Term Paper on "Law Cases"

Term Paper 4 pages (1292 words) Sources: 1+

[EXCERPT] . . . .

Freakonomics claimed in an interview on the Today Show that the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, which paved to the way for legal abortions, also helped the crime rate to drop. That was not the first time that point had been made. That author, Steven Levitt, had been quoted in an article in the American Prospect in 2001, when he released his contention that there was a stronger link than that between tougher policing and reduced crime rates. That more direct link was between abortion and crime. As the article said, "Or to be more precise, between the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion and the much heralded fall in crime rates starting about 18 years later, in the early 1990s" (Abramsky, 2001, p. 25). Clearly, if that is true, Roe v. Wade had a major effect on changing social policy; indeed, it was also likely a reaction to changing social policy.

All four of the cases considered here contributed to and were at least partially representative of changing social policy. They also shed some light on the principle of stare decisis, and the implied, as well as actual, powers of the judiciary.

An interesting pair of cases in particular helps trace both social attitudes, in this case toward slavery and discrimination, and the use of the stare decisis principle. Those two cases are Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education (Topeka, KS), although all the cases have some issues concerning precedent and why it was, or was not, the deciding factor for the members of the Supreme Court.

One observer, Paulsen, believes that the Supreme Court often uses "changes in factual circumstances or assumptions that could justify departure from precedent" (2000, p. 1529), a viewpoint also articulated in a National Review article (1986, p. 17+). Paulsen notes that it was very likely changes circumstances in the Brown v. Board of Education decision that justified its de facto overruling of Plessy v. Ferguson (Paulsen, 2000).

Plessy v. Ferguson, while not based on school issues, but rather commercial interests and individual minority rights, nevertheless would have been sufficient to continue in force the practice of 'separate but equal' schools for minority student. In addition to the precedent in Plessy v. Ferguson, in which discrimination was basically upheld, there was a widely held belief at the time that blacks were mentally inferior, despite the "clear evidence that many blacks -- for example, Frederick Douglass, a self-educated former slave who became a U.S. ambassador, and George Washington Carver, a former slave who became a great agricultural innovator -- were far more intelligent than most whites. There was no rational educational ground to support tracking by race and no defensible state interest" (Kapla, 1999, p. 310).

On the basis of social concepts at the time, the Supreme Court could easily have acted on the basis of stare decisis. However, it is tempting to think that they, if not the society as a whole, were well aware how ludicrous the belief in black inferiority was, and therefore took the (needed) changes in society as their starting point for dismissing precedent in Brown v. Board of Education, and finding in such a way that society was, in fact, changed by the decision. It is also tempting to think that the Brown v. Board of Education decision opened the way for President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society a decade later. The legislation engendered by that social concept included the civil rights legislation that today prohibits job and housing discrimination and many more advances that were not even under discussion generally when Brown v. Board of Education was decided.

There is something of a common thread regarding social causes and impacts in the Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade cases. Each of those concerned the civil rights of individuals; the decisions dealt with… READ MORE

How to Reference "Law Cases" Term Paper in a Bibliography

Related Term Papers:

Liability the Case With Virginia Pollard Case Study

Liability

The case with Virginia Pollard is showing how Teddy's Supplies is facing major legal challenges from the sexual harassment lawsuit. This is in spite of the New Jersey Supreme… read more

Case Study 3 pages (1331 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence

---

Laws of Corrections Case Study

Laws of Corrections

When someone is detained, there is the assumption that prisoners are not entitled to Fourth Amendment protections (i.e. unreasonable searches and seizures). Evidence of this can be… read more

Case Study 5 pages (1503 words) Sources: 1 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence

---

Law Case Study

Law Case Study

Claim 1 - Karl vs. Dogwood

Karl has a very good negligence claim against the doctor. Dr. Dogwood had actual knowledge of the dangerous condition and exercised… read more

Case Study 2 pages (521 words) Sources: 0 Topic: Nursing / Doctor / Physician

---

Constitutional Law -- Confusion Term Paper

Constitutional Law Case Study -- Confusion vs Denial

Facts and Constitutional Issues Raised

The State of Confusion statute places a significant burden on all trucking originating outside of Confusion because… read more

Term Paper 3 pages (933 words) Sources: 3 Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence

---

Law Movie Analysis and Research Silkwood Term Paper

Law Movie Analysis and Research

Silkwood like many other movies, e.g. The Insider, Erin Brockovich, Norma Rae, deals with the problems of corporate America, a greedy, corrupt, criminal corporate America… read more

Term Paper 4 pages (1566 words) Sources: 1+ Topic: Law / Legal / Jurisprudence

---

View 100+ more related papers  >>