Thesis on "Lincoln or Jef Davis"

Thesis 7 pages (2536 words) Sources: 1+ Style: APA

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Historiographical Analysis of Jefferson Davis

Although the commanders-in-chief of the Union and Confederacy received their full measures of criticisms during and following the end of the Civil War, the martyrdom of the Union's Abraham Lincoln seems to have absolved him of many of the harsher attacks that his counterpart in the South Jefferson Davis has been forced to endure over the years. Indeed, everyone loves a winner, the adage advises, and this has certainly been the case with Lincoln. Conversely, and especially in Davis's case, many observers hate a loser and this sentiment is reflected in the primary sources from the era as well as in the historical record in subsequent years as well. Although another adage suggests that "time heals all wounds," the wounds inflicted on the South were no quick to heal and it was more than a full century before the role played by Davis during the Civil War began to receive a more balanced appraisal from most historians. To trace this shift in opinion concerning Davis and his actions during and following the Civil War, this paper provides a review of the primary and secondary literature followed by a summary of the research and salient findings in the conclusion.

Review and Discussion

Just over half a century had passed when Eckenrode (1923) wrote his biography of Jefferson Davis, who he notes was born in Kentucky in 1808 near the birthplace of Abraham Lincoln who was born in 1809. Although Davis and Lincoln were contemporaries to this extent, Eckenrode suggests that is where the parallels leave off: "Davis, in later life, was something of an aristocrat, in obedience to the social law of his section, just as Lincoln
Continue scrolling to

download full paper
, also in obedience to social law, remained a plain man of the people" (1923, p. 29). Moreover, Eckenrode reports that Davis was named after the presiding president of the United States when he was born (just as children in the Confederacy would be named after him), and his original name was indisputably "Thomas Jefferson Davis"; however, like Woodrow Wilson, Davis dropped the "Thomas" in order to provide himself with a more stately sounding name. According to this historian, "It had something to do with his success in life: men with ill-sounding names seldom rise high in politics" (Eckenrode, 1923, p. 29). According to Eckenrode, Davis enjoyed a quality education for the era at a private academy in Kentucky and at Transylvania University until his appointment to the United States Military Academy. As Eckenrode emphasizes, this experience had a transformational effect on the future Confederate president: "He was at the military academy with such other notables as Robert E. Lee and Joseph E. Johnston. Jefferson Davis was not a model student like Lee, hating mathematics and slighting his courses for desultory reading, but he graduated in 1828 with a fair class standing and carried away with him an almost pathetic faith in education" (p. 30). In fact, as president of the Confederacy, Davis was reluctant to promote officers to the higher ranks unless they had been educated at West Point like himself (Eckenrode, 1923). All in all, Eckenrode's biography of Davis points out some of his strong points but generally characterizes him as an aloof and pretentious individual who affected airs of greatness that he did not necessarily deserve. For instance, although she would not live long after they were married, Davis fell in love and courted the daughter of Zachary Taylor. In this regard, Eckenrode points out that, "Davis had become engaged to the daughter of his commanding officer, Zachary Taylor. The latter had taken a strong dislike to the lieutenant, not improbably on account of his preciousness, for Taylor was a rough, uneducated Indian fighter and must have been galled by his would-be son-in-law's probably too obvious attitude of superiority" (p. 31).

In addition, like another president, Richard Nixon, Jefferson Davis was also elected to a term that he would not be able to complete. According to McPherson, "Jefferson Davis was inaugurated to his full six-year term as president on February 22, 1861 (until then he had been provisional president). He conceded in his inaugural address that 'after a series of successes and victories, we have recently met with serious disasters'" (quoted at p. 21). The characterization of the setbacks which the Confederacy had experience as "serious disasters" can be viewed in retrospect as understatements, but Davis was fighting a war that as the war progressed, he increasingly recognized he could not win but he felt that it was his duty to prosecute the war to its ultimate conclusion in hopes of securing terms from the North and alleviating the suffering that was its unfortunate concomitant. For example, the wounds of the Civil War will still apparent when in 1937, McElroy wrote that, "Davis' view was that 'violence, on the one side, and extreme measures on the other, now, will dissolve the Union; but if they will give me time, all is not lost' -- a sufficient answer to the later propaganda which made him an arch-conspirator, seeking with mad ambition to tear down the structure which he had sworn to defend" (p. 259). From Davis's perspective, though, the Confederacy held the high moral ground and these points are made time and again in his book, the Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government.

In an essay by Dirck (2002), the point is made that Davis remained unrepentant for his role in the South's defeat. In this regard, Dirck notes that, "In 1881 Jefferson Davis published the Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government, his contribution to the growing literature of the Lost Cause. As the Confederacy's ex-president, he was in a unique position to write an insider's account of the short-lived Southern nation" (p. 237). Although the book by Davis had a number of literary and moralistic flaws from Dirck's perspective, the overriding issue that emerged from this book was its self-serving purpose. According to Dirck, "Dry and colorless in its narrative, legalistic and utterly without humor in its style, Rise and Fall was most of all self-righteous. Never once in nearly thirteen hundred pages of text did Davis admit a mistake, either by himself personally or by the Confederacy" (p. 238). Although the Union's track record was certainly not spotless when it came to, for example, the defense of civil liberties during the Civil War, Dirck emphasizes that Davis engaged in many of the same violations but that the former president simply overlooked these transgressions in his book. In this regard, Dirck writes that, "Davis largely passed over in silence the more thorny policy initiatives of his own administration -- the military draft, impressment of civilian goods, declarations of martial law, and suspensions of the writ of habeas corpus -- saying in effect to the reader that his record in these matters was so above reproach as to require no defense" (p. 238). Clearly, though, some defense is in order because even modern historians continue to cite these actions in a negative light. For instance, Brick-Turin (2004) notes that, "The Confederacy was far less democratic than it set out to be. The necessity of raising funds resulted in an income tax, contrary to its constitution and in advance of its Northern adversary. And like its rival, the Confederacy was quick to suspend habeas corpus and draft men for the army -- again contrary to constitutional prohibitions" (p. 585). From Davis's viewpoint, though, the Confederacy was justified in taking these steps while the Union was not, a bit of military hypocrisy that was not overlooked by his contemporaries or by historians ever since.

For instance, according to Sutherland (2002), "Davis cites instances where Union troops had behaved far more barbarously than the worst Rebel bushwhackers and irregulars. As the Federals dealt ever more harshly with both guerrillas and the citizens who harbored or assisted them, Davis found himself in the awkward position of defending the guerrilla war he had always deplored" (p. 260). Desperate times call for desperate measures, and the historical record makes it clear that Davis was a desperate commander-in-chief. In this regard, in July 1862, Davis lamented to Robert E. Lee that, "We find ourselves driven by our enemies by steady progress towards a practice which we abhor and which we are vainly struggling to avoid" (quoted in Sutherland at p. 260). The actions taken by Davis during the Civil War can be viewed as being reprehensible, and many contemporary observers and historians adopted this position to be sure, there was more to the man that his brief tenure as the president of the Confederate States.

Nevertheless, as the leader of the losing side, Davis was the natural target for the animosity that remained after the war drew to its bloody conclusion. For example, according to Cooper (2003), "In four years of bloody warfare that claimed 600,000 American lives, the United States smashed the Confederate states. Even though Davis and his cause failed, the vastness of the war and the profound consequences… READ MORE

Quoted Instructions for "Lincoln or Jef Davis" Assignment:

Historiography project: Examine the interpretation of one specific topic by more than one author and from more than one period of writing.

Definition: Historiography is the study of how written history is created and evolves, based on a critical examination of the underlying sources, how the authentic materials were selected and used, and how the author*****s syntheses of material was developed into a narrative, that should be able to stand against the test of critical research methods. Primary source material is original documentation created by an eyewitness, participant or author of an original document. Secondary source materials are those created by newspaper accounts developed from interviews, commentary by others on an event or person, books/articles/papers written by anyone who was not a participant in the event or is not autobiographic.

Goals: Through this project, you will be introduced to the basic methodology of written history. The project will help you develop a larger view of the study of history, in order to have a better understanding of how history is *****constructed***** and/or as preparation for in-depth study of historiography in HIS440. That will be accomplished by moving you away from the memorization / repeating of names, dates and places or from stopping with one author*****s view as authority - to a view that is broader, more developed, critical and analytical. To reach that ultimate goal, you will tackle smaller goals by:

Examining how the author of the text under study treated the selected topic (favorably/unfavorably).

b. Reviewing the primary and secondary sources which the author used to develop his/her presentation, seeking to determine if he/she presented the information as in the original or if it has been altered, slanted or taken out of context of time, place and events.

c.Then find other resources on the same topic to see what primary and secondary sources were used and if they differ from the text under study. Even if a second author used the same source material, you should analyze how that material is used and presented to shape the ultimate perspective on the subject.

d. Briefly examine how depictions of the subject have changed or been modified through time or location.

The ultimate goal is find the most accurate sources relating to the original event, in order to develop the least unambiguous knowledge about the subject. In doing so, you should begin to develop the skills of identifying bias in writing, and preconceptions within yourself. While eliminating all bias is not truly possible, limiting, isolating and coming to terms with how both an author*****s and our own bias greatly affect one*****s perspective on and understanding of an event or person in history.

Assignment:

Select one of the seven characters who figured prominently in the Civil War and whom you find of special interest.

Abraham Lincoln

Jefferson Davis

Examine how McPherson (2001), generally treated that figure, (use your notes and the index in the back of the text to focus your research).

Review the major events related to the person selected and corresponding description(s), depictions and incidents listed in the index. For each, examine the notes, footnotes and references McPherson cited in order to determine:

What primary and secondary source material did he use?

Are there hints about any method that he may have used to shape the information?

What was the context of the incident(s)? Did McPherson keep that context clear *****“ allowing the events/persons to *****speak***** for themselves?

Determine what materials were primary sources (i.e., eye witnesses statements, personal accounts) and which were secondary (i.e., accounts by others of the events who were not participants).

If possible review the original material, particularly the Official Records. The Official Records of the Civil War can be electronically word searched and examined at: http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/moa/browse.monographs/waro.html

Examine two to three other sources concerning the selected figure looking for differing opinions, accounts, depictions etc, in opposition or support of McPherson*****s interpretation and explain the differences or corroboration. (You should look beyond Wikipedia, and not use it as one of the two to three sources consulted.)

As a result of the research and reading, you should be able to produce a paper which explains briefly the nature of the character examined, how the person has been depicted by McPherson and others and give an informed opinion as to why or how those depictions were developed and how they deviate/comply with the primary source material.

Instructor Notes:

Be selective determining how far you are going to take the subject. Those four figures loom large in the text and in the Civil War and may present a larger project than you care to do or have time to produce. If you have questions, please contact your instructor for suggestions about narrowing or approaching the subject in a practical manner. For example, if examining Lincoln, you might select one of the categories listed by McPherson in the index on pp. I-15*****”16, such as Lincoln *****“ *****as commander in chief***** and focus only upon the data used to shape the presentation in that selection of references from the McPherson text.

How to Reference "Lincoln or Jef Davis" Thesis in a Bibliography

Lincoln or Jef Davis.” A1-TermPaper.com, 2009, https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/historiographical-analysis-jefferson/99202. Accessed 27 Sep 2024.

Lincoln or Jef Davis (2009). Retrieved from https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/historiographical-analysis-jefferson/99202
A1-TermPaper.com. (2009). Lincoln or Jef Davis. [online] Available at: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/historiographical-analysis-jefferson/99202 [Accessed 27 Sep, 2024].
”Lincoln or Jef Davis” 2009. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/historiographical-analysis-jefferson/99202.
”Lincoln or Jef Davis” A1-TermPaper.com, Last modified 2024. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/historiographical-analysis-jefferson/99202.
[1] ”Lincoln or Jef Davis”, A1-TermPaper.com, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/historiographical-analysis-jefferson/99202. [Accessed: 27-Sep-2024].
1. Lincoln or Jef Davis [Internet]. A1-TermPaper.com. 2009 [cited 27 September 2024]. Available from: https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/historiographical-analysis-jefferson/99202
1. Lincoln or Jef Davis. A1-TermPaper.com. https://www.a1-termpaper.com/topics/essay/historiographical-analysis-jefferson/99202. Published 2009. Accessed September 27, 2024.

Related Thesis Papers:

Lincoln Memorial and Social Activism Thesis

Paper Icon

Lincoln Memorial and Social Activism

Mankind has created numerous impressive architectural structures which served as symbols and which people chose to use in order to express a certain state of… read more

Thesis 8 pages (2525 words) Sources: 7 Topic: American History / United States


Lincoln Abraham Lincoln: The Family Man Thesis

Paper Icon

LINCOLN

ABRAHAM LINCOLN: THE FAMILY MAN

In the summer of 1860, Jeriah Bonham, a newspaper editor from Springfield, Illinois, paid a visit to President Abraham Lincoln, staying at the Illinois… read more

Thesis 4 pages (1254 words) Sources: 4 Style: MLA Topic: American History / United States


Lincoln Leadership President Abraham Lincoln Is Frequently Term Paper

Paper Icon

Lincoln Leadership

President Abraham Lincoln is frequently discussed, as his role in U.S. history was monumental and his ability as a leader was challenged almost daily during his term in… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1507 words) Sources: 4 Style: MLA Topic: Leadership / Mentoring


Lincoln Douglas Debates Essay

Paper Icon

Lincoln-Douglas debates came out of the senatorial campaign of 1858 between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas. Lincoln and Douglas debated issues such as the growth of slavery, the power… read more

Essay 2 pages (688 words) Sources: 3 Topic: American History / United States


Lincoln Electric Company Historic Sketch Term Paper

Paper Icon

Lincoln Electric Company Historic Sketch

With nearly 7,000 employees, Lincoln Electric Company is the world's largest manufacturer of arc welding products and a leading producer of industrial electric motors.

The… read more

Term Paper 2 pages (609 words) Sources: 4 Style: MLA Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce


Fri, Sep 27, 2024

If you don't see the paper you need, we will write it for you!

Established in 1995
900,000 Orders Finished
100% Guaranteed Work
300 Words Per Page
Simple Ordering
100% Private & Secure

We can write a new, 100% unique paper!

Search Papers

Navigation

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!