****¢ In what way does *****An Inconvenient Truth***** work rhetorically to explain its vast public impact and popularity? What ideologies does it utilize?

Paper abstract:

The issues of global warming aren*****t new; scientists, lawmakers, and environmentalists have been waving flags at us for years, so the current public controversy on global warming that is at the forefront of popular discussion baffles me. We have headlines clamoring about the global warming debate, we may have respected peers that don*****t believe in global warming, and we have lawmakers battling each other over how to resolve the situation. Having been educated from grade school about the facts of global warming and its effects, I wonder about how the argument is now shifting given the preponderance of scientific evidence. In school we had slogans; now we have award-winning documentaries on the subject. My goal is to study this change in strategies to examine the new facts and ideologies that are revealed by them.

What are the rhetorical strategies used by Gore in an attempt to secure the legitimacy, support, and acceptance of society at large? How has he impacted public opinion? I plan to rhetorically analyze Al Gore*****s video An Inconvenient Truth in order to understand the ideologies expressed by it. I also want to look at the ways in which it was received in order to see how it impacted public opinion. This paper is a look into the multi-layered rhetorical approach Al Gore takes in his Global Peace Prize winning documentary *****An Inconvenient Truth*****. In an effort to understand how we have gone from slogans to award winning documentaries, I decided to analyze how this film works rhetorically. I argue that through the use of rhetorical ideas such as stasis and doxa, Gore provides his audience with both a simple understanding and an ability to effect change. Gore also utilizes the American individualistic ideologies as a back door into ensuring governmental legislation to reverse the threat of global warming.

Additional directions:

I have a five page paper (Gore*****s Recipe: Stasis and Doxa) that I would like extended and used as a basis for this term paper. I*****ve been told that it definitely can be elaborated into my term paper and that the argument is good, but needs firming up toward the end. I would like for my writing style and tone to be attempted by the *****, as both come through clearly in this writing piece.

*****

How to Reference "Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2008, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/inconvenient-truth-former-vice-president/699745. Accessed 3 Jul 2024.

Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth (2008). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/inconvenient-truth-former-vice-president/699745
A1-TermPaper.com. (2008). Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/inconvenient-truth-former-vice-president/699745 [Accessed 3 Jul, 2024].
”Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth” 2008. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/inconvenient-truth-former-vice-president/699745.
”Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/inconvenient-truth-former-vice-president/699745.
[1] ”Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/inconvenient-truth-former-vice-president/699745. [Accessed: 3-Jul-2024].
1. Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2008 [cited 3 July 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/inconvenient-truth-former-vice-president/699745
1. Rhetorical Analysis of the Ideologies of Gore's an Inconvenient Truth. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/inconvenient-truth-former-vice-president/699745. Published 2008. Accessed July 3, 2024.

Related Term Papers:

Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth Research Proposal

Paper Icon

Inconvenient Truth: The Science behind it

Director Davis Guggenheim's (2006) documentary featuring former Vice President, Al Gore, an Inconvenient Truth, documents the former vice president's campaign against global warming. The… read more

Research Proposal 2 pages (721 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Weather / Climate / Meteorology


Ideology and U.S. Foreign Relations Essay

Paper Icon

Ideology and U.S. foreign relations

Foreign Relations

Howard Zinn (1991), author of Declarations of independence: cross-examining American ideology, begins his book by saying that when the idea that black people… read more

Essay 7 pages (2130 words) Sources: 5 Topic: American History / United States


Rhetorical Analysis of the Ballot or the Bullet by Malcolm X Essay

Paper Icon

Ballot or the Bullet, Malcolm X was very effective. In fact, this may very well have been the beginnings of the reason for his assassination. While this may seem to… read more

Essay 3 pages (954 words) Sources: 3 Topic: African-American / Black Studies


Martin Luther King's I Have a Dream Essay

Paper Icon

MARTIN LUTHER KING'S I HAVE a DREAM SPEECH

Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his infamous I Have a Dream speech from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington… read more

Essay 3 pages (1095 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Philosophy / Logic / Reason


Movie Review an Inconvenient Truth Movie Review

Paper Icon

Inconvenient Truth

Narrated by former Vice President Al Gore, David Guggenheim's 2006 documentary an Inconvenient Truth is immediately compelling because of its celebrity profile. Gore, who has been a long-time… read more

Movie Review 2 pages (627 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Weather / Climate / Meteorology


Wed, Jul 3, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!