Research Paper on "General Motors"

Research Paper 12 pages (3623 words) Sources: 10

[EXCERPT] . . . .

General Motors was taken over by the United States government in the spring of 2009 after filing the second-largest bankruptcy in the history of the United States. The bankruptcy was characterized at the time as an "unprecedented opportunity to reverse decades of decline." As part of the bankruptcy, GM was set to close 17 factories and lay off 20,000 workers in a move to reduce capacity, which would match the company's slumping sales (King & Terlep, 2009). Since that time, General Motors has embarked on an ambitious strategy to revitalize itself. This strategy will be analyzed from an external perspective, and this analysis will lead to recommendations for GM going forward.

Background & Strategy

There are differences between the stated strategy and the actual strategy. GM for years had been a dominant player in the American -- and by extension the global -- automotive industry. Years of slumping sales, however, had left the company with very little sense of strategy. By 2005, the company was so out of control that its executives did not even have a sense of what its financial position would be at the end of the year. It was predicted amidst this chaos that GM would need to become a company reborn, with "fewer brands, fewer models and reduced legacy costs" (Welch & Beucke, 2005). At the time, the company disputed this prognosis, and believed that it could recover market share.

According to an interview with then head of product development Bob Lutz, the company began producing better cars at this time. Lutz was in charge of improving GM's product, and began to introduce new designs. This did not improve the company's fortunes, something that Lutz attributes to bad marketing. Customers were still only compelled to purchase a GM vehicle by discounts and rebates -- the customer perception was that the vehicles simply were not good enough (Bloomberg, 2009). Thus, GM was essentially operating a cost leadership strategy, but without the low prices and with vehicles of a lower quality that those of other cost leaders. By 2009, the firm was bankrupt.

With the government takeover of GM came many changes. A new executive team was sworn in and was given full mandate to set a new course for GM. His take on the company's strategy was that it should make better vehicles and expend more money marketing those vehicles. He especially felt that improvements needed to be made with respect to detailing quality and features (Bloomberg, 2009). The company also wanted to focus emphasis on streamlining production, reducing costs, and improving sales internationally. The bankruptcy and subsequent restructuring eliminated some of the competitive cost disadvantages by lowering legacy costs, which prior to the restructuring amounted to $2,000 per car, costs that were passed along to consumers (Hill, 2010). This equated to a labor cost of over $70 per hour, compared with under $48 at competitors (Krolicki & Bailey, 2007). The restructuring brought GM's labor cost per hour down to $62, which is still high but represents an improvement (AP, 2009).

The company does not currently issue a mission or vision statement. This reflects in part the fact that the company is currently undergoing a significant restructuring. On one hand, the expectation would be that the company would only restructure with a clear vision for its future. On the other hand, it is reasonable that GM does not know, precisely, what its future entails. All of the elements of the company -- brands, markets, ways of doing things, corporate culture -- should all be on the table for evaluation, given the state the company has found itself in. Indeed, some of the company's recent strategic actions indicate that to a certain extent, the lack of vision or mission is allowing the company to make some bold decisions about its future. Whether the lack of clarity will hinder the long-term recovery of GM or whether it will remove constraints to that recovery remains to be seen.

Current Strategy

There are a number of different areas of strategy that GM is following at present. As indicated by then-Vice Chairman of Global Product Development Lutz (2009), the company is shifting focus away from a failed cost leadership strategy and attempting to improve its value proposition by balancing out the quality of its vehicles with its pricing. Beyond this generic strategy, GM has undertaken a number of tactical initiatives in recent years that hint at its broad strategic vision.

Marketing was highlighted by Lutz as a key area of focus for the company. There are a few different tactics that GM has implemented in order to streamline its marketing efforts and make them more effective. It has reduced the number of brands that it carries, most recently killing off the long-lived Pontiac brand (Bunkely, 2010). This was part of the prescription for the company back in 2005, but was not implemented at the time. By reducing the number of brands (and consequently models) the company allows more marketing dollars per capita to the other brands and models.

GM's marketing strategy has also been modernized. The company has implemented a social media strategy in an attempt to produce different messages and reach different audiences that the firm's conventional marketing campaigns. Those conventional campaigns still form the bulk of GM marketing, but the firm is attempting to modernize its promotional strategy in an attempt to keep up with the rest of the industry (Borges, 2010). This strategy involves increasing transparency of communications and building better relationships with customers, in particular the large installed base of GM users. The impacts of this strategy will not be known for some time, however, and GM still relies heavily on traditional media advertising and messages.

Beyond marketing strategy, General Motors has shifted its focus on developing new markets. China is currently the company's largest market (GM.com, 2010). The China business is based on a series of joint ventures with local firms and was therefore unaffected by the bankruptcy proceedings, which helped the company maintain momentum in China. As that country emerged very quickly from the economic downturn, sales have increased significantly. GM sales in China were up 34% in the first nine months of 2009, for example, and the company has a 13.4% share of the Chinese market (Stoll, 2009). The company is also focused on expanding operations in India, also through joint ventures such as one with SACI Motor Corp, and sees promise in dealer expansion in India into rural areas (Anant, 2010). The company plans to enter a number of Asian markets with Wuling vans made in China (Stoll, 2009). GM's near-term growth strategy in the U.S. may be more well-known, but it is China that is the leading engine of global growth for the company.

Another element of GM's current strategy is to lower costs. Aside from the cost savings in average labor cost per hour that was garnered in the process of offloading some legacy costs onto the UAW and CAW during the company's bankruptcy, General Motors has also begun outsourcing as a means of achieving cost savings. As noted, a significant amount of production is now in China, and their Chinese facilities will produce for other Asian markets as well. A significant amount of savings is being derived from it multisourcing. GM is using its considerable bargaining power with suppliers in order to extract contracts that offer cost reductions and service improvements simultaneously. The company remains optimistic about the ability of its multisourcing strategy to achieve these objectives, although there is little evidence thus far of long-term, sustainable success (Mitchell, 2006).

Another area of focus for GM is with respect to its finance unit. Finance units at automotive companies began as an adjunct to the automotive sales units, providing credit for buyers. Many such financial companies have grown substantially beyond that original role and contribute to their firm's bottom line directly. General Motors acquired General Motors Financial Co earlier in 2010 in an attempt to bring all elements of the company under one roof again. GM Finance recorded $51.3 million in net income for the third quarter of 2010, more than doubling its totals from the previous year. GM Financial is expected to help GM in implementing its new strategy by returning to its original role of using financing alternatives to promote auto sales (Trudell & Welch, 2010).

SWOT

The new General Motors must rebuild its business around its strengths, shore up its weaknesses, and correctly identify the opportunities and threats in the marketplace. Among the company's strengths are its distribution network, its market share in the world's major auto markets, its bargaining power and its brand recognition. As formerly the world's number one automaker, General Motors has a strong distribution network that can brings its products to market around the world. This allows GM to introduce new products more easily, and to shift focus to different international markets as need be. The strong distribution network also provides opportunities to build out distribution channels in new markets, as the company has… READ MORE

How to Reference "General Motors" Research Paper in a Bibliography

Related Research Papers:

General Motors GM's Number One Priority Term Paper

General Motors

GM's number one priority must be to cut costs. The company spends $2,500 more than its Japanese rivals to build each car and truck in the U.S. (Robison).… read more

Term Paper 1 pages (378 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

General Motors Europe Essay

General Motors Europe

As of 2008, the economic agents are under tremendous pressure. A financial crisis commenced within the United States' real estate sector to quickly expand to other industries… read more

Essay 10 pages (2956 words) Sources: 10 Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

General Motors (GM) Thesis

General Motors (GM) is one of the largest automobile companies in the world. Over the years GM has been able to carve out a corporate identity, to become one of… read more

Thesis 25 pages (6236 words) Sources: 17 Style: Harvard Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce

---

General Motors Microeconomic Analysis Research Proposal

General Motors

Microeconomic Analysis of General Motors

It is now without a doubt that the American economy is facing severe economic challenges, which affect all features of the everyday life.… read more

Research Proposal 6 pages (1552 words) Sources: 4 Style: APA Topic: Transportation / Mass Transit

---

General Motors Thesis

General Motors

In order to determine the best set of alternatives for General Motors, the issues facing the company must be prioritized. Now that the company has swapped out its… read more

Thesis 2 pages (850 words) Sources: 3 Style: APA Topic: Business / Corporations / E-commerce

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>